`
UNITED STATES |
|
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION | |
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 | |
FORM 10-Q |
[X] |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For Quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 |
|
OR |
|
[ ] |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _______________________to____________________ |
|
Commission file number 1-7677 |
LSB Industries, Inc. |
|
Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter |
DELAWARE |
73-1015226 |
|
State or other jurisdiction of |
I.R.S. Employer Identification No. |
16 South Pennsylvania Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73107 |
|
Address of principal executive offices (Zip Code) |
|
(405) 235-4546 |
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code | |
None | |
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report. |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. YES X NO___
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). YES ____ NO
1
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Information at June 30, 2005 is unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Item 1.
|
June 30, |
December 31, |
Current assets: |
|||||||
Cash |
$ |
2,869 |
$ |
1,020 |
|||
Restricted cash |
- |
158 |
|||||
Accounts receivable, net |
49,598 |
41,888 |
|||||
Inventories: |
|||||||
Finished goods |
17,161 |
17,180 |
|||||
Work in process |
1,572 |
2,364 |
|||||
Raw materials |
9,236 |
9,113 |
|||||
Total inventories |
27,969 |
28,657 |
|||||
Supplies, prepaid items and other: |
|||||||
Deferred rent expense |
- |
938 |
|||||
Prepaid insurance |
2,417 |
4,498 |
|||||
Precious metals |
5,455 |
5,616 |
|||||
Other |
3,614 |
3,736 |
|||||
Total supplies, prepaid items and other |
11,486 |
14,788 |
|||||
Total current assets |
91,922 |
86,511 |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
71,156 |
70,219 |
|||||
Other assets: |
|||||||
Debt issuance and other costs, net |
2,757 |
2,517 |
|||||
Investment in affiliate |
3,303 |
3,111 |
|||||
Goodwill |
1,724 |
1,724 |
|||||
Other, net |
2,564 |
2,833 |
|||||
Total other assets |
10,348 |
10,185 |
|||||
$ |
173,426 |
|
$ |
166,915 |
|
(Continued on following page)
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Information at June 30, 2005 is unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
June 30, |
December 31, |
Current liabilities: |
|||||||
Accounts and drafts payable |
$ |
28,753 |
$ |
31,405 |
|||
Accrued liabilities: |
|||||||
Customer deposits |
273 |
3,421 |
|||||
Deferred rent expense |
1,940 |
- |
|||||
Other |
17,406 |
13,006 |
|||||
Total accrued liabilities |
19,619 |
16,427 |
|||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
2,962 |
4,833 |
|||||
Total current liabilities |
51,334 |
52,665 |
|||||
Long-term debt |
106,268 |
101,674 |
|||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
4,016 |
4,178 |
|||||
Contingencies (Note 6) |
|||||||
Stockholders' equity: |
|||||||
Series B 12% cumulative, convertible preferred stock, $100 par
value; |
|
|
|||||
Series 2 $3.25 convertible, exchangeable Class C preferred stock,
$50 |
|
|
|||||
Series D 6% cumulative, convertible Class C preferred stock, no
|
|
|
|||||
Common stock, $.10 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized,
17,065,345 |
|
|
|||||
Capital in excess of par value |
57,510 |
57,352 |
|||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(1,135 |
) |
(1,280 |
) |
|||
Accumulated deficit |
(63,349 |
) |
(66,840 |
) |
|||
28,910 |
25,049 |
||||||
Less treasury stock at cost: |
|||||||
Series 2 Preferred; 15,000 shares (5,000 in 2004) |
651 |
200 |
|||||
Common stock; 3,321,607 shares |
16,451 |
16,451 |
|||||
Total stockholders' equity |
11,808 |
8,398 |
|||||
$ |
173,426 |
|
$ |
166,915 |
|
(See accompanying notes)
3
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
Six and Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Six Months |
Three Months |
2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
Net sales (Notes 12 and 13) |
$ |
196,189 |
$ |
187,906 |
$ |
109,508 |
$ |
104,114 |
|||||||
Cost of sales |
163,920 |
159,814 |
91,788 |
87,301 |
|||||||||||
Gross profit |
32,269 |
28,092 |
17,720 |
16,813 |
|||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
26,153 |
25,702 |
13,887 |
14,396 |
|||||||||||
Operating income |
6,116 |
2,390 |
3,833 |
2,417 |
|||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
|||||||||||||||
Other income (Note 11) |
3,441 |
3,098 |
1,335 |
1,002 |
|||||||||||
Interest expense |
(5,828 |
) |
(3,029 |
) |
(3,091 |
) |
(1,597 |
) |
|||||||
Other expense |
(238 |
) |
(311 |
) |
- |
(96 |
) |
||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes and |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Provision for income taxes (Note 10) |
- |
4 |
- |
- |
|||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change |
3,491 |
2,144 |
2,077 |
1,726 |
|||||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change (Note 13) |
- |
(536 |
) |
- |
- |
||||||||||
Net income |
$ |
3,491 |
$ |
1,608 |
$ |
2,077 |
$ |
1,726 |
|||||||
Net income applicable to common stock (Note 9) |
$ |
2,374 |
$ |
474 |
$ |
1,522 |
$ |
1,159 |
|||||||
Weighted average common shares (Note 9): |
|||||||||||||||
Basic |
13,481 |
12,729 |
13,727 |
12,803 |
|||||||||||
Diluted |
15,061 |
15,195 |
15,289 |
15,163 |
|||||||||||
Income per common share (Note 9): |
|||||||||||||||
Basic: |
|||||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
- |
(.04 |
) |
- |
- |
||||||||||
Net income |
$ |
.18 |
$ |
.04 |
$ |
.11 |
$ |
.09 |
|||||||
Diluted: |
|||||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of accounting |
$ |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
- |
(.03 |
) |
- |
- |
||||||||||
Net income |
$ |
.16 |
|
$ |
.03 |
$ |
.10 |
$ |
.08 |
||||||
(See accompanying notes)
4
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
2005 |
2004 |
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|||||||
Net income |
$ |
3,491 |
$ |
1,608 |
|||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by |
|||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
- |
536 |
|||||
Gains on sales of property and equipment |
(899 |
) |
(143 |
) |
|||
Provision for (realization and reversal of) losses on firm sales |
|
|
|
||||
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment |
5,293 |
5,196 |
|||||
Amortization |
682 |
449 |
|||||
Provision for losses on accounts receivables |
256 |
340 |
|||||
Provisions for (realization and reversal of) losses on inventory |
(916 |
) |
29 |
||||
Provision for impairment on long-lived assets |
75 |
- |
|||||
Other |
87 |
1 |
|||||
Cash provided (used) by changes in assets and liabilities (net of
|
|||||||
Accounts receivable |
(7,733 |
) |
(13,398 |
) |
|||
Inventories |
1,604 |
- |
|||||
Supplies, prepaid items and other |
2,180 |
1,742 |
|||||
Accounts payable |
(2,704 |
) |
583 |
||||
Customer deposits |
(3,148 |
) |
(4,292 |
) |
|||
Deferred rent expense |
2,878 |
2,903 |
|||||
Other accrued and noncurrent liabilities |
4,239 |
1,459 |
|||||
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities |
5,385 |
(3,092 |
) |
||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|||||||
Capital expenditures |
(6,797 |
) |
(5,388 |
) |
|||
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
1,231 |
286 |
|||||
Net change in restricted cash |
158 |
(349 |
) |
||||
Other assets |
(651 |
) |
(392 |
) |
|||
Net cash used by investing activities |
(6,059 |
) |
(5,843 |
) |
(Continued on following page)
5
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
2005 |
2004 |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|||||||
Payments on long-term and other debt |
$ |
(1,507 |
) |
$ |
(3,312 |
) |
|
Long-term and other borrowings |
1,764 |
178 |
|||||
Net change in revolving debt facilities |
2,440 |
12,094 |
|||||
Net change in drafts payable |
54 |
175 |
|||||
Purchases of preferred stock |
(451 |
) |
- |
||||
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
223 |
664 |
|||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
2,523 |
9,799 |
|||||
Net increase in cash from variable interest entity (Note 13) |
- |
711 |
|||||
Net increase in cash |
1,849 |
1,575 |
|||||
Cash at beginning of period |
1,020 |
3,189 |
|||||
Cash at end of period |
$ |
2,869 |
$ |
4,764 |
|||
Supplemental cash flow information includes: |
|||||||
Noncash investing and financing activities: |
2005 |
2004 |
|||||
Effects of the consolidation of a variable interest entity (Note 13): |
|||||||
Increase in property, plant and equipment |
$ |
- |
$ |
5,847 |
|||
Elimination of notes receivable |
$ |
- |
$ |
(2,558 |
) |
||
Increase in other assets |
$ |
- |
$ |
311 |
|||
Increase in long-term debt |
$ |
- |
$ |
(581 |
) |
(See accompanying notes)
6
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of LSB Industries, Inc. (the
"Company", "We", "Us" or "Our") and its subsidiaries. We are a diversified holding company which is engaged, through our wholly-owned subsidiary ThermaClime, Inc. ("ThermaClime") and its subsidiaries, in the manufacture and sale of a broad range of air handling and heat pump products (the
"Climate Control Business") and the manufacture and sale of chemical products (the
"Chemical
Business"). See Note 12 - Segment Information. ThermaClime is a holding company with no significant assets or
operations other than its investments in its subsidiaries. Entities that are 20% to
50% owned and for which we
have significant influence are accounted for on the equity method. See Note 2 - Investment in Affiliate. All
material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Certain reclassifications have been made in our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for 2004 to conform to
our condensed consolidated financial statement
presentation for 2005.
In the opinion of management, the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company as of June
30, 2005 and for the six and three month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 include all adjustments and
accruals, consisting only of normal, recurring accrual adjustments, except for the cumulative effect of accounting
change as discussed in Note 13 which are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim
periods. These interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements should be read in connection with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Note 2: Investment in Affiliate One of our subsidiaries has a 50% equity interest in an energy conservation joint
venture which is accounted for on the equity method. At June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our investment was
$3,303,000 and $3,111,000, respectively. Our equity in joint-venture earnings
which are included in other income
in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income are as follows:
Six Months Ended |
Three Months Ended |
2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
(In thousands) |
Equity in joint-venture earnings |
$ |
367 |
$ |
327 |
$ |
185 |
$ |
168 |
|||
7
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
Summarized financial information of the joint venture is as follows (in thousands):
June 30, |
December 31, |
||
2005 |
2004 |
Current assets |
$ |
2,604 |
$ |
2,575 |
||
Noncurrent assets |
$ |
8,830 |
$ |
9,333 |
||
Current liabilities |
$ |
1,645 |
$ |
1,815 |
||
Noncurrent liabilities |
$ |
6,506 |
$ |
7,019 |
||
Partners' capital |
$ |
3,283 |
$ |
3,074 |
Six Months Ended |
Three Months Ended |
2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
Total revenues |
$ |
2,180 |
$ |
2,155 |
$ |
1,090 |
$ |
1,077 |
||||
Operating income |
$ |
1,096 |
$ |
1,077 |
$ |
548 |
$ |
541 |
||||
Net income |
$ |
733 |
$ |
654 |
$ |
369 |
$ |
335 |
Note 3: Life Insurance Policies We maintain life insurance policies on various individuals. As of June 30,
2005, the total face amount of these policies was $22 million of which $2.5 million of the proceeds is required
to be paid as discussed below. Some of these life insurance policies have cash surrender values and
we have borrowed against these cash surrender values. The cash surrender values are included in other assets
in the amounts of $.7 million and $.6 million, net of borrowings of $2.4 million at June 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004. Increases in cash surrender values of $.2 million and $.3
million are netted against the
premiums paid for life insurance policies of $.6 million and $.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005
and 2004, respectively, and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
On May 12, 2005 the Company entered into a certain death benefit agreement
("Death Benefit Agreement") with Jack E. Golsen. The Death Benefit Agreement provides that, upon Mr. Golsen's death, the
Company will pay to Mr. Golsen's family or designated beneficiary $2.5 million to be funded from the net
proceeds received by the Company under certain new life insurance policies on Mr. Golsen's life that have
been purchased and are owned by the Company. The Company is obligated to keep in existence no less than $2.5
million of the stated death benefit. The new life insurance policies owned by the Company provide a stated death
benefit of $7 million.
Note 4: Product Warranty Our Climate Control Business sells equipment that has an expected life, under
normal circumstances and use, that extends over many years. As such, we provide warranties after equipment
shipment/start-up covering defects in materials and workmanship.
Generally, the warranty coverage for the manufactured equipment in the Climate Control Business is limited to
eighteen months from the date of shipment or twelve months from the date of start-up, whichever is shorter,
and to ninety days for spare parts. In most cases, equipment is required to be returned to the factory or
its authorized representative and the warranty is limited to the repair and replacement of the defective
product, with a maximum warranty of the refund
8
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
of the purchase price. Furthermore, companies within the Climate Control Business do not make any warranties related to merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose and disclaim and exclude any liability for consequential or incidental damages. In some cases, an extended warranty may be purchased. The above discussion is generally applicable but variations do occur depending upon specific contractual obligations, certain system components and local laws.
Our accounting policy and methodology for warranty arrangements is to periodically measure and recognize the expense and liability for such warranty obligations using a percentage of net sales, based upon our historical warranty costs.
The carrying amount of the product warranty obligation which is classified as other current and noncurrent accrued liabilities is as follows:
Six Months Ended |
Three Months Ended |
2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
(In thousands) |
Balance at beginning of period |
$ |
1,999 |
$ |
1,693 |
$ |
2,110 |
$ |
1,722 |
||||||||
Add: Charged to costs and expenses |
991 |
941 |
580 |
562 |
||||||||||||
Deduct: Costs incurred |
(743 |
) |
(691 |
) |
(443 |
) |
(341 |
) |
||||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ |
2,247 |
$ |
1,943 |
$ |
2,247 |
$ |
1,943 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5: Long-Term Debt Long-term debt consists of the following:
June 30, |
December 31, |
||
2005 | 2004 |
(In thousands) |
Senior Secured Loan due 2009 (A) |
$ |
50,000 |
$ |
50,000 |
||
Working Capital Revolver Loan - ThermaClime (B) |
29,996 |
27,489 |
||||
10-3/4% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2007 (C) |
13,300 |
13,300 |
||||
Other, with interest at rates of 3.59% to
12%, |
|
|
||||
109,230 |
106,507 |
|||||
Less current portion of long-term debt |
2,962 |
4,833 |
||||
Long-term debt due after one year |
$ |
106,268 |
$ |
101,674 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
(A) In September 2004, ThermaClime and certain of its subsidiaries (the "Borrowers") completed a $50 million term loan ("Senior Secured Loan") with a certain lender (the "Lender"). The Senior Secured Loan is to be repaid as follows:
quarterly interest payments which began September 30, 2004;
quarterly principal payments of $312,500 beginning September 30, 2007;
9
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
The Senior Secured Loan accrues interest at the applicable LIBOR rate, as defined, plus an applicable LIBOR
margin, as defined or, at the election of the Borrowers, the alternative base rate, as defined, plus an
applicable base rate margin, as defined, with the annual interest rate not to exceed 11% or 11.5% depending
on the leverage ratio. At June 30, 2005 the annual interest rate was 11.49%.
The Borrowers are subject to numerous covenants under the Senior Secured Loan agreement including, but not
limited to, limitation on the incurrence of certain additional indebtedness and liens, limitations on
mergers, acquisitions, dissolution and sale of assets, and limitations on declaration of dividends and
distributions to us, all with certain exceptions. The Borrowers are also subject to a minimum fixed
charge coverage ratio, measured quarterly on a trailing twelve-month basis. The Borrowers were in
compliance with the required minimum ratio for the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2005. The maturity
date of the Senior Secured Loan can be accelerated by the Lender upon the occurrence of a continuing event
of default, as defined.
The Senior Secured Loan agreement includes a prepayment fee equal to 3% of the principal amount should
the Borrowers elect to prepay any principal amount prior to September 15, 2005. This fee is reduced to
2% during the second twelve-month period and to 1% during the third twelve-month period and 0% thereafter.
The Senior Secured Loan is secured by (a) a first lien on (i) certain real property and equipment located
at the El Dorado Facility, (ii) certain real property and equipment located at the Cherokee Facility,
(iii) certain equipment of the Climate Control Business, and (iv) the equity stock of certain of
ThermaClime's subsidiaries, and (b) a second lien on the assets upon which ThermaClime's Working Capital
Revolver lender has a first lien. The Senior Secured Loan is guaranteed by the Company and is also secured
with the stock of ThermaClime.
A portion of the proceeds of the Senior Secured Loan was used to repay the outstanding balance under a
former financing agreement ("Financing Agreement"). There was no interest expense recognition on the
Financing Agreement indebtedness from May 2002 through September 2004 since that transaction was accounted
for as a voluntary debt restructuring in 2002.
(B) In April 2001, ThermaClime and its subsidiaries ("the Borrowers") entered into a $50 million
revolving credit facility (the "Working Capital Revolver Loan") that provides for advances based on
specified percentages of eligible accounts receivable and inventories for ThermaClime and its
subsidiaries. Effective February 28, 2005 the Working Capital Revolver Loan was amended which, among
other things, extended the maturity date to April 2009 and removed language considered as a subjective
acceleration provision. The Working Capital Revolver Loan, as amended, accrues interest at a base rate
(generally equivalent to the prime rate) plus .75% or LIBOR plus 2% (formerly base rate plus 2% or LIBOR
plus
10
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
4.50%). The annual interest rate at June 30, 2005 was 5.51%. The facility provides for up to $8.5
million of letters of credit. Under the Working Capital Revolver Loan, as amended, the lender also
requires the borrowers to pay a letter of credit fee equal to 1% (formerly 2.75%) per annum of the undrawn
amount of all outstanding letters of credit, an unused line fee equal to .5% per annum for the excess amount
available under the facility not drawn and various other audit, appraisal and valuation charges. All
letters of credit outstanding reduce availability under the facility. Amounts available for additional
borrowing under the Working Capital Revolver Loan at June 30, 2005 were $18.2 million.
In March 2005, we purchased two interest rate cap contracts which set a maximum three-month LIBOR
base rate of 4.59% on $30 million and mature on March 29, 2009. See Note 8 - Derivatives, Hedges and
Financial Instruments.
The lender may, upon an event of default, as defined, terminate the Working
Capital Revolver Loan and make the balance outstanding due and payable in full.
The Working Capital Revolver Loan is secured by receivables, inventories and
intangibles of all the ThermaClime entities other than El Dorado Nitric Company
and its subsidiaries ("EDNC") and a second lien on certain real property and equipment. EDNC is
neither a borrower nor guarantor of the Working Capital Revolver Loan.
A prepayment premium equal to 3% of the facility is due to the lender should the borrowers elect to prepay
the facility prior to April 13, 2006. This premium is reduced to 2% during the second twelve-month period
and to 1% during the third twelve-month period and 0% thereafter.
The Working Capital Revolver Loan, as amended, requires ThermaClime to maintain
minimum quarterly earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
("EBITDA"), as defined, for ThermaClime and its
Climate Control Business on a trailing twelve-month basis. ThermaClime and its Climate Control Business
were in compliance with the required minimum EBITDA amounts for the twelve-month period ended June 30,
2005. The trailing twelve-months EBITDA requirements for the remainder of 2005 range from $13.7 to $16
million for ThermaClime and is fixed at $10 million for the Climate Control Business. The Working
Capital Revolver Loan also requires ThermaClime to achieve an annual fixed charge coverage ratio and
limits capital expenditures, as defined, measured quarterly on a trailing twelve-month basis. The Working
Capital Revolver Loan also contains covenants that, among other things, limit the borrowers' ability to:
(a) incur additional indebtedness, (b) incur liens, (c) make restricted payments or loans to affiliates who
are not Borrowers, (d) engage in mergers, consolidations or other forms of recapitalization, (e) dispose of assets, or (f) repurchase ThermaClime's 10-3/4% Senior Unsecured Notes.
The Working Capital Revolver Loan also requires all collections on accounts receivable be made through a bank
account in the name of the lender or their agent.
(C) In 1997, ThermaClime completed the sale of its 10-3/4% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2007 (the
"Notes").
The Notes bear interest at an annual rate of 10-3/4% payable semiannually in arrears on June 1 and December
1 of each year. The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of ThermaClime and rank equal in right of
payment to all existing and future senior
11
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
unsecured indebtedness of ThermaClime and its subsidiaries.
The Notes are effectively subordinated to all existing and future secured indebtedness of ThermaClime.
ThermaClime's payment obligations under the Notes are fully, unconditionally and joint and severally
guaranteed by all of the existing subsidiaries of ThermaClime, except for EDNC ("Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries").
Set forth below is consolidating financial information of ThermaClime's Guarantor Subsidiaries, the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, and ThermaClime.
12
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
Note 5: Long-Term Debt (continued)
ThermaClime, Inc. |
|
Consolidated Non- |
|
|
|
Assets |
|||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash |
$ |
92 |
$ |
- |
$ |
669 |
$ |
761 |
|||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
44,762 |
3,985 |
14 |
48,761 |
|||||||||||||||
Inventories |
26,540 |
122 |
- |
26,662 |
|||||||||||||||
Supplies, prepaid items and other |
4,377 |
154 |
2,470 |
7,001 |
|||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
- |
- |
4,675 |
4,675 |
|||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
75,771 |
4,261 |
7,828 |
87,860 |
|||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
63,123 |
2,774 |
27 |
65,924 |
|||||||||||||||
Investment in and advances to affiliates |
- |
- |
100,429 |
$ |
(100,429 |
) |
- |
||||||||||||
Receivable from Parent |
32,353 |
13,096 |
- |
(45,449 |
) |
- |
|||||||||||||
Other assets, net |
5,397 |
23 |
3,055 |
8,475 |
|||||||||||||||
$ |
176,644 |
$ |
20,154 |
$ |
111,339 |
$ |
(145,878 |
) |
$ |
162,259 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ |
22,547 |
$ |
2,242 |
$ |
1,736 |
$ |
26,525 |
|||||||||||
Accrued liabilities |
13,027 |
4,245 |
1,084 |
18,356 |
|||||||||||||||
Due to LSB and affiliates |
- |
- |
1,715 |
1,715 |
|||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
413 |
353 |
- |
766 |
|||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
35,987 |
6,840 |
4,535 |
47,362 |
|||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
6,112 |
676 |
90,205 |
96,993 |
|||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
- |
- |
1,735 |
1,735 |
|||||||||||||||
Other non-current liabilities |
2,050 |
390 |
- |
2,440 |
|||||||||||||||
Stockholders' equity: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
66 |
1 |
1 |
$ |
(67 |
) |
1 |
||||||||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
166,212 |
- |
13,052 |
(166,212 |
) |
13,052 |
|||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
- |
(1,135 |
) |
- |
(1,135 |
) |
|||||||||||||
Due from LSB and affiliates |
- |
- |
(2,558 |
) |
(2,558 |
) |
|||||||||||||
Retained earnings (deficit) |
(33,783 |
) |
13,382 |
4,369 |
20,401 |
4,369 |
|||||||||||||
Total stockholders' equity |
132,495 |
12,248 |
14,864 |
(145,878 |
) |
13,729 |
|||||||||||||
$ |
176,644 |
$ |
20,154 |
$ |
111,339 |
$ |
(145,878 |
) |
$ |
162,259 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
Note 5: Long-Term Debt (continued)
ThermaClime, Inc. |
|
Consolidated Non- |
|
|
|
Assets |
|||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash |
$ |
174 |
$ |
- |
$ |
676 |
$ |
850 |
|||||||||||
Restricted cash |
- |
- |
158 |
158 |
|||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
36,075 |
4,716 |
17 |
40,808 |
|||||||||||||||
Inventories |
27,345 |
195 |
- |
27,540 |
|||||||||||||||
Supplies, prepaid items and other |
4,349 |
887 |
4,467 |
9,703 |
|||||||||||||||
Deferred rent expense |
- |
938 |
- |
938 |
|||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
- |
- |
4,675 |
4,675 |
|||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
67,943 |
6,736 |
9,993 |
84,672 |
|||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
62,482 |
2,393 |
32 |
64,907 |
|||||||||||||||
Investment in and advances to affiliates |
- |
- |
96,127 |
$ |
(96,127 |
) |
- |
||||||||||||
Receivable from Parent |
39,163 |
8,364 |
- |
(47,527 |
) |
- |
|||||||||||||
Other assets, net |
5,271 |
25 |
2,783 |
- |
8,079 |
||||||||||||||
$ |
174,859 |
$ |
17,518 |
$ |
108,935 |
$ |
(143,654 |
) |
$ |
157,658 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ |
22,560 |
$ |
2,663 |
$ |
3,903 |
$ |
29,126 |
|||||||||||
Accrued liabilities |
11,592 |
2,279 |
1,178 |
15,049 |
|||||||||||||||
Due to LSB and affiliates, net |
- |
- |
1,480 |
1,480 |
|||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
444 |
353 |
- |
797 |
|||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
34,596 |
5,295 |
6,561 |
46,452 |
|||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
6,353 |
853 |
87,538 |
94,744 |
|||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
- |
- |
1,735 |
1,735 |
|||||||||||||||
Other non-current liabilities |
2,449 |
457 |
- |
2,906 |
|||||||||||||||
Stockholders' equity: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
66 |
1 |
1 |
$ |
(67 |
) |
1 |
||||||||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
166,212 |
- |
13,052 |
(166,212 |
) |
13,052 |
|||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
- |
(1,280 |
) |
- |
- |
(1,280 |
) |
||||||||||||
Due from LSB and affiliates |
- |
- |
(2,558 |
) |
- |
(2,558 |
) |
||||||||||||
Retained earnings (deficit) |
(34,817 |
) |
12,192 |
2,606 |
22,625 |
2,606 |
|||||||||||||
Total stockholders' equity |
131,461 |
10,913 |
13,101 |
(143,654 |
) |
11,821 |
|||||||||||||
$ |
174,859 |
$ |
17,518 |
$ |
108,935 |
$ |
(143,654 |
) |
$ |
157,658 |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
Note 5: Long-Term Debt (continued)
ThermaClime, Inc. |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
2005 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ |
171,462 |
$ |
21,557 |
$ |
193,019 |
|||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
144,220 |
19,545 |
$ |
476 |
164,241 |
||||||||||||||
Gross profit (loss) |
27,242 |
2,012 |
(476 |
) |
28,778 |
||||||||||||||
Selling, general and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
5,629 |
1,818 |
(1,626 |
) |
4 |
5,825 |
|||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(5,035 |
) |
(21 |
) |
(5,154 |
) |
4,884 |
(5,326 |
) |
||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Benefit (provision) for income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income |
$ |
1,034 |
$ |
1,190 |
$ |
1,763 |
$ |
(2,224 |
) |
$ |
1,763 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ |
158,359 |
$ |
22,930 |
$ |
181,289 |
|||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
135,654 |
20,914 |
$ |
394 |
156,962 |
||||||||||||||
Gross profit (loss) |
22,705 |
2,016 |
(394 |
) |
24,327 |
||||||||||||||
Selling, general and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
3,364 |
1,809 |
(1,949 |
) |
4 |
3,228 |
|||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(5,465 |
) |
(16 |
) |
(2,261 |
) |
5,258 |
(2,484 |
) |
||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Benefit (provision) for income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ |
(988 |
) |
$ |
1,031 |
$ |
723 |
$ |
(43 |
) |
$ |
723 |
|||||||
15
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
Note 5: Long-Term Debt (continued)
ThermaClime, Inc. |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
2005 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ |
96,622 |
$ |
10,958 |
$ |
107,580 |
|||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
81,614 |
9,942 |
$ |
356 |
91,912 |
||||||||||||||
Gross profit (loss) |
15,008 |
1,016 |
(356 |
) |
15,668 |
||||||||||||||
Selling, general and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
3,609 |
912 |
(1,006 |
) |
2 |
3,517 |
|||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(2,627 |
) |
(11 |
) |
(2,737 |
) |
2,552 |
(2,823 |
) |
||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Benefit (provision) for income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income |
$ |
1,163 |
$ |
551 |
$ |
1,595 |
$ |
(1,714 |
) |
$ |
1,595 |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ |
86,924 |
$ |
11,570 |
$ |
98,494 |
|||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
73,249 |
10,534 |
$ |
169 |
83,952 |
||||||||||||||
Gross profit (loss) |
13,675 |
1,036 |
(169 |
) |
14,542 |
||||||||||||||
Selling, general and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
3,653 |
931 |
(1,379 |
) |
2 |
3,207 |
|||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(2,843 |
) |
(8 |
) |
(1,189 |
) |
2,716 |
(1,324 |
) |
||||||||||
Income from operations before |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
(447 |
) |
(354 |
) |
(6 |
) |
(807 |
) |
|||||||||||
Net income |
$ |
700 |
$ |
554 |
$ |
1,421 |
$ |
(1,254 |
) |
$ |
1,421 |
||||||||
16
LSB
INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
Note 5: Long-Term Debt (continued)
ThermaClime, Inc. |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
2005 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash flows provided (used) by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(5,497 |
) |
(551 |
) |
(7 |
) |
(6,055 |
) |
|||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of property and |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net change in restricted cash |
- |
- |
158 |
158 |
|||||||||||||||
Other assets |
(17 |
) |
(1 |
) |
(779 |
) |
(797 |
) |
|||||||||||
Net cash used by investing activities |
(5,358 |
) |
(552 |
) |
(628 |
) |
(6,538 |
) |
|||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Payments on long-term debt |
(31 |
) |
(177 |
) |
- |
(208 |
) |
||||||||||||
Net change in revolving debt |
- |
- |
2,507 |
2,507 |
|||||||||||||||
Net change in due to/from LSB and |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Advances to/from affiliates |
5,934 |
(4,732 |
) |
(1,202 |
) |
- |
|||||||||||||
Net cash provided (used) by financing |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Net decrease in cash from all |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Cash at the beginning of period |
174 |
- |
676 |
850 |
|||||||||||||||
Cash at the end of period |
$ |
92 |
$ |
- |
$ |
669 |
$ |
761 |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash flows provided (used) by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(4,662 |
) |
(617 |
) |
- |
(5,279 |
) |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of property and |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Other assets |
(360 |
) |
4 |
1 |
(355 |
) |
|||||||||||||
Net cash provided (used) by investing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Payments on long-term debt |
(406 |
) |
(176 |
) |
(1,817 |
) |
(2,399 |
) |
|||||||||||
Net change in revolving debt |
1,087 |
- |
10,826 |
11,913 |
|||||||||||||||
Net change in due to/from LSB and |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
Advances to/from affiliates |
15,083 |
(529 |
) |
(14,554 |
) |
- |
|||||||||||||
Net cash provided (used) by financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
Cash at the beginning of period |
208 |
- |
2,712 |
2,920 |
|||||||||||||||
Cash at the end of period |
$ |
513 |
$ |
1,428 |
$ |
17 |
$ |
1,958 |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
Note 6: Contingencies
Legal Matters
Following is a summary of certain legal actions involving the Company:
A. Environmental Matters
Our operations are subject to numerous environmental laws ("Environmental Laws") and to other federal, state and local laws regarding health and safety matters ("Health Laws"). In particular, the manufacture and distribution of chemical products are activities which entail environmental risks and impose obligations under the Environmental Laws and the Health Laws, many of which provide for substantial fines and criminal sanctions for violations. There can be no assurance that material costs or liabilities will not be incurred by us in complying with such laws or in paying fines or penalties for violation of such laws. The Environmental Laws and Health Laws and enforcement policies thereunder relating to our Chemical Business have in the past resulted, and could in the future result, in compliance expenses, cleanup costs, penalties or other liabilities relating to the handling, manufacture, use, emission, discharge or disposal of pollutants or other su
bstances at or from our facilities or the use or disposal of certain of its chemical products. Historically, significant expenditures have been incurred by subsidiaries within our Chemical Business, including, but not limited to, EDC at its El Dorado, Arkansas plant (the
"El Dorado Facility"), in order to comply with the Environmental Laws and Health Laws. Our Chemical Business could be required to make significant additional site or operational modifications at this or other facilities involving substantial expenditures. The Company plans to continue to operate the El Dorado Facility in the foreseeable future. However, the Company has certain discharge water monitoring obligations for this facility and would be required to recognize a liability for such costs should operations be discontinued in the foreseeable future.
1. Water Matters
Discharge Water Issues
The El Dorado Facility generates process wastewater. This wastewater is transported at the El Dorado Facility to a small pond for pH adjustment and then to a larger pond for biological oxidation. The process water discharge and storm-water run off are governed by a state NPDES water discharge permit renewed every five years. During 2004, EDC
entered into a settlement agreement with the state of Arkansas Department of
Environmental Quality ("ADEQ") that provided, in part, for effluent limits which EDC believes are acceptable. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the ADEQ issued the final revised NPDES water discharge permit, which became effective on June 1, 2004. In order to release EDC's discharge water, we plan for EDC to utilize a pipeline to be built by the City of El Dorado, Arkansas (the
"City").
We believe that the NPDES permit, as issued, will require additional expenditures by EDC through June 2007, estimated to be approximately $3 to $4 million, plus reimbursement to the City of approximately $1.8 million for our pro-rata portion of pipeline engineering and construction costs as those costs are incurred. This estimate assumes that the City timely builds
18
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
its own discharge pipeline to a nearby river and we are permitted to tie our pipeline into the City's pipeline. The City council has approved the joint pipeline, but construction of the pipeline by the City is subject to the City receiving a permit from the ADEQ. The ADEQ
has not issued the necessary permit to discharge wastewater into the pipeline
and, as a result, this has caused a delay of unknown duration in construction of
the pipeline. This
delay may impact our ability to meet our compliance schedule under the NPDES
permit. We do not have any
reliable estimates of the cost of an alternative solution in the event that the
pipeline is not built, or timely built, by the City.
In addition, EDC has entered into a Consent Administrative Order ("CAO") that recognizes the presence of nitrate contamination in the shallow groundwater at the El Dorado Facility. A new CAO is being completed to address the shallow groundwater contamination, which will include an evaluation of the current conditions and remediation based upon a risk assessment. The final remedy for shallow groundwater contamination, should any remediation be required, will be selected pursuant to the new CAO and based upon the risk assessment. There are no known users of this shallow groundwater in the area, and preliminary risk assessments have not identified any public health risk that would require remediation. During the second quarter of 2005, we spent $325,000 relating to the dredging of our neutralization pond to increase its efficiency. At June 30, 2005 the estimated cost to complete the requested investigation and risk assessment is approximately $33,000 which liability has been established. The cost of a
ny additional remediation that may be required will be determined based on the results of the investigation and risk assessment and cannot currently be reasonably estimated.
2.Air Matters
EDC and the ADEQ have entered into a consent
administrative order ("AirCAO") resolving certain air regulatory alleged violations associated with EDC's sulfuric acid plant and certain other alleged air emission violations. The AirCAO became effective during February 2004. The AirCAO requires EDC to implement additional air emission controls at the El Dorado Facility. The ultimate cost of any technology changes required cannot presently be determined but is believed to cost between $1.5 million to $3 million, depending on the technology changes ultimately required by the ADEQ. The implementation of the technological change and related expenditures will be incurred through February 2010.
3.Other Environmental Matters
In April 2002, Slurry Explosive Corporation ("Slurry"), a subsidiary within our Chemical Business, entered into a Consent Administrative Order ("Slurry Consent Order") with the state of Kansas, regarding Slurry's Hallowell, Kansas manufacturing facility ("Hallowell Facility"). The Slurry Consent Order addressed the release of contaminants from the facility into the soils and groundwater and surface water at the Hallowell Facility. There are no known users of the groundwater in the area. The adjacent strip pit is used for fishing. Under the terms of the Slurry Consent Order, Slurry is required to, among other things, submit an environmental assessment work plan to the state of Kansas for review and approval, and agree with the state as to any required corrective actions to be performed at the Hallowell Facility.
19
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
In connection with the sale of substantially all of the operating assets of Slurry and UTeC, both subsidiaries within our Chemical Business, in December 2002, UTeC leased the Hallowell Facility to the buyer under a triple net long-term lease agreement. However, Slurry retained the obligation to be responsible for, and perform the activities under, the Slurry Consent Order. In addition, certain of our subsidiaries agreed to indemnify the buyer of such assets for these environmental matters. Slurry has placed the prior owners (Chevron/Texaco) of the Hallowell Facility on notice of their responsibility for contribution towards the costs to investigate and remediate this site. Representatives of a prior owner have agreed to pay for one-half of the costs of the investigation on an interim, non-binding basis. At June 30, 2005 a liability of $147,000 has been established for our share of the estimated remaining investigation and known remediation costs. No additi
onal liabilities can be estimated until the requested testing and investigation is complete. However, these estimates may be revised based on the results of our investigation and testing.
Grand Jury Investigation - Slurry - Hallowell Facility
The U.S. Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms Agency ("AT&F") previously conducted an investigation at Slurry. In August 2003, the Company learned that a federal grand jury for the District of Kansas was investigating Slurry and certain of its former employees relating to the conduct at Slurry's commercial explosives manufacturing plant at the Hallowell, Kansas facility ("Hallowell Facility") related to compliance with federal explosives statutes. Active operations at the Hallowell Facility were discontinued in February 2002 after its license to possess explosives was revoked by the AT&F. Thereafter, as stated above, Slurry's business was sold to a third party. As of the date of this report, no target letters indicating a decision by the United States to seek criminal charges in connection with this investigation have been received.
Threatened Litigation
During July 2005, we
received correspondence from the Purchaser ("Purchaser") of the assets of our
explosive subsidiary advising that they had received a letter threatening them
and others with legal action due to alleged blasting activities in Millbury,
Massachusetts, that the threatening parties claimed caused ammonium perchlorate
contamination in the drinking water. It has been alleged that prior to the time
our explosive company sold its assets to the Purchaser, it sold certain of the
blasting products to the blasting companies that performed the blasting
activities at the site that caused the contamination. The initial claims were made by the landowner and owners
of certain water wells in the area against the drilling and blasting companies.
The drilling and blasting activities were performed on the landowner's site as
part of construction of a shopping mall. These claims have been made against
numerous parties, including the Purchaser and other parties that performed
blasting and drilling activities at the site, alleging that the costs of
remediation will be several million dollars. We are investigating this matter
and intend to vigorously defend ourselves, and, if required, the Purchaser in
this matter.
20
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
B. Other Pending or Threatened Litigation
1. Climate Control Business
A lawsuit was filed in August 2002, against Trison Construction, Inc. ("Trison"), a subsidiary within our Climate Control Business, in the District Court, State of Oklahoma, Pontotoc County, in the case styled Trade Mechanical Contractors, Inc., et al. v. Trison Construction, Inc.
In this lawsuit, the plaintiff alleges that Trison breached its contract with
the plaintiff by delaying contract performance and refusal of payment, and that
the actions by Trison damaged the plaintiff. The plaintiff alleges that Trison
owes it approximately $231,000, inclusive of overhead, cost and profit;
approximately $94,000 in extended overhead and expenses Trison has asserted a
counterclaim against the plaintiff for recovery of its costs and attorneys fees
associated with the defense of this case and approximately $306,000 in damages
due to plaintiff's breach of contract. Johnson Controls, Inc. ("JCI") filed a formal demand for arbitration against Trison and its bonding company. JCI is alleging that it has sustained damages of approximately $1.7 million as a result of alleged defects in Trison's work in connection with a facility located in Pontotoc County, Oklahoma. Arbitration proceedings began during the second quarter of 2005. In addition, in accordance with demands by the Company's bonding company, the Company has agreed to increase the security deposited with the bonding company from a $1 million letter of credit to $1.5 million letter of credit.
The Company and one of our subsidiaries within the Climate Control Business, ClimaCool Corp., have been sued, together with two unrelated companies, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, in a case styled Multistack LLC v. ClimaCool Corp., et al., alleging that we, ClimaCool and others infringed on a patent in connection with certain modular air chillers that ClimaCool purchased from a French air conditioning company for resale in the United States. The Company is planning to manufacture modular air chillers similar to the design that is subject to this litigation. The complaint alleges that the defendants have infringed and continue to infringe on a certain patent and request:
We have answered the allegations, denying infringement and raising various affirmative defenses, including the assertion of counterclaims for unfair competition, abuse of process, and declaratory judgment of non-infringement and non-enforceability. We intend to vigorously defend this action.
2. Chemical Business
Cherokee Nitrogen, Inc. ("Cherokee"), a subsidiary within our Chemical Business, has been sued for an undisclosed amount of monies based on a claim, that the subsidiary breached an agreement by overcharging the plaintiff for ammonium nitrate as a result of inflated prices for natural gas used to manufacture the ammonium nitrate. The suit is Nelson Brothers, LLC v. Cherokee Nitrogen v. Dynegy Marketing,
and is pending in Alabama state court in Colbert
21
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
County. Cherokee has filed
a third party complaint against Dynegy and a subsidiary asserting that Dynegy
was the party responsible for fraudulently causing artificial natural gas prices
to exist and seeking an undisclosed amount from Dynegy, including any amounts
which may be recovered by the plaintiff. Dynegy has filed a counterclaim against
Cherokee for monies allegedly owed on account, which is alleged by Dynegy to be $600,000. Although there is no assurance, counsel for Cherokee has advised the company that, at this time, they believe that there is a good likelihood that Cherokee will recover monies from Dynegy over and above any monies which may be recovered by the plaintiff or owed to Dynegy.
3. Other
Zeller Pension Plan
In February 2000, the Company's Board of Directors authorized management to proceed with the sale of the automotive business, since the automotive business was no longer a
"core business" of the Company. In May 2000, the Company sold substantially all of its assets in its automotive business. After the authorization by the board, but prior to the sale, the automotive business purchased the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Zeller Corporation ("Zeller"). The liabilities of Zeller assumed by the automotive business included Zeller's pension plan, which is not a multi-employer pension plan. In June 2003, the principal owner ("Owner")
of the buyer of the automotive business was contacted by a representative of the
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation ("PBGC") regarding the plan. The Owner has been informed by the PBGC of a possible under-funding of the plan and a possible takeover of the plan by the PBGC. The Owner has notified the Company of these events. The Company has also been contacted by the PBGC and has been advised that the PBGC considers the Company to be potentially liable for the under-funding of the Zeller Plan in the event that the plan is taken over by the PBGC and has alleged that the under-funding is approximately $.6 million. The Company has been advised by ERISA counsel that, based upon numerous representations made by the Company and the assumption that the trier of fact determining the Company's obligations with respect to the plan would find that: we disposed, in May 4, 2000 of interest in the automotive business including the Zeller assets and business pursuant to a bona fide purchase agreement under the terms of which the purchaser assumed all obligations with respect to the operation
, including funding of the Zeller plan, the purpose of the sale of the automotive business did not include an attempt to evade liability for funding the Zeller plan, at the time we disposed or our interest in the automotive business, the Zeller plan was adequately funded, on an ongoing basis and all required contributions had been made, and the Zeller plan did not terminate at anytime that any member of the Company's controlled group of entities was a contribution sponsor to the Zeller plan, that the possibility of an unfavorable outcome to us in a lawsuit if the PBGC attempts to hold us liable for the under-funding of the Zeller plan is remote.
Asserting Financing Fee
On December 4, 2003, the Company and Southwest Securities, Inc. ("Southwest") entered into a letter agreement whereby the Company agreed to retain Southwest to assist the Company in obtaining financing for the Company. Southwest's right to a fee under the Agreement is limited to a refinancing occurring during
"a period of sixty days, to be extended if a transaction
is
22
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
ongoing." A financing did
not occur within sixty days of the date of the Agreement, nor was a funding
transaction "ongoing" at the end of that period. In September 2004, more than
ten months after the date of the Agreement between the Company and Southwest,
ThermaClime borrowed $50 million from Orix Capital Markets, LLC ("Orix"). It is the Company's position that the Orix financing transaction was not the result of any efforts by Southwest, nor was it the culmination of any negotiations or transaction commenced during the sixty-day term of the Agreement. Nonetheless, Southwest has asserted that it is entitled to a fee of $1.7 million pursuant to the Agreement. The Company brought an action against Southwest in Oklahoma state court in a lawsuit styled LSB Industries, Inc. v. Southwest Securities, Inc. pending in the Oklahoma District Court, Oklahoma County, for a declaratory judgment that the Company is not liable to Southwest under the Agreement as a result of the Orix financing transaction. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against the claim by Southwest. As of the date of this report, no liability has been established relating to the fee asserted by Southwest.
We are also involved in various other claims and legal actions which in the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, if determined adversely to us, would not have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Insurance Recovery Contingency
Beginning in October 2004 and continuing into June 2005, the Chemical Business' results were adversely affected as a result of a mechanical failure of one of the four nitric acid plants at the El Dorado, Arkansas plant. The failure, which resulted in major damage, caused the plant that normally produces 10,000 tons per month of nitric acid to go down on October 7, 2004. The plant was restored to normal production in June 2005. Approximately $5.5 million was expended to repair the plant. Our property insurance provides for replacement cost coverage subject to a $1 million deductible. As of June 30, 2005 we recognized insurance claims of $1.6 million relating to this property damage claim
which we have received from our insurance carriers as of the date of this report. The effect of this property insurance recovery to the accompanying statements of income was $.4 million for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2005, which was classified as other income. We have additional property damage claims pending. Recoveries related to pending claims will be recognized when the claim amounts are agreed to by our insurers and will impact our financial statements in the near term.
In addition, our business interruption insurance policy contains a forty-five day waiting period before covering losses resulting from business interruptions. As of June 30, 2005 we have not filed a claim for recovery of the business interruption related to this incident. As a result, we have not recognized any insurance recoveries. Since the business interruption period related to this incident has ended, we are currently compiling the information necessary to submit the claim. Recoveries related to this business interruption will be recognized when the claim amount is agreed to by our insurers.
23
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
Note 7: Stockholders' Equity The table below provides detail (in thousands) of activity in the stockholders' equity accounts for the six months ended June 30, 2005:
|
Non-Redeemable Preferred Stock |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
16,401 |
$ |
34,177 |
$ |
1,640 |
$ |
57,352 |
$ |
(1,280 |
) |
$ |
(66,840 |
) |
$ |
(200 |
) |
$ |
(16,451 |
) |
$ |
8,398 |
|||
Net income |
3,491 |
3,491 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of cash flow |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
3,636 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of warrants (1) |
586 |
59 |
(59 |
) |
- |
|||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
77 |
8 |
215 |
223 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of non-redeemable |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of 18 shares of |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2005 |
(2) |
17,065 |
$ |
34,177 |
$ |
1,707 |
$ |
57,510 |
$ |
(1,135 |
) |
$ |
(63,349 |
) |
$ |
(651 |
) |
$ |
(16,451 |
) |
$ |
11,808 |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) In March 2005, the lenders of the loans under a former financing agreement exercised warrants, under a cashless exercise provision, to purchase 586,140 shares of our common stock.
(2) Includes 3,321,607 shares of the Company's common stock held in treasury. Excluding the 3,321,607 shares held in treasury, the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock at June 30, 2005 were 13,743,738.
24
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
Note 7: Stockholders' Equity (continued)
Stock Options
As of June 30, 2005 we have several Qualified and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plans. We currently account for those plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. See discussion in Note 13 - Recently Issued Pronouncements. No stock-based compensation cost is reflected in net income applicable to common stock for the six and three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 and no options were granted under those plans during these periods.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income applicable to common stock and net income per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based compensation. The fair value for the underlying options was estimated at their respective date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the qualified and non-qualified stock options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period.
Six Months Ended |
Three Months Ended |
2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
(In thousands) |
Net income applicable to common stock, as reported |
$ |
2,374 |
$ |
474 |
$ |
1,522 |
$ |
1,159 |
|||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Pro forma net income applicable to common stock |
$ |
2,267 |
$ |
357 |
$ |
1,465 |
$ |
1,101 |
|||||||
Net income per common share: |
|||||||||||||||
Basic - as reported |
$ |
.18 |
$ |
.04 |
$ |
.11 |
$ |
.09 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Basic - pro forma |
$ |
.17 |
$ |
.03 |
$ |
.11 |
$ |
.09 |
|||||||
Diluted - as reported |
$ |
.16 |
$ |
.03 |
$ |
.10 |
$ |
.08 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Diluted - pro forma |
$ |
.15 |
$ |
.02 |
$ |
.10 |
$ |
.07 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8: Derivatives, Hedges and Financial Instruments
We account for derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133,
"Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS No.133 requires the recognition of derivatives in the balance sheet and the measurement of these instruments at fair value. Changes in fair value of derivatives are recorded in results of operations unless the normal purchase or sale exceptions apply or hedge accounting is elected.
In 1997, we entered into an interest rate forward agreement to effectively fix the interest rate of a long-term lease
commitment (not for trading purposes). In 1999, we executed a long-term lease
25
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
agreement and terminated the forward agreement at a net cost of $2.8 million. We historically accounted for this cash flow hedge under the deferral method (as an adjustment of the initial term lease rentals). Upon adoption of SFAS No. 133 in 2001, the remaining deferred cost amount was reclassified from other assets to accumulated other comprehensive loss and is being amortized to operations over the term of the lease arrangement. At June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, accumulated other comprehensive loss consisted of the remaining deferred cost of $1,135,000 and $1,280,000, respectively. The amount amortized to operations was $145,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. There were no income tax benefits related to these expenses.
Raw materials for use in our manufacturing processes include copper used by our Climate Control Business and natural gas used by our Chemical Business. As part of our raw material price risk management, we periodically enter into exchange-traded futures contracts for these materials, which contracts are generally accounted for on a mark-to-market basis in accordance with SFAS No. 133. At June 30, 2005 the unrealized gains on these contracts was $124,000 (minimal at December 31, 2004) and are included in supplies, prepaid items and other in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet, as the term of these contracts are for periods of twelve months or less. Gains and losses on such contracts are included in cost of sales but have not been material in the periods presented.
In March 2005, we purchased two interest rate cap contracts for a cost of $590,000. These contracts are free-standing derivatives and are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis in accordance with SFAS No.133. At June 30, 2005 the market basis of these contracts was $312,000 and is included in other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The change in the value of these contracts is included in interest expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.
Note 9: Net Income Per Share Net income applicable to common stock is computed by adjusting net income by the amount of preferred stock dividends. Basic net income per common share is based upon net income applicable to common stock and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted income per share is based on the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding, if any, and the assumed conversion of dilutive convertible securities outstanding, if any.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005 our Board of Directors did not declare and we did not pay the regular quarterly dividends of $.8125 on our Series 2 $3.25 Convertible Class C preferred stock ("Series 2 Preferred"). Also our Board of Directors did not declare and we did not pay the January 1, 2005 regular dividend on our Series B 12% Convertible, Cumulative preferred stock ("Series B Preferred"). As of June 30, 2005 the aggregate amount of unpaid dividends in arrears on our Series 2 Preferred, Series B Preferred and Series D 6% Cumulative, Convertible Class C preferred stock ("Series D Preferred") totaled approximately $11.9 million, $1.3 million and $.2 million respectively. During 2005, we purchased 10,000 shares of our Series 2 Preferred at $45.10 a share. As of June 30, 2005 we or our subsidiaries own as treasury stock 15,000 shares of our Series 2 Preferred.
26
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income per share:
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Six Months Ended |
Three Months Ended |
2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
Numerator: |
|||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ |
3,491 |
$ |
1,608 |
$ |
2,077 |
$ |
1,726 |
|||||||
Preferred stock dividend requirements |
(1,117 |
) |
(1,134 |
) |
(555 |
) |
(567 |
) |
|||||||
Numerator for basic and diluted net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Denominator: |
|||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic net income per share |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|||||||||||||||
Employee stock options |
1,231,586 |
1,520,872 |
1,213,812 |
1,413,247 |
|||||||||||
Warrants |
54,267 |
648,440 |
53,768 |
650,110 |
|||||||||||
Convertible preferred stock |
290,560 |
292,960 |
290,380 |
292,660 |
|||||||||||
Convertible note payable |
4,000 |
4,000 |
4,000 |
4,000 |
|||||||||||
Dilutive potential common shares |
1,580,413 |
2,466,272 |
1,561,960 |
2,360,017 |
|||||||||||
Denominator for diluted net income per |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Basic net income per share |
$ |
.18 |
$ |
.04 |
$ |
.11 |
$ |
.09 |
|||||||
Diluted net income per share |
$ |
.16 |
$ |
.03 |
$ |
.10 |
$ |
.08 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following shares of securities were not included in the computation of diluted net income per share as their effect would have been antidilutive.
Six Months Ended |
Three Months Ended |
2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
Convertible preferred stock |
3,311,547 |
3,347,931 |
3,296,662 |
3,347,931 |
27
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
Note 10: Income Taxes
At December 31, 2004, we had federal regular-tax net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards of $71.8 million ($51.8 million alternative minimum tax NOLs). Due to NOL carryforwards, no provisions for income taxes were necessary for the six and three-month periods of 2005 and 2004 except for certain state income taxes for 2004.
Note 11: Other Income Other income consists of the following:
Six Months Ended |
Three Months Ended |
2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
(In thousands) |
Proceeds from certain key individual life |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Gain on sales of certain current assets, |
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Gains on sales of property and equipment |
899 |
143 |
477 |
138 |
|||||||||||
Insurance recoveries in excess of losses |
|
- |
|
|
|||||||||||
Equity in earnings in affiliate |
367 |
327 |
185 |
168 |
|||||||||||
Other |
425 |
545 |
281 |
333 |
|||||||||||
Total other income |
$ |
3,441 |
$ |
3,098 |
$ |
1,335 |
$ |
1,002 |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
Note 12: Segment Information
Six Months Ended |
Three Months Ended |
2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
(In thousands) |
Net sales: |
|||||||||||||||
Climate Control (1) |
$ |
75,495 |
$ |
69,982 |
$ |
39,991 |
$ |
38,433 |
|||||||
Chemical |
117,524 |
115,099 |
67,589 |
63,853 |
|||||||||||
Other |
3,170 |
2,825 |
1,928 |
1,828 |
|||||||||||
$ |
196,189 |
$ |
187,906 |
$ |
109,508 |
$ |
104,114 |
||||||||
Gross profit: (2) |
|||||||||||||||
Climate Control |
$ |
21,986 |
$ |
22,217 |
$ |
11,978 |
$ |
11,835 |
|||||||
Chemical (3) |
9,215 |
5,075 |
5,104 |
4,507 |
|||||||||||
Other |
1,068 |
800 |
638 |
471 |
|||||||||||
$ |
32,269 |
$ |
28,092 |
$ |
17,720 |
$ |
16,813 |
||||||||
Operating profit: (4) |
|||||||||||||||
Climate Control |
$ |
6,305 |
$ |
7,035 |
$ |
3,726 |
$ |
3,337 |
|||||||
Chemical (3)(5) |
4,712 |
2,239 |
2,894 |
2,230 |
|||||||||||
11,017 |
9,274 |
6,620 |
5,567 |
||||||||||||
General corporate expenses and other business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Interest expense |
(5,828 |
) |
(3,029 |
) |
(3,091 |
) |
(1,597 |
) |
|||||||
Provision for impairment on long-lived assets |
(75 |
) |
- |
- |
- |
||||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certain reclassifications have been made in our segment information for 2004 to conform to our segment information presentation for 2005.
(1) As discussed in Note 13, effective March 31, 2004, we were required to consolidate the parent company of a French manufacturer ("MultiClima") of HVAC equipment. Therefore the operating results include net sales of $3.8 million, gross profit of $.8 million and an operating loss of $.6 million relating to MultiClima (after all material intercompany transactions have been eliminated) for the six and three months ended June 30, 2004.
(2) Gross profit by industry segment represents net sales less cost of sales. Gross profit classified as
"Other" relates to industrial machinery and components.
(3) We follow the practice of expensing precious metals used as a catalyst in the Chemical Business manufacturing processes as they are used, because the amount and timing of recovery is not predictable. Periodically, we recover a portion of the amount previously expensed. During the first quarter of 2005, a recovery of $1 million contributed to an
29
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
increase in gross profit. During the second quarter of 2004, a settlement of $.6 million was reached with a vendor's insurance carrier relating to several mechanical problems with a boiler that had been repaired by one of our vendors at the El Dorado Facility. This amount is classified as a reduction of cost of sales.
(4) Operating profit by industry segment represents operating income (loss) plus other income and other expense earned/incurred by each industry segment before general corporate expenses and other business operations, net (including unallocated portions of other income and other expense). In computing operating profit, none of the following items have been added or deducted: general corporate expense and other business operations (including unallocated portions of other income and other expense), interest expense, provision for impairment on long-lived assets, income taxes, and cumulative effect of accounting change.
(5) During the second quarter of 2005, we recognized a gain of $.4 million from certain property insurance claims as discussed in Note 6-Contingencies. During the first quarter of 2004, we recognized a gain of $1.8 million (which is classified as other income in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations) from the sale of certain current assets purchased in 2003.
(6) The amounts included are not allocated to our Climate Control and Chemical Businesses since these items are not included in the operating results reviewed by our chief operating decision makers for purposes of making decisions with regard to resource allocation and performance evaluation. General corporate expenses and other business operations, net consist of the following:
|
Six Months Ended |
Three Months Ended |
2005 |
2004 |
2005 |
2004 |
(In thousands) |
Gross profit-Other |
$ |
1,068 |
$ |
800 |
$ |
638 |
$ |
471 |
|||||||
Selling, general and administrative: |
|||||||||||||||
Personnel |
(2,628 |
) |
(1,935 |
) |
(1,464 |
) |
(854 |
) |
|||||||
Professional fees (A) |
(1,018 |
) |
(1,875 |
) |
(575 |
) |
(1,434 |
) |
|||||||
Office overhead |
(396 |
) |
(390 |
) |
(189 |
) |
(170 |
) |
|||||||
Property, franchise and other taxes |
(101 |
) |
(142 |
) |
(47 |
) |
(67 |
) |
|||||||
All other |
(705 |
) |
(680 |
) |
(361 |
) |
(285 |
) |
|||||||
Total selling, general and administrative |
(4,848 |
) |
(5,022 |
) |
(2,636 |
) |
(2,810 |
) |
|||||||
Other income (B) |
2,235 |
175 |
546 |
117 |
|||||||||||
Other expense |
(78 |
) |
(50 |
) |
- |
(22 |
) |
||||||||
Total general corporate expenses and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
(A) During the second quarter of 2004, we incurred professional fees and other costs aggregating $1 million
relating to a proposed unregistered offering of Senior Secured Notes which was terminated in June 2004.
(B) During the first quarter of 2005, we recognized $1.1 million in proceeds receivable from certain key individual
life insurance policies in excess of the present value of our obligations for benefits. During the first and
second quarters of 2005, we recognized gains of $.4 million and $.3 million, respectively, from sales of
corporate assets (these items are classified as other income in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement
of operations).
Note 13: Recently Issued Pronouncements On December 16, 2004 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of FASB Statement No.
123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Statement 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees, and amends FASB Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach
in Statement 123(R) is similar to the approach described in Statement 123. However, Statement 123(R) requires all
share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income
statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative.
As amended by the Securities and Exchange Commission, Statement 123(R) must be adopted at the beginning of the
next fiscal year that begins after June 15, 2005. We expect to adopt Statement 123(R) on January 1, 2006. Our
Board of Directors is considering a plan to accelerate the vesting schedule of both qualified and non-qualified
stock options currently outstanding. At December 31, 2005 we currently estimate that there will be 45,000
shares that will not be fully vested with a remaining $90,000 of stock-based compensation expense. If the plan
is executed, at December 31, 2005 all outstanding stock options will be fully vested and no cumulative effect of
accounting change adjustment will be required on our financial statements when Statements 123(R) is adopted.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46") "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities."
FIN 46 addresses the consolidation of variable interest entities which meet certain characteristics. In December
2003, the FASB revised FIN 46 that included changes to the effective dates depending on the characteristics of the
variable interest entities and the date of involvement.
Prior to 2003, we, through our subsidiaries, entered into loan agreements where we loaned funds to the
parent company of MultiClima, S.A. ("MultiClima") a French manufacturer of HVAC equipment, whose product line is
compatible with our Climate Control Business. Under the loan agreements, one of our subsidiaries has the option
("Option") to exchange its rights under the loan agreements for 100% of the borrower's outstanding common stock.
This subsidiary also obtained a security interest in the stock of MultiClima to secure its loans. Based on our
assessment of the parent company and MultiClima in relation to FIN 46, as revised, we were required to consolidate
this entity effective March 31, 2004. Prior to consolidating this entity, the outstanding notes receivable balance,
net of reserve, was $2,558,000.
31
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
As a result of consolidating the consolidated assets and liabilities of the parent company of MultiClima, at
March 31, 2004 we recorded a cumulative effect of accounting change of $536,000 which is included in the
accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations. The cumulative effect of accounting change
primarily relates to the elimination of embedded profit included in the cost of inventory which was purchased from
MultiClima by certain of our subsidiaries.
For the three months ended June 30, 2004 the parent company of MultiClima had a consolidated net loss of $575,000
(after all material intercompany transactions have been eliminated). Based on our assessment of the parent
company and MultiClima's historical and forecasted liquidity and results of operations during 2004, we
concluded that the outstanding notes receivable were not collectable. As a result, effective July 1, 2004 we
forgave and canceled the loan agreements in exchange for extending the Option's expiration date from June 15,
2005 to June 15, 2008. We recognized a provision for loss of $1,447,000 for the three months ended September 30,
2004. As a result of the cancellation and the estimated value of this Option at zero, we no longer have a
variable interest in this entity and are no longer required to consolidate this entity.
32
Item 2.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A")
should be read in conjunction with our June 30, 2005 Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Certain statements contained in this MD&A may be deemed forward-looking statements. See
"Special Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements".
Overview
General
We are a diversified holding company. Our wholly-owned subsidiary, ThermaClime, through its subsidiaries, owns
substantially all of our core businesses consisting of the:
Climate Control Business engaged in the manufacturing and selling of a broad range of water source heat pumps (including geothermal heat pumps) and hydronic fan coils, as well as other products including large custom air handlers, used in commercial and residential air conditioning systems and
Climate Control Business
Most of the products of the Climate Control Business are produced to customer orders that are placed well in
advance of required delivery dates. As a result, the Climate Control Business carries significant backlogs that
eliminate the necessity to carry substantial inventories other than for firm customer orders.
In recent periods, the Climate Control Business' profitability was affected by operating losses of certain new
product lines being developed over the past few years. In 2005, the emphasis is to move these new operations into
an operating profit by increasing the sales levels above the breakeven point.
The Climate Control Business has historically generated consistent annual profits and positive cash flows. The
Climate Control Business' objectives include the continued emphasis on increasing the sales and operating margins
of existing products and on new product development.
Chemical Business
The primary raw material feedstocks (anhydrous ammonia and natural gas) of the Chemical Business are
commodities, subject to significant price fluctuations and are purchased at prices in effect at time of purchase.
Due to the uncertainty of the spot sales price, we have pursued a strategy of developing customers that purchase
substantial quantities of products pursuant to
33
sales agreements and/or formulas that provide for the pass through of raw material costs, variable costs,
and certain fixed costs, plus in most cases, a profit margin. These pricing arrangements provide a hedge against
the commodity risk inherent in the raw material feedstocks of natural gas and anhydrous ammonia. In addition we hedge
most sales commitments made at fixed sales prices.
The remaining sales are primarily into agricultural markets at the price in effect at time of shipment. The
anhydrous ammonia and natural gas feedstock costs are decoupled from the sales price of the Company's
agricultural products resulting in profitability problems in this market in recent periods.
Our facility in Baytown, Texas ("Baytown Facility") continues to generate consistent operating profit and the
operating profit from the remaining Chemical Business improved for 2005 compared to the first six months of 2004
despite the El Dorado Facility sustaining a mechanical failure of one of its four nitric acid plants adversely
affecting the results of our fourth quarter of 2004 and first two quarters of 2005 as discussed below under
"Liquidity and Capital Resources."
Irrespective of our strategy of developing customers that purchase substantial quantities of our products based on
formulas as discussed above, our Chemical Business continues to underperform our expectations due, in part, to
our inability to generate sufficient non-seasonal sales volume to operate our manufacturing facilities at
optimum levels. As a result, we are reviewing alternative strategies for our Chemical Business to improve our
operating results. Although we have discussed the issues with certain investment bankers we have not retained an
investment banker to assist us in our review.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As a diversified holding company, cash requirements are primarily dependent upon credit agreements and our ability
to obtain funds from our ThermaClime and non-ThermaClime subsidiaries.
Historically, ThermaClime's primary cash needs have been for working capital and capital expenditures. ThermaClime
and its subsidiaries depend upon credit agreements, internally generated cash flows, and secured equipment financing
in order to fund operations and pay obligations.
ThermaClime and its subsidiaries depend upon its Working Capital Revolver Loan, in addition to internally generated
cash flows, to fund operations and pay their obligations. The Senior Secured Loan and the Working Capital
Revolver Loan both have financial covenants that are described along with other details of the loans in
"Loan
Agreements - Terms and Conditions".
ThermaClime's ability to maintain an adequate amount of borrowing availability under its Working Capital
Revolver Loan depends on its ability to comply with the terms and conditions of its loan agreements and its
ability to generate cash flow from operations. ThermaClime is restricted under its credit agreements as to
the funds it may transfer to LSB and its affiliates and certain ThermaClime subsidiaries. This limitation does
not prohibit payment of amounts due
34
under a
Services Agreement, Management Agreement and a Tax Sharing Agreement.
As of June 30, 2005 ThermaClime had availability under its Working Capital Revolver Loan of $18.2 million, based on eligible
collateral, plus cash on hand of $.8 million.
The Chemical Business in recent years has been unable to generate significant positive cash flows due to
lower than optimum sales volume levels, margin problems and extensive capital expenditure requirements.
The ability to generate a positive margin on Chemical sales is affected by the volatility of the raw material
feedstocks of natural gas and anhydrous ammonia, as well as the necessity to produce at the optimum production
levels to fully absorb the fixed plant costs. The predominant production costs of a process chemical plant, other
than the raw material costs, tend to be fixed costs.
For the first six months of 2005, approximately 64% of the Chemical Business' sales are made pursuant to sales
agreements that provide for the pass through of raw material costs, variable costs, and certain fixed costs,
plus in most cases, a profit margin. Even though 64% of our sales are based upon the above described sales
agreements, our Chemical Business has continued to sustain losses due, in part, to non-seasonal sales volume being
insufficient to run the plants at optimum production levels.
Our primary efforts to improve the results of the Chemical Business include sales efforts to increase the
non-seasonal sales volumes of the Alabama and Arkansas plants with an emphasis on customers that will accept the
commodity risk inherent with natural gas and anhydrous ammonia.
Beginning in October 2004 and continuing into June 2005, the Chemical Business' results were adversely affected as
a result of a mechanical failure of one of the four nitric acid plants at the El Dorado, Arkansas plant. The
failure, which resulted in major damage, caused the plant that normally produces 10,000 tons per month of nitric
acid to go down on October 7, 2004. The plant was restored to normal production in June 2005. Approximately
$5.5 million was expended to repair the plant. Our property insurance provides for replacement cost coverage
subject to a $1 million deductible. As of June 30, 2005 we recognized insurance claims of $1.6 million relating
to this property damage claim which we have received from our insurance
carriers as of the date of this report. The effect of this property insurance recovery to the accompanying statements of income was $.4 million
for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2005, which was classified as other income. We have additional
property damage claims pending. Recoveries related to pending claims will be recognized when the claim amounts
are agreed to by our insurers and will impact our financial statements in the near term.
In addition, our business interruption insurance policy contains a forty-five day waiting period before covering
losses resulting from business interruptions. As of June 30, 2005 we have not filed a claim for recovery of
the business interruption related to this incident. As a result, we have not recognized any insurance recoveries.
Since the business interruption period related to this incident has ended, we are currently compiling the
information necessary to submit the claim. Preliminary indications are that the negative impact on earnings
resulting from the lost production was approximately $5 to $5.5 million from October 7, 2004 through the restart
date in June 2005 of which approximately $1.5 million occurred in the second quarter 2005 and
35
approximately $1.5
to $2 million occurred in the first quarter 2005. The above loss estimates do not include extra expenses incurred
by the Company in investigating damages and commissioning the plant which is also covered by insurance.
Recoveries related to this business interruption will be recognized when the claim amount is agreed to by our
insurers.
One of our non-ThermaClime subsidiaries continues to actively market its investment in a chemical plant located in Pryor, Oklahoma. We do not currently have a contract for the sale of this plant.
Capital Expenditures
Our Chemical Business has historically required significant investment to fund capital expenditures, while our Climate Control Business has been much less capital intensive, however, we believe we have committed capital expenditures for the remainder of 2005 of approximately $2 million related to our Climate Control Business and approximately $3.2 million related to our Chemical Business. The $3.2 million includes $2.4 million relating to operations, and $.8 million for environmental compliance. These expenditures will be financed through internally generated cash flow and secured asset financing.
Other capital expenditures are believed to be discretionary and are dependent upon an adequate amount of liquidity and/or obtaining acceptable funding. We have carefully managed those expenditures to projects necessary to execute our business plans and those for environmental and safety compliance.
We currently expect to incur capital expenditures of approximately $3 to $4 million through June 2007 to construct a new water treatment collection and discharge facility. In addition our pro-rata portion of engineering and construction costs for the City to build a pipeline for the discharged water is approximately $1.8 million. Certain additional expenditures will be required to bring the sulfuric acid plant's air emissions to lower limits. The ultimate cost is believed to be between $1.5 and $3 million, through February 2010.
Dividends
Due to previous operating losses and limited borrowing ability under credit facilities, we discontinued payment of cash dividends on our outstanding capital stock for periods subsequent to January 1, 1999. Although dividends on all of our outstanding series of preferred stock are payable if and when declared by the Board of Directors, the terms of each outstanding series of preferred stock provide that dividends are cumulative, except for the redeemable, non-cumulative, convertible preferred stock. As of June 30, 2005 there is approximately $13.4 million of accrued and unpaid dividends on our outstanding preferred stocks. We do not anticipate paying dividends on our stock for the foreseeable future.
Purchases of Preferred Stock
During the second quarter of 2005, we purchased 10,000 shares of our Series 2 Preferred at $45.10 a share, for a total of $451,000. We financed these purchases of the Series 2 Preferred from our working capital. As of June 30, 2005 we or our subsidiaries own as treasury stock 15,000 shares of our Series 2 Preferred.
36
Summary
Cash flow and liquidity will continue to be managed very carefully. We believe, based upon current forecasts, that we will have adequate cash in 2005 from internal cash flows and financing sources to enable us to satisfy our cash requirements as they become due in 2005 and our lease payment of $5.8 million due in January 2006 in connection with our lease of our Baytown
Facility. Due to the volatility of the cost for major raw materials used in our Chemical Business, we have historically experienced revisions to financial forecasts on a frequent basis during the course of a year. As a result, actual results may be significantly different than our forecast, which could have a material impact on our liquidity and future operating results. In addition, during 2006 and 2007, we have certain obligations becoming due, including, but not limited to, approximately $13 million of ThermaClime's 10-3/4 % Senior Unsecured Notes due in 2007. We are currently exploring alternatives for raising additional long-term liquidity to assist us in funding for these obligations and/or for general working capital purposes.
Loan Agreements - Terms and Conditions
Working Capital Revolver Loan
- ThermaClime finances its working capital requirements through borrowings under a Working Capital Revolver Loan. Under the Working Capital Revolver Loan, ThermaClime and its subsidiaries may borrow on a revolving basis up to $50 million based on specific percentages of eligible accounts receivable and inventories. Effective February 28, 2005 the Working Capital Revolver Loan was amended which, among other things, extended the maturity date to April 2009 and removed language considered as a subjective acceleration provision. As of June 30, 2005 borrowings outstanding were $30 million and the net credit available for additional borrowings was $18.2 million. The Working Capital Revolver Loan requires that ThermaClime and its Climate Control Business meet certain financial covenants and minimum EBITDA amounts. The EBITDA requirements are measured quarterly on a trailing twelve-month basis. ThermaClime and its Climate Control Business were in compliance with the required min
imum EBITDA amounts for the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2005. The trailing twelve-month EBITDA requirements for the remainder of 2005 range from $13.7 to $16 million for ThermaClime and is fixed at $10 million for the Climate Control Business. The EBITDA requirements were set at amounts based upon our forecasts which are presently considered by management to be achievable. See discussion under
"Liquidity and Capital Resources - Summary" as to the historical viability of our forecasts.
We have the ability to set our financial covenants under the Working Capital Revolver Loan agreement with our lenders on an annual basis each January. For 2005, we have established mutually agreeable limits that we believe are well within our ability to achieve.
Senior Secured Loan -
In September 2004, ThermaClime and certain of its subsidiaries (the
"Borrowers") completed a $50 million term loan ("Senior Secured Loan") with a certain lender (the
"Lender"). The Senior Secured Loan is to be repaid as follows:
37
The Senior Secured Loan accrues interest at the applicable LIBOR rate, as defined, plus an applicable LIBOR
margin, as defined or, at the election of the Borrowers, the alternative base rate, as defined, plus an applicable
base rate margin, as defined, with the annual interest rate not to exceed 11% or 11.5% depending on the leverage
ratio. At June 30, 2005 the annual interest rate was 11.49%.
The Borrowers are subject to numerous affirmative and negative covenants under the Senior Secured Loan
agreement including, but not limited to, limitation on the incurrence of certain additional indebtedness and
liens, limitations on mergers, acquisitions, dissolution and sale of assets, and limitations on declaration of
dividends and distributions to us, all with certain exceptions. The Borrowers are also subject to a minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio, measured quarterly on a trailing twelve-month basis. The Borrowers were in
compliance with the required minimum ratio for the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2005. The maturity date of
the Senior Secured Loan can be accelerated by the Lender upon the occurrence of a continuing event of default, as
defined.
For the remainder of 2005, it is anticipated that ThermaClime will incur interest expense of approximately $2.9
million relating to the Senior Secured Loan.
Cross - Default Provisions
- The Working Capital Revolver Loan agreement and the Senior Secured Loan contain
cross-default provisions. If ThermaClime fails to meet the financial covenants of the Senior Secured Loan, the
lender may declare an event of default, making the debt due on demand. If this should occur, there are no
assurances that we would have funds available to pay such amount or that alternative borrowing arrangements would
be available. Accordingly, ThermaClime could be required to curtail operations and/or sell key assets. These
actions could result in the recognition of losses that may be material.
Seasonality
We believe that the only seasonal products are fertilizer and related chemical products sold by our Chemical
Business to the agricultural industry. The selling seasons for those products are primarily during the spring
and fall planting seasons, which typically extend from March through June and from September through November in
the geographical markets in which the majority of our agricultural products are distributed. As a result, our
Chemical Business increases its inventory of ammonium nitrate and UAN prior to the beginning of each planting
season. In addition, the amount and timing of sales to the agricultural markets depend upon weather conditions
and other circumstances beyond our control.
Death Benefit Agreement
On May 12, 2005 the Company entered into a Death
Benefit Agreement with Jack E. Golsen. The Death Benefit Agreement provides that, upon Mr. Golsen's death, the Company will
pay to Mr. Golsen's family or designated beneficiary $2.5 million to be funded from the net proceeds received by
the Company under certain new life insurance policies on Mr. Golsen's life that have been purchased and are owned
by the Company. The new life insurance policies owned by the Company provide a stated death benefit of $7 million. The Company is obligated to keep in existence no less than $2.5 million of
the stated death benefit.
38
Certain Related Party Transaction
In August 1996, Prime Financial Corporation ("Prime"), one of our subsidiaries, made a loan to John A. Shelley
in the principal sum of $50,000, bearing an annual rate of interest of 9%, payable on demand. The loan was
evidenced by a demand promissory note and was made as part of his severance package as President of Equity Bank
when the Company sold the bank. The note was fully reserved by Prime. Prime never demanded repayment of the
principal or any accrued interest under the note. During the second quarter of 2005, Prime wrote off the note
prior to the 2005 Annual Meeting held on June 23, 2005 during which Mr. Shelley was elected as a director of the
Company for a one-year term.
Critical Accounting Policy
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and disclosures of contingencies. In addition to
those critical accounting policies discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004, during the quarter ended June 30, 2005 a significant area of financial reporting impacted by
management's judgment, estimates and assumptions was the timing of the
recognition of the property and business interruption insurance claims
which are discussed above under "Liquidity and Capital Resources" and in Note 6
of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our June 30, 2005 Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements and accompanying notes.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net Sales
Our Climate Control Business net sales for the first six months of 2005 were $75.5 million compared to $70
million for the same period in 2004, a 7.9% increase. Net sales of our heat pump products increased $6.9 million,
or 21.1%, primarily as a result of a 12% increase in the number of units sold due to stronger customer demand,
an 8% increase in overall average unit sales prices due to the increase in our raw material costs as discussed
below, and change in product mix. Net sales of our hydronic fan coils increased $1.1 million, or 4.6%, primarily
due to a 4% increase in overall average unit sales prices due to the increase in our raw material costs as well
as an increase in unit volume related to an improved rate of customer orders. Net sales of our other HVAC
products decreased $2.5 million. For 2004, net sales of other HVAC products includes $3.8 million as a result
of consolidating MultiClima's operating results in the second quarter of 2004 as required under FIN 46. Effective
July 1, 2004, we were no longer required to consolidate MultiClima's operating results (also see Note 13 of
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). Excluding the effect of MultiClima,
sales of other HVAC
products increased $1.3 million which includes an increase in sales of $.9
million relating to our modular chiller systems and
$.5 million relating to a new product line as a result of improved customer
order
intake.
39
Our Chemical Business net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2005 were $117.5 million compared to $115.1
million for the same period in 2004 or a 2.1% increase. This overall increase reflects, in part, higher sales
prices resulting from the increased cost of the raw material feedstocks (anhydrous ammonia and natural gas) as
discussed below. Sales prices increased overall by 7% but volume of tons sold decreased 5%. The decrease in
volume includes a decrease of 11% at the El Dorado Facility due primarily to the lost production as a result
of the mechanical failure discussed above in "Liquidity and Capital Resources." The increase in net sales
includes an increase of $3.3 million relating to our agricultural products, an increase of $.5 million relating
to our mining products, offset, in part, by a decrease of $1.4 million relating to our industrial acid and other
chemical products.
Net sales classified as "Other" consists of sales of industrial machinery and related components. Net sales for
the six-month period ended June 30, 2005 were $3.2 million compared to $2.8 million for the same period in 2004 or
an increase of $.4 million.
Gross Profit
Gross profit by industry segment represents net sales less cost of sales.
Our Climate Control Business gross profit was $22 million or 29.1% as a percentage of net sales for the first six
months of 2005 compared to $22.2 million or 31.7% for the same period in 2004. The net decrease in gross profit
of $.2 million resulted primarily by our inability to fully pass on to our customers the increases in raw
material costs of steel and copper, estimated to be 13% and 20%, respectively. In addition, the decrease includes
$.8 million relating to MultiClima in the second quarter of 2004 as discussed above and the disruption in
production of our hydronic fan coils as discussed above. This decrease in gross profit was partially offset by the
increase in sales of our heat pump products as discussed above.
Our Chemical Business gross profit was $9.2 million or 7.8 % as a percentage of net sales for the six months
ended June 30, 2005 compared to $5.1 million or 4.4% for the same period in 2004. The net increase in gross profit
of $4.1 million is due primarily to improved margins on certain agricultural and industrial acid products,
increased fixed-cost absorption at the Cherokee, Alabama nitrogen plant ("Cherokee Facility") in 2005 as a result
of the plant being down for several weeks in the first quarter of 2004 for a planned major maintenance activity
("Turnaround") and the recovery of $1 million of production catalyst (precious metals) in 2005. This increase was
offset, in part, to the lost production at the El Dorado Facility as a result of the mechanical failure discussed
above in "Liquidity and Capital Resources" and our inability to fully pass on to our customers the 13% and 12%
increases in costs of our primary raw material feedstocks, anhydrous ammonia and natural gas, respectively. In
addition in 2004, a settlement of $.6 million was reached with a vendor's insurance carrier relating to several
mechanical problems experienced in 2001 through 2003 with a boiler that had been repaired by one of our vendors at
the El Dorado Facility.
Gross profit classified as "Other" (see discussion above) was $1.1 million or 33.7% as a percentage of net sales
for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005 compared to $.8 million or 28.3% for the same period in 2004 or an
increase of $.3 million.
40
Operating Profit by Segment
Operating profit by industry segment represents operating income plus other income and other expense earned/incurred
by each industry segment before general corporate expenses and other business operations, net (including unallocated
portions of other income and other expenses). In computing operating profit from operations, none of the following
items have been added or deducted: general corporate expense and other business operations (including unallocated
portions of other income and other expense), interest expense, provision for impairment on long-lived assets,
provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting changes.
Our Climate Control Business operating profit was $6.3 million for the first six months of 2005 compared to $7 million for the same period of 2004. The net decrease in operating profit of $.7 million resulted primarily by
the increase in personnel costs of $.4 million due primarily to increased group health insurance costs, increased
shipping costs of $.4 million as a result of increased sales volume and rising fuel costs, increased commissions of
$.4 million due to increased sales volume, increased professional fees of $.3 million primarily relating to
arbitrations between one of our subsidiaries, Trison, and a customer (also see discussions in Note 6 of Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), increased advertising costs of $.3 million primarily to stimulate
additional sales and the net decrease in gross profit as discussed above. This decrease was partially offset by
the decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses of $1.4 million relating to MultiClima in the second
quarter of 2004 as discussed above.
Our Chemical Business operating profit was $4.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to $2.2
million for the same period in 2004. The net increase in operating profit of $2.5 million resulted primarily by the
net increase in gross profit of $4.1 million as discussed above and a gain of $.4 million from certain property
insurance claims as discussed above under "Liquidity and Capital Resources." This increase was offset, in part, by
a gain of $2.1 million in 2004 from the sales of certain current assets
acquired in 2003 by a non-ThermaClime subsidiary.
General Corporate Expense and Other Business Operations, Net
Our general corporate expense and other business operations, net were $1.6 million for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2005 compared to $4.1 million for the same period of 2004. The net decrease of $2.5 million relates
primarily to proceeds from certain key individual life insurance policies in excess of benefit obligations of $1.2
million in 2005, professional fees of $1 million incurred during the second quarter of 2004 relating to a proposed
unregistered offering of Senior Secured Notes which was terminated and gains of $.7 million in 2005 from the sales
of corporate assets. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in personnel costs of $.7 million which
includes an increase in group health insurance costs and net premium costs associated with key individual life
insurance policies including policies associated with a death benefit agreement entered into with Jack E.
Golsen during the second quarter of 2005 as discussed above under "Death Benefit
Agreement."
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $5.8 million for
the first six months of 2005 compared to $3 million for the same period in
2004. The increase of $2.8 million relates primarily to interest expense
41
incurred on the $50 million term loan that was completed in September 2004 as
discussed under "Loan Agreements -
Terms and Conditions." A portion of the proceeds of the Senior Secured Loan was
used to repay the outstanding
balance under a former financing agreement ("Financing Agreement"). There was no
interest expense recognition on
the Financing Agreement indebtedness from May 2002 through September 2004 since
that transaction was accounted for
as a voluntary debt restructuring in 2002.
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change
Effective March 31, 2004 we included in our condensed consolidated balance sheet the consolidated assets and
liabilities of the parent company of MultiClima as required under FIN 46 (also see Note 13 of Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). As a result, we recorded a cumulative effect of accounting change of
$.5 million primarily relating to the elimination of embedded profit included in the cost of inventory which was
purchased from MultiClima by certain of our subsidiaries.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2004
Net Sales
Our Climate Control Business net sales for the second quarter of 2005 were $40 million compared to $38.4
million for the same period in 2004, a 4.1% increase. Net sales of our heat pump products increased $2 million,
or 10.9%, as a result of a 7% increase in the number of units sold due to stronger customer demand and a 4%
increase in overall sales prices due to the increase in our raw material costs as previously discussed. Net sales
of our hydronic fan coils increased $1.8 million, or 14.2%, due to an increase in overall average unit sales
prices due to the increase in our raw material costs as previously discussed and an increase in sales volume as
a result of an improved rate of customer orders. Net sales of our other HVAC products decreased $2.2 million.
For 2004, net sales of other HVAC products includes $3.8 million as a result of consolidating MultiClima's
operating results in the second quarter of 2004 as required under FIN 46 as discussed above. Excluding the
effect of MultiClima, sales of other HVAC products increased $1.6 million which includes an increase in sales of
$.6 million relating to a construction project which began in February 2005, an increase of $.5 million relating
to our modular chiller systems and $.3 million relating to a new product line as a result of improved customer
order intake.
Our Chemical Business net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2005 were $67.6 million compared to $63.9
million for the same period in 2004 or a 5.9% increase. This overall increase reflects, in part, higher sales prices
resulting from the increased cost of the raw material feedstocks (anhydrous ammonia and natural gas) as discussed
below. Sales prices increased overall by 13% but volume of tons sold decreased 6%. The decrease in volume
includes a decrease of 13% at the El Dorado Facility due primarily to the lost production as a result of the
mechanical failure discussed above in "Liquidity and Capital Resources." The increase in net sales includes an
increase of $2.8 million relating to our agricultural products, an increase of $1.6 million relating to our
mining products, and an increase of $.7 million relating to our industrial acid and other chemical products.
Net sales classified as "Other" (see discussion above) for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005 were
$1.9 million compared to $1.8 million for the same period in 2004 or an increase of $.1 million.
42
Gross Profit
Gross profit by industry segment represents net sales less cost of sales.
Our Climate Control Business gross profit was $12 million or 30% as a percentage of net sales for the second
quarter of 2005 compared to $11.8 million or 30.8% for the same period in 2004. The net increase in gross profit
of $.2 million resulted primarily by the increase in sales of our hydronic fan coil products as discussed above
and improved margins relating to our large custom air handler products as a result of selling price increases to
cover higher material costs. This increase was offset, in part, by $.8 million relating to MultiClima in the
second quarter of 2004 as discussed above and our inability to fully pass on to our customers increases in raw
material costs of steel and copper as discussed previously.
Our Chemical Business gross profit was $5.1 million or 7.6% as a percentage of net sales for the three months
ended June 30, 2005 compared to $4.5 million or 7.1% for the same period in 2004. The net increase in gross profit
of $.6 million is due primarily to improved margins and increased fixed-cost absorption at the Cherokee Facility as
the result of increased sales prices and volume of tons sold. This increase was offset, in part, by the lost
production at the El Dorado Facility as a result of the mechanical failure discussed above in
"Liquidity and
Capital Resources" and our inability to fully pass on to our customers the 40% and 15% increases in costs of our
primary raw material feedstocks, anhydrous ammonia and natural gas, respectively. In addition in 2004, a settlement
of $.6 million was reached with a vendor's insurance carrier relating to several mechanical problems experienced in
2001 through 2003 with a boiler that had been repaired by one of our vendors at the El Dorado Facility.
Gross profit classified as "Other" (see discussion above) was $.6 million or 33.1% as a percentage of net sales for
the three-month period ended June 30, 2005 compared to $.5 million or 25.8% for the same period in 2004 or an
increase of $.1 million.
Operating Profit by Segment
See discussion above for definition of operating profit by industry segment.
Our Climate Control Business operating profit was $3.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared
to $3.3 million for the same period of 2004. The net increase in operating profit of $.4 million resulted
primarily by the decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses of $1.4 million relating to MultiClima
in the second quarter of 2004 and the net increase in gross profit of $.2 million discussed above. This
increase was offset, in part, by the increase in commissions of $.4 million due to increased sales volume,
increased personnel costs of $.2 million due primarily to increased group health insurance costs, increased
shipping costs of $.2 million as a result of increased sales volume and rising fuel costs and increased
professional fees of $.2 million primarily relating to arbitrations between one of our subsidiaries and a customer
as previously discussed.
Our Chemical Business operating profit was $2.9 million for the second quarter of 2005 compared to $2.2 million
for the same period in 2004. The net increase in operating profit of $.7 million resulted primarily by the net
increase in gross profit of $.6 million discussed above and a
43
gain of $.4 million from
certain property insurance
claims as previously discussed partially offset by a gain of $.3 million in 2004 from the sales of certain current assets acquired in 2003 by a non-ThermaClime
subsidiary.
General Corporate Expense and Other Business Operations, Net
Our general corporate expense and other business operations, net were $1.5 million for the three-month period
ended June 30, 2005 compared to $2.2 million for the same period of 2004. The net decrease of $.7 million
relates primarily of professional fees of $1 million incurred relating to a proposed unregistered offering of
Senior Secured Notes which was terminated during the second quarter of 2004 and gains of $.3 million from the
sales of corporate assets. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in personnel costs of $.6 million
which includes an increase in net premium costs associated with key individual life insurance policies including
policies associated with a death benefit agreement entered into with Jack E. Golsen during the second quarter
of 2005 as discussed above under "Death Benefit Agreement."
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $3.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to $1.6 million for the
same period in 2004. The increase of $1.5 million relates primarily to interest expense incurred on the $50 million term loan that was completed in September 2004 as discussed under
"Loan Agreements - Terms and
Conditions." A portion of the proceeds of the Senior Secured Loan was used to repay the outstanding balance
under a former financing agreement ("Financing Agreement"). There was no interest expense recognition on the
Financing Agreement indebtedness from May 2002 through September 2004 since that transaction was accounted for as
a voluntary debt restructuring in 2002.
Cash Flow From Operating Activities
Historically, our primary cash needs have been for operating expenses, working capital and capital expenditures.
We have financed our cash requirements primarily through internally generated cash flow, borrowings under our
revolving credit facilities, secured asset financing and the sale of assets. See additional discussion concerning
cash flows from our Climate Control and Chemical Businesses in "Liquidity and
Capital Resources."
Cash provided by operations from net income plus depreciation and amortization less other non-cash adjustments was
$8.1 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005.
Cash used by operations included $2.7 million as the result of an increase in accounts receivable and a decrease
in customer deposits and accounts payable partially offset by an increase in other accrued liabilities, change in
deferred rent expense, a decrease in prepaid insurance and inventories.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $5.4 million.
The increase in accounts receivable resulted, in part, from:
44
The increase in accounts receivable was partially offset from proceeds received from certain insurance claims
outstanding at December 31, 2004.
The decrease in customer deposits relates to the realization of former prepaid sales of our agricultural products
in the Chemical Business.
The decrease in accounts payable relates primarily to:
The increase in other accrued liabilities includes:
The change in deferred rent expense is due to the rent expense incurred exceeded the scheduled lease payments for
the first six months of 2005.
The decrease in prepaid insurance resulted from the recognition of related insurance expense for the six months
ended June 30, 2005.
The decrease in inventories relates primarily to the increased sales of our agricultural products in our
Chemical Business as a result of the spring planting season offset, in part, to an increase of UAN at our
Cherokee Facility as a result of one of our customers inability to provide enough railcars for transportation
purposes and a planned inventory buildup due to a Turnaround scheduled during the fourth quarter of 2005.
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
Net cash used by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005 included $6.8 million for capital
expenditures of which $5.4 million is for the benefit of our Chemical Business. A majority of these expenditures
relating to the Chemical Business are the result of the mechanical failure of the acid plant discussed above under
"Liquidity and Capital Resources."
Cash provided by investing activities included $1.2 million of proceeds from sales of corporate assets.
45
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities
primarily consisted of a net increase in the Working Capital Revolver
Loan of $2.5 million and long-term borrowings of $1.8 million partially offset by payments on long-term
debt of $1.5 million and the purchase of 10,000 shares of our Series 2 Preferred
for $.5
million.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
In the operation of our businesses, we enter into contracts, leases and borrowing arrangements. In connection
with a series of agreements with Bayer Corporation ("Bayer"), under which we are to supply nitric acid with a
provision for pass through of production costs subject to certain performance obligations on our part, a
subsidiary of ThermaClime entered into a 10 year lease in June 1999 that requires minimum future net lease
rentals of approximately $34.4 million at June 30, 2005. The lease payments are includable costs in these
agreements. These lease rentals are made monthly on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreements,
typically with one annual payment representing a majority of the amount due for the year. The next annual
lease payment of approximately $5.8 million due in January 2006, has been considered in evaluating our
liquidity. Our ability to perform on this lease commitment is contingent upon Bayer's performance under the related
purchase agreement and our liquidity.
As discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, we had certain contractual
obligations at December 31, 2004, with various maturity dates, related to the following:
As discussed under "Cash Flow from Financing Activities" of this MD&A during the first six months of 2005, we had a net increase in borrowings under the Working Capital Revolver Loan of $2.5 million and other long-term borrowings of $1.8 million.
46
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures about Market Risk
General
Our results of operations and operating cash
flows are impacted by changes in market interest rates and changes in market
prices of copper, steel, anhydrous ammonia and natural gas.
Forward Sales Commitments Risk
Periodically our Chemical Business enters into forward sales commitments of chemical products for deliveries in
future periods. As a result, we could be exposed to embedded losses should our product costs exceed the firm
ales prices. To minimize this risk, our Chemical Business enters into exchange-traded futures for natural gas as
discussed below. At June 30, 2005 our sales commitments with firm sales prices
were minimal.
Commodity Price Risk
Our Climate Control Business buys substantial quantities of copper and steel for use in manufacturing processes
and our Chemical Business buys substantial quantities of anhydrous ammonia and natural gas as feedstocks
generally at market prices. Periodically, our Climate Control Business enters into exchange-traded futures for
copper and our Chemical Business enters into exchange-traded futures for natural gas, which contracts are
generally accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. At June 30, 2005 our purchase commitments under these
contracts were for 875,000 pounds of copper through May 2006 at a weighted average cost of $1.24 per pound
($1,086,000) and a weighted average market value of $1.36 per pound ($1,188,000) and for 50,000 MMBtu of
natural gas through August 2005 at a weighted average cost of $6.55 per MMBtu ($328,000) and a weighted average
market value of $6.98 per MMBtu ($349,000).
Interest Rate Risk
Our interest rate risk exposure results from our debt portfolio which is impacted by short-term rates, primarily
index-based borrowings from commercial banks, and long-term rates, primarily fixed-rate notes, some of which
prohibit prepayment or require substantial prepayment penalties.
Reference is made to our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, for an expanded analysis of expected
maturities of long-term debt and its weighted average interest rates.
We purchased two interest rate cap contracts for a cost of $590,000 in March 2005 to help minimize our interest
rate risk exposure relating to the Working Capital Revolver Loan. These contracts set a maximum three-month LIBOR
base rate of 4.59% on $30 million. These contracts mature on March 29, 2009. These contracts are free-standing
derivatives and are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis in accordance with SFAS No.133. At June 30, 2005 the
market basis of these contracts was $312,000.
As of June 30, 2005 our variable rate and fixed rate debt, which aggregated $109.2 million exceeded the debt's fair
market value by approximately $7 million ($6.1 million at December 31, 2004).
47
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Controls and Procedures
As noted on the cover of this Form 10-Q, we are not an
"accelerated filer". Due to the definitions, certain areas
contained within the disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), overlap with the definition of internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act).
Subject to completion of our review of our internal controls over financial reporting, we believe that our
disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the periodic
reports filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to our management. Based on management's most recent evaluation, in which our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer participated, completed as of the end of the period covered by this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer believe, subject to
completion of our review of our internal controls over financial reporting, that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective. During our second fiscal quarter of 2005, there were no significant changes in our
internal controls over financial reporting that affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal controls over financial reporting.
We are in the process of documenting and testing our internal controls over financial reporting to provide the
basis for our report covering our internal controls over financial reporting when we are required to issue
management's report as to our internal controls over financial reporting in a subsequent Form 10-K. In the course
of this process, management routinely reviews potential internal control over financial reporting issues with our
Audit Committee. Therefore at this time, due to the ongoing evaluation and testing process, no assurance can be
given that there may not be reportable conditions or material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial
reporting that would be required to be reported at a later date which could effect our disclosure controls and
procedures.
48
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained within this report may be deemed "Forward-Looking Statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements in this report other than statements of historical fact are Forward-Looking Statements that are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual results and performance of the Company to differ materially from such statements. The words "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "intend", "will", and similar expressions identify Forward-Looking Statements. Forward-Looking Statements contained herein relate to, among other things,
|
the agricultural products are the only seasonal products, |
|
as it relates to the Chemical Business, our efforts include increasing non-seasonal sales volumes of the Alabama and Arkansas plants with an emphasis on customers that will accept the commodity risk inherent with natural gas and anhydrous ammonia, |
|
the anticipated consent order for Slurry will not have a material adverse effect on the Company, |
|
the amount of committed capital expenditures related to our Climate Control and Chemical Businesses, |
|
amounts to be spent relating to compliance with federal, state and local environmental laws at the El Dorado Facility including matters relating to the sulfuric acid plant, |
|
liquidity and availability of funds, |
|
anticipated financial performance, |
|
adequate cash in 2005 from internal cash flows and financing sources to meet our presently anticipated working capital requirements, |
|
adequate resources to meet our obligations as they come due, |
|
ability to make planned capital improvements, |
|
amount of and ability to obtain financing for the Discharge Water disposal project, |
|
ThermaClime's forecasts for 2005 for ThermaClime's operating results meeting all required covenant tests for all quarters and the year ending in 2005, |
|
ThermaClime's actions and the result of those actions if it fails to meet debt covenants and the lender declares an event of default, |
|
maintain compliance with all loan covenants, |
|
EDC's ability to comply with the terms of the Discharge Water permit, |
|
the amount of additional expenditures relating to the AirCAO, |
|
the good likelihood that Cherokee will recover monies from Dynegy over and above any monies which may be recovered by the plaintiff or owed to Dynegy, |
|
property and business interruption claim amounts being agreed to by our insurer and impacting our financial statements in the near term, |
|
the impact on our liquidity and future operating results if actual results are significantly different than our forecast, |
|
the amount of interest to be incurred for the remainder of 2005 relating to the Senior Secured Loan and |
|
the Climate Control Business' objectives include moving new operations into an operating profit by increasing the sales levels above the breakeven point and the continued emphasis on increasing the sales and operating margins of existing products and on new product development. |
49
While we believe the expectations reflected in such Forward-Looking Statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance such expectations will prove to have been correct. There are a variety of factors which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those described in this report, including, but not limited to,
|
decline in general economic conditions, both domestic and foreign, |
|
material reduction in revenues, |
|
material increase in interest rates, |
|
ability to collect in a timely manner a material amount of receivables, |
|
increased competitive pressures, |
|
changes in federal, state and local laws and regulations, especially environmental regulations, or in interpretation of such, pending, |
|
additional releases (particularly air emissions) into the environment, |
|
material increases in equipment, maintenance, operating or labor costs not presently anticipated by us, |
|
the requirement to use internally generated funds for purposes not presently anticipated, |
|
the inability to secure additional financing for planned capital expenditures, |
|
the cost for the purchase of anhydrous ammonia and natural gas, |
|
changes in competition, |
|
the loss of any significant customer, |
|
changes in operating strategy or development plans, |
|
inability to fund the working capital and expansion of our businesses, |
|
adverse results in any of our pending litigation, |
|
inability to obtain necessary raw materials and |
|
other factors described in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation" contained in this report. |
Given these uncertainties, all parties are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such Forward-Looking Statements. We disclaim any obligation to update any such factors or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of the Forward-Looking Statements contained herein to reflect future events or developments.
50
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
There are no material legal proceedings pending against the Company and/or its subsidiaries not previously reported in Item 3 of the Company's 10-K for year ended December 31, 2004 and in Item 1 of Part II of the Company's 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 except the following matters have been initiated, resolved or settled during the second quarter of 2005:
The Company and one of our subsidiaries within the Climate Control Business, ClimaCool Corp., have been sued, together with two unrelated companies, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, in a case styled Multistack LLC v. ClimaCool Corp., et al., alleging that we, ClimaCool and others infringed on a patent in connection with certain modular air chillers that ClimaCool purchased from a French air conditioning company for resale in the United States. The Company is planning to manufacture modular air chillers similar to the design that is subject to this litigation. The complaint alleges that the defendants have infringed and continue to infringe on a certain patent and request:
We have answered the allegations, denying infringement and raising various affirmative defenses, including
the assertion of counterclaims for unfair competition, abuse of process, and declaratory judgment of non-infringement
and non-enforceability. We intend to vigorously defend this action.
IEC's insurance company settled the case styled Hilton Hotels, et al. v.
International Environmental Corporation, et al., without IEC's participation.
The insurance company agreed to pay the plaintiff approximately $1.1 million,
subject to completion of definitive settlement agreements.
During July 2005,
we received correspondence from the Purchaser ("Purchaser") of the assets of our
explosive subsidiary advising that they had received a letter threatening them
and others with legal action due to alleged blasting activities in Millbury,
Massachusetts, that the threatening parties claimed caused ammonium perchlorate
contamination in the drinking water. It has been alleged that prior to the time
our explosive company sold its assets to the Purchaser, it sold certain of the
blasting products to the blasting companies that performed the blasting
activities at the site that caused the contamination. The initial claims were made by the landowner and owners
of certain water wells in the area against the drilling and blasting companies.
The drilling and blasting activities were performed on the landowner's site as
part of construction of a shopping mall. These claims have been made against
numerous parties, including the Purchaser
51
and
other parties that performed blasting and drilling activities at the site,
alleging that the costs of remediation will be several million dollars. We are
investigating this matter and intend to vigorously defend ourselves, and, if
required, the Purchaser in this matter.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The following table includes information relating to purchases of equity securities by the Company and affiliated purchasers, as defined, for the three months ended June 30, 2005
|
(a) Total number of shares of preferred stock purchased |
|
(c) Total number of shares of preferred stock purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs |
(d) Maximum number (or approximate dollar value) |
April 1, 2005 - |
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2005 - |
|
|
|
|
June 1, 2005 - |
|
|
|
|
Total |
10,000 |
$ 45.10 |
- |
- |
During the second quarter of 2005, we purchased 10,000 shares of Series 2 Preferred in the open market. These
shares are being held as treasury stock.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
(b) Although dividends on our Series 2 Preferred are payable if and when declared by the Board of Directors,
the terms of the Series 2 Preferred provide that dividends are cumulative. Our Board of Directors have not
declared and paid dividends on our outstanding Series 2 Preferred since June 1999. The amount of the total
arrearage of unpaid dividends on the outstanding Series 2 Preferred is $11.9 million as of June 30, 2005. If the
September 15 dividend on the Series 2 Preferred is not paid, the amount of the total arrearage of unpaid dividends
payable on the outstanding Series 2 Preferred will be $12.4 million.
The terms of Series 2 Preferred provide that whenever dividends on the Series 2 Preferred are in arrears and
unpaid in an amount equal to at least six quarterly dividends: (i) the number of
members of our Board of
Directors shall be increased by two effective as of the time of election of such
directors; (ii) we shall,
upon the written request of the record holder of 10% of the shares of Series 2
Preferred, call a special
meeting of the Preferred Stockholders for the purpose of electing such two
additional directors; (iii) the
Preferred Stockholders have the exclusive right to vote for and elect such two
additional directors; and (iv)
the Preferred Stockholders right to elect
52
two additional directors
will terminate when all cumulative and
unpaid dividends on the Series 2 Preferred have been declared and set apart for
payment.
At the request of Jayhawk Capital Management, L.L.C. ("Jayhawk"), a special meeting was held on March 11,
2002 for the purpose of electing the two additional directors to our Board of Directors. At this special meeting,
the holders of the Series 2 Preferred elected two members of our Board of Directors, Dr. Allen Ford and Mr. Grant
Donovan, as permitted pursuant to the terms of the Series 2 Preferred.
Also our Board of Directors did not declare and pay the January 1 regular dividend on our Series B Preferred
since 1999. Dividends in arrears at June 30, 2005 related to the Series B Preferred was $1.3 million.
In addition, dividends in arrears related to our Series D Preferred was $.2 million as of June 30, 2005.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At the Company's 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on June 23, 2005 the following nominees to the Board of
Directors were elected as directors of the Company:
|
|
Number of Shares "Against" and to "Withhold Authority" |
|
Raymond B. Ackerman |
13,763,827 |
19,962 |
- |
|||
Bernard G. Ille |
13,747,526 |
36,263 |
- |
|||
Donald W. Munson |
13,726,547 |
57,242 |
- |
|||
Tony M. Shelby |
13,710,147 |
73,642 |
- |
|||
John A. Shelley |
13,716,194 |
67,595 |
- |
Messrs. Ackerman, Ille, Munson and Shelby had been serving on the Board of Directors at the time of the Annual
Meeting and were reelected for a term of three years. Mr. Shelley was elected for a one-year term. The following
are the directors whose terms of office continued after such Annual Meeting: Robert C. Brown, M.D., Charles A.
Burtch, Grant J. Donovan, Dr. N. Allen Ford, PH.D, Jack E. Golsen, Barry H. Golsen, J.D., David R. Goss and Horace G.
Rhodes.
At the Annual Meeting, Ernst & Young, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, was appointed as
independent auditors of the Company for 2005, as follows:
|
|
Number of |
13,778,150 |
3,313 |
2,326 |
53
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) |
Exhibits The Company has included the following exhibits in this report: |
31.1 |
Certification of Jack E. Golsen, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302. |
31.2 |
Certification of Tony M. Shelby, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302. |
32.1 |
Certification of Jack E. Golsen, Chief Executive Officer, furnished pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 906. |
32.2 |
Certification of Tony M. Shelby, Chief Financial Officer, furnished pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 906. |
(b) |
Reports on Form 8-K We filed the following reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended June 30, 2005: |
(i) |
Form 8-K, dated May 9, 2005. The item reported was Item 2.02 - Results of Operations and Financial Condition, discussing the issuance of our financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2005. |
(ii) |
Form 8-K, dated May 18, 2005. The item reported was Item 1.01 - Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, discussing a certain Death Benefit Agreement the Company entered into with Jack E. Golsen, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. |
(iii) |
Form 8-K, dated May 18, 2005. The item reported was Item 5.03 - Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or By laws, discussing an amendment to the Company's Bylaws to increase the maximum number of directors from twelve to thirteen. |
54
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company has caused the undersigned, duly authorized, to sign this report on its behalf on this 5th day of August 2005.
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC. |
By: /s/ Tony M. Shelby |
|
Tony M. Shelby |
By: /s/ Jim D. Jones |
|
Jim D. Jones |
55
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Jack E. Golsen, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LSB Industries, Inc. (the "registrant");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
[paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.
Date: August 5, 2005
/s/ Jack E. Golsen
Jack E. Golsen
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Tony M. Shelby, Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LSB Industries, Inc. (the "registrant");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
[paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.
Date: August 5, 2005
/s/ Tony M. Shelby
Tony M. Shelby
Executive Vice President of Finance
and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial officer)
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of LSB Industries, Inc. ("LSB"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Jack E. Golsen, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of LSB, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
/s/ Jack E. Golsen
Jack E. Golsen
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive officer)
August 5, 2005
This certification is furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. 1350 subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of LSB Industries, Inc. ("LSB"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Tony M. Shelby, Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of LSB, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
/s/ Tony M. Shelby
Tony M. Shelby
Executive Vice President of Finance
and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
August 5, 2005
This certification is furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. 1350 subject to the knowledge standard contained therein and not for any other purpose.