Proxy 2007

 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 
 
Filed by the Registrant  [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [  ]
 
 
Check the appropriate box:
 
o    Preliminary Proxy Statement
 
o    Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
 
x    Definitive Proxy Statement
 
o    Definitive Additional Materials
 
o    Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
 
    ___________________________________________________________________________________
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
 

    ___________________________________________________________________________________
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
 
x
No fee required.
o
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
 
5) Total fee paid:
 
Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a SEC 1913(05-05) currently valid OMB control number.
 
o    Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
 
o  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 
1) Amount Previously Paid:
 
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
 
3) Filing Party:
 
4) Date Filed:
 
 

 
 
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
16 South Pennsylvania Avenue
Post Office Box 754
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73101
FAX: (405) 235-5067

Notice of Special Meeting of Stockholders
To Be Held March 6, 2007

To the Stockholders of
LSB Industries, Inc.

The Special Meeting of the Stockholders of LSB Industries, Inc. (“LSB”, “we”, “our” or “us”) will take place at our offices located at 16 S. Pennsylvania Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, on Tuesday, March 6, 2007, at 11:00 a.m. (CDT), for the purpose of considering and acting upon the following matters:

(1)  
Approval of two amendments to the Certificate of Designations of our $3.25 Convertible Exchangeable Class C Preferred Stock, Series 2; and

(2)  
Any other business which properly may come before the meeting or any adjournment of the meeting.

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on January 23, 2007, as the record date for the determination of holders of our common stock and voting preferred stock entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the Special Meeting.
 
To ensure the presence of a quorum at the Special Meeting, please sign and promptly return the enclosed Proxy Card in the accompanying self-addressed envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States.
 
By order of the Board of Directors
                  
/s/ David M. Shear    
David M. Shear
Secretary

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
February 6, 2007
 

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
16 South Pennsylvania Avenue
Post Office Box 754
Oklahoma City, OK 73101

SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
March 6, 2007

The accompanying proxy and this proxy statement have been prepared by LSB Industries, Inc.’s (“LSB”, “we”, “our” or “us”) management for our Board of Directors. Your proxy is being solicited by the Board of Directors for use at a special meeting of stockholders to be held on Tuesday, March 6, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. at our offices located at 16 South Pennsylvania Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and at any adjournment thereof. This proxy statement contains information about the matters to be considered at the special meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting. This proxy statement is first being mailed to stockholders, on or about February 6, 2007.

ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING

What is being considered at the meeting?

You will be voting:

l   To approve two amendments (the “Amendments”) to our Certificate of Designations for our $3.25 Convertible Exchangeable Class C Preferred Stock, Series 2 (the “Series 2 Preferred”) as described in this proxy statement. The Amendments generally provide as follows:

(a)  
the first Amendment permits us and our subsidiaries, during the period that cumulative accrued and unpaid dividends exist on our Series 2 Preferred, to purchase, redeem, or otherwise acquire shares of our common stock for a period of five years from the date of completion of an exchange or tender offer by us after January 1, 2007, for at least 180,000 shares of the outstanding Series 2 Preferred; and

(b)  
the second Amendment provides that the current right of the holders of Series 2 Preferred to elect two directors to our board when at least six quarterly dividends on the Series 2 Preferred are in arrears and unpaid may be exercised only if and so long as at least 140,000 shares of Series 2 Preferred are issued and outstanding.

l   To transact such other and further business as may properly come before the meeting.

Who is soliciting your proxy?

Your proxy is being solicited by our Board of Directors.

How do I vote?

If you are a stockholder whose shares are registered in your name, you may vote your shares in person at the meeting or by one of the three following methods:

·  
Vote by Internet, by going to the web address www.cesvote.com and following the instructions for Internet voting.

·  
Vote by Telephone, by dialing 1-888-693-8683, which is a toll-free number, and following the instructions for telephone voting.
 

 
·  
Vote by Proxy Card, by completing, signing, dating and mailing the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided. If you vote by Internet or telephone, please do not mail your proxy card.

If your shares are held in “street name” (through a broker, bank or other nominee), you may receive a separate voting instruction form with this proxy statement, or you may need to contact your broker, bank or other nominee to determine whether you will be able to vote electronically using the Internet or by telephone.

Can I change my mind after I vote?

Yes, you may change your mind at any time before the polls close at the meeting. You can change your vote by

·  
executing and submitting a revised proxy;

·  
providing a written revocation to the Secretary of the Company; or

·  
voting in person at the meeting.

In the absence of a revocation, shares represented by the proxies will be voted at the meeting. Your attendance at the meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy. If you do not hold your shares directly, you should follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank or nominee to revoke your previously voted proxy.
 
What if I sign and return my proxy card but I do not include voting instructions?

If you sign your proxy card and return it to us but you do not include voting instructions as to the proposal, your proxy will be voted “FOR” the Amendments.

What does it mean if I receive more than one proxy card?

It means that you have multiple accounts with brokers and/or our transfer agent. Please vote all of these shares. We recommend that you contact your broker and/or our transfer agent to consolidate as many accounts as possible under the same name and address. Our transfer agent is UMB Bank, n.a., P.O. Box 410064, Kansas City, Missouri 64141 whose phone number is (800) 821-2171.

Will my shares be voted if I do not provide my proxy?

No. If your shares are registered in your name, they will not be voted, unless you submit your proxy card or vote in person at the meeting. If you hold your shares directly in your own name, you must vote, either by completing, signing and delivering a proxy, voting by telephone or the internet, or attending the meeting and voting at the meeting.

If your stock is held in your brokerage account, you can instruct your broker how your shares should be voted. If you fail to give your broker instructions, the broker will submit a “broker non-vote.” A broker non-vote is counted toward the shares needed for a quorum, but it is not counted in determining whether the proposal has been approved.

Are abstentions counted?

If your proxy indicates an abstention from voting on the proposal, the shares represented will be counted as present for the purpose of determining a quorum, but they will not be voted on any matter at the special meeting. Consequently, if you abstain from voting on a proposal, your abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal.
 
 
2

 
How many votes must be present to hold the meeting?

In order for us to conduct our meeting, we must have a quorum. We will have a quorum, and be able to conduct the meeting, if a majority of our outstanding voting shares of common stock and voting preferred stock, and at least two-thirds of our outstanding Series 2 Preferred, as of January 23, 2007, are present at the meeting. Your shares will be counted as being present at the meeting if you (a) attend the meeting, or (b) vote by telephone or the internet, (c) properly return a proxy by mail, or (d) fail to give your broker voting instructions and the broker submits a “broker non-vote.”

Who is entitled to vote at the meeting?

You may vote if you owned stock as of the close of business on January 23, 2007, which is the record date for determining who is eligible to vote at the special meeting.

As of the close of business on the record date, we had the following shares of common stock and preferred stock issued and outstanding:

(a)  
16,773,465 shares of common stock (excluding 3,447,754 shares held in treasury), with each share entitled to one vote;

(b)  
660.5 shares of Convertible Noncumulative Preferred Stock (“Noncumulative Preferred”), with each full share entitled to one vote and each half share entitled to one-half of one vote;

(c)  
20,000 shares of Series B 12% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred”), with each share entitled to one vote;

(d)  
1,000,000 shares of Series D 6% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock ("Series D Preferred"), with each share entitled to .875 of one vote; and

(e)  
499,102 shares of Series 2 Preferred (excluding 18,300 shares held in treasury), which is generally non-voting.

Shares of our Noncumulative Preferred, Series B Preferred and Series D Preferred are referred to as a “voting preferred stock.” All of our outstanding shares of common stock and voting preferred stock will vote together as a single class as to the Amendments. Since our Series 2 Preferred is generally a non-voting series of preferred stock, holders of our Series 2 Preferred will not vote with the holders of our common stock and voting preferred stock. The holders of our outstanding Series 2 Preferred, however, must vote separately as a class as to the Amendments.
 

What vote is required to approve the Amendments?

When the Certificate of Designations of the Series 2 Preferred was filed with the Delaware Secretary of State, under Delaware law it had the effect of amending our certificate of incorporation. As a result, approval of the Amendments constitutes an amendment to our certificate of incorporation. Thus, under Delaware law and the Certificate of Designations of the Series 2 Preferred, approval of the Amendments requires both the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock and voting preferred stock, voting together as a class, and the affirmative vote of two-thirds of our outstanding shares of Series 2 Preferred voting separately as a class. See “Proposal - Vote Required.”

Who will count the votes?

All votes will be tabulated by the inspector of election appointed for the special meeting, who will separately tabulate affirmative and negative votes and abstentions.
 
 
3

 
What is the deadline for submission of stockholder proposals?

As noted in our proxy statement for our 2006 Annual Meeting, if you wish to submit proposals to be included in our proxy statement for our 2007 Annual Meeting, proposals must be received at our principal executive offices not later than February 7, 2007. Proposals must satisfy the procedures set forth in Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act.

The deadline for providing us with timely notice of matters that you otherwise desire to introduce at our next annual meeting of stockholders, other than those that will be included in our proxy materials, is 50 days prior to the date of the 2007 Annual Meeting (or if we give less than 60 days notice of the date of the 2007 Annual Meeting, written notice of the proposal must be received not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which we mail notice of, or publicly disclose, the date of the meeting). If you wish to present a proposal, but you fail to notify us by such deadline, you will not be entitled to present the proposal at the meeting. We suggest that you submit your proposals by registered mail, return receipt requested, attention: Secretary.

Who is paying the cost of the meeting?

We will pay for preparing, printing and mailing this proxy statement. Proxies may be solicited on our behalf by our directors, officers or employees in person or by telephone, electronic transmission and facsimile transmission. We will reimburse banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for their out-of-pocket costs of sending the proxy materials to our beneficial owners. We have also retained and will pay for the services of Georgeson, Inc. to assist in the solicitation of proxies for a fee of $11,500, plus reasonable charges and out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them.

Shareholder List

A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the special meeting will be open to the examination of any stockholder for any purpose germane to the special meeting during ordinary business hours commencing 10 days before the special meeting. The list will be maintained at our principal executive offices located at 16 South Pennsylvania Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. 

Other Matters Brought Before the Meeting

The Board of Directors does not intend to bring any matter before the special meeting other than matters specifically referred to in the notice of the special meeting, nor does the Board of Directors know of any other matter that anyone else proposes to present for action at the special meeting. However, if any other matter is properly brought before the special meeting, the persons named in the accompanying proxy or their duly constituted substitutes acting at the special meeting will be deemed authorized to vote or otherwise act thereon in accordance with their judgment on such matter.


PROPOSAL

AMENDMENTS TO OUR CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATIONS FOR OUR $3.25 CONVERTIBLE EXCHANGEABLE CLASS C PREFERRED STOCK, SERIES 2

The Board of Directors has approved and is proposing to the stockholders two Amendments to the Certificate of Designations (the “Certificate”) of our Series 2 Preferred. The Amendments are being considered together as a single proposal and will not be voted upon separately. The Amendments generally provide as follows:

(a)  
the first Amendment permits us and our subsidiaries during the period that cumulative accrued and unpaid dividends exist on our Series 2 Preferred to purchase, redeem, or otherwise acquire shares of our common stock for a period of five years from the date of completion of an exchange or tender offer by us occurring after January 1, 2007, for at least 180,000 shares of the outstanding Series 2 Preferred; and
 
 
4

 
(b)  
the second Amendment provides that the current right of the holders of Series 2 Preferred to elect two directors to our board when at least six quarterly dividends on the Series 2 Preferred are in arrears and unpaid may be exercised only if and so long as at least 140,000 shares of Series 2 Preferred are issued and outstanding (excluding shares held by us or our subsidiaries in treasury).

First Amendment

The first proposed Amendment would revise the second paragraph of Section 3(a) of the Certificate to include a new last sentence. As amended, Section 3(a) would read as follows:

No dividends or other distributions, other than dividends payable solely in shares of Common Stock or other Junior Stock or distributions of Rights, as defined below, shall be declared, paid or set apart for payment on, and, except as otherwise provided below in this Section 3(a), no purchase, redemption or other acquisition shall be made by the Corporation of, any shares of Common Stock or other Junior Stock (or any payment made in respect of or made available to a sinking fund for the redemption of any shares of Junior Stock) unless and until all cumulative and unpaid dividends on the Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock shall have been paid or declared and set apart for payment through the last dividend Due Date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, during the period that cumulative and unpaid dividends exists on the Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock, the Corporation may purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire in any manner or for any reason any shares of Common Stock or other Junior Stock (including, but not limited to, pursuant to existing or future stock option plans or otherwise) for a period of five years from the completion of an exchange or tender offer by the Corporation occurring after January 1, 2007, for at least 180,000 outstanding shares of the Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock.

Second Amendment

The second proposed Amendment would (a) insert the words “if, and only so long as, at least 140,000 shares of Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock are issued and outstanding (excluding shares held in treasury),” at the beginning of the first sentence of Section 7(b) of the Certificate. As amended, the first sentence of Section 7(b) would read as follows:

If, and only so long as, at least 140,000 shares of Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock are issued and outstanding (excluding shares held in treasury), whenever dividends on the Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock shall be in arrears and unpaid, whether or not declared, in an amount equal to at least six quarterly dividends (whether or not consecutive) (i) the number of members of the Board shall be increased by two, effective as of the time of election of such directors as hereinafter provided, and (ii) the holders of the Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock (voting separately as a class with all other affected classes or series of the Parity Stock upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable) will have the exclusive right to vote for and elect such two additional directors of the Corporation at any meeting of stockholders of the Corporation at which directors are to be elected held during the period that any dividends on the Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock remain in arrears.

The proposed Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate is attached as Exhibit A to this proxy statement.

The terms of the Series 2 Preferred, as well as our Series D Preferred and Series B Preferred, provide that dividends are cumulative. Dividends on our outstanding preferred stock are required to be paid only if and when declared by our Board of Directors. We have not paid dividends on our outstanding series of preferred stock for any period subsequent to January 1, 1999, except nominal dividends paid
 
5

 
each quarter during 2006. As of January 23, 2007, there was an aggregate of approximately $14 million of cumulative accrued and unpaid dividends on our outstanding preferred stock, which includes approximately $12 million as to the Series 2 Preferred, approximately $1.7 million as to the Series B Preferred, and $300,000 as to the Series D Preferred. None of the cumulative accrued and unpaid dividends have been declared payable by the Board of Directors. Although we do not anticipate paying all accrued and unpaid dividends on our outstanding preferred stock in the foreseeable future, we have paid nominal dividends on the preferred stock each quarter during 2006, and may continue to pay nominal dividends on our preferred stock from time to time, if the Board determines that our financial condition and requirements justify such dividends.

Purposes of Amendments

As further discussed below, the purposes of the Amendments are to:

·  
permit us, if desired, to adopt a common stock repurchase program;

·  
permit us to acquire shares of our common stock under the cashless exercise provisions of our stock option plans and outstanding warrants;

·  
prohibit the holders of Series 2 Preferred from appointing two directors to our board if fewer than 140,000 shares of the Series 2 Preferred is outstanding; and

·  
satisfy a condition precedent to the Jayhawk Group’s agreement to exchange or tender to us certain of its shares of Series 2 Preferred pursuant to the terms of the Jayhawk Agreement, described below.

The Amendments, if approved, would enable us to adopt a program to repurchase shares of our common stock (which would be effected in accordance with applicable federal and state securities laws and regulations, including without limitation, Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act) in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions if we deem that a repurchase program is advisable and in our best interest.

The ability to adopt a repurchase program could be beneficial to us because, under certain circumstances, a repurchase program would be expected to:

·  
improve our operating performance on a per share basis,

·  
enhance, in the long term, the market price per share of our common stock,

·  
be a beneficial investment,

·  
provide shares for reissuance in connection with employee stock option plans, thereby avoiding additional dilution, and/or

·  
provide additional shares for future acquisitions involving the exchange of our common stock.

Accordingly, our Board of Directors believes that we and our stockholders would benefit if we have the ability, if desired, to adopt a program to repurchase shares of our common stock during the period that there is outstanding accrued and unpaid dividends on our outstanding preferred stock.

Under our existing stock option plans, certain options for the purchase of our common stock permit the holder of the option to pay the purchase price of the option by tendering to us shares of our common stock that are already owned by the holder. This is commonly referred to as a “cashless” exercise of a stock option. Since 1999, we have received 251,174 shares of our common stock from employees in payment of the exercise price under our stock option plans pursuant to the cashless exercise provisions of the plans.
 
 
6

 
A holder of our Series 2 Preferred has alleged that the receipt by us of common stock under the cashless exercise provisions of our stock option plans during the period that we had cumulative accrued and unpaid dividends on our Series 2 Preferred may constitute an “acquisition” of common stock that is prohibited under the Certificate. The first Amendment would clarify that receipt by the us of common stock upon the cashless exercise of our outstanding stock options is not prohibited by the terms of the Certificate and would expressly permit such transactions during the period that cumulative accrued and unpaid dividends exist on our Series 2 Preferred for a period of five years after completion of a tender offer or exchange by the us after January 1, 2007, of at least 180,000 shares of the outstanding Series 2 Preferred.

Although the loan agreements between our subsidiary, ThermaClime, Inc., and certain of ThermaClime’s subsidiaries (as borrowers) and their lenders, do not prohibit us from acquiring our common stock or entering into a repurchase program to acquire its common stock, such loan agreements do limit or prohibit ThermaClime and its subsidiaries from purchasing or acquiring our stock.

The Certificates of Designations for the Series B Preferred and Series D Preferred stock are not being amended at this time. Neither the Series B Preferred nor Series D Preferred prohibit us or our subsidiaries from purchasing, redeeming, or otherwise acquiring shares of our common stock, regardless of whether there are outstanding cumulative accrued and unpaid dividends on the Series B Preferred or the Series D Preferred. Accordingly, the Certificates of Designations for the Series B and the Series D Preferred do not require an amendment to allow us or our subsidiaries to purchase shares of our common stock.

The second Amendment to the Certificate would limit the right of our Series 2 Preferred stockholders to elect two directors whenever dividends on the Series 2 Preferred are in arrears and unpaid in an amount equal to at least six quarterly dividends to periods during which at least 140,000 shares of the Series 2 Preferred are issued and outstanding. We believe that if fewer than 140,000 shares of the original 920,000 shares of Series 2 Preferred remains issued and outstanding, representing only approximately 15% of the original issuance of the Series 2 Preferred, the then remaining holders of the Series 2 Preferred would be disproportionately represented on our Board as compared to the owners of our common stock. If the second Amendment to the Certificate is approved, the remaining holders of the Series 2 Preferred would not be entitled to elect two directors to our Board and any directors previously elected by the Series 2 Preferred would be automatically removed, if and so long as fewer than 140,000 shares of Series 2 Preferred are outstanding.

The terms of the Series 2 Preferred currently provide that whenever dividends on the Series 2 Preferred are in arrears and unpaid in an amount equal to at least six quarterly dividends:

·  
the number of members of our Board of Directors shall be increased by two effective as of the time of election of such directors;

·  
we shall, upon the written request of the record holders of at least 10% of the shares of Series 2 Preferred, call a special meeting of the Series 2 Preferred holders for the purpose of electing such two additional directors;

·  
the Series 2 Preferred holders have the exclusive right to vote for and elect such two additional directors; and

·  
the term of office of such directors will terminate immediately upon the termination of the right of the Series 2 Preferred holders to vote for such two additional directors, subject to the requirements of Delaware law.

In 2002, the holders of the Series 2 Preferred elected Grant J. Donovan and N. Allen Ford to serve as directors pursuant to the terms of the Series 2 Preferred and each of them are currently serving as a member of our Board pursuant to such election.  The Series 2 Preferred holders have the right to remove without cause at any time and replace either of the two directors that the Series 2 Preferred holders have elected.
 
7

 
In 1993, 920,000 shares of the Series 2 Preferred stock were sold by the Company. As a result of conversions of the Series 2 Preferred, exchanges of certain shares of Series 2 Preferred for our common stock, and acquisitions of the Series 2 Preferred by us and our subsidiaries, 499,102 shares of the Series 2 Preferred shares remain outstanding as of the record date. If we undertake a tender offer for shares of the Series 2 Preferred or determine to issue shares of our common stock in exchange for additional shares of Series 2 Preferred, each as described below under “Jayhawk Agreement,” and all shares of Series 2 Preferred that may be tendered or exchanged pursuant to the Jayhawk Agreement are tendered or exchanged, then 189,295 shares of Series 2 Preferred would remain outstanding, of which 23,083 shares would be owned by the Golsen Group (consisting of Jack E. Golsen, our Chairman of the Board and CEO, his wife, children, including, but not limited to, Barry H. Golsen, our President, and certain entities controlled by them) and 166,212 shares would be owned by the Jayhawk Group. See “Jayhawk Agreement.” Accordingly, as long as the Jayhawk Group continues to own at least 140,000 shares of the Series 2 Preferred, it would have the right to appoint two directors to our Board under the terms of the Certificate, as proposed to be amended.

Jayhawk Agreement

On November 10, 2006, we entered into an Agreement (the “Jayhawk Agreement”) with the “Jayhawk Group,” which consists of Kent C. McCarthy, Jayhawk Capital Management, L.L.C., Jayhawk Institutional Partners, L.P., and Jayhawk Investments, L.P. The Jayhawk Agreement provides that if we undertake, in our sole discretion, within one year from the date of the Jayhawk Agreement, a tender offer for, or exchange of, our Series 2 Preferred, that the Jayhawk Group will either exchange or deliver to us 180,450 shares of the Series 2 Preferred owned by the Jayhawk Group for 1,335,330 shares of our common stock, based on 7.4 shares of common stock for each share of Series 2 Preferred surrendered to us in the transaction.

In connection with the contemplated exchange or tender offer, the Agreement further provides that the Jayhawk Group would waive its rights to all accrued and unpaid dividends on the Series 2 Preferred tendered or exchanged. As of the date of the Special Meeting, the accrued and unpaid dividend on the Series 2 Preferred will be $23.975 per share. Accordingly, if a tender offer or exchange is completed, the Jayhawk Group would waive a total of approximately $4.3 million in accrued and unpaid dividends on the 180,450 shares of Series 2 Preferred which would be surrendered to us.

The terms of Section 7(b) of the Certificate currently provide that, whenever dividends on the Series 2 Preferred are in arrears and unpaid in an amount equal to at least six quarterly dividends: (a) the number of members of our Board of Directors shall be increased by two; and (b) the Series 2 Preferred holders have the exclusive right to vote for and elect two additional directors until the payment of accrued and unpaid dividends on the Series 2 Preferred. In 2002, the holders of the Series 2 Preferred, including the Jayhawk Group, elected two directors pursuant to the terms of the Series 2 Preferred.

The Jayhawk Agreement further provides that any such exchange or tender offer would be subject to:

·  
our receipt of a fairness opinion for the transaction;

·  
the listing on the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”) of the common stock to be issued in the transaction;

·  
the approval by the holders of our common stock and Series 2 Preferred of the Amendments; and

·  
the Golsen Group exchanging or tendering in connection with this transaction 26,467 shares of the 49,550 shares of Series 2 Preferred beneficially owned by them and waiving all accrued and unpaid dividends on the 26,467 shares (approximately $634,500) so tendered or exchanged.
 
8

 
As the beneficial and record of 346,662 shares of Series 2 Preferred, the Jayhawk Group has the power to vote 69.5% of the total votes held by all holders of Series 2 Preferred which is sufficient to approve the Amendments on behalf of the Series 2 Preferred.

In light of the Jayhawk Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Jayhawk Agreement, our Board of Directors has approved, subject certain conditions (including the conditions set forth in the Jayhawk Agreement), a tender offer for all of the issued and outstanding shares of Series 2 Preferred, except as limited as described above with respect to the Jayhawk Group and the Golsen Group. As of the date of mailing of this proxy statement, a tender offer for the Series 2 Preferred has not commenced. When the exchange offer is commenced, we will mail tender offer documents to holders of the Series 2 Preferred and file a tender offer statement with the SEC.

The Jayhawk Agreement was solicited by the Jayhawk Group and negotiated with the Jayhawk Group. Neither we nor any member of the Jayhawk Group has paid or given, or agreed to pay or give, directly or indirectly, any commission or other remuneration in connection with the Agreement. If we elect to initiate an exchange or a tender offer, the transaction will be conducted under the exemption from registration provided by Section 3(a)(9) the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”). 

Vote Required

Approval of the Amendments, which are being considered together as a single proposal, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of our common stock and voting preferred stock (excluding the Series 2 Preferred), voting together as a class, as well as the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Series 2 Preferred, voting separately as a class.

As of the record date, the Jayhawk Group owned of record 1,214,700 shares of our common stock, representing approximately 7.2% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock, and 346,662 shares of the Series 2 Preferred, representing approximately 69.5% of our issued and outstanding shares of Series 2 Preferred. As of the record date, the Golsen Group owned of record 3,396,520 shares of our common stock, representing 20.2% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock, 1,020,000 shares of voting preferred stock, representing 99.9% of the issued and outstanding voting preferred stock, and 49,550 shares of the Series 2 Preferred, representing approximately 9.9% of the issued and outstanding Series 2 Preferred. See “Principal Stockholders.”

The Golsen Group and the Jayhawk Group have each indicated that they will vote their shares of Series 2 Preferred, representing an aggregate of approximately 79.4% of the issued and outstanding Series 2 Preferred, “FOR” the Amendments. As a result, the Series 2 Preferred, voting as a class, will approve the Amendments.

Together, the Golsen Group and the Jayhawk Group possessed, as of the record date, the power to vote approximately 31.2% of our issued and outstanding shares of our common stock and voting preferred stock entitled to vote at the special meeting (which excludes the Series 2 Preferred). The Golsen Group and the Jayhawk Group have each indicated that they will vote their respective shares of common stock and voting preferred stock “FOR” approval of the Amendments.

Stockholders should complete the Proxy as to the proposed Amendments, even if they own common stock, Series 2 Preferred, or any other series of preferred stock.

The Board of Directors Recommends that Stockholders Vote “FOR”
the Amendments to the Series 2 Preferred Certificate
 
9

 
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

Our common stock is listed on the American Stock Exchange. The following table shows the total number and percentage of the outstanding shares of our voting common stock, voting preferred stock and Series 2 Preferred beneficially owned as of the close of business on January 23, 2007, with respect to each person (including any "group" as used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended) that we know to have beneficial ownership of more than 5% of our voting common stock and voting preferred stock. A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of shares of our common stock which the person could acquire within 60 days of January 23, 2007.

Because of the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as to the method of determining the amount of shares an individual or entity may beneficially own, the amounts shown below for an individual or entity may include shares also considered beneficially owned by others.

 
 
Common Stock
 
Voting Preferred Stock
 
Series 2 Preferred
Name of
Beneficial Owner
 
Number of Shares(1)
 
Percentage of Class+
 
Number of Shares(1)
 
Percentage of Class+
 
Number of Shares(1)
 
Percentage of Class+
Jack E. Golsen and members of his family(2)
 
4,820,688(3)(4)
 
26.5%
 
1,020,000(5)
 
99.9%
 
49,550(6)
 
9.9%
 
Kent C. McCarthy & affiliates(7)
 
2,969,150     
 
 
16.0%
 
 
-
 
 
-
 
 
346,662
 
 
69.5%
 
Paul J. Denby(8)
1,270,400     
 
7.6%
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
James W. Sight(9)
966,320     
 
5.8%
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 

+ Because of the requirements of the SEC as to the method of determining the amount of shares an individual or entity may own beneficially, the amount shown for an individual may include shares also considered beneficially owned by others. Any shares of stock which a person does not own, but which he or she has the right to acquire within 60 days of January 23, 2007, are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding stock of the class owned by such person but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of the class owned by any other person.

(1) This information with respect to beneficial ownership is based on information furnished by the above-named individuals or entities or contained in filings made with the SEC or our records.

(2) Includes Jack E. Golsen and the following members of his family: wife, Sylvia H. Golsen; son, Barry H. Golsen (a Director and our Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors and President); son, Steven J. Golsen (executive officer of several of our subsidiaries); and daughter, Linda F. Rappaport. The address of Jack E. Golsen, Sylvia H. Golsen, Barry H. Golsen, and Linda F. Rappaport is 16 South Pennsylvania Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73107; and Steven J. Golsen's address is 7300 SW 44th Street, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73179.

(3) Includes (a) the following shares over which Jack E. Golsen ("J. Golsen") has the sole voting and dispositive power: (i) 25,000 shares that he owns of record, (ii) 4,000 shares that he has the right to acquire upon conversion of a promissory note, (iii) 133,333 shares that he has the right to acquire upon the conversion of 4,000 shares of LSB's Series B Preferred owned of record by a trust, of which he is the sole trustee, (iv) 93,529 shares owned of record by a trust, of which he is the sole trustee, and (v) 176,500 shares that he has the right to acquire within the next 60 days under LSB's stock option plans; (b) 838,747 shares owned of record by a trust, of which Sylvia H. Golsen is the sole trustee, over which she and her husband, J. Golsen share voting and dispositive power; (c) 311,639 shares over which Barry H. ("B. Golsen") has the sole voting and dispositive power, 533 shares owned of record by B. Golsen's wife, over which he shares the voting and dispositive power, and 66,250 shares that he has the right to acquire within the next 60 days under LSB's stock option plans; (d) 248,915 shares over which
 
10

 
Steven J. Golsen ("S. Golsen") has the sole voting and dispositive power and 46,250 shares that he has the right to acquire within the next 60 days under LSB's stock option plans; (e) 195,406 shares held in trust for the grandchildren and great grandchild of J. Golsen and Sylvia H. Golsen of which B. Golsen, S. Golsen and Linda F. Rappaport ("L. Rappaport") jointly share voting and dispositive power; (f) 82,552 shares owned of record by L. Rappaport over which she has sole voting and dispositive power; (g) 1,512,099 shares owned of record by SBL Corporation ("SBL"), 39,177 shares that SBL has the right to acquire upon conversion of 9,050 shares of Series 2 Preferred; 400,000 shares that SBL has the right to acquire upon conversion of 12,000 shares of Series B Preferred owned of record by SBL, and 250,000 shares that SBL has to right to acquire upon conversion of 1,000,000 shares of Series D Preferred owned of record by SBL and (h) 88,100 shares owned of record by Golsen Petroleum Corporation ("GPC"), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SBL, 133,333 shares that GPC has the right to acquire upon conversion of 4,000 shares of Series B Preferred owned of record by GPC and 175,325 shares that GPC has the right to acquire upon conversion of 40,500 shares of Series 2 Preferred owned of record by GPC. SBL is wholly-owned by Sylvia H. Golsen (40% owner), B. Golsen (20% owner), S. Golsen (20% owner), and L. Rappaport (20% owner) and, as a result, SBL, J. Golsen, Sylvia H. Golsen, B. Golsen, S. Golsen, and L. Rappaport share the voting and dispositive power of the shares beneficially owned by SBL. J. Golsen disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares that B. Golsen, S. Golsen, and L. Rappaport each have the sole voting and investment power over as noted above. B. Golsen, S. Golsen, and L. Rappaport disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares that J. Golsen has the sole voting and investment power over as noted above and in footnote (5) and the shares owned of record by Sylvia H. Golsen. Sylvia H. Golsen disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares that J. Golsen has the sole voting and dispositive power over. SBL's address is 16 South Pennsylvania Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73107.

(4) Does not include 70,200 shares of our common stock that L. Rappaport's husband owns of record and 185,000 shares which he has the right to acquire within the next 60 days under our stock option plans, all of which L. Rappaport disclaims beneficial ownership. Does not include 263,320 shares of common stock owned of record by certain trusts for the benefit of B. Golsen, S. Golsen, and L. Rappaport over which B. Golsen, S. Golsen and L. Rappaport have no voting or dispositive power. Heidi Brown Shear, our Vice President and Managing Counsel, the niece of J. Golsen, the wife of David M. Shear, our Senior Vice President and General Counsel, and daughter of Dr. Robert C. Brown, a director of our Company, is the Trustee of each of these trusts.

(5) Includes: (a) 4,000 shares of Series B Preferred owned of record by a trust, of which J. Golsen is the sole trustee, over which he has the sole voting and dispositive power; (b) 12,000 shares of Series B Preferred owned of record by SBL; (c) 4,000 shares Series B Preferred owned of record by SBL's wholly-owned subsidiary, GPC, over which SBL, J. Golsen, Sylvia H. Golsen, B. Golsen, S. Golsen, and L. Rappaport share the voting and dispositive power and (d) 1,000,000 shares of Series D Preferred owned of record by SBL.

(6) Includes 9,050 shares of Series 2 Preferred owned of record by SBL and 40,500 shares of Series 2 Preferred owned by GPC. See footnote (3) for a discussion of SBL and GPC.

(7) Kent C. McCarthy, manager of Jayhawk Capital Management, L.L.C. ("Jayhawk"), a Delaware limited liability company and investment advisor, is deemed to beneficially own 2,969,150 shares of our common stock (which includes 1,500,700 shares of common stock receivable upon conversion of 346,662 shares of our Series 2 Preferred, 112,500 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon exercise of warrants, and 141,250 shares of common stock that may be acquired upon conversion of $1 million principal amount of our 7% Convertible Senior Subordinated Debentures due 2011. This number of shares includes the shares Mr. McCarthy personally owns, as well as the shares he controls as manager and sole member of others within the Jayhawk Group. As manager and the principal owner of the entities within the Jayhawk Group, Mr. McCarthy has sole voting and dispositive power over the common stock and Series 2 Preferred beneficially owned by the Jayhawk Group. Mr. McCarthy disclaims beneficial ownership of all of our securities held by the Jayhawk Group other than his personal holdings of 161,000 shares of common stock held through a revocable trust and 103,030 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the 23,800 shares of Series 2 Preferred held by him. Mr. McCarthy’s address is 5410 West 61st Place, Suite 100, Mission, Kansas 66205.
 
11

 
(8) Paul J. Denby advised LSB that he has voting and dispositive power over 1,270,400 shares of common stock. This number of shares includes 53,400 shares beneficially owned by Mr. Denby’s spouse over which Mr. Denby shares voting and dispositive power. Mr. Denby’s address is 4613 Redwood Court, Irving, Texas 75038.

(9) James W. Sight has sole voting and dispositive power over these shares of our common stock. Mr. Sight's address is 2100 Brookwood, Mission, Kansas 66208.


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information obtained from our directors and executive officers and our directors and executive officers as a group as to their beneficial ownership of our voting common stock, voting preferred stock and Series 2 Preferred, as of January 23, 2007.

 
 
Common Stock
 
 
Voting Preferred Stock
 
 
Series 2 Preferred
 
 
Beneficial Owner
 
 
Number of Shares(1)
 
 
Percentage of Class+
 
 
Number of Shares(1)
 
 
Percentage of Class+
 
 
Number of Shares(1)
 
 
Percentage of Class+
 

Raymond B. Ackerman
21,000(2) 
 
*
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
--
 

Robert C. Brown, M.D.
 
208,329(3) 
 
 
1.2%
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
--
 

Charles A. Burtch
 
15,000(4) 
 
 
*
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
--
 

Grant J. Donovan
 
42,951(5) 
 
 
*
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
6,988  
 
 
1.4%
 

N. Allen Ford
 
 1,432(6) 
 
 
*
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
100  
 
 
*
 

Barry H. Golsen
 
3,169,462(7) 
 
 
17.8%
 
 
1,016,000(15)
 
 
99.5%
 
49,550(16)
 
 
9.9%
 

Jack E. Golsen
 
3,869,143(8) 
 
 
21.4%
 
 
1,020,000(15)
 
 
99.9%
 
 
49,550(16)
 
 
9.9%
 

David R. Goss
 
263,641(9) 
 
 
1.6%
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
--
 

Bernard G. Ille
 
45,000(10)
 
 
*
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
--
 

Donald W. Munson
 
16,432(11)
 
 
*
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
100  
 
 
*
 

Horace G. Rhodes
 
20,000(12)
 
 
*
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
--
 

Tony M. Shelby
 
305,421(13)
 
 
1.8%
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
3,500  
 
 
*
 

John A. Shelley
 
  --
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
 
--
 
Directors and Executive Officers as a group number (15 persons)
 
5,731,885(14)
 
 
30.6%
 
 
1,020,000
 
 
99.9%
 
 
60,238  
 
 
12.1%
 

* Less than 1%.

+ See footnote + of the table under “Principal Stockholders.”

(1) The above information, with respect to beneficial ownership, is based on information furnished by each director or officer, contained in filings made with the SEC, or contained in our records.

(2) This amount includes the following shares over which Mr. Ackerman shares voting and dispositive power: (a) 2,000 shares held by Mr. Ackerman's trust, and (b) 4,000 shares held by the trust of Mr. Ackerman's wife. The remaining 15,000 shares of common stock included herein are shares that Mr. Ackerman may acquire pursuant to currently exercisable non-qualified stock options granted to him by the Company.
 
 
12

 
(3) The amount shown includes 15,000 shares of common stock that Dr. Brown may acquire pursuant to currently exercisable non-qualified stock options granted to him by the Company. The shares, with respect to which Dr. Brown shares the voting and dispositive power, consists of 122,516 shares owned by Dr. Brown's wife, 50,727 shares owned by Robert C. Brown, M.D., Inc., a corporation wholly-owned by Dr. Brown, and 20,086 shares held by the Robert C. Brown M.D., Inc. Employee Profit Sharing Plan, of which Dr. Brown serves as the trustee. The amount shown does not include shares owned directly, or through trusts, by the children of Dr. Brown and the son-in-law of Dr. Brown, all of which Dr. Brown disclaims beneficial ownership.

(4) Mr. Burtch has sole voting and dispositive power over these shares, which may be acquired by Mr. Burtch pursuant to currently exercisable non-qualified stock options granted to him by the Company.

(5) The amount includes (a) 42,451 shares of common stock, including 30,251 shares that Mr. Donovan has the right to acquire upon conversion of 6,988 shares of Series 2 Preferred, over which Mr. Donovan has the sole voting and dispositive power, and (b) 500 shares owned of record by Mr. Donovan’s wife, voting and dispositive power of which are shared by Mr. Donovan and his wife.

(6) Mr. Ford and his wife share voting and dispositive over these shares, which include (a) 1,000 shares of common stock and (b) 432 shares of common stock that Mr. Ford has the right to acquire upon conversion of 100 shares of Series 2 Preferred.

(7) See footnotes (3), (4), (5), and (6) of the table under ”Principal Stockholders” for a description of the amount and nature of the shares beneficially owned by B. Golsen, including shares he has the right to acquire within 60 days.

(8) See footnotes (3), (5), and (6) of the table under ”Principal Stockholders” for a description of the amount and nature of the shares beneficially owned by J. Golsen, including the shares he has the right to acquire within 60 days.

(9) Mr. Goss has the sole voting and dispositive power over these shares, which include 115,000 shares that Mr. Goss has the right to acquire within 60 days pursuant to options granted under our stock option plans.

(10) The amount includes (a) 15,000 shares that Mr. Ille may purchase pursuant to currently exercisable non-qualified stock options, over which Mr. Ille has the sole voting and dispositive power, and (b) 30,000 shares owned of record by Mr. Ille's wife, voting and dispositive power of which are shared by Mr. Ille and his wife.

(11) Mr. Munson has the sole voting and dispositive power over these shares, which include (a) 432 shares of common stock that Mr. Munson has the right to acquire upon conversion of 100 shares of Series 2 Preferred and (b) 15,000 shares that Mr. Munson may purchase pursuant to currently exercisable non-qualified stock options.

(12) Mr. Rhodes has sole voting and dispositive power over these shares, which include 15,000 shares that may be acquired by Mr. Rhodes pursuant to currently exercisable non-qualified stock options granted to him by the Company.

(13) Mr. Shelby has the sole voting and dispositive power over these shares, which include 115,000 shares that Mr. Shelby has the right to acquire within 60 days pursuant to options granted under our stock option plans and 15,151 shares that Mr. Shelby has the right to acquire upon conversion of 3,500 shares of Series 2 Preferred.

(14) The amount shown includes 778,294 shares of common stock that executive officers and directors have the right to acquire within 60 days under our stock option plans, and 1,181,434 shares of
 
13

 
common stock that executive officers, directors, or entities controlled by our executive officers and directors, have the right to acquire within 60 days under other rights, warrants and convertible securities.

(15) Includes: (a) 12,000 shares of Series B Preferred owned of record by SBL; (b) 4,000 of Series B Preferred owned of record by GPC, over which SBL, J. Golsen, Sylvia H. Golsen, B. Golsen, S. Golsen, and L. Rappaport share the voting and dispositive power, and (c) 1,000,000 shares of Series D Preferred owned of record by SBL. Also includes as to J. Golsen, 4,000 shares of Series B Preferred owned of record by a trust, of which J. Golsen is the sole trustee, over which he has the sole voting and dispositive power. See Footnote (3) of the table under “Principal Stockholders” for a discussion of SBL and GPC.

(16) Includes 9,050 shares of Series 2 Preferred owned of record by SBL and 40,500 shares of Series 2 Preferred owned by GPC. See footnote (3) of the table under “Principal Stockholders” for a discussion of SBL and GPC.
 
OTHER MATTERS

Our Board of Directors does not intend to present to the meeting any matters not referred to in the form of proxy. If any proposal not set forth in this proxy statement should be presented for action at the meeting, and is a matter which should come before the meeting, it is intended that the shares represented by proxies will be voted with respect to such matters in accordance with the judgment of the persons voting them.

Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm ("Ernst & Young"), has served as our auditors for more than five years, including the fiscal year most recently completed.  We expect that one or more representatives of Ernst & Young will attend the special meeting and will be available to respond to appropriate questions or make a statement should they desire to do so.
 
INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE

The SEC allows us to “incorporate by reference” information into this proxy statement. This means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to another document we have filed separately with the SEC . The information incorporated by reference is considered a part of this proxy statement, except for any information superseded by information contained in this proxy statement.

This proxy statement incorporates by reference the following information:

1.  
Items 7, 7A, 8 and 9 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed March 31, 2006 (the “2005 Form 10-K”); and

2.  
Items 1, 2 and 3 of Part I of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, filed with the SEC on November 8, 2006 (the “September 30, 2006 Form 10-Q”).

A copy of our 2005 Form 10-K and September 30, 2006 Form 10-Q are being delivered to you with this proxy material. Any information incorporated by reference in this proxy statement will be deemed to be modified or superseded for purposes of this proxy statement to the extent that a statement contained in this proxy statement or any other subsequently filed document that is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement modifies or supersedes the statement. Any statement so modified or superseded will not be deemed, except as so modified or superseded, to constitute a part of this proxy statement.
 
14

 
AVAILABLE INFORMATION

We are currently subject to the information requirements of the Exchange Act and in accordance therewith file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC relating to our business, financial statements and other matters.

Copies of such reports, proxy statements and other information may be copied (at prescribed rates) at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at Room 1024, 100 Fifth Street, N.E., Judiciary Plaza, Washington, D.C. 20549. For further information concerning the SEC’s public reference room, you may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Some of this information may also be accessed on the World Wide Web through the SEC’s Internet address at http://www.sec.gov.

In addition, the documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement are available from us upon request. We will provide to you a copy of any and all of the information that is incorporated by reference in this proxy statement (not including exhibits to the information unless those exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference into this proxy statement), without charge, upon written or oral request. You should make any request for documents by February 26, 2007, to ensure timely delivery of the documents.

Requests for documents relating to us should be directed to:

Director - Communications Department
c/o LSB Industries, Inc.
16 South Pennsylvania Avenue
Post Office Box 754
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73101
 

Whether or not you plan to attend, you are urged to complete, date and sign the enclosed proxy card and return it in the accompanying envelope or follow the instructions provided for voting by phone or via the Internet, if applicable. Prompt response will greatly facilitate arrangements for the meeting, and your cooperation is appreciated. Stockholders who attend the meeting may vote their shares personally even though they have sent in their proxy cards or voted by phone or the Internet.



By Order of the Board of Directors,
David M. Shear
Secretary and General Counsel
February 6, 2007

 
15

Exhibit "A"

Certificate of Amendment
of the
Certificate of Designations of the
$3.25 Convertible Exchangeable Class C Preferred Stock, Series 2

_________________________________________

To: Secretary of State
State of Delaware

LSB Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), for the purpose of amending its Restated Certificate of Incorporation by amending the Certificate of Designations of the $3.25 Convertible Exchangeable Class C Stock, Series 2 (the "Certificate of Designations"), as provided by Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, hereby certifies:

1.  The Certificate of Designations was originally filed with the Secretary of State on May 21, 1993.

2.  The second paragraph of Section 3(a) of the Certificate of Designations is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:

No dividends or other distributions, other than dividends payable solely in shares of Common Stock or other Junior Stock or distributions of Rights, as defined below, shall be declared, paid or set apart for payment on, and, except as otherwise provided below in this Section 3(a), no purchase, redemption or other acquisition shall be made by the Corporation of, any shares of Common Stock or other Junior Stock (or any payment made in respect of or made available to a sinking fund for the redemption of any shares of Junior Stock) unless and until all cumulative and unpaid dividends on the Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock shall have been paid or declared and set apart for payment through the last dividend Due Date. Notwithstanding the foregoing, during the period that cumulative and unpaid dividends exists on the Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock, the Corporation may purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire in any manner or for any reason any shares of Common Stock or other Junior Stock (including, but not limited to, pursuant to existing or future stock option plans or otherwise) for a period of five years from the completion of an exchange or tender offer by the Corporation occurring after January 1, 2007, for at least 180,000 outstanding shares of the Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock.

3.  The first sentence of the first paragraph of Section 7(b) of the Certificate of Designations is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:

If, and only so long as, at least 140,000 shares of Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock are issued and outstanding (excluding shares held in treasury), whenever dividends on the Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock shall be in arrears and unpaid, whether or not declared, in an amount equal to at least six quarterly dividends (whether or not consecutive) (i) the number of members of the Board shall be increased by two, effective as of the time of election of such directors as hereinafter provided, and (ii) the holders of the Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock (voting separately as a class with all other affected classes or series of the Parity Stock upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable) will have the exclusive right to vote for and elect such two additional directors of the Corporation at any meeting of
 

 
stockholders of the Corporation at which directors are to be elected held during the period that any dividends on the Convertible Exchangeable Preferred Stock remain in arrears.

4.  No other provisions of the Certificate of Designations or the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company are amended or changed by this Amendment.

5.  At a meeting of the Board of Directors held on the 9th day of January 2007, a resolution was duly adopted setting forth the foregoing proposed amendment declaring such amendment to be advisable and setting a Special Meeting of Stockholders of the Company for consideration thereof.

6.  Thereafter, pursuant to said resolution of its Board of Directors, the Special Meeting of Stockholders of the Company was duly called and held on March 6, 2007, at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by statute and the Certificate of Designations were voted in favor of such amendment.

Such Amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned does cause this Certificate to be signed by its President and attested by its Secretary this ___ day of _________ 2007.

LSB Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Attest:

__________________    ______________________
David M. Shear, Secretary   Jack E. Golsen, Chief Executive Officer
 
 

 
 
 
                           
VOTE BY TELEPHONE
 
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.                 Have your proxy card available when you call our Toll-Free number
c/o UMB Bank, n. a.                   1-888-693-8683 using a touch-tone phone and follow the simple
P.O. Box 419064       instructions to record your vote.
Kansas City, MO 54141      
VOTE BY INTERNET
 
Have your proxy card available when you access the website
 www.cesvote.com and follow the simple instructions to record your vote.
 
VOTE BY MAIL
 
                                Please mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the 
                                postage-paid envelope provided or return it to: Proxy Tabulator,
                               P.O. Box 535450, Pittsburgh PA 15253
 

Vote by Telephone
 
Vote by Internet
 
Vote by Mail
Call Toll-Free using a
 
Access the Website and
 
Return your proxy
touch-tone telephone:
 
cast your vote:
 
in the postage-paid
1-888-693-8683
 
www.cesvote.com
 
envelope provided

Vote 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
If you vote by telephone or over the Internet, do not mail your proxy card.
Telephone and Internet votes must be received by 6:00 a.m. EST
on March 6, 2007 to be included in the final tabulation.
 
                        
If voting by mail, this proxy card must be signed and dated below.
Please fold and detach card at perforation before mailing.  
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 
JACK E. GOLSEN and TONY M. SHELBY, or either of them, with the power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent the undersigned at the Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the principal offices of LSB Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) located at 16 South Pennsylvania Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73107, on March 6, 2007, at 11:00 a.m., local time, and any adjournments thereof, on the matters printed on the reverse side. In such capacity, they or either or any of them, may vote (a) all shares of the Company’s Common Stock, Convertible Noncumulative Preferred Stock, 12% Series B Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, and Series D 6% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, all of which vote as single class, and (b) all shares of the Company’s $3.25 Convertible Exchangeable Class C Preferred Stock, Series 2 (the “Series 2 Preferred”) which votes separately as a class, all as held by the undersigned, as designated on the reverse side. The undersigned is hereby revoking any proxy previously given in respect of the shares represented by this Proxy. Please sign exactly as your name appears below, date and return this Proxy Card promptly, using the self-addressed, prepaid envelope enclosed for your convenience.
 
Date: __________________ 2007
 
                                     
_______________________
  Signature
 
_______________________
      Signature
 

Persons signing in a fiduciary capacity should indicate that fact and give their full title. If a corporation, please sign in the full corporate name by the president or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in the partnership name by an authorized person. If joint tenants, both persons should sign.
 

 
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
 
If you do not vote by telephone or Internet, please sign and date this proxy card and return it promptly in the enclosed postage-paid envelope, or otherwise to Proxy Tabulator, P.O. Box 535450, Pittsburgh, PA 15253, so your shares will be represented at the Special Meeting. If you vote by telephone or Internet, it is not necessary to return this proxy card.
 
Please fold and detach card at perforation before mailing.
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC. PROXY
 
If this Proxy is signed and returned with no direction indicating how the shares represented by this Proxy are to be voted, this Proxy will be voted FOR Proposal 1 below.
 
The Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR" the Proposal.
 
1.  PROPOSAL - TO AMEND THE CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATIONS OF THE SERIES 2 PREFERRED TO:
(a) Permit the Company and its subsidiaries during the period that cumulative accrued and unpaid dividends exist on the Series 2 Preferred to purchase, redeem, or otherwise acquire shares of our common stock for a period of five years from the date of completion of an exchange or tender offer by the Company occurring after January 1, 2007, for at least 180,000 shares of the outstanding Series 2 Preferred; and

(b)  Provide that the current right of the holders of Series 2 Preferred to elect two directors to the Company’s board of directors when at least six quarterly dividends on the Series 2 Preferred are in arrears and unpaid may be exercised only if and so long as at least 140,000 shares of Series 2 Preferred are issued and outstanding (excluding shares held by the Company or its subsidiaries).
o FOR   o AGAINST  o ABSTAIN

2.  TO TRANSACT SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE SPECIAL MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT THEREOF.

(CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE)

 
Report of Independent Acct. Firm

Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors and Stockholders of LSB Industries, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of LSB Industries, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of LSB Industries, Inc. at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective March 31, 2004 the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.

ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
                        
 
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
March 30, 2006


Exhibit 99.2 2006 3rd qtr 10Q
LSB Industries, Inc.

Form 10-Q (9-30-2006)

 
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q
 
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
 
For the quarterly period ended             September 30, 2006        
   
 
OR
   
[  ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
   
 
For the transition period from   _____________to______________
   
 
Commission file number                  1-7677      
   
                LSB Industries, Inc.            
Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter
 
           Delaware            
     73-1015226      
State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization
I.R.S. Employer Identification No.
 
        16 South Pennsylvania Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma                     73107       
             Address of principal executive offices                            (Zip Code)
 
               (405) 235-4546                  
  Registrant's telephone number, including area code
 
          __             None            _        ___          
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if  changed since last report.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES   X     NO ___

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer [ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). [  ] Yes   [X]  No
 
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's voting common stock, as of October 31, 2006 was 14,525,618 shares, excluding 3,447,754 shares held as treasury stock.
 
FORM 10-Q OF LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.

 
 
Page
     
 
PART I - Financial Information
 
     
Item 1.
3
     
Item 2.
34
     
Item 3.
51
     
Item 4.
52
   
53
     
 
PART II - Other Information
 
     
Item 1.
55
     
Item 1A.
56
     
Item 2.
57
     
Item 3.
58
     
Item 4.
59
     
Item 5.
59
     
Item 6.
60

 
2

PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Information at September 30, 2006 is unaudited)

ASSETS
September 30,
2006
 
December 31,
2005
 
(In Thousands)
Current assets:
             
               
Cash and cash equivalents
$
480
   
$
4,653
 
               
Restricted cash
 
564
     
177
 
               
Accounts receivable, net
 
75,051
     
49,437
 
               
Inventories:
             
   Finished goods
 
19,697
     
23,342
 
   Work in process
 
3,027
     
2,601
 
   Raw materials
 
18,784
     
11,328
 
  Total inventories
 
41,508
     
37,271
 
               
Supplies, prepaid items and other:
             
Prepaid insurance
 
991
     
3,453
 
Precious metals
 
7,793
     
4,987
 
Other
 
4,482
     
4,432
 
  Total supplies, prepaid items and other
 
13,266
     
12,872
 
               
Total current assets
 
130,869
     
104,410
 
               
Property, plant and equipment, net
 
73,001
     
74,082
 
               
Other assets:
             
Debt issuance and other debt-related costs, net
 
3,096
     
2,573
 
Investment in affiliate
 
3,279
     
3,368
 
Goodwill
 
1,724
     
1,724
 
Other, net
 
2,430
     
2,806
 
Total other assets
 
10,529
     
10,471
 
               
 
$
214,399
   
$
188,963
 

(Continued on following page)
3

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
(Information at September 30, 2006 is unaudited)
 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
September 30,
2006
 
December 31,
2005
 
(In Thousands)
Current liabilities:
             
Accounts payable
$
36,074
   
$
31,687
 
Short-term financing and drafts payable
 
364
     
2,790
 
Accrued liabilities
 
30,075
     
23,219
 
Current portion of long-term debt
 
5,641
     
3,348
 
Total current liabilities
 
72,154
     
61,044
 
               
Long-term debt
 
107,104
     
108,776
 
               
Other noncurrent liabilities
 
5,592
     
5,687
 
               
Contingencies (Note 11)
             
               
Stockholders' equity:
             
Series B 12% cumulative, convertible preferred stock, $100 par value; 20,000 shares issued and outstanding; aggregate liquidation preference of $3,597,800 ($3,440,000 in 2005)
 
 
2,000
     
 
2,000
 
Series 2 $3.25 convertible, exchangeable Class C preferred stock, $50 stated value; 621,950 shares issued (623,550 in 2005); aggregate liquidation preference of $45,139,908 ($43,963,406 in 2005)
 
 
31,097
     
 
31,177
 
Series D 6% cumulative, convertible Class C preferred stock, no par value; 1,000,000 shares issued; aggregate liquidation preference of $1,240,000 in 2006 and 2005
 
 
1,000
     
 
1,000
 
Common stock, $.10 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 17,945,758 shares issued (17,082,265 in 2005)
 
1,795
     
1,708
 
Capital in excess of par value
 
62,263
     
57,547
 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
 
(773
)
   
(990
)
Accumulated deficit
 
(49,400
)
   
(61,738
)
   
47,982
     
30,704
 
Less treasury stock at cost:
             
Series 2 Preferred; 18,300 shares
 
797
     
797
 
Common stock; 3,447,754 shares (3,321,607 in 2005)
 
17,636
     
16,451
 
Total stockholders' equity
 
29,549
     
13,456
 
               
 
$
214,399
   
$
188,963
 

(See accompanying notes)
 
4

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
Nine and Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005
 
 
Nine Months
 
Three Months
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Net sales
$
367,864
   
$
301,370
   
$
123,847
   
$
105,181
 
Cost of sales
 
299,787
     
251,368
     
100,280
     
87,448
 
Gross profit
 
68,077
     
50,002
     
23,567
     
17,733
 
                               
Selling, general and administrative expense
 
46,028
     
39,078
     
16,735
     
13,181
 
Provisions for losses on accounts receivable
 
599
     
728
     
317
     
472
 
Other expense
 
706
     
148
     
15
     
(29
)
Other income
 
(231
)
   
(2,243
)
   
(83
)
   
(688
)
Operating income
 
20,975
     
12,291
     
6,583
     
4,797
 
                               
Interest expense
 
8,957
     
8,627
     
3,196
     
2,799
 
Non-operating other income, net
 
(565
)
   
(1,525
)
   
(68
)
   
(67
)
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes and equity in earnings of affiliate
 
 
12,583
     
 
5,189
     
 
3,455
     
 
2,065
 
Provision for income taxes
 
408
     
84
     
208
     
84
 
Equity in earnings of affiliate
 
(611
)
   
(554
)
   
(206
)
   
(187
)
Income from continuing operations
 
12,786
     
5,659
     
3,453
     
2,168
 
                               
Net loss from discontinued operations (Note 11)
 
244
     
512
     
113
     
512
 
Net income
 
12,542
     
5,147
     
3,340
     
1,656
 
                               
Preferred stock dividend requirements
 
(1,655
)
   
(1,671
)
   
(551
)
   
(554
)
Net income applicable to common stock
$
10,887
   
$
3,476
   
$
2,789
   
$
1,102
 
                               
Weighted average common shares:
                             
Basic
 
13,839
     
13,571
     
13,979
     
13,751
 
                               
Diluted
 
21,058
     
15,147
     
21,346
     
15,984
 
                               
Income per common share:
                             
Basic:
                             
    Income from continuing operations
$
.81
   
$
.30
   
$
.21
   
$
.12
 
Net loss from discontinued operations
 
(.02
)
   
(.04
)
   
(.01
)
   
(.04
)
Net income
$
.79
   
$
.26
   
$
.20
   
$
.08
 
                               
Diluted:
                             
    Income from continuing operations
$
.65
   
$
.26
   
$
.18
   
$
.10
 
Net loss from discontinued operations
 
(.01
)
   
(.03
)
   
(.01
)
   
(.03
)
Net income
$
.64
   
$
.23
   
$
.17
   
$
.07
 

(See accompanying notes)
5

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

 
2006
 
2005
 
(In Thousands)
Cash flows from continuing operating activities:
             
Net income
$
12,542
   
$
5,147
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by continuing operating activities:
             
Net loss from discontinued operations
 
244
     
512
 
Gains on property insurance recoveries
 
-
     
(1,170
)
Gains on sales of property and equipment
 
(10
)
   
(759
)
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
 
8,428
     
7,947
 
Amortization
 
911
     
918
 
Provisions for losses on accounts receivables
 
599
     
728
 
Realization and reversal of losses on inventory
 
(905
)
   
(993
)
Provisions for impairment on long-lived assets
 
286
     
75
 
Provision for losses on firm sales commitments
 
500
     
-
 
Equity in earnings of affiliate
 
(611
)
   
(554
)
Distributions received from affiliate
 
700
     
313
 
Change in fair value of interest rate caps
 
11
     
197
 
Cash provided (used) by changes in assets and liabilities:
             
Accounts receivable
 
(25,858
)
   
(19,233
)
Inventories
 
(3,153
)
   
(604
)
Other supplies and prepaid items
 
(395
)
   
2,578
 
Accounts payable
 
4,387
     
994
 
Customer deposits
 
1,894
     
(2,104
)
Deferred rent expense
 
(550
)
   
4,462
 
Other accrued and noncurrent liabilities
 
4,866
     
3,499
 
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities
 
3,886
     
1,953
 
               
Cash flows from continuing investing activities:
             
Capital expenditures
 
(8,036
)
   
(11,305
)
Proceeds from property insurance recoveries
 
-
     
2,438
 
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
 
120
     
1,343
 
Proceeds from (deposits of) restricted cash
 
(387
)
   
158
 
Other assets
 
(221
)
   
(437
)
Net cash used by continuing investing activities
 
(8,524
)
   
(7,803
)
               

(Continued on following page)
6

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

 
2006
 
2005
 
(In Thousands)
Cash flows from continuing financing activities:
             
Proceeds from revolving debt facilities
$
343,633
   
$
268,848
 
Payments on revolving debt facilities
 
(341,462
)
   
(260,018
)
Proceeds from 7% convertible debentures, net of fees
 
16,520
     
-
 
Acquisition of 10-3/4 % Senior Unsecured Notes
 
(13,300
)
   
-
 
Proceeds from other long-term debt
 
-
     
1,764
 
Payments on other long-term debt
 
(2,153
)
   
(2,391
)
Proceeds from short-term financing and drafts payable
 
610
     
1,610
 
Payments on short-term financing and drafts payable
 
(3,036
)
   
(4,484
)
Acquisition of non-redeemable preferred stock
 
(95
)
   
(451
)
Dividends paid on preferred stock
 
(204
)
   
-
 
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
 
131
     
235
 
Net cash provided by continuing financing activities
 
644
     
5,113
 
Cash flows of discontinued operations:
             
Operating cash flows
 
(179
)
   
-
 
Net decrease in cash
 
(4,173
)
   
(737
)
               
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
 
4,653
     
1,020
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
480
   
$
283
 
               
Supplemental cash flow information:
             
               
Noncash investing and financing activities:
             
Debt issuance costs
$
1,480
   
$
-
 
Long-term and other debt issued for property, plant and equipment
$
19
   
$
110
 
Debt issuance costs associated with 7% convertible debentures converted to common stock
$
275
   
$
-
 
7% convertible debentures converted to common stock
$
3,750
   
$
-
 
 
(See accompanying notes)
7

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1: Basis of Presentation The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of LSB Industries, Inc. (the "Company", "We", "Us" or "Our") and its subsidiaries. We are a manufacturing, marketing and engineering company which is primarily engaged, through our wholly-owned subsidiary ThermaClime, Inc. (“ThermaClime”) and its subsidiaries, in the manufacture and sale of a broad range of geothermal and water source heat pumps and air handling products (the "Climate Control Business") and the manufacture and sale of chemical products (the "Chemical Business"). See Note 19-Segment Information. The Company and ThermaClime are holding companies with no significant assets or operations other than our investments in our subsidiaries. Entities that are 20% to 50% owned and for which we have significant influence are accounted for on the equity method. See Note 7-Investment in Affiliate. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company as of September 30, 2006 and for the nine and three month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 include all adjustments and accruals, consisting only of normal, recurring accrual adjustments which are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods. These interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted in this Form 10-Q pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in connection with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

Based on internal reviews of our accounting policies and financial presentation, we made a classification change relating to the financing portion of prepaid insurance in our 2005 condensed consolidated statement of cash flows. The effect of this classification change was an increase to net cash provided by changes in accounts payable and continuing operating activities of $2,902,000 and an increase in proceeds from short-term financing and drafts payable of $1,306,000 and an increase in payments on short-term financing and drafts payable of $4,208,000 resulting in a decrease in net cash provided by continuing financing activities of $2,902,000. This classification change did not affect our condensed consolidated statements of income for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2005.

Note 2: Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncement In September 2006, the FASB completed a project to clarify guidance on the accounting for planned major maintenance activities (“Turnarounds”). The FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. AUG AIR-1 (“FSP”) which eliminates the accrue-in-advance method of accounting for Turnarounds. In addition, the adoption of the provisions in the FSP is to be considered a change in accounting principle with retrospective application as described in SFAS 154-Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, if practical. The FSP becomes effective for us on January 1, 2007. We currently are using the accrue-in-advance method for Turnarounds that is eliminated under the FSP. There are three other acceptable accounting methods for Turnarounds that we may adopt. Currently, we have not made the decision on which method we will adopt. As a result, we are unable to determine the impact the FSP will have on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

 
8

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
Note 3: Accounts Receivable
 
September 30,
2006
 
December 31,
2005
 
(In Thousands)
Trade receivables
$
76,178
   
$
51,096
 
Other
 
1,340
     
1,021
 
   
77,518
     
52,117
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts
 
(2,467
)
   
(2,680
)
 
$
75,051
   
$
49,437
 

Note 4: Inventories Inventories are priced at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined using the first-in, first-out basis. Finished goods and work-in-process inventories include material, labor, and manufacturing overhead costs. At September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, inventory reserves for certain slow-moving inventory items (primarily Climate Control products) were $905,000 and $1,028,000, respectively. In addition, inventory reserves for certain nitrogen-based inventories produced by our Chemical Business were $285,000 and $1,395,000 at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, because cost exceeded the net realizable value.

Changes in our inventory reserves are as follows:
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
(In Thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
$
2,423
   
$
2,185
   
$
1,556
   
$
1,269
 
Add: Provision for (realization and reversal of) losses
 
(905
)
   
(993
)
   
(366
)
   
(77
)
Deduct: Write-offs/disposals
 
(328
)
   
-
     
-
     
-
 
Balance at end of period
$
1,190
   
$
1,192
   
$
1,190
   
$
1,192
 
 
The realization and reversal of losses are reductions to cost of sales in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income.

Note 5: Precious Metals Precious metals are used as a catalyst in the Chemical Business manufacturing process. Precious metals are carried at cost, with cost being determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) basis. As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, precious metals were $7,793,000 and $4,987,000, respectively, and are included in supplies, prepaid items and other in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. Because some of the catalyst consumed in the production process cannot be readily recovered and the amount and timing of recoveries are not predictable, we follow the practice of expensing precious metals as they are consumed. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, the amounts expensed for precious metals were approximately $4,039,000 and $2,615,000, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, the amounts expensed were approximately $1,370,000 and $903,000, respectively. These precious metals expenses are included in cost of sales in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income.

9

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Occasionally, during major maintenance or capital projects, we may be able to perform procedures to recover precious metals (previously expensed) which have accumulated over time within the manufacturing equipment. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, we recognized recoveries of precious metals at historical FIFO costs of approximately $2,392,000 and $1,178,000, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2006, we recognized recoveries of precious metals at historical FIFO costs of approximately $1,267,000 (none for the same period in 2005). These recoveries are reductions to cost of sales.

Note 6: Debt Issuance and Other Debt-Related Costs, net Debt issuance and other debt-related costs are amortized over the term of the associated debt instrument except for the cost of interest rate caps (discussed below). Such costs, which are included in supplies, prepaid items and other and other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, were $3,096,000 and $2,583,000, net of accumulated amortization, as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.

As discussed in (C) of Note 10-Long-Term Debt, during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we incurred debt issuance costs of $1,480,000 relating to our 7% Convertible Senior Subordinated Debentures due 2011 (the “Debentures”). During September 2006, a portion of the Debentures were converted into our common stock. As a result of the conversions, approximately $275,000 of the debt issuance costs, net of amortization, associated with the Debentures were charged against capital in excess of par value.

In 2005, we purchased two interest rate cap contracts for a cost of $590,000. These contracts are free-standing derivatives and are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No.133. See discussion in Note 14-Derivatives, Hedges and Financial Instruments.

Note 7: Investment in Affiliate Cepolk Holding, Inc. (“CHI”), a subsidiary of the Company, is a limited partner and has a 50% equity interest in Cepolk Limited Partnership (“Partnership”) which is accounted for on the equity method. The Partnership owns an energy savings project located at the Ft. Polk Army base in Louisiana (“Project”). At September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, our investment was $3,279,000 and $3,368,000, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, distributions received from this affiliate were $700,000 and $313,000, respectively. The Partnership and general partner to the Partnership is indebted to Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Lender”), as construction and term lender to the Project, in the current amount of approximately $6,500,000 (“Loan”), with a term extending to December 2010. CHI has pledged its limited partnership interest in the Partnership to the Lender as part of the Lender’s collateral securing all obligations under the Loan. This guarantee and pledge is limited to CHI’s limited partnership interest and does not expose CHI or the Company to liability in excess of CHI’s limited partnership interest. No liability has been established for this pledge since it was entered into prior to FASB Interpretation No. 45. CHI has no recourse provisions or available collateral that would enable CHI to recover its partnership interest should the Lender be required to perform under this pledge. 
 
10

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
Summarized financial information of the Partnership is as follows (in thousands):
 
September 30,
 
December 31,
 
2006
 
2005
Current assets
$
2,336
 
$
2,610
Noncurrent assets
$
7,573
 
$
8,327
Current liabilities
$
1,789
 
$
1,699
Noncurrent liabilities
$
4,935
 
$
5,872
Partners’ capital
$
3,185
 
$
3,366
 
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
Total revenues
$
3,324
 
$
3,270
 
$
1,108
 
$
1,090
Operating income
$
1,654
 
$
1,644
 
$
553
 
$
548
Net income
$
1,219
 
$
1,108
 
$
412
 
$
375

Note 8: Product Warranty Our Climate Control Business sells equipment that has an expected life, under normal circumstances and use that extends over several years. As such, we provide warranties after equipment shipment/start-up covering defects in materials and workmanship.

Generally, the base warranty coverage for most of the manufactured equipment in the Climate Control Business is limited to eighteen months from the date of shipment or twelve months from the date of start-up, whichever is shorter, and to ninety days for spare parts. The warranty provides that most equipment is required to be returned to the factory or its authorized representative and the warranty is limited to the repair and replacement of the defective product, with a maximum warranty of the refund of the purchase price. Furthermore, companies within the Climate Control Business generally disclaim and exclude warranties related to merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose and disclaim and exclude any liability for consequential or incidental damages. In some cases, the customer may purchase or a specific product may be sold with an extended warranty. The above discussion is generally applicable to such extended warranties, but variations do occur depending upon specific contractual obligations, to certain system components, and local laws.

Our accounting policy and methodology for warranty arrangements is to periodically measure and recognize the expense and liability for such warranty obligations using a percentage of net sales, based upon our historical warranty costs. It is possible that future warranty costs could exceed our estimates.
 
11

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Changes in our product warranty obligation are as follows:
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
(In Thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
$
2,302
   
$
1,999
   
$
2,931
   
$
2,247
 
Add: Charged to costs and expenses
 
2,085
     
1,484
     
869
     
493
 
Deduct: Costs incurred
 
(1,005
)
   
(1,048
)
   
(418
)
   
(305
)
Balance at end of period
$
3,382
   
$
2,435
   
$
3,382
   
$
2,435
 
 
Note 9: Accrued Liabilities
 
September 30,
2006
 
December 31,
2005
 
(In Thousands)
Accrued payroll and benefits
$
5,158
   
$
3,519
 
Deferred rent expense
 
4,559
     
5,109
 
Customer deposits
 
3,821
     
1,927
 
Accrued commissions
 
2,197
     
1,406
 
Accrued property and franchise taxes
 
2,055
     
1,902
 
Current portion of accrued warranty
 
1,786
     
1,282
 
Current portion of plant turnaround costs
 
1,720
     
1,249
 
Accrued insurance
 
1,384
     
1,426
 
Accrued precious metals costs
 
1,348
     
680
 
Current portion of accrued environmental costs
 
1,168
     
459
 
Other
 
4,879
     
4,260
 
 
$
30,075
   
$
23,219
 
 
Note 10: Long-Term Debt 
 
September 30,
2006
 
December 31,
2005
 
(In Thousands)
Senior Secured Loan due 2009 (A)
$
50,000
   
$
50,000
 
Working Capital Revolver Loan due 2009 - ThermaClime (B)
 
34,239
     
31,975
 
7% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 (C)
 
14,250
     
-
 
10-3/4% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2007 (C)
 
-
     
13,300
 
Other, with interest at rates of 2% to 11.76%, most of which is secured by machinery, equipment and real estate
 
14,256
     
16,849
 
   
112,745
     
112,124
 
Less current portion of long-term debt
 
5,641
     
3,348
 
Long-term debt due after one year
$
107,104
   
$
108,776
 
 
12

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
(A)  In September 2004, ThermaClime and certain of its subsidiaries (the “Borrowers”) completed a $50 million term loan (“Senior Secured Loan”) with a certain lender (the “Lender”). The Senior Secured Loan is to be repaid as follows:
  
·    quarterly interest payments which began September 30, 2004;
·  
 quarterly principal payments of $312,500 beginning September 30, 2007;
·  
 a final payment of the remaining outstanding principal of $47.5 million and accrued interest on September 16, 2009.

The Senior Secured Loan accrues interest at the applicable LIBOR rate, as defined, plus an applicable LIBOR margin, as defined or, at the election of the Borrowers, the alternative base rate, as defined, plus an applicable base rate margin, as defined, with the annual interest rate not to exceed 11% or 11.5% depending on the leverage ratio. At September 30, 2006, the effective interest rate was 11%.

The Borrowers are subject to numerous covenants under the Senior Secured Loan agreement including, but not limited to, limitation on the incurrence of certain additional indebtedness and liens, limitations on mergers, acquisitions, dissolution and sale of assets, and limitations on declaration of dividends and distributions to us, all with certain exceptions. The Borrowers are also subject to a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, measured quarterly on a trailing twelve-month basis. The Borrowers’ fixed charge coverage ratio exceeded the required ratio for the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2006. The maturity date of the Senior Secured Loan can be accelerated by the Lender upon the occurrence of a continuing event of default, as defined.
 
The Senior Secured Loan agreement includes a prepayment fee equal to 1% of the principal amount should the Borrowers elect to prepay any principal amount prior to September 15, 2007 but is eliminated thereafter.

The Senior Secured Loan is secured by (a) a first lien on (i) certain real property and equipment located at the El Dorado, Arkansas plant (“El Dorado Facility”), (ii) certain real property and equipment located at the Cherokee, Alabama plant (“Cherokee Facility”), (iii) certain equipment of the Climate Control Business, and (iv) the equity stock of certain of ThermaClime’s subsidiaries, and (b) a second lien on the assets upon which ThermaClime’s Working Capital Revolver lender has a first lien. The carrying value of the pledged assets is approximately $189 million at September 30, 2006. The Senior Secured Loan is guaranteed by the Company and is also secured with the stock of ThermaClime.

(B)   In April 2001, ThermaClime and its subsidiaries ("the Borrowers") entered into a $50 million revolving credit facility (the "Working Capital Revolver Loan") that provides for advances based on specified percentages of eligible accounts receivable and inventories for ThermaClime, and its subsidiaries. Effective February 28, 2005, the Working Capital Revolver Loan was amended which, among other things, extended the maturity date to April 2009 and removed a subjective acceleration clause. The Working Capital Revolver Loan, as amended, accrues interest at a base rate (generally equivalent to the prime rate) plus .75% or LIBOR plus 2%. The interest rate at September 30, 2006 was 6.89% considering the impact of the interest rate cap contracts discussed below. Interest is paid
 
13

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

monthly. The facility provides for up to $8.5 million of letters of credit. All letters of credit outstanding reduce availability under the facility. Amounts available for additional borrowing under the Working Capital Revolver Loan at September 30, 2006 were $12 million. Under the Working Capital Revolver Loan, as amended, the lender also requires the borrowers to pay a letter of credit fee equal to 1% per annum of the undrawn amount of all outstanding letters of credit, an unused line fee equal to .5% per annum for the excess amount available under the facility not drawn and various other audit, appraisal and valuation charges.

In March 2005, we purchased two interest rate cap contracts which set a maximum three-month LIBOR base rate of 4.59% on $30 million and mature on March 29, 2009. See Note 14 - Derivatives, Hedges and Financial Instruments.
 
The lender may, upon an event of default, as defined, terminate the Working Capital Revolver Loan and make the balance outstanding due and payable in full. The WorkingCapital Revolver Loan is secured by receivables, inventories and intangibles of all the ThermaClime entities other than DSN Corporation and El Dorado Nitric Company and its subsidiaries ("EDNC") and a second lien on certain real property and equipment. EDNC is neither a borrower nor guarantor of the Working Capital Revolver Loan. The carrying value of the pledged assets is approximately $172 million at September 30, 2006.

A prepayment premium equal to 2% of the facility is due to the lender should the borrowers elect to prepay the facility prior to April 13, 2007. This premium is reduced to 1% during the following twelve-month period and is eliminated thereafter.

The Working Capital Revolver Loan, as amended, requires ThermaClime and its Climate Control Business to maintain quarterly earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), as defined, on a trailing twelve-month basis. ThermaClime and its Climate Control Business's EBITDA for the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2006 were in excess of the required amounts. The trailing twelve-month EBITDA requirement for the remainder of 2006 is $16.4 million for ThermaClime and $10 million for the Climate Control Business. The Working Capital Revolver Loan also requires ThermaClime to achieve an annual fixed charge coverage ratio and limits capital expenditures, as defined, measured quarterly on a trailing twelve-month basis. The Working Capital Revolver Loan also contains covenants that, among other things, limit the Borrowers' (which does not include the Company) ability to: (a) incur additional indebtedness, (b) incur liens, (c) make restricted payments or loans to affiliates who are not Borrowers, (d) engage in mergers, consolidations or other forms of recapitalization, (e) dispose assets, or (f) repurchase ThermaClime's 10-3/4% Senior Unsecured Notes (the “Notes”). The Working Capital Revolver Loan also requires all collections on accounts receivable be made through a bank account in the name of the lender or their agent.

In connection with the redemption of the Notes in July 2006 as discussed in (C) below, the lenders of the Working Capital Revolver Loan and the Senior Secured Loan provided consents to permit ThermaClime to borrow $6.4 million from LSB for the purpose of redeeming the Notes.
 
14

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
   (C)   On March 14, 2006, we completed a private placement to six qualified institutional buyers pursuant to which we sold $18 million aggregate principal amount of our 7% Convertible Senior Subordinated Debentures due 2011 (the “Debentures”). We used a placement agent for this transaction which we paid a fee of 6% of the aggregate gross proceeds received in the financing. Other offering expenses in connection with the transaction were $.4 million. As a result, the total debt issuance costs related to this transaction were $1.5 million. Interest on the Debentures is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 1 and September 1 of each year which began September 1, 2006.
 
Jayhawk Capital Management, L.L.C. and its affiliates (together “Jayhawk”) purchased $1 million principal amount of the Debentures. Prior to the closing of the private placement, Jayhawk owned beneficially approximately 17.4% of our common stock (of which 10% relates to shares issuable upon conversion of our preferred stock at a conversion price of $11.55 per share and exercise of an outstanding warrant for up to 112,500 shares at an exercise price of $3.49 per share).
 
The Debentures are convertible by holders, in whole or in part, into shares of the Company’s common stock prior to their maturity on March 1, 2011. Holders of debentures electing to convert all or any portion of a debenture will obtain the following conversion rate per $1,000 principal amount of debentures during the dates indicated:
 
 
 Shares Per $1,000
Principal Amount
 
 Conversion
Price Per Share
 
       
September 1, 2006 - February 28, 2007
     141.25
 
$
7.08
March 1, 2007 - August 31, 2007
141.04
 
 $
7.09
September 1, 2007 - February 29, 2008
137.27
 
 $
7.28
March 1, 2008 - August 31, 2008
133.32
 
 $
7.50
September 1, 2008 - February 28, 2009
129.23
 
 $
7.74
March 1, 2009 - March 1, 2011
125.00
 
 $
8.00
 
The conversion rates will be adjusted to reflect dividends, stock splits, issuances of rights to purchase shares of common stock and other events, as set forth in the Indenture.
 
During September 2006, $3.75 million of the Debentures were converted into 529,688 shares of our common stock at the conversion price of $7.08 per share. One of the conversions related to an offer received from a holder and accepted by us which included additional consideration of $87,500 to be paid to the holder. Because the offer met the criteria within SFAS 84-Induced Conversions of Convertible Debt, the additional consideration was expensed.

If a designated event (as defined in the Debenture) occurs at any time prior to the maturity of the Debentures, the holders may require us to repurchase the Debentures, in whole or in part, for cash on a repurchase date specified by us that is not less than 45 days after the date of mailing of our notice of the designated event. We will repurchase the Debentures at a cash price equal to 101% of the principal amount to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest in accordance with the terms of the Debentures.
 
15

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

The Debentures may be redeemed by us beginning March 1, 2009, under certain conditions. The redemption price is payable at our option in cash or, subject to certain conditions, in shares of our common stock. At maturity, we may elect to pay up to one-half of the principal amount of the Debentures, plus accrued and unpaid interest due thereon, in shares of our common stock under certain conditions; provided that payment of a portion of the principal amount in common stock is subject to shareholder approval. If we pay the redemption price on any portion of the Debentures at maturity on our common stock, our common stock is to be valued for those purposes at 95% of the weighted average of the closing sales price of our common stock for the 20 consecutive trading days ending on the 5th trading day prior to the applicable redemption date or maturity date.

We have used substantially all of the net proceeds from the sale of the Debentures for the redemption or purchase of our higher interest rate debt or debt of our subsidiaries, including the Notes. The remaining balance was used for general corporate purposes. Approximately $13.6 million of the net proceeds have been used to purchase or redeem all of the outstanding Notes held by unrelated third parties and Jayhawk at ThermaClime’s carrying value (which includes $1 million that was held by Jayhawk) including accrued interest of $.3 million. Approximately $6.95 million of the Notes held by LSB remain outstanding for ThermaClime.

Note 11: Contingencies We accrue for contingent losses when such losses are probable and reasonably estimable. In addition, we recognize contingent gains when such gains are realizable.

Following is a summary of certain legal matters and other contingencies involving the Company:

A.
Environmental Matters

Our operations are subject to numerous environmental laws (“Environmental Laws”) and to other federal, state and local laws regarding health and safety matters (“Health Laws”). In particular, the manufacture and distribution of chemical products are activities which entail environmental risks and impose obligations under the Environmental Laws and the Health Laws, many of which provide for certain performance obligations, substantial fines and criminal sanctions for violations. There can be no assurance that material costs or liabilities will not be incurred by us in complying with such laws or in paying fines or penalties for violation of such laws. The Environmental Laws and Health Laws and enforcement policies thereunder relating to our Chemical Business have in the past resulted, and could in the future result, in compliance expenses, cleanup costs, penalties or other liabilities relating to the handling, manufacture, use, emission, discharge or disposal of pollutants or other substances at or from our facilities or the use or disposal of certain of its chemical products. Historically, significant expenditures have been incurred by subsidiaries within our Chemical Business in order to comply with the Environmental Laws and Health Laws and are reasonably expected to be incurred in the future.

FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations requires recognition of a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. We have a legal obligation to monitor certain discharge water outlets at our Chemical Business facilities should we discontinue the operations of a facility. We do not believe that the annual costs of the required monitoring
 
16

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
activities would be significant and as we currently have no plans to discontinue the use of the facilities and the remaining life of the facilities is indeterminable, an asset retirement liability has not been recognized. Currently, there is insufficient information to estimate the fair value of the asset retirement obligations. However, we will continue to review these obligations and record a liability when a reasonable estimate of the fair value can be made.

The Company has certain facilities that contain asbestos insulation around certain piping and heated surfaces. The asbestos insulation is in adequate condition to prevent leakage and can remain in place as long as the facility is operated or remains assembled. The Company plans to maintain the facilities in an adequate condition to prevent leakage through its standard repair and maintenance activities. The Company has not recorded a liability relating to the asbestos insulation, as management believes that it is not possible to reasonably estimate a settlement date for asbestos insulation removal because the facilities have an indeterminate life.
 
1.  
Discharge Water Matters
 
The El Dorado, Arkansas facility (the “El Dorado Facility”) within our Chemical Business generates process wastewater. The process water discharge and storm-water run off are governed by a state National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) water discharge permit issued by the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (“ADEQ”), which permit is to be renewed every five years. The ADEQ issued to the El Dorado Facility a new revised NPDES water discharge permit in 2004, and the El Dorado Facility has until June 2007 to meet the compliance deadline for the more restrictive limits under the 2004 NPDES permit. In order to meet the El Dorado Facility’s June 2007 limits, the El Dorado Facility is considering three options to discharge its wastewater:

·  
reducing its effluent levels in order to discharge its wastewater at the El Dorado Facility;
·  
direct discharge into the sewer discharge system of the City of El Dorado, Arkansas (the “City”), subject to the El Dorado Facility obtaining a sewer discharge permit from the City; and/or
·  
utilization of a joint pipeline to be built by the City.

In order to discharge its wastewater from the El Dorado Facility and to more consistently meet the June 2007 permit limits for metals and dissolved minerals, the El Dorado Facility conducted a study of the adjacent stream to determine whether a permit modification of the metals and dissolved mineral permit limits is appropriate. On September 22, 2006, the Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission (“Commission”) approved the results of the study that showed that the proposed permit modification is appropriate. This effectiveness of the permit modification, as approved by the Commission, is subject to a 60 day public comment period and public hearing. If the El Dorado Facility receives a permit modification from the ADEQ and is able to discharge its wastewater directly, then we estimate the remaining capital expenditures to meet the requirements of the NPDES permit to be minimal. Accordingly, discharge of wastewater directly from the El Dorado Facility appears at this time to be the most likely wastewater discharge option, although there is no assurance that this option will ultimately be made available to the El Dorado Facility.

17

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
The El Dorado Facility has submitted an application to the City which, if approved, would allow the El Dorado Facility to tie-in to the City’s sanitary sewer system and become an industrial customer of the City. This option would require a capital expenditure for the tie-in plus a monthly sewer charge based upon the total gallons discharged. While a feasible option, this option has been put in abeyance while the El Dorado Facility concentrates on reducing its effluent levels to allow continued discharge to the existing location.

For the past several years, the El Dorado Facility has planned to utilize a joint pipeline to be built by the City to discharge its wastewater. The City has approved the construction of a joint pipeline, but the City’s construction of the pipeline is subject to the City receiving a permit from the ADEQ. The ADEQ has not issued the necessary permit to discharge wastewater into the pipeline and, as a result, this has caused a delay of unknown duration in construction of the pipeline. During March 2006, the ADEQ issued a draft permit to the City for the joint pipeline, and a public hearing occurred in May 2006 to receive public comments. It is expected that a final permit will be issued in the near future. However, a group of residents opposed to the pipeline could appeal the final permit when issued. The pipeline will not be available by the June 1, 2007 deadline. The ADEQ has stated to the El Dorado Facility that since the direct discharge of wastewater appears promising, the ADEQ has declined to allow an extension of compliance deadlines that would coincide with a delayed construction schedule for the City’s planned joint wastewater pipeline.

The estimated remaining capital expenditures to meet the requirements of the NPDES permit ranges from minimal to $3.3 million, depending on which option that the El Dorado Facility must utilize. If the El Dorado Facility participates in the City’s joint pipeline, the El Dorado Facility will be obligated to pay an additional $2 million for its pro-rata portion of the City’s pipeline engineering and construction costs.

In addition, the El Dorado Facility has entered into a consent administrative order (“CAO”) that recognizes the presence of nitrate contamination in the shallow groundwater at the El Dorado Facility. A new CAO is being completed to address the shallow groundwater contamination, which will include an evaluation of the current conditions and remediation based upon a risk assessment. The final remedy for shallow groundwater contamination, should any remediation be required, will be selected pursuant to the new CAO and based upon the risk assessment. There are no known users of this shallow groundwater in the area, and preliminary risk assessments have not identified any public health risk that would require remediation. As an interim measure, the El Dorado Facility has installed two recovery wells to recycle ground water and to recover nitrates. The cost of any additional remediation that may be required will be determined based on the results of the investigation and risk assessment and cannot currently be reasonably estimated. Therefore, no liability has been established at September 30, 2006.
 
2.  
Air Matters
 
Under the terms of a consent administrative order relating to air matters (“AirCAO”), which became effective in February 2004, resolving certain air regulatory alleged violations associated with the El Dorado Facility’s sulfuric acid plant and certain other alleged air emission violations, the El Dorado Facility is required to implement additional air emission controls at the El Dorado Facility no later than six years from the effective date of the AirCAO. The ultimate cost of any

18

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
technology changes required cannot presently be determined but is believed to cost between $1.5 million to $4 million of capital expenditures, depending on the technology changes as may be required.
 
3.  
Other Environmental Matters
 
In April 2002, Slurry Explosive Corporation (“Slurry”), later renamed Chemex I Corp., a subsidiary within our Chemical Business, entered into a Consent Administrative Order (“Slurry Consent Order”) with the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (“KDHE”), regarding Slurry’s Hallowell, Kansas manufacturing facility (“Hallowell Facility”). The Slurry Consent Order addressed the release of contaminants from the facility into the soils and groundwater and surface water at the Hallowell Facility. There are no known users of the groundwater in the area. The adjacent strip pit is used for fishing. Under the terms of the Slurry Consent Order, Slurry is required to, among other things, submit an environmental assessment work plan to the KDHE for review and approval, and agree with the KDHE as to any required corrective actions to be performed at the Hallowell Facility.

In connection with the sale of substantially all of the operating assets of Slurry and Universal Tech Corporation (“UTeC”) in December 2002, which was accounted for as discontinued operations, both subsidiaries within our Chemical Business, UTeC leased the Hallowell Facility to the buyer under a triple net long-term lease agreement. However, Slurry retained the obligation to be responsible for, and perform the activities under, the Slurry Consent Order. In addition, certain of our subsidiaries agreed to indemnify the buyer of such assets for these environmental matters. The successor (“Chevron”) of the prior owner of the Hallowell Facility has agreed, within certain limitations, to pay one-half of the costs of certain interim remediation measures at the site approved by the KDHE, subject to reallocation.

As a result of meetings with the KDHE, we recorded a provision of $512,000 for our share of these additional estimated costs for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2005. In addition, during the first nine months of 2006, additional costs were estimated due to requirements by the KDHE to further investigate and delineate the site. As a result, for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2006, we recorded provisions of $194,000 and $113,000, respectively, for our share of these estimated costs. The above provisions are classified as discontinued operations (in accordance with SFAS 144) in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income (there are no income tax benefits related to this expense). At September 30, 2006, our liability (which is included in other current and noncurrent accrued liabilities) in connection with this remediation matter is $1,485,000 and our receivable (which is included in accounts receivable and other assets) from Chevron for one-half of these costs is $743,000. These amounts are not discounted to their present value. It is reasonably possible that a change in estimate of our liability and receivable will occur in the near term. It is expected that the soil remediation will be completed during the first half of 2007 followed by up to five years of ground water monitoring.
 
19

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
B. Other Pending, Threatened or Settled Litigation
 
1.  
 Climate Control Business
 
Trison Construction, Inc. (“Trison”), a subsidiary within our Climate Control Business, entered into a contract with Johnson Controls, Inc. (“JCI”) to design, remove and install selected components on existing air conditioning systems at a project in Oklahoma (“Project”). JCI alleged that Trison’s work on the Project contained certain defects and purported inadequacies and claimed that Trison defaulted on its contract with JCI. JCI made demand under Trison’s performance bond seeking recovery of costs alleged to have been required to correct and complete Trison’s work under its contract with JCI. In June 2004, JCI filed for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association claiming damages in the amount of approximately $1.7 million. Trison denied that its work was defective or otherwise incomplete.

On January 16, 2006, the arbitrator issued his Interim Award finding in favor of Trison and against JCI on all allegations. See Note 21 - Subsequent Events discussing the issuance of the arbitrator’s Final Award confirming and reaffirming his January 16, 2006, interim award in favor of Trison, and awarding to Trison approximately $1.2 million in attorneys’ fees and costs incurred to defend against JCI’s claims. We have spent approximately $1.4 million in attorneys’ fees and expenses in connection with this arbitration as of September 30, 2006.

There was no accounting recognition for the interim or final award as of September 30, 2006. When the final award is realized, it will be recorded in the financial statements at that time.
 
2.  
 Chemical Business
 
In 2005, El Dorado Chemical Company (“EDC”), a subsidiary in the Company’s Chemical Business, sued the general partners of Dresser Rand Company, Ingersoll-Rand Company and DR Holdings Corp., and an individual employee of Dresser Rand Company, in connection with its faulty repair of a hot gas expander of EDC’s DMW nitric acid plant. As a result of defects in the repair, on October 8, 2004, the hot gas expander failed, leading to a fire at the DMW plant. The lawsuit is styled El Dorado Chemical Company, et al v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (NJ), et al. in the Union County Arkansas Circuit Court.

The complaint alleged that negligent repair led to the hot gas expander failure and resulting fire, and claimed $5 million for property damage to the DMW plant and $5 million in lost profits while the DMW plant was down for repair. The Defendants claimed that a limitation of liability clause in a purchase order of Dresser Rand Company, the general partnership, applies, effectively limiting damages to the amount of the purchase order, approximately $.1 million. The complaint named only the general partners and an individual supervisory employee of Dresser Rand Company.

See Note 21-Subsequent Events for discussing the jury verdict awarding EDC approximately $9.8 million in damages. There has been no accounting recognition for the jury award as of September 30, 2006. When the jury award is realized, it will be recorded in the financial statements at that time.
 
20

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
Cherokee Nitrogen, Inc. (“Cherokee”), a subsidiary within our Chemical Business, has been sued for an undisclosed amount of monies based on a claim that Cherokee breached an agreement by overcharging the plaintiff, Nelson Brothers, LLC, (“Nelson”) for ammonium nitrate as a result of inflated prices for natural gas used to manufacture the ammonium nitrate. The suit is Nelson Brothers, LLC v. Cherokee Nitrogen v. Dynegy Marketing, and is pending in Alabama state court in Colbert County. Cherokee has filed a third-party complaint against Dynegy and a subsidiary (“Dynegy”) asserting that Dynegy was the party responsible for fraudulently causing artificial natural gas prices to exist and seeking an undisclosed amount from Dynegy, including any amounts which may be recovered by Nelson. Dynegy has filed a counterclaim against Cherokee for $600,000 allegedly owed on account, which has been recorded by Cherokee. Although there is no assurance, counsel for Cherokee has advised us that, at this time, they believe that Cherokee will recover monies from Dynegy and the likelihood of Dynegy recovering from Cherokee is remote. Our counsel also has advised us that they believe that the likelihood of Nelson recovering monies from Cherokee over and above any monies which may be recovered from Dynegy by Cherokee is remote.

Cherokee has filed suit against Meecorp Capital Markets, LLC (“Meecorp”) and Lending Solutions, Inc. in Alabama State Court, in Etowah County, Alabama, for recovery of actual damages of $140,000 plus punitive damages, relating to a loan transaction. Meecorp counterclaimed for the balance of an alleged commitment fee of $100,000, an alleged equity kicker of $200,000 and $3,420,000 for loss of opportunity. Cherokee is vigorously pursuing this matter, and counsel for Cherokee has advised that they believe there is a substantial likelihood Cherokee will recover from the defendants and that the likelihood of Meecorp recovering from Cherokee is remote.
 
3.  
Other

Zeller Pension Plan

In February 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized management to proceed with the sale of the automotive products business, since the automotive products business was no longer a “core business” of the Company. In May 2000, the Company sold substantially all of its assets in its automotive products business. After the authorization by the board, but prior to the sale, the automotive products business purchased the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Zeller Corporation (“Zeller”). The liabilities of Zeller assumed by the automotive products business included Zeller’s pension plan, which is not a multi-employer pension plan. In June 2003, the principal owner (“Owner”) of the buyer of the automotive products business was contacted by a representative of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) regarding the plan. The Owner was informed by the PBGC of a possible under-funding of the plan and a possible takeover of the plan by the PBGC. The PBGC previously advised the Company that the PBGC may consider the Company to be potentially liable for the under-funding of the Zeller Plan in the event that the plan is taken over by the PBGC and alleged that the under-funding is approximately $600,000. However, the Company’s ERISA counsel was recently verbally informed by a PBGC representative that he would probably recommend no further action by the PBGC with respect to the Company’s involvement with the Zeller plan. There are no assurances that such recommendation, will be made or, if made, will be accepted by the PBGC.

21

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
MEI Drafts

On July 18, 2006, Masinexportimport Foreign Trade Company (“MEI”) gave notice to the Company and a subsidiary of the Company alleging that it was owed $1,533,000 in connection with MEI’s attempted collection of 10 non-negotiable bank drafts payable to the order of MEI. The bank drafts were issued by Aerobit Ltd. (“Aerobit”), a non-U.S. company and at the time of issuance of the bank drafts was a subsidiary of the Company. Each of the bank drafts has a face value of $153,300, for an aggregate principal face value of $1,533,000. The bank drafts were issued in September 1992, and had a maturity date of December 31, 2001. Each bank draft was endorsed by LSB Corp., which, at the time of endorsement, was a subsidiary of the Company.
 
On October 22, 1990, a settlement agreement between the Company, its subsidiary Summit Machine Tool Manufacturing Corp. (“Summit”), and MEI (the “Settlement Agreement”), was entered into, and in connection with the Settlement Agreement, Summit issued to MEI obligations totaling $1,533,000. On May 16, 1992, the Settlement Agreement was rescinded by the Company, Summit, and MEI at the request of MEI, and replaced with an agreement purportedly substantially similar to the Settlement Agreement between MEI and Aerobit, pursuant to which MEI agreed to replace the original $1,533,000 of Summit’s obligations with Aerobit bank drafts totaling $1,533,000, endorsed by LSB Corp. Aerobit previously advised us that MEI has not fulfilled the requirements under the bank drafts for payment thereof.
 
All of the Company’s ownership interest in LSB Corp. was sold to an unrelated third party in September 2002. Further, all of the Company’s interest in Aerobit was sold to a separate unrelated third party, in a transaction completed on or before November 2002. Accordingly, neither Aerobit, which was the issuer of the bank drafts, nor LSB Corp., which was the endorser of the bank drafts, are currently subsidiaries of the Company.
 
Neither the Company nor any of its currently owned subsidiaries are makers or endorsers of the bank drafts in question. The Company is currently reviewing the facts relating to MEI’s alleged claim. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in connection with this matter. No liability has been established relating to these bank drafts as of September 30, 2006.

Business Interruption and Property Insurance Claims

Beginning in October 2004 and continuing into June 2005, the Chemical Business’ results were adversely affected as a result of the loss of production due to a mechanical failure of one of the four nitric acid plants at the El Dorado, Arkansas plant. The plant was restored to normal production in June 2005. We filed a property damage insurance claim for $3.8 million, net of a $1 million deductible. We also filed a business interruption claim for $5 million, net of the forty-five day waiting period. As of September 30, 2006, the insurers have paid claims totaling $5.5 million. The insurers are contesting our remaining claims.

On March 23, 2006, we filed a lawsuit in Federal Court in the Western District of Arkansas, El Dorado Division, to collect amounts from our insurers to which we believe we are owed under the policy. The total amount claimed under the lawsuit which includes business interruption and property claims, is approximately $2.5 million, plus attorney fees. Additional recoveries, if any, will be recognized when realized.
 
22

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Securities and Exchange Commission Inquiry

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) made an informal inquiry to the Company by letter dated August 15, 2006. The inquiry relates to the restatement of the Company’s financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2004 and accounting matters relating to the change in inventory accounting from LIFO to FIFO. The Company responded to the inquiry on September 19, 2006. At the present time the informal inquiry is not a pending proceeding nor does it rise to the level of a government investigation. Until further communication and clarification with the SEC, if any, the Company is unable to determine (a) if the inquiry will ever rise to the level of an investigation or proceeding, or (b) the materiality to the Company’s financial position with respect to enforcement actions, if any, the SEC may have available to it.

We are also involved in various other claims and legal actions which in the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, if determined adversely to us, would not have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
 
23

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 12: Stockholders' Equity The table below provides detail (in thousands) of activity in the stockholders' equity accounts for the nine months ended September 30, 2006:
 
 

Common Stock
Shares
 
Non-
Redeemable Preferred
Stock
 

Common
Stock Par Value
 

Capital in Excess of
Par Value
 
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss
 


Accumulated Deficit
 

Treasury Stock-Preferred
 

Treasury Stock-Common
 



Total
Balance at December 31, 2005
 
17,082
$
34,177
$
1,708
$
57,547
 
$
(990
)
$
(61,738
)
$
(797
)
$
(16,451
)
$
13,456
 
                                                 
Net income
                         
12,542
               
12,542
 
Amortization of cash flow hedge (Note 14)
                   

217
                     

217
 
Total comprehensive income
                                           
12,759
 
Dividends paid on preferred stock (Note 15)
                         

(204

)
             

(204

)
Conversion of Debentures to common stock (Notes 6 and 10)
 

530
     

53
 

3,431
                           

3,484
 
Exercise of stock options
 
326
     
33
 
1,283
                     
(1,185
)
 
131
 
Acquisition of 1,600 shares of non-redeemable preferred stock
     

(80

)
   
(15 

                         

(95

)
Conversion of 188 shares of redeemable preferred stock to common stock
 


8
     


1
 


17
                           


18
 
Balance at September 30, 2006
(1)
17,946
$
34,097
$
1,795
$
62,263
 
$
(773
)
$
(49,400
)
$
(797
)
$
(17,636
)
$
29,549
 
 
 (1)      
Includes 3,447,754 shares of the Company's common stock held in treasury. The outstanding shares of the Company's common stock at September 30, 2006 not held in treasury were 14,498,004.
 
 
24

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 13: Stock Options As of September 30, 2006, we have several Qualified and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plans. Effective January 1, 2006, we account for those plans in accordance with SFAS 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123(R)”). During 2005, we accounted for those plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25 (“APB 25”), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. Under APB 25, stock-based compensation cost was not usually reflected in our results of operations, as the majority of all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. No options were granted during the first nine months of 2006 and 2005.
 
On June 19, 2006, the Executive Compensation and Option Committee of our Board of Directors granted 450,000 shares of non-qualified stock options to certain employees, which are subject to shareholders’ approval. The option price of these options is $8.01 per share which is based on the market value of our common stock at the date of authorization. These options will vest over a ten-year period at a rate of 10% per year and expire on September 16, 2016 with certain restrictions. Under SFAS 123(R), the fair value for these options will be estimated, using an option pricing model, as of the date we receive shareholders’ approval which is currently expected to be no later than our 2007 annual shareholders’ meeting. In general, a ratable portion of the total estimated fair value relating to these options will be charged to selling, general, and administrative expense (“SG&A”) at the date of shareholders’ approval and the remaining balance amortized to SG&A over the options’ remaining vesting period.
 
The following table illustrates the effect on net income applicable to common stock and net income per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R) to stock-based compensation during 2005. The fair value for the underlying options was estimated at their respective date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model.

For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the qualified and non-qualified stock options is amortized to expense over the options' vesting period.

 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2005
 
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Net income applicable to common stock, as reported
$
3,476
   
$
1,102
 
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards
 
(165
)
   
(58
)
Pro forma net income applicable to common stock
$
3,311
   
$
1,044
 
               
Net income per common share:
             
Basic - as reported
$
.26
   
$
.08
 
Basic - pro forma
$
.24
   
$
.08
 
               
Diluted - as reported
$
.23
   
$
.07
 
Diluted - pro forma
$
.22
   
$
.07
 
 
Note 14: Derivatives, Hedges and Financial Instruments We account for derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." SFAS No.133 requires the recognition of derivatives in the balance sheet and the measurement of these instruments at fair value. Changes in fair value of derivatives are recorded
 
25

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
in results of operations unless the normal purchase or sale exceptions apply or hedge accounting is elected.

In 1997, we entered into an interest rate forward agreement to effectively fix the interest rate of a long-term lease commitment (not for trading purposes). In 1999, we executed a long-term lease agreement and terminated the forward agreement at a net cost of $2.8 million. We historically accounted for this cash flow hedge under the deferral method (as an adjustment of the initial term lease rentals). Upon adoption of SFAS No. 133 in 2001, the remaining deferred cost amount was reclassified from other assets to accumulated other comprehensive loss and is being amortized to operations over the term of the lease arrangement. At September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, accumulated other comprehensive loss consisted of the remaining deferred cost of $773,000 and $990,000, respectively. The amount amortized to operations was $217,000 and $72,000 for each of the nine and three-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. There were no income tax benefits related to these expenses.

In March 2005, we purchased two interest rate cap contracts for a cost of $590,000. These contracts are free-standing derivatives and are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis in accordance with SFAS No.133. At September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the market values of these contracts were $418,000 and $429,000, respectively, and are included in other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The changes in the value of these contracts are included in interest expense.

Raw materials for use in our manufacturing processes include copper used by our Climate Control Business and natural gas used by our Chemical Business. As part of our raw material price risk management, we periodically enter into exchange-traded futures contracts for these materials, which contracts are generally accounted for on a mark-to-market basis in accordance with SFAS No. 133. At September 30, 2006, the unrealized loss on the futures contracts was $179,000 and is included in accrued liabilities and at December 31, 2005, the unrealized gain was $367,000 and is included in supplies, prepaid items and other in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The unrealized gains and losses are classified as current assets and liabilities, respectively, as the term of these contracts are for periods of twelve months or less. For the nine and three months ended September 30, 2006, we incurred losses of $992,000 and $233,000, respectively, on such contracts. For the nine and three months ended September 30, 2005, we recognized gains of $631,000 and $303,000, respectively. These losses and gains are included in cost of sales.

Note 15: Net Income Per Share Net income applicable to common stock is computed by adjusting net income by the amount of preferred stock dividend requirements. Basic net income per common share is based upon net income applicable to common stock and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted income per share is based on net income applicable to common stock plus preferred stock dividend requirements on preferred stock assumed to be converted, if dilutive, and interest expense including amortization of debt issuance costs, net of income taxes, on convertible debt assumed to be converted, if dilutive, and the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding and the assumed conversion of dilutive convertible securities outstanding.
 
See (C) of Note 10-Long-Term Debt concerning the sale of $18 million of convertible debt during March 2006 and the conversion of $3.75 million of convertible debt into our common stock during September 2006.

26

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
During each of the three quarters of 2006, our Board of Directors declared and we paid nominal dividends on certain outstanding series of our preferred stock as follows: $.10 per share on our outstanding Series 2 $3.25 Convertible Exchangeable Class C preferred stock (“Series 2 Preferred”), $.37 per share on our outstanding Series B 12% Cumulative Convertible preferred stock (“Series B Preferred”), and $.31 per share on our outstanding Non-Cumulative Redeemable preferred stock. These dividends were not for the full amount of the required quarterly dividends pursuant to the terms of all of our outstanding series of preferred stock. As of September 30, 2006, the aggregate amount of unpaid dividends in arrears on our Series 2 Preferred, Series B Preferred and Series D 6% Cumulative, Convertible Class C preferred stock (“Series D Preferred”) totaled approximately $14 million, $1.6 million and $.2 million, respectively. See Note 21-Subsequent Event discussing the conversion of a portion of the Series 2 Preferred into common stock.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted income per share:

(Dollars In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 

Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
Numerator:
                             
    Net income
$
12,542
   
$
5,147
   
$
3,340
   
$
1,656
 
    Preferred stock dividend requirements
 
(1,655
)
   
(1,671
)
   
(551
)
   
(554
)
Numerator for basic net income per share - net income applicable to common stock
 

10,887
     

3,476
     

2,789
     

1,102
 
Preferred stock dividend requirements on preferred stock assumed to be converted, if dilutive
 

1,655
     

-
     

551
     

60
 
Interest expense including amortization of debt issuance costs, net of income taxes, on convertible debt assumed to be converted
 

858
     

-
     

373
     

-
 
Numerator for diluted net income per share
$
13,400
   
$
3,476
   
$
3,713
   
$
1,162
 
                               
Denominator:
                             
Denominator for basic net income per share - weighted - average shares
 
13,838,989
     
13,571,009
     
13,979,342
     
13,751,463
 
Effect of dilutive securities:
                             
Convertible preferred stock
 
3,567,700
     
289,573
     
3,564,832
     
954,266
 
Convertible notes payable
 
2,317,041
     
4,000
     
2,443,122
     
4,000
 
Stock options
 
1,272,219
     
1,227,700
     
1,289,617
     
1,219,930
 
Warrants
 
62,029
     
54,436
     
69,053
     
54,773
 
Dilutive potential common shares
 
7,218,989
     
1,575,709
     
7,366,624
     
2,232,969
 
Denominator for diluted net income per share - adjusted weighted - average shares and assumed conversions
 

21,057,978
     

15,146,718
     

21,345,966
     

15,984,432
 
                               
Basic net income per share
$
.79
   
$
.26
   
$
.20
   
$
.08
 
                               
Diluted net income per share
$
.64
   
$
.23
   
$
.17
   
$
.07
 
 
27

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
The following shares of securities were not included in the computation of diluted net income per share as their effect would have been antidilutive.
 
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
Convertible preferred stock
 
-
 
2,857,731
 
-
 
2,616,765

Note 16: Income Taxes At December 31, 2005, we had regular-tax net operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards of $67 million ($47.8 million alternative minimum tax NOLs). Due to NOL carryforwards, no provisions for income taxes were necessary for the nine and three-month periods of 2006 and 2005 except for federal alternative minimum taxes and state income taxes.

Note 17: Business Interruption and Property Insurance Recoveries Beginning in October 2004 and continuing into June 2005, the Chemical Business’ results were adversely affected as a result of the loss of production due to a mechanical failure of one of the four nitric acid plants at the El Dorado Facility. The plant was restored to normal production in June 2005. We filed insurance claims for recovery of business interruption and property losses related to this incident. For the nine and three months ended September 30, 2006, we realized insurance recoveries of $882,000 and $287,000, respectively, relating to the business interruption claim which is recorded as a reduction to cost of sales. For the nine and three months ended September 30, 2005, we recognized insurance recoveries totaling $1,170,000 and $647,000, respectively, of which most were under our replacement cost insurance policy relating to this property damage claim which are recorded as other income. As discussed in Note 11-Contingencies, we have instituted litigation for the balance of our business interruption and property insurance claims relating to this incident. Additional recoveries, if any, related to this incident will be recognized when realized.

28

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 18: Other Expense, Other Income and Non-Operating Other Income, net 

 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
(In Thousands)
Other expense:
                             
Litigation settlement (1)
$
300
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
 
Impairments on long-lived assets (2)
 
286
     
75
     
-
     
-
 
Other miscellaneous expense (3)
 
120
     
73
     
15
     
(29
)
Total other expense
$
706
   
$
148
   
$
15
   
$
(29
)
                               
Other income:
                             
Rental income
$
25
   
$
130
   
$
2
   
$
28
 
Gains on sales of property and equipment
 
10
     
759
     
3
     
15
 
Property insurance recoveries in excess of losses incurred (Note 17)
 
-
     
1,170
     
-
     
647
 
Other (3)
 
196
     
184
     
78
     
(2
)
Total other income
$
231
   
$
2,243
   
$
83
   
$
688
 
                               
Non-operating other income, net:
                             
Interest income
$
464
   
$
102
   
$
68
   
$
36
 
Net proceeds from certain key individual life insurance policies (4)
 
-
     
1,162
     
-
     
-
 
Gains on sales of certain current assets, primarily precious metals
 
-
     
237
     
-
     
17
 
Miscellaneous income (3)
 
174
     
109
     
25
     
38
 
Miscellaneous expense (3)
 
(73
)
   
(85
)
   
(25
)
   
(24
)
Total non-operating other income, net
$
565
   
$
1,525
   
$
68
   
$
67
 

(1)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, a litigation settlement was reached relating to an asserted financing fee.
(2)
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we recognized impairments of $286,000 which includes $230,000 relating to the wastewater projects as discussed in Note 11 - Contingencies. Due to the significant wastewater quality progress at the El Dorado Facility and meetings with the ADEQ, certain capitalized costs relating to the wastewater projects are no longer believed to be recoverable.
(3)
Amounts represent numerous unrelated transactions, none of which are individually significant requiring separate disclosure.
(4)
Amounts relate to the recognition in net proceeds from certain key individual life insurance policies due to the untimely death of one of our executives in January 2005.

29

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 19: Segment Information

 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
(In Thousands)
Net sales:
                             
Climate Control
$
159,893
   
$
117,002
   
$
61,089
   
$
41,507
 
Chemical
 
201,461
     
179,703
     
60,764
     
62,179
 
Other
 
6,510
     
4,665
     
1,994
     
1,495
 
 
$
367,864
   
$
301,370
   
$
123,847
   
$
105,181
 
                               
Gross profit: (1)
                             
Climate Control
$
47,634
   
$
35,191
   
$
17,554
   
$
13,205
 
Chemical (2)
 
18,198
     
13,217
     
5,334
     
4,002
 
Other
 
2,245
     
1,594
     
679
     
526
 
 
$
68,077
   
$
50,002
   
$
23,567
   
$
17,733
 
                               
Operating income: (3)
                             
Climate Control (4)
$
18,480
   
$
10,282
   
$
6,903
   
$
4,344
 
Chemical (2)(5)
 
8,787
     
6,925
     
2,196
     
2,492
 
General corporate expenses and other business operations, net (6) (8)
 
(6,292
)
   
(4,916
)
   
(2,516
)
   
(2,039
)
   
20,975
     
12,291
     
6,583
     
4,797
 
                               
Interest expense
 
(8,957
)
   
(8,627
)
   
(3,196
)
   
(2,799
)
Non-operating other income, net:
                             
Climate Control
 
1
     
-
     
1
     
-
 
Chemical
 
261
     
334
     
25
     
55
 
    Corporate and other business operations (7)
 
303
     
1,191
     
42
     
12
 
Provision for income taxes
 
(408
)
   
(84
)
   
(208
)
   
(84
)
Equity in earnings of affiliate-Climate Control
 
611
     
554
     
206
     
187
 
Income from continuing operations
$
12,786
   
$
5,659
   
$
3,453
   
$
2,168
 

 (1)  
Gross profit by industry segment represents net sales less cost of sales. Gross profit classified as “Other” relates to industrial machinery and components.
 
(2) 
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we recognized impairments of $286,000 which includes $230,000 relating to the wastewater projects as discussed in Note 11 - Contingencies. Due to the significant wastewater quality progress at the El Dorado Facility and meetings with the ADEQ, certain capitalized costs relating to the wastewater projects are no longer believed to be recoverable.
 
   (3)    
Our chief operating decision makers use operating income by industry segment for purposes of making decisions which include resource allocations and performance evaluations.

30

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

   
Operating income by industry segment represents gross profit by industry segment less selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) incurred by each industry segment plus other income and other expense earned/incurred by each industry segment before general corporate expenses and other business operations, net. General corporate expenses and other business operations, net consist of unallocated portions of gross profit, SG&A, other income and other expense.

   (4)   
During the nine and three months ended September 30, 2005, Trison incurred professional fees of approximately $1,090,000 and $645,000, respectively, relating to an arbitration case  as discussed in Note 11-Contingencies.
 
 (5)    
As discussed in Note 18-Other Expense, Other Income and Non-Operating Other Income, net, during the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we recognized impairments on long-lived assets of $286,000. During the nine and three months ended September 30, 2005, we recognized gains of $1,170,000 and $647,000, respectively, from certain property insurance claims including the claims discussed in Note 17-Business Interruption and Property Insurance Recoveries. 

   (6)    
The amounts included are not allocated to our Climate Control and Chemical Businesses since these items are not included in the operating results reviewed by our chief operating decision makers for purposes of making decisions as discussed above. A detail of these amounts are shown in footnote (8) below.

 (7) 
As discussed in Note 18-Other Expense, Other Income and Non-Operating Other Income, net, we recognized $1,162,000 in net proceeds from certain key man life insurance policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 due to the untimely death of one of our executives in January 2005.

 (8)    
General corporate expenses and other business operations, net, consist of the following: 

 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
(In Thousands)
Gross profit-Other
$
2,245
   
$
1,594
   
$
679
   
$
526
 
Selling, general and administrative:
                             
Personnel
 
(4,346
)
   
(3,976
)
   
(1,521
)
   
(1,348
)
Professional fees
 
(2,146
)
   
(1,549
)
   
(893
)
   
(531
)
Office overhead
 
(460
)
   
(583
)
   
(149
)
   
(187
)
Property, franchise and other taxes
 
(232
)
   
(192
)
   
(91
)
   
(91
)
All other (A)
 
(1,062
)
   
(1,154
)
   
(517
)
   
(449
)
Total selling, general and administrative
 
(8,246
)
   
(7,454
)
   
(3,171
)
   
(2,606
)
                               
Other income (B)
 
19
     
1,027
     
(14
)
   
17
 
Other expense (C)
 
(310
)
   
(83
)
   
(10
)
   
24
 
Total general corporate expenses and other business operations, net
$
(6,292
)
 
$
(4,916
)
 
$
(2,516
)
 
$
(2,039
)
 
31

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

(A) For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, a refund of $350,000 was recognized relating to insurance brokerage fees.

(B) During the nine months ended September 30, 2005, we recognized gains of $762,000 from sales of corporate assets.

(C) For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, a litigation settlement for $300,000 was reached relating to an asserted financing fee.

Information about our total assets by industry segment is as follows:

 
September 30,
 
December 31,
 
2006
 
2005
 
(In Thousands)
Total assets:
             
Climate Control
$
85,739
   
$
60,970
 
Chemical
 
117,131
     
111,212
 
Corporate assets and other
 
11,529
     
16,781
 
 
$
214,399
   
$
188,963
 

Note 20: Related Party Transaction One of the manufacturing facilities within our Climate Control Business sustained substantial water damage in its office area resulting from the improper installation by an unrelated third-party vendor of certain plumbing to a water line. As a result of the water damage, it became necessary to replace all of the carpet in the office area of the facility. During the first quarter of 2006, we purchased replacement carpet from a company (“Designer Rugs”) owned by Linda Golsen Rappaport, the daughter of Jack E. Golsen, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and sister of Barry H. Golsen, our President. We paid approximately $159,000 to Designer Rugs for the new carpet, removal of the damaged carpeting and installation of the new carpet. During the second quarter of 2006, we were reimbursed under our insurance coverage for the cost of the carpet and installation except for a deductible amount of $25,000.

In addition, another subsidiary within our Climate Control Business is in the process of remodeling their offices including the replacement of carpet and flooring throughout the office area. Payments totaling $65,000 were made during the second and third quarters of 2006 towards a purchase totaling $75,000 from Designer Rugs. Delivery and installation have commenced with completion expected by December 31, 2006.

As discussed in (C) of Note 10-Long-Term Debt, Jayhawk purchased $1 million principal amount of the Debentures. In addition, we purchased $1 million principal amount of the Notes held by Jayhawk plus accrued interest of $37,000.

Note 21: Subsequent Events Following a trial held the week of October 9, 2006, a jury verdict awarded EDC approximately $9,796,000 in damages relating to the lawsuit styled El Dorado Chemical Company, et al. v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (NJ), et al. in the Union County Arkansas Circuit Court as discussed in Note 11-Contingencies. EDC thereafter filed a motion to add pre-judgment interest to the verdict. It is anticipated that the Defendants will appeal. In order to

32

LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

appeal, it is expected that the Defendants will be required to post a bond in an amount sufficient to pay the verdict, plus any prejudgment interest, plus post-judgment interest that will accrue at the rate of 10%. EDC will pay attorneys fees equal to 31.67 % of any net recovery.

On October 20, 2006, the arbitrator over a case involving Trison and JCI issued the Final Award in Trison’s favor including that Trison and its bonding company are entitled to recover from JCI $1,217,000 for attorney’s fees and costs incurred in this proceeding (See Note 11-Contingencies).

During October 2006, we entered into Exchange Agreements with certain holders of our Series 2 Preferred. Pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreements, we will issue 773,655 shares of our common stock in exchange for 104,548 shares of Series 2 Preferred. As of September 30, 2006, the amount of unpaid dividends on the Series 2 Preferred was $23.2625 per share. The holders that are parties to an Exchange Agreement have agreed to waive their rights to all unpaid dividends totaling approximately $2.4 million on the Series 2 Preferred being exchanged. Upon completion of these exchanges, 499,102 shares of Series 2 Preferred (excluding shares held in treasury) will remain issued and outstanding, and there will be a total of approximately $11.6 million in unpaid dividends on the Series 2 Preferred remaining outstanding. The Exchange Agreements are subject to the approval by the American Stock Exchange for the listing of the 773,655 shares of common stock to be issued pursuant to the Exchange Agreements.
 


The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with our September 30, 2006 condensed consolidated financial statements. Certain statements contained in this MD&A may be deemed forward-looking statements. See "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements".

Overview

General

We are a manufacturing, marketing and engineering company. Our wholly-owned subsidiary, ThermaClime, through its subsidiaries, owns substantially all of our core businesses consisting of the:

·  
Climate Control Business engaged in the manufacturing and selling of a broad range of niche air conditioning and heating products consisting of geothermal and water source heat pumps, hydronic fan coils, large custom air handlers and other niche products used in commercial and residential new building construction, renovation of existing buildings and replacement of existing systems.

·  
Chemical Business engaged in the manufacturing and selling of chemical products produced from three plants located in Arkansas, Alabama and Texas for the industrial, mining and agricultural markets.
 
Third Quarter Results

LSB’s third quarter 2006 operating income was $6.6 million compared to $4.8 million in 2005 and income from continuing operations was $3.5 million compared to $2.2 million in 2005.

The Climate Control Business continued to report strong sales and operating results due to record high backlogs and new order flow. Their operating income before allocation of corporate overhead was $6.9 million, a 59% increase over the $4.3 million in the 2005 third quarter.

Our Chemical Business third quarter operating income before allocation of corporate overhead was $2.2 million compared to $2.5 million in the 2005 third quarter.

Climate Control Business

The Climate Control Business has historically and consistently generated annual profits and positive cash flows and continues to do so. Climate Control’s sales for the third quarter were $61.1 million, a 47% increase from the same period last year. Operating income for the third quarter of 2006 was $6.9 million compared to $4.3 million in the same quarter last year. The significant increase in sales and operating income is due primarily to the increase in demand for both our geothermal and water source heat pumps. Management’s objectives for the Climate Control Business include the continued emphasis on increasing the sales and operating margins of all products and to continue to develop new products and increase production to meet customer demand.


Most of the products of the Climate Control Business are produced to customer orders that are placed well in advance of required delivery dates. As a result, the Climate Control Business maintains significant backlogs that eliminate the necessity to carry substantial inventories other than for firm customer orders. Due to the significant increase in the demand for Climate Control’s products, the backlog of confirmed orders has also increased significantly. The backlog of confirmed orders has increased from approximately $56 million at December 31, 2005 to approximately $85 million at September 30, 2006. We anticipate shipping substantially all of this backlog within twelve months.

Management is taking certain actions to increase the production level to reduce the current backlog. In response to record intake level of customer orders, we recently increased our unit output through additional shifts and overtime. Management has also invested $6.5 million in fabrication equipment, plant-wide process control systems and other upgrades during the past 15 months and has committed another $1.3 million for additional production equipment during the remainder of 2006. This investment is expected to increase capacity and reduce overtime. In addition, we have entered into an agreement to acquire a 45,000 sq. ft. building adjacent to our existing 270,000 sq. ft. geothermal and water source heat pump production facility at an approximate cost of $2.5 million to increase production space. We have also committed approximately $1.3 million to renovate an existing building as a distribution center for our geothermal and water source heat pumps. Management plans are that both of these real property investments will be financed by mortgages at an approximate loan to value of 80%

During the second quarter and into the third quarter, the Climate Control Business encountered cost increases for certain raw materials and component parts which will impact future margin percentages until the backlog is shipped and customer price increases that have been implemented are fully realized.

Our Climate Control Business will continue to launch new products and product upgrades in an effort to maintain our current market position and to establish a presence in new markets. In recent periods, the Climate Control Business's profitability was affected by operating losses of certain new product lines being developed over the past few years. Our emphasis has been to increase the sales levels of these operations above the breakeven point. During 2005 and into 2006, the results for these new products have not improved significantly. We believe that the prospects for these new product lines are improving and will make a contribution in the future.

Chemical Business

The Chemical Business has production facilities in Baytown, Texas (the “Baytown” facility), El Dorado, Arkansas (the “El Dorado” facility) and Cherokee, Alabama (the  “Cherokee” facility). Baytown and El Dorado produce nitrogen products from anhydrous ammonia that is delivered by pipeline. Cherokee produces anhydrous ammonia and nitrogen products from natural gas that is delivered by pipeline. For the third quarter 2006, Chemical Business’ sales and operating income were both slightly lower as compared to last year’s third quarter. Sales were down to $60.8 million from $62.2 million in 2005 and operating income, before allocation of corporate overhead, was $2.2 million compared to $2.5 million.

The quantity of products shipped was higher in the 2006 third quarter as compared to the 2005 third quarter but the unit selling prices were lower due primarily to product mix and lower costs of anhydrous ammonia and natural gas which generally result in lower selling prices. The
 
 
agricultural nitrogen sales were adversely affected in the third quarter 2006 as compared to 2005 as a result of abnormally hot, dry weather conditions which persisted throughout our primary market areas. The lower agricultural sales volume was offset by significantly higher nitric acid sales volume resulting from customer demand from other producers that encountered unplanned downtime.

Anhydrous ammonia and natural gas are commodities, subject to significant price fluctuations, generally purchased at prices in effect at time of purchase. Due to the uncertainty of the sales prices of our products in relation to the cost of anhydrous ammonia and natural gas, we have developed some customers that purchase substantial quantities of products pursuant to sales agreements and/or formulas that provide for the pass through of raw material costs, variable costs, and certain fixed costs, plus, in most cases, a profit margin. These pricing arrangements help mitigate the commodity risk inherent in anhydrous ammonia and natural gas. Approximately 70% of the Chemical Business’ products sold in the third quarter of 2006 were sold pursuant to these pricing arrangements.

Although anhydrous ammonia is produced from natural gas, the price of anhydrous ammonia does not necessarily follow the spot price of natural gas in the United States because much of the anhydrous ammonia consumed in our geographical area is produced off shore and delivered by pipeline that originates in the Gulf of Mexico. Our cost of anhydrous ammonia is based upon formulas indexed to published industry ammonia prices, primarily tied to import prices.

Most of the production from Baytown is sold pursuant to a long-term supply agreement that provides for the pass through of certain production costs including anhydrous ammonia. This facility continues to generate consistent operating profits and reported higher sales and profits in the third quarter 2006 than in the same period of 2005.

El Dorado produces approximately 500,000 tons of products per year from purchased anhydrous ammonia. Approximately 57% of these products sold in the third quarter of 2006 were sold pursuant to pricing arrangements that allow for the pass through of the cost of anhydrous ammonia to the customer. The balance of these products sold during the quarter was primarily agricultural and was sold at the spot price in effect at the time of shipment.

El Dorado is a party to a supply agreement with a customer to supply a significant amount of industrial grade ammonium nitrate each year pursuant to pricing arrangements that allow for the pass through of the cost of anhydrous ammonia and certain other non-controllable costs to the customer, plus a profit component per ton. During August 2006, the agreement was amended. The amendment provides among other things an increase of 10% of annual tons per year beginning in 2007 and a price increase in the per ton profit component. The term of the amended agreement is through the end of December 2010.

As previously reported, Cherokee generated significant losses in the third and fourth quarters 2005 and the first quarter of 2006 related to disruptions at the plant caused by the record climb in natural gas costs primarily due to the hurricanes in the U.S. Gulf. Cherokee was able to improve its results in the second and third quarters of 2006 as natural gas prices came down and customer demand increased. Due to the increase in customer demand, Cherokee was able to increase production and better absorb their fixed costs. However, the production level in the third quarter of 2006 was affected by unplanned downtime due to mechanical problems which had a negative effect on Cherokee’s results.


Natural gas prices continue to be unpredictable. Monthly average spot prices per MMbtu, excluding transportation, during the third quarter 2006 ranged from a high of $7.45 to a low of $4.95. Cherokee’s weighted average delivered cost was $7.04 per MMbtu. During the third quarter of 2006, approximately 70% of Cherokee’s sales were priced to include the cost of natural gas.

As we have previously disclosed, we could from time to time, suspend production at the Cherokee facility due to the high cost of natural gas resulting in loss of customer demand. Our results of operations and financial condition have in the past been, and may in the future be, materially affected by such disruptions.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As a diversified holding company, cash requirements are primarily dependent upon credit agreements and our ability to obtain funds from our ThermaClime and non-ThermaClime subsidiaries.

On March 14, 2006, we completed an $18 million private placement of the Company’s 7% Senior Subordinated Debentures due 2011 (the “Debentures”). Interest on the Debentures is payable semi-annually each year beginning September 1, 2006.

We used substantially all of the net proceeds of $16.5 million from the Debentures to purchase or redeem higher interest rate debt, including ThermaClime’s 10 3/4 % Senior Unsecured Notes due 2007. The remaining balance was used for general corporate purposes.

The private placement significantly improves the Company’s capital structure since the Debentures are subordinated to substantially all of the Company’s other debts.

During September 2006, $3.75 million of the Debentures were converted into common stock at the conversion price of $7.08 per common share. The conversion is a significant further improvement to the Company’s capital structure since it reduces subordinated debt, increases stockholders’ equity and reduces annual interest expense by $262,500 At maturity and at the Company’s option, 50% of the Debentures are payable in common stock, subject to certain conditions..

During October 2006, we entered into Exchange Agreements with certain holders of our $3.25 Convertible Exchangeable Class C Preferred Stock, Series 2 (the “Series 2 Preferred”). Pursuant to the terms of the Exchange Agreements we will issue 773,655 shares of our common stock in exchange for 104,548 shares of Series 2 Preferred. As of September 30, 2006, the amount of unpaid dividends on the Series 2 Preferred was $23.2625 per share. The holders that are parties to an Exchange Agreement have agreed to waive their rights to all unpaid dividends on the Series 2 Preferred being exchanged. Upon completion of these exchanges 499,102 shares of Series 2 Preferred (excluding shares held in Treasury) will remain issued and outstanding, and there will remain a total of approximately $11.6 million in unpaid dividends on the Series 2 Preferred remaining outstanding.

Historically, ThermaClime’s primary cash needs have been for working capital and capital expenditures. ThermaClime and its subsidiaries depend upon their Working Capital Revolver Loan, internally generated cash flows, and secured equipment financing in order to fund operations and pay obligations.


The Working Capital Revolver Loan and the Senior Secured Loan have financial covenants that are discussed below under “Loan Agreements - Terms and Conditions”.

ThermaClime’s ability to maintain an adequate amount of borrowing availability under its Working Capital Revolver Loan depends on its ability to comply with the terms and conditions of its loan agreements and its ability to generate cash flow from operations. ThermaClime is restricted under its credit agreements as to the funds it may transfer to the Company and its non-ThermaClime affiliates and certain ThermaClime subsidiaries. This limitation does not prohibit payment to the Company of amounts due under a Services Agreement, Management Agreement and a Tax Sharing Agreement. ThermaClime’s Working Capital Revolver is a $50 million facility. As of September 30, 2006, ThermaClime had availability for additional borrowing under its Working Capital Revolver Loan of $12 million. Borrowing availability is based upon certain percentages of accounts receivable and inventory. At September 30, 2006, ThermaClime had $19 million availability as defined, in excess of the $50 million facility. Management does not have any current plans to negotiate an increase in the facility.

Although the Chemical Business’ recent results are improved from prior periods, the Chemical Business in recent years prior to 2005 has not generated significant positive cash flows due to lower than optimum sales volume levels, margin problems and extensive capital expenditures. In 2005 and 2006, Chemical’s operating results have improved but capital expenditures continue to be substantial. The outlook for capital expenditures for 2007 ranges from $8 to $10 million.

As discussed above, Cherokee’s ability to generate a positive margin on sales is affected by the volatility of natural gas as well as the necessity to produce at the optimum production levels to fully absorb the facility’s fixed costs. The predominant production costs of a process chemical plant, other than the raw material costs, tend to be fixed costs.

Our primary efforts to improve the results of the Chemical Business include efforts to increase the non-seasonal sales volumes of Cherokee and El Dorado with an emphasis on customers that will accept the commodity risk inherent with natural gas and anhydrous ammonia.

Capital Expenditures

General

Our Chemical Business has historically required significant investment to fund capital expenditures, while our Climate Control Business has been much less capital intensive.

Recently, we have made substantial investments to increase the capacity of the Climate Control Business. In addition to current commitments, our plans for 2007, if there is sufficient cash flow, are to add additional production capacity at Climate Control.

Current Commitments

As of September 30, 2006, we have committed capital expenditures of approximately $6.7 million for production equipment and environmental compliance, of which $4.4 million is scheduled to occur in 2006 and the remainder in 2007. The expenditures include $5.4 million at Chemical and $1.3 million for Climate Control. We plan to finance approximately $1.3 million and the balance will be funded from working capital.


In addition, as discussed in the “Overview” above, we plan to spend approximately $3.8 million in the fourth quarter 2006 on real estate to expand the production and distribution facilities of our geothermal and water source heat pump business which will be funded by mortgage debt.

In addition, certain additional capital expenditures will be required to bring the sulfuric acid plant's air emissions to lower limits. There have been minimal expenditures on this project since 2004. The ultimate cost is believed to be between $1.5 million and $4.0 million, to be expended through February 2010. Currently, there are no committed capital expenditures for the project.

The ADEQ issued to El Dorado a new revised NPDES water discharge permit in 2004, and El Dorado has until June 2007 to meet the compliance deadline for the more restrictive limits under the recently issued NPDES permit. In order to meet El Dorado’s June 2007 limits, El Dorado is considering three options to discharge its wastewater.

The estimated remaining capital expenditures to meet the requirements of the NPDES permit ranges from minimal to $3.3 million, depending on which option El Dorado utilizes or is required to utilize to meet the permit requirements. One of the options available to El Dorado is to participate in a joint pipeline to be built by the City of El Dorado, Arkansas (the “City”). However, it appears that the City will not obtain its permit to build and use the pipeline so that the pipeline will not be available by June 2007. If this option is utilized, El Dorado would be obligated to pay an additional $2.0 million for its pro-rata portion of the City’s pipeline engineering and construction costs.

Other capital expenditures are believed to be discretionary and are dependent upon an adequate amount of liquidity and/or obtaining acceptable funding. We have carefully managed those expenditures to projects necessary to execute our business plans and those for environmental and safety compliance.

Dividends

We have not paid cash dividends on our outstanding common stock in many years, and from 1999 through 2005, we had not paid any dividends on our outstanding cumulative preferred stock. During each of the three quarters of 2006, our Board of Directors declared and we paid partial dividends on certain outstanding series of our preferred stock as follows: $.10 per share on our outstanding Series 2 Preferred, $.37 per share on our outstanding Series B Preferred, and $.31 per share on our outstanding Non-Cumulative Redeemable preferred stock. These dividends were not for the full amount of the required quarterly dividends pursuant to the terms of all of our outstanding series of preferred stock. As of September 30, 2006, there were approximately $15.9 million of unpaid dividends on our outstanding cumulative preferred stock. See discussion above concerning the issuance of common stock in exchange for a portion of the Series 2 Preferred in October 2006. We intend to retain most of our future earnings, if any, to provide funds for our operations and/or expansion of our business.
 
We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our outstanding common stock in the foreseeable future, and until all unpaid dividends are paid on our outstanding cumulative preferred stock, no dividends may be paid on our common stock.


Compliance with Long-Term Debt Covenants

As discussed below under “Loan Agreements - Terms and Conditions”, the Senior Secured Loan and Working Capital Revolver Loan, as amended, of ThermaClime and its subsidiaries require, among other things, that ThermaClime meet certain lender defined earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), capital expenditure limitation amounts and achieve minimum fixed charge coverage ratios quarterly, on a trailing twelve-month basis. ThermaClime's forecasts for the remainder of 2006 indicate that ThermaClime will be able to meet all required covenant tests for the year ending December 31, 2006.

Summary

Cash flow and liquidity will continue to be managed very carefully. We believe, with the infusion of new capital as a result of the recently completed debenture offering and based upon current forecasts, that we will have adequate cash from internal cash flows and financing sources to enable us to satisfy our cash requirements for the remainder of 2006. Due to the volatility of the cost of major raw materials, we have historically experienced revisions to financial forecasts on a frequent basis during the course of a year. As a result, actual results may differ significantly from our forecast, which could have a material impact on our liquidity and future operating results.

Loan Agreements - Terms and Conditions

7% Convertible Senior Subordinated Debentures - On March 14, 2006, we completed a private placement to six qualified institutional buyers, pursuant to which we sold $18.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 7% Convertible Senior Subordinated Debentures due 2011 (the “Debentures”). Interest on the Debentures is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 1 and September 1 of each year which began September 1, 2006.

The Debentures are convertible by holders, in whole or in part, into shares of the Company’s common stock prior to their maturity on March 1, 2011. Holders of debentures electing to convert all or any portion of a debenture will obtain the following conversion rate per $1,000 principal amount of debentures during the dates indicated:
 
 
 Shares Per $1,000
Principal Amount
 
 Conversion
Price Per Share
         
 September 1, 2006 - February 28, 2007
 141.25
 
$
 7.08
 March 1, 2007 - August 31, 2007
 141.04
 
$
 7.09
 September 1, 2007 - February 29, 2008
 137.27
 
$
 7.28
 March 1, 2008 - August 31, 2008
 133.32
 
$
 7.50
 September 1, 2008 - February 28, 2009
 129.23
 
$
 7.74
 March 1, 2009 - March 1, 2011
 125.00
 
$
 8.00
 
The conversion rates will be adjusted to reflect dividends, stock splits, issuances of rights to purchase shares of common stock and other events, as set forth in the Indenture.

During September 2006, $3.75 million of the Debentures were converted into 529,688 shares of our common stock at the conversion price of $7.08 per share. One of the conversions related

to an offer received from a holder and accepted by us which included additional consideration of $87,500 to be paid to the holder. Because the offer met the criteria within SFAS 84-Induced Conversions of Convertible Debt, the additional consideration was expensed.

We have used substantially all of the net proceeds for the purchase or redemption of our higher interest rate debt or debt of our subsidiaries, including ThermaClime’s Notes. The remaining balance was used for general corporate purposes.

Approximately $13.6 million of the net proceeds have been used to purchase or redeem all of the Notes held by unrelated third parties and Jayhawk at ThermaClime’s carrying value (which includes $1.0 million that was held by Jayhawk) including accrued interest of $0.3 million. Approximately $6.95 million of the Notes held by us remain outstanding.

Working Capital Revolver Loan - ThermaClime finances its working capital requirements through borrowings under a Working Capital Revolver Loan. Under the Working Capital Revolver Loan, ThermaClime and its subsidiaries may borrow on a revolving basis up to $50.0 million based on specific percentages of eligible accounts receivable and inventories. The Working Capital Revolver Loan matures in April 2009. As of September 30, 2006, borrowings outstanding were $34.2 million and the net credit available for additional borrowings was $12.0 million. The Working Capital Revolver Loan requires that ThermaClime and its Climate Control Business meet certain financial covenants and minimum EBITDA amounts. The EBITDA requirements are measured quarterly on a trailing twelve-month basis. ThermaClime and its Climate Control Business were in compliance with the required minimum EBITDA amounts for the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2006. The trailing twelve-month EBITDA requirement for the remainder of 2006 is $16.4 million for ThermaClime including $10.0 million for the Climate Control Business. The EBITDA requirements were set at amounts based upon our forecasts which are presently considered by management to be achievable. See discussion under “Liquidity and Capital Resources - Summary” as to the historical viability of our forecasts.

Senior Secured Loan - In September 2004, ThermaClime and certain of its subsidiaries (the “Borrowers”) completed a $50.0 million term loan (“Senior Secured Loan”) with a certain lender (the “Lender”). The Senior Secured Loan is to be repaid as follows:

·  
quarterly interest payments which began September 30, 2004;
·  
quarterly principal payments of $312,500 beginning September 30, 2007;
·  
a final payment of the remaining outstanding principal of $47.5 million and accrued interest on September 16, 2009.

The Senior Secured Loan accrues interest at the applicable LIBOR rate, as defined, plus an applicable LIBOR margin, as defined or, at the election of the Borrowers, the alternative base rate, as defined, plus an applicable base rate margin, as defined, with the annual interest rate not to exceed 11% or 11.5% depending on the leverage ratio. At September 30, 2006, the annual interest rate was 11%.

The Borrowers are subject to numerous affirmative and negative covenants under the Senior Secured Loan agreement including, but not limited to, limitation on the incurrence of certain additional indebtedness and liens, limitations on mergers, acquisitions, dissolution and sale of assets, and limitations on declaration of dividends and distributions to us, all with certain exceptions. The Borrowers are also subject to a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, measured


quarterly on a trailing twelve-month basis. The Borrowers were in compliance with the required minimum ratio for the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2006 and the coverage ratio is considered to be achievable for the remainder of 2006. The maturity date of the Senior Secured Loan can be accelerated by the Lender upon the occurrence of a continuing event of default, as defined.

Cross - Default Provisions - The Working Capital Revolver Loan agreement and the Senior Secured Loan contain cross-default provisions. If ThermaClime fails to meet the financial covenants of the Senior Secured Loan, the lender may declare an event of default, making the debt due on demand. If this should occur, there are no assurances that we would have funds available to pay such amount or that alternative borrowing arrangements would be available. Accordingly, ThermaClime could be required to curtail operations and/or sell key assets. These actions could result in the recognition of losses that may be material.

Seasonality

We believe that our only seasonal products are fertilizer and related chemical products sold by our Chemical Business to the agricultural industry. The selling seasons for those products are primarily during the spring and fall planting seasons, which typically extend from March through June and from September through November in the geographical markets in which the majority of our agricultural products are distributed. As a result, our Chemical Business increases its inventory of ammonium nitrate and UAN prior to the beginning of each planting season. In addition, the amount and timing of sales to the agricultural markets depend upon weather conditions and other circumstances beyond our control.

Critical Accounting Policiesand Estimates

See our discussion on critical accounting policies in Item 7 of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. In addition, the preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosures of contingencies.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncement

In September 2006, the FASB completed a project to clarify guidance on the accounting for planned major maintenance activities (“Turnarounds”). The FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. AUG AIR-1 (“FSP”) which eliminates the accrue-in-advance method of accounting for Turnarounds. In addition, the adoption of the provisions in the FSP is to be considered a change in accounting principle with retrospective application as described in SFAS 154-Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, if practical. The FSP becomes effective for us on January 1, 2007. We currently are using the accrue-in-advance method for Turnarounds that is eliminated under the FSP. There are three other acceptable accounting methods for Turnarounds that we may adopt. Currently, we have not made the decision on which method we will adopt. As a result, we are unable to determine the impact the FSP will have on our condensed consolidated financial statements.


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Nine months ended September 30, 2006 vs. Nine months ended September 30, 2005

Net Sales

Our Climate Control Business’ net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 were $159.9 million compared to $117.0 million for 2005, an increase of $42.9 million or 36.7%. Net sales of our heat pump products increased $35.5 million, or 57%, primarily as a result of an increase in the number of units sold in the commercial and residential markets due to customer demand and gain in market share. Net sales of our hydronic fan coils increased $2.7 million, or 7%, primarily due to a 6% increase in overall average unit sales prices as the result of lower discounting and higher selling prices driven by raw material cost increases. Net sales of our other HVAC products increased $4.7 million, or 32%, primarily as the result of an increase in the number of large custom air handlers sold primarily relating to two large projects.

Our Chemical Business’ net sales for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 were $201.5 million compared to $179.7 million for 2005, an increase of $21.8 million or 12.1%. The increase in net sales includes an increase of $13.7 million relating to our industrial acid and other chemical products, an increase of $4.1 million relating to our mining products and an increase of $4.0 million relating to our agricultural products. Overall sales prices increased 3% and overall volume of tons sold increased 10%.

Sales prices and volume of tons sold at El Dorado increased 6% and 15%, respectively. The increase in sales prices is due primarily to the increased cost of the raw material feedstock, anhydrous ammonia. The increase in volume is due primarily to increased volume of industrial acid and other chemical products due to spot sales opportunities, the loss of production during the first half of 2005 which resulted in lower production of agricultural products as discussed below, and increased volume to the mining industry related to the growth in coal mining.
 
Sales prices at Baytown were consistent with 2005 while volume of tons sold increased 27%. The increase in volume relates primarily to the increase in demand for our industrial acid and other chemical products as the result of a closing of a chemical facility within our market and various spot sales opportunities.

Sales prices at Cherokee increased 8% while volume of tons sold decreased 15%. The increase in sales prices is primarily due to the impact of the increased cost of the raw material feedstock, natural gas, during the first quarter of 2006 and the fourth quarter of 2005 and the effects natural gas cost increases have had on domestic producers. The decrease in volume also relates primarily to the increased natural gas pricing as we lost several key customers resulting in the suspension of production during the first half of January 2006 and further production curtailments throughout the first quarter of 2006, as discussed above under “Overview - Chemical Business.”
 
As discussed under “Liquidity and Capital Resources”, beginning in October 2004 and continuing into June 2005, the Chemical Business’ results were adversely affected as a result of the loss of production due to a mechanical failure of one of the four nitric acid plants at El Dorado. The plant was restored to production in June 2005.

 
Net sales classified as “Other” consists of sales of industrial machinery and related components. Net sales for the first three quarters of 2006 were $6.5 million compared to $4.7 million for the same period in 2005 or an increase of $1.8 million.

Gross Profit

Gross profit by industry segment represents net sales less cost of sales.

Our Climate Control Business’ gross profit was $47.6 million or 29.8% as a percentage of net sales for the first nine months of 2006 compared to $35.2 million or 30.1% for 2005. The net increase in gross profit of $12.4 million resulted primarily from the increase in sales of our heat pump, large custom air handlers, and hydronic fan coil products as discussed above.

Our Chemical Business’ gross profit was $18.2 million or 9.0% as a percentage of net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to $13.2 million or 7.4% for 2005. The net increase in gross profit of $5.0 million is due to the increase in gross profit at El Dorado and Baytown related primarily to the increase in volumes as discussed above. El Dorado also had an additional $1.2 million in precious metals recoveries over 2005.

Also, as discussed above and under “Liquidity and Capital Resources”, the Chemical Business’ results were adversely affected in 2005 as a result of the loss of production due to a mechanical failure of one of the four nitric acid plants at El Dorado. We recognized insurance recoveries of $0.9 million under our business interruption insurance policy relating to this claim in 2006 which is recorded as a reduction to cost of sales. The negative impact on gross profit resulting from the lost production was approximately $4.0 million for the first nine months of 2005.

Gross profit classified as “Other” (see discussion above) was $2.2 million for the first three quarters of 2006 compared to $1.6 million for 2005, an increase of $0.6 million.

Operating Income

Our chief operating decision makers use operating income by industry segment for purposes of making decisions which include resource allocations and performance evaluations. Operating income by industry segment represents gross profit by industry segment less selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) incurred by each industry segment plus other income and other expense earned/incurred by each industry segment before general corporate expenses and other business operations, net. General corporate expenses and other business operations, net consist of unallocated portions of gross profit, SG&A, other income and other expense.

Operating Income - Climate Control: Our Climate Control Business’ operating income was $18.5 million for the first nine months of 2006 compared to $10.3 million for 2005. The net increase in operating income of $8.2 million resulted primarily from the net increase in gross profit of $12.4 million as discussed above and a decrease in professional fees of $1.0 million primarily as the result of fees incurred during 2005 relating to the arbitration case involving Trison. This increase in operating income was partially offset by increased shipping and handling costs of $2.7 million as the result of increased sales volume and rising fuel costs, increased commissions of $1.2 million due to increased sales volume and distribution mix and increased personnel cost of $0.5 million as the result of increased number of personnel and higher incentives.

 
Operating Income - Chemical: Our Chemical Business’ operating income was $8.8 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to $6.9 million for 2005. The net increase in operating profit of $1.9 million relates primarily to the net increase in gross profit of $5.0 million as discussed above. This increase in operating income was partially offset by increased handling costs of approximately $1.0 million as the result of increased sales volume and impairments on long-lived assets of $0.3 million. In addition, we recognized gains of $1.2 million from certain property insurance claims in 2005.

General Corporate Expense and Other Business Operations, Net: Our general corporate expense and other business operations, net were $6.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 compared to $4.9 million for 2005. The net increase of $1.4 million relates primarily to an increase in professional fees of $0.6 million due, in part, for assistance in our evaluation of our internal controls and procedures and related documentation for Sarbanes-Oxley requirements, an increase of $0.4 million in personnel costs, a litigation settlement of $0.3 million relating to an asserted financing fee, and a decrease in gains of $.8 million from the sales of corporate assets. The increase was partially offset by a refund of $0.4 million relating to insurance brokerage fees and the increase in gross profit classified as “Other” of $0.6 million as discussed above.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $9.0 million for the first three quarters of 2006 compared to $8.6 million for 2005, an increase of $0.4 million. This net increase in interest expense includes $0.9 million relating to the Debentures sold in March 2006 which was partially offset by a decrease of $0.5 million relating to the Notes which were purchased or redeemed during 2006.

Non-Operating Other Income, net

Our non-operating other income, net was $0.6 million for the first nine months of 2006 compared to $1.5 million for 2005. In 2005, we recognized net proceeds from key individual life insurance policies of $1.2 million.

Provision For Income Taxes
 
   Due to net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards, no provisions for income taxes were necessary for the nine-month periods of 2006 and 2005 except for federal alternative minimum taxes and state income taxes.
 
Net Loss From Discontinued Operations

Net loss from discontinued operations includes provisions of $194,000 and $512,000 for 2006 and 2005, respectively, for our share of estimated costs to investigate and delineate a site in Hallowell, Kansas as a result of meetings with the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (“KDHE”).

 
Three months ended September 30, 2006 vs. Three months ended September 30, 2005

Net Sales

Our Climate Control Business’ net sales for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 were $61.1 million compared to $41.5 million for 2005, an increase of $19.6 million or 47.2%. Net sales of our heat pump products increased $14.1 million, or 63%, primarily as a result of an increase in the number of units sold in the commercial and residential markets due to customer demand and gain in market share. Net sales of our hydronic fan coils increased $1.2 million, or 9% as the result of a 5% increase in average sales price and an increase in the number of units sold. Net sales of our other HVAC products increased $4.3 million, or 91%, primarily as the result of an increase in the number of large custom air handlers sold primarily to two large projects.

Our Chemical Business’ net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2006 were $60.8 million compared to $62.2 million for 2005, a decrease of $1.4 million or 2.3%. The decrease in net sales includes a decrease of $2.8 million relating to our agricultural products, a decrease of $1.6 million relating to our mining products partially offset by an increase of $3.0 million relating to our industrial acid and other chemical products. Sales prices decreased overall by 7% and overall volume of tons sold increased 6%.

Sales prices were down 3% at El Dorado. Sales volumes were consistent with 2005. Although the overall volume of tons sold was consistent with 2005, the volume of tons sold of mining and industrial acid and other chemical products increased while the agricultural products decreased. Agricultural volumes were impacted by drought conditions in our primary market area.

Sales prices at Baytown were down 4% while volume of tons sold increased 27%. The increase in volume relates primarily to the increase in spot sales opportunities for our industrial acid and other chemical products.

Sales prices at Cherokee decreased 7% and the volume of tons sold decreased 4%. The decrease in sales prices is due, in part, to the decreased cost of natural gas in relation to the third quarter of 2005.

Net sales classified as “Other” (see discussion above) for the third quarter of 2006 were $2.0 million compared to $1.5 million for 2005 or an increase of $0.5 million.

Gross Profit

Our Climate Control Business’ gross profit was $17.6 million or 28.7% as a percentage of net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to $13.2 million or 31.8% for 2005. The net increase in gross profit of $4.4 million resulted primarily by the increase in sales of our heat pump products and large custom air handlers as discussed above. The decrease in the gross profit percentage was primarily the result of raw material cost increases that could not be passed on to customers.
 
Our Chemical Business’ gross profit was $5.3 million or 8.8% as a percentage of net sales for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to $4.0 million or 6.4% for 2005.

 
The net increase in gross profit of $1.3 million is due to improvements at Cherokee and El Dorado. Although sales prices decreased at Cherokee as discussed above, losses decreased as the result of the 22% decline in the average cost of natural gas at Cherokee. At El Dorado, we had a cost recovery of $1.3 million of production catalyst (precious metals) used in the manufacturing process in the third quarter of 2006 (none in 2005). In addition, we also recognized insurance recoveries of $0.3 million under our business interruption insurance policy for the three months ended September 30, 2006.

Gross profit classified as “Other” (see discussion above) was $0.7 million for the third quarter of 2006 compared to $0.5 million for 2005, an increase of $0.2 million.

Operating Income

Operating Income - Climate Control: Our Climate Control Business’ operating income was $6.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to $4.3 million for 2005. The net increase in operating income of $2.6 million resulted primarily by the net increase in gross profit of $4.4 million as discussed above and a decrease in professional fees of $0.7 million primarily relating to the arbitration case discussed above. This increase in operating income was partially offset by increased shipping and handling costs of $1.0 million as the result of increased sales volume and rising fuel costs and increased commissions of $0.6 million due to increased sales volume and distribution mix and increased personnel costs of $0.4 million as the result of increased number of personnel and higher incentives.

Operating Income - Chemical: Our Chemical Business’ operating income was $2.2 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2006 compared to $2.5 million for 2005, a decrease of $0.3 million. This decrease in operating profit includes increased handling costs of $0.5 million and an overall increase in SG&A as the result of increased sales volume. In addition we recognized gains of $0.6 million from certain property insurance claims in 2005. This decrease in operating profit was partially offset by the net increase in gross profit of $1.3 million as discussed above.

General Corporate Expense and Other Business Operations, Net: Our general corporate expense and other business operations, net were $2.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 compared to $2.0 million for 2005. The net increase of $0.5 million relates primarily to an increase in professional fees of $0.4 million as previously discussed and an increase of $0.2 million in personnel costs. The increase was partially offset by the increase in gross profit classified as “Other” of $0.2 million as discussed above.

Interest Expense

Interest expense was $3.2 million for the third quarter of 2006 compared to $2.8 million for 2005, an increase of $0.4 million. During the three months ended September 30, 2006, we recognized an unrealized loss of $0.3 million compared to an unrealized gain of $0.1 million in 2005 relating to interest rate cap contracts which are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis.


Provision For Income Taxes
 
  Due to NOL carryforwards, no provisions for income taxes were necessary for the three-month periods of 2006 and 2005 except for federal alternative minimum taxes and state income taxes.
 
Net Loss From Discontinued Operations

Net loss from discontinued operations relate to provisions of $113,000 and $512,000 for 2006 and 2005, respectively, for our share of estimated costs to investigate and delineate a site in Hallowell, Kansas as a result of meetings with the KDHE.

Cash Flow From Operating Activities

Historically, our primary cash needs have been for operating expenses, working capital and capital expenditures. We have financed our cash requirements primarily through internally generated cash flow, borrowings under our revolving credit facilities, secured asset financing and the sale of assets. See additional discussion concerning cash flows from our Climate Control and Chemical Businesses in "Liquidity and Capital Resources."

For the first nine months of 2006, net cash provided by continuing operating activities was $3.9 million, including net income plus depreciation and amortization and other adjustments offset by cash used by changes in assets and liabilities.

Accounts receivable increased $25.9 million including:

·  
an increase of $15.6 million relating to the Climate Control Business due primarily to increased sales of our heat pump products, large custom air handlers, and hydronic fan coils as discussed above under “Results of Operations” and
·  
an increase of $10.5 million relating to the Chemical Business as the result of extending the terms an additional 36 days for a major customer and increased sales volume at Baytown as discussed above under “Results of Operations.”

Inventories increased by a net $3.2 million including an increase of $7.8 million relating to the Climate Control Business primarily relating to the increased cost of certain raw materials, increased raw materials on hand relating to heat pump products and hydronic fan coils due to increasing sales volume, and increased inventories on hand as the result of two customer orders of large custom air handlers.

The increase in inventories was partially offset by a decrease of $5.0 million relating to the Chemical Business as the result of the increased sales volume at Cherokee and the decline in the average cost of our raw material feedstocks, anhydrous ammonia and natural gas, in September 2006 compared to December 2005.

The change in other supplies and prepaid items includes a net increase of $2.8 million in precious metals due primarily to a recoveries performed and additional precious metals purchased net of the amount consumed in the manufacturing process partially offset by a decrease of $2.5 million in prepaid insurance as the result of recognizing the related insurance expense for the first three quarters of 2006.


Accounts payable increased $4.4 million primarily due to:

·  
an increase of $3.7 million in our Climate Control Business resulting from increased production of our heat pump products, large custom air handlers, and hydronic fan coils, increased cost of certain raw materials, and increased levels of inventories on hand and
·  
an increase of $0.9 million in our Chemical Business resulting primarily from increased sales volume at Baytown.

Customer deposits increased $1.9 million primarily due to the increase in deposits received as down payments on two customer orders of large air handlers in the Climate Control Business.

The change in deferred rent expense of $0.6 million is due to the scheduled lease payments during the first three quarters of 2006 exceeding the rent expense recognized on a straight-line-basis.

The increase in other accrued and noncurrent liabilities of $4.9 million includes primarily:

·  
an increase of $1.6 million of accrued payroll and benefits due to the increased number of payroll days outstanding and an increase in the number of employees in the Climate Control Business,
·  
an increase of $1.1 million of accrued warranty and $0.8 million of accrued commissions as the result of increased sales volume in the Climate Control Business, and
·  
an increase of $0.7 million of accrued precious metals costs as the result of the timing of gauze changes.

Cash Flow from Investing Activities

Net cash used by continuing investing activities was $8.5 million for 2006 which included $8.0 million for capital expenditures for the benefit of our Climate Control and Chemical Businesses of $4.0 million each.

Cash Flow from Financing Activities

Net cash provided by continuing financing activities was $0.6 million and primarily consisted of:

·  
proceeds of $16.5 million from the 7% convertible debentures, net of fees of $1.5 million, as discussed above under “Loan Agreements - Terms and Conditions”,
·  
proceeds of $2.2 million on revolving debt facilities, net of payments, as the result of the increases in accounts receivable and inventories as discussed above, offset, in part, by
·  
the acquisition of $13.3 million of the Notes as discussed above under “Loan Agreements - Terms and Conditions”,
·  
payments of $2.4 million on short-term financing and drafts payable, net of proceeds, and
·  
payments of $2.2 million on other long-term debt.
 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except for the following:
 
Cepolk Holding, Inc. (“CHI”), a subsidiary of the Company, is a limited partner and has a 50% equity interest in Cepolk Limited Partnership (“Partnership”) which is accounted for on the equity method. The Partnership owns an energy savings project located at the Ft. Polk Army base in Louisiana (“Project”). At September 30, 2006,  our investment was $3,279,000. The Partnership and general partner to the Partnership is indebted to Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Lender”), as construction and term lender to the Project, in the current amount of approximately $6,500,000 (“Loan”), with a term extending to December 2010. CHI has pledged its limited partnership interest in the Partnership to the Lender as part of the Lender’s collateral securing all obligations under the Loan. This guarantee and pledge is limited to CHI’s limited partnership interest and does not expose CHI or the Company to liability in excess of CHI’s limited partnership interest. No liability has been established for this pledge since it was entered into prior to FASB Interpretation No. 45. CHI has no recourse provisions or available collateral that would enable CHI to recover its partnership interest should the Lender be required to perform under this pledge.
 
Aggregate Contractual Obligations

In the operation of our businesses, we enter into contracts, leases and borrowing arrangements. In connection with a series of agreements (the “Bayer Agreement”) with Bayer Corporation ("Bayer"), under which we are to supply nitric acid with a provision for pass through of production costs subject to certain performance obligations on our part, a subsidiary of ThermaClime entered into a 10 year lease in June 1999 that requires minimum future net lease rentals of approximately $26.7 million at September 30, 2006. The lease payments are includable costs in these agreements. These lease rentals are made monthly over the term of the agreements, typically with one annual payment representing a majority of the amount due for the year. Lease payments of approximately $1.2 million and $7.4 million due in December 2006 and January 2007, respectively, have been considered in evaluating our liquidity.

As discussed in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, we had certain contractual obligations at December 31, 2005, with various maturity dates, related to the following:

·  
long-term debt,
·  
interest payments on long-term debt,
·  
capital expenditures,
·  
operating leases,
·  
exchange-traded futures contracts,
·  
purchase obligations and
·  
other long-term liabilities.
 
 
Under “Liquidity and Capital Resources”, “Capital Expenditures”, “Loan Agreements - Terms and Conditions” and “Cash Flow from Financing Activities” of this MD&A, we discussed the following which occurred during the first nine months of 2006:

·  
net proceeds of $16.5 million from the 7% convertible debentures,
·  
acquisition of $13.3 million of the 10-3/4% senior unsecured notes,
·  
conversion of $3.75 of the 7% convertible debentures into common stock and
·  
planned capital expenditure of approximately $3.8 million on real estate relating to the Climate Control Business.


General

Our results of operations and operating cash flows are impacted by changes in market interest rates and changes in market prices of copper, steel, anhydrous ammonia and natural gas.
 
Forward Sales Commitments Risk

Periodically, we enter into forward firm sales commitments for products to be delivered in future periods. As a result, we could be exposed to embedded losses should our product costs exceed the firm sales prices. At September 30, 2006, we had $0.5 million of embedded losses associated with sales commitments with firm sales prices in our Chemical Business.
 
Commodity Price Risk

Our Climate Control Business buys substantial quantities of copper and steel for use in manufacturing processes and our Chemical Business buys substantial quantities of anhydrous ammonia and natural gas as feedstocks generally at market prices. Periodically, our Climate Control Business enters into exchange-traded futures for copper and our Chemical Business enters into exchange-traded futures for natural gas, which contracts are generally accounted for on a mark-to-market basis in accordance with SFAS No. 133. At September 30, 2006 our purchase commitments under these contracts were for 60,000 MMBtu of natural gas through April 2007 at a weighted average cost of $10.26 per MMBtu ($0.6 million) and a weighted average market value of $7.27 per MMBtu ($0.4 million).

Interest Rate Risk

Our interest rate risk exposure results from our debt portfolio which is impacted by short-term rates, primarily variable-rate borrowings from commercial banks, and long-term rates, primarily fixed-rate notes, some of which prohibit prepayment or require substantial prepayment penalties.

Reference is made to our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, for an expanded analysis of expected maturities of long-term debt and its weighted average interest rates.

We purchased two interest rate cap contracts for a cost of $0.6 million in March 2005 to help minimize our interest rate risk exposure relating to the Working Capital Revolver Loan. These
 
 
contracts set a maximum three-month LIBOR base rate of 4.59% on $30.0 million. These contracts mature on March 29, 2009. These contracts are free-standing derivatives and are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis in accordance with SFAS No.133. At September 30, 2006, the market value of these contracts was $0.4 million.

As of September 30, 2006, the estimated fair market value of our variable rate and fixed rate debt, which aggregated $113.8 million, exceeded the debt's carrying value by approximately $1.1 million. At December 31, 2005, the carrying value exceeded the fair market value by $8.5 million. The increase in our debt’s fair market value relates primarily to the fair market value of the Debentures in comparison to the Notes which we purchased or redeemed value during the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The estimated fair market value of the Debentures is based on the conversion rate and market price of our common stock at September 30, 2006.


As noted on the cover of this Form 10-Q, we are not an “accelerated filer.” Due to the definitions, certain areas contained within the disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), overlap with the definition of internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act).

It is our goal to maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management. Based on our most recent evaluation, which was completed as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, we have evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Although during the evaluation we noted several significant deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of September 30, 2006.

There were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained within this report may be deemed "Forward-Looking Statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements in this report other than statements of historical fact are Forward-Looking Statements that are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual results and performance of the Company to differ materially from such statements. The words "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "intend", "will", and similar expressions identify Forward-Looking Statements. Forward-Looking Statements contained herein relate to, among other things,
 
·  
the Climate Control’s emphasis on increasing the sales and operating margins of all products and to continue to develop new products and increase production to meet customer demand;
·  
the Climate Control Business shipping substantially all of their backlog within twelve months;
·  
the cost increases for certain raw materials and component parts in the Climate Control Business impacting future margin percentages;
·  
the investment in the Climate Control Business is expected to increase capacity and reduce overtime;
·  
the Climate Control Business will continue to launch new products and product upgrades in an effort to maintain our current market position and to establish presence in new markets;
·  
prospects for Climate Control’s new products are improving and will make a contribution in the future;
·  
our results of operations and financial condition at Cherokee may in the future be materially affected by changes in the supply and cost of natural gas;
·  
funding our projected capital expenditures for the remainder of 2006 from working capital and financing;
·  
the real property investment of approximately $3.8 million during the fourth quarter 2006 in the Climate Control Business will be financed by mortgages at an approximate loan value of 80%;
·  
the outlook for capital expenditures for 2007;
·
our plans for 2007 include additional production capacity at Climate Control if there is sufficient cash flow;
     ·     the projected cost of and expected completion of soil remediation at the Hallowell Facility;
·  
retaining most of our future earnings, if any, to provide funds for our operations and/or expansion of our business;
·  
paying dividends on our common stock;
·  
ability to meet all required covenants for the remainder of 2006 under our loan agreements;
·  
that we will have adequate cash in 2006 to satisfy our cash requirements as they become due in 2006;
·  
our seasonal products in our Chemical Business;
·  
our primary efforts to improve the results of the Chemical Business include efforts to increase the non-seasonal sales volumes of Cherokee and El Dorado with an emphasis on customers that will accept the commodity risk inherent with natural gas and anhydrous ammonia; and
·  
projected capital expenditures and the amounts thereof including the amounts relating to the NPDES permit and the sulfuric acid plant’s air emissions.


While we believe the expectations reflected in such Forward-Looking Statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance such expectations will prove to have been correct. There are a variety of factors which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those described in this report, including, but not limited to,

·  
decline in general economic conditions, both domestic and foreign,
·  
material reduction in revenues,
·  
material increase in interest rates,
·  
ability to collect in a timely manner a material amount of receivables,
·  
increased competitive pressures,
·  
changes in federal, state and local laws and regulations, especially environmental regulations, or in interpretation of such, pending,
·  
additional releases (particularly air emissions) into the environment,
·  
material increases in equipment, maintenance, operating or labor costs not presently anticipated by us,
·  
the requirement to use internally generated funds for purposes not presently anticipated,
·  
the inability to secure additional financing for planned capital expenditures,
·  
the cost for the purchase of raw materials including anhydrous ammonia and natural gas,
·  
changes in competition,
·  
the loss of any significant customer,
·  
changes in operating strategy or development plans,
·  
inability to fund the working capital and expansion of our businesses,
·  
adverse results in any of our pending litigation,
·  
inability to obtain necessary raw materials and
·  
other factors described in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation" contained in this report.

Given these uncertainties, all parties are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such Forward-Looking Statements. We disclaim any obligation to update any such factors or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of the Forward-Looking Statements contained herein to reflect future events or developments.
 
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION


There are no material legal proceedings pending against us and/or our subsidiaries not reported in Item 3 of our Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2005 and Item 1 of Part II of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 and our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, except for the following material developments to such proceedings that occurred during the third quarter of 2006 or the following matters which have been resolved or settled during the third quarter of 2006:
 
Trison

Trison Construction, Inc. (“Trison”), a subsidiary within our Climate Control Business, entered into a contract with Johnson Controls, Inc. (“JCI”) to design, remove and install selected components on existing air conditioning systems at a project in Oklahoma (“Project”). JCI alleged that Trison’s work on the Project contained certain defects and purported inadequacies and claimed that Trison defaulted on its contract with JCI. JCI made demand under Trison’s performance bond seeking recovery of costs alleged to have been required to correct and complete Trison’s work under its contract with JCI. In June 2004, JCI filed for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association claiming damages in the amount of approximately $1.7 million. Trison denied that its work was defective or otherwise incomplete.

On January 16, 2006, the arbitrator issued his Interim Award finding in favor of Trison and against JCI on all allegations. On October 20, 2006, the arbitrator issued his Final Award confirming and reaffirming its January 16, 2006, interim award in favor of Trison, and awarding to Trison approximately $1.2 million in attorneys’ fees and costs incurred to defend against JCI’s claims.

Zeller Pension Plan

In February 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized management to proceed with the sale of the automotive products business, since the automotive products business was no longer a “core business” of the Company. In May 2000, the Company sold substantially all of its assets in its automotive products business. After the authorization by the board, but prior to the sale, the automotive products business purchased the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Zeller Corporation (“Zeller”). The liabilities of Zeller assumed by the automotive products business included Zeller’s pension plan, which is not a multi-employer pension plan. In June 2003, the principal owner (“Owner”) of the buyer of the automotive products business was contacted by a representative of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) regarding the plan. The Owner was informed by the PBGC of a possible under-funding of the plan and a possible takeover of the plan by the PBGC. The PBGC previously advised the Company that the PBGC may consider the Company to be potentially liable for the under-funding of the Zeller Plan in the event that the plan is taken over by the PBGC and alleged that the under-funding is approximately $.6 million. However, the Company’s ERISA counsel was recently verbally informed by a PBGC representative that he would probably recommend no further action by the PBGC with respect to the Company’s involvement with the Zeller plan. There are no assurances that such recommendation, will be made or, if made, will be accepted by the PBGC.


El Dorado Chemical
 
In 2005, El Dorado Chemical Company (“EDC”), a subsidiary in the Company’s Chemical Business, sued the general partners of Dresser Rand Company, Ingersoll-Rand Company and DR Holdings Corp., and an individual employee of Dresser Rand Company, in connection with its faulty repair of a hot gas expander of EDC’s DMW nitric acid plant. As a result of defects in the repair, on October 8, 2004, the hot gas expander failed, leading to a fire at the DMW plant. The lawsuit is styled El Dorado Chemical Company, et al. v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (NJ), et al. in the Union County Arkansas Circuit Court.
 
The complaint alleged that negligent repair led to the hot gas expander failure and resulting fire, and claimed $5 million for property damage to the DMW plant and $5 million in lost profits while the DMW plant was down for repair. The Defendants claimed that a limitation of liability clause in a purchase order of Dresser Rand Company, the general partnership, applies, effectively limiting damages to the amount of the purchase order, approximately $.1 million. The complaint named only the general partners and an individual supervisory employee of Dresser Rand Company.
 
Following a trial held the week of October 9, 2006, a jury verdict awarded EDC approximately $9.8 million in damages. EDC thereafter filed a motion to add pre-judgment interest to the verdict. It is anticipated that the Defendants will appeal. In order to appeal, it is expected that the Defendants will be required to post a bond in an amount sufficient to pay the verdict, plus any prejudgment interest, plus post-judgment interest that will accrue at the rate of 10%. EDC will pay attorneys fees equal to 31.67 % of any net recovery.
 
See Part 1, Item 1 at Note 11 “Contingencies - A. Environmental Matters - 1. Discharge Water Matters” for a discussion of certain developments concerning our Chemical Business’ El Dorado, Arkansas facility.
   
See “Item 5-Other Information” regarding an informal inquiry by the Securities and Exchange Commission.


Reference is made to Item 1A of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, for our discussion concerning risk factors. There are no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in our Form 10-K except for the following:

We may be required to expand our security procedures and install additional security equipment for our Chemical Business in order to comply with the Homeland Security Appropriations Bill and possible future government laws and regulations and industry requirements.

Because of the current Homeland Security Appropriations Bill and the continued emphasis by the government, industry and public on security issues relating to the chemical industry, we may be required to incur additional costs relating to security at our chemical facilities and distribution centers, and transportation of our products to comply with possible changes in laws, regulations and requirements. As a result, these costs could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operation.



Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The following tables include information relating to purchases of equity securities by the Company and affiliated purchasers, as defined, for the three months ended September 30, 2006.




Period
(a) Total number
of shares of
common stock purchased
(b) Average
price paid per
share of common
stock
(c) Total number of
shares of common stock
purchased as part of publicly
announced plans or programs
(d) Maximum number (or approximate
dollar value) of shares of common stock
that may yet be purchased under the
plans or programs
July 1, 2006 -
July 31, 2006

-
 

$

-

-

-
             
August 1, 2006 -
August 31, 2006

113,943
 

$

9.50

-

-
             
September 1, 2006 -
September 30, 2006
 
-
 
 
$
 
-
 
-
 
-
Total
113,943
 
$
9.50
-
-

During the third quarter of 2006, we received the above shares for payment of the exercise price of certain stock options exercised during this period. These shares are being held as treasury stock.




Period
(a) Total number
of shares of
Series 2 Preferred purchased
(b) Average
price paid per
share of
Series 2 Preferred
(c) Total number of shares of
Series 2 Preferred purchased
as part of publicly announced
plans or programs
(d) Maximum number (or approximate
dollar value) of shares of Series 2
Preferred that may yet be purchased
under the plans or programs
July 1, 2006 -
July 31, 2006
 
1,600
 
 
$
 
59.74
 
-
 
-
             
August 1, 2006 -
August 31, 2006
 
-
 
 
$
 
-
 
-
 
-
             
September 1, 2006 -
September 30, 2006
 
-
 
 
$
 
-
 
-
 
-
Total
1,600
 
$
59.74
-
-

During the third quarter of 2006, we purchased the above shares in the open market. These shares are being cancelled.
 

(b) Although dividends on our Series 2 Preferred are payable if and when declared by the Board of Directors, the terms of the Series 2 Preferred provide that dividends are cumulative. Our Board of Directors did not declare and we did not pay dividends on our outstanding Series 2 Preferred from June 1999 through December 2005. During each of the three quarters of 2006, our Board of Directors declared and we paid nominal dividends of $.10 per share on our outstanding Series 2 Preferred. The amount of the total arrearage of unpaid dividends on the outstanding Series 2 Preferred is $14.0 million as of September 30, 2006. See discussion under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in the MD&A of Part I concerning Exchange Agreements entered into during October 2006 with certain holders of the Series 2 Preferred.

The terms of Series 2 Preferred provide that whenever dividends on the Series 2 Preferred are in arrears and unpaid in an amount equal to at least six quarterly dividends: (i) the number of members of our Board of Directors shall be increased by two effective as of the time of election of such directors; (ii) we shall, upon the written request of the record holder of 10% of the shares of Series 2 Preferred, call a special meeting of the Preferred Stockholders for the purpose of electing such two additional directors; (iii) the Preferred Stockholders have the exclusive right to vote for and elect such two additional directors; and (iv) the Preferred Stockholders right to elect two additional directors will terminate when all cumulative and unpaid dividends on the Series 2 Preferred have been declared and set apart for payment.

At the request of Jayhawk, a special meeting was held on March 11, 2002 for the purpose of electing the two additional directors to our Board of Directors. Jayhawk selected Grant J. Donovan and Dr. N. Allen Ford to be the nominees to be elected by the holders of our Series 2 Preferred to our Board of Directors pursuant to the terms of the Series 2 Preferred. At this special meeting, the holders of the Series 2 Preferred, which Jayhawk owns a majority, elected Mr. Donovan and Dr. Ford to our Board of Directors, as permitted pursuant to the terms of the Series 2 Preferred.

Also our Board of Directors did not declare and pay the January 1 regular dividend on our Series B Preferred from 1999 through 2005. During each of the three quarters of 2006, our Board of Directors declared and we paid nominal dividends of $.37 per share on our outstanding Series B Preferred. The amount of dividends in arrears at September 30, 2006 related to the Series B Preferred is $1.6 million.

In addition, the amount of dividends in arrears related to our Series D Preferred is $0.2 million as of September 30, 2006.
 

At the Company’s 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on July 6, 2006, the following nominees to the Board of Directors were elected as directors of the Company:


Name
 
Number of Shares
"For"
 
Number of Shares to
"Withhold Authority"
Robert C. Brown, M.D.
 
13,704,871
 
18,090
Barry H. Golsen, J.D.
 
13,705,528
 
17,433
David R. Goss
 
13,705,821
 
17,140
John A. Shelley
 
13,702,801
 
20,160

Messrs. Brown, Golsen, Goss and Shelley had been serving on the Board of Directors at the time of the Annual Meeting and were reelected for a term of three years. The following are the directors whose terms of office continued after such Annual Meeting: Raymond B. Ackerman, Charles A. Burtch, Grant J. Donovan, N. Allen Ford, PH.D, Jack E. Golsen, Bernard G. Ille, Donald W. Munson, Horace G. Rhodes and Tony M. Shelby.

At the Annual Meeting, Ernst & Young, LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, was appointed as independent auditors of the Company for 2006, as follows:

 
Number of
Shares "For"
 
 
Number of Shares
"Against"
 
Number of
Abstentions and
Broker Non-Votes
13,722,154
 
415
 
392

 
The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) made an informal inquiry to the Company by letter dated August 15, 2006. The inquiry relates to the restatement of the Company’s financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2004 and accounting matters relating to the change in inventory accounting from LIFO to FIFO. The Company responded to the inquiry on September 19, 2006. At the present time the informal inquiry is not a pending proceeding nor does it rise to the level of a government investigation. Until further communication and clarification with the SEC, if any, the Company is unable to determine (a) if the inquiry will ever rise to the level of an investigation or proceeding, or (b) the materiality to the Company’s financial position with respect to enforcement actions, if any, the SEC may have available to it.
 
 
 
(a)
 
Exhibits The Company has included the following exhibits in this report:
     
10.1    
Second Amendment to AN Supply Agreement, executed August 24, 2006, to be effective as of January 1, 2006, between Orica USA, Inc. and El Dorado Company. CERTAIN INFORMATION WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AS IT IS THE SUBJECT OF A REQUEST BY THE COMPANY FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. THE OMITTED INFORMATION HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FOR PURPOSES OF SUCH REQUEST. 
     
10.2  
 
Exchange Agreement, dated October 6, 2006, between LSB Industries, Inc., Paul Denby, Trustee of the Paul Denby Revocable Trust, U.A.D. 10/12/93, The Paul J. Denby IRA, Denby Enterprises, Inc., Tracy Denby, and Paul Denby. Substantially similar Exchange Agreements (each having the same exchange rate) were entered with the following individuals or entities on the dates indicated for the exchange of the number of shares of LSB’s $3.25 Convertible Exchangeable Class C Preferred Stock, Series 2 (the “Series 2 Preferred”) noted: October 6, 2006 - James W. Sight (35,428 shares of Series 2 Preferred), Paul Denby, Trustee of the Paul Denby Revocable Trust, U.A.D. 10/12/93 (25,000 shares of Series 2 Preferred), The Paul J. Denby IRA (11,000 shares of Series 2 Preferred), Denby Enterprises, Inc. (4,000 shares of Series 2 Preferred), Tracy Denby (1,000 shares of Series 2 Preferred); October 12, 2006 - Harold Seidel (10,000 shares of Series 2 Preferred); October 11, 2006 -Brent Cohen (4,000 shares of Series 2 Preferred), Brian J. Denby and Mary Denby (1,200 shares of Series 2 Preferred), Brian J. Denby, Trustee, Money Purchase Pension Plan (5,200 shares of Series 2 Preferred), Brian Denby, Inc. Profit Sharing Plan (600 shares of Series 2 Preferred); October 25, 2006 - William M. and Laurie Stern ( 400 shares of Series 2 Preferred), William M. Stern Revocable Living Trust, UTD July 9, 1992 (1,570 shares of Series 2 Preferred), the William M. Stern IRA (2,000 shares of Series 2 Preferred), and William M. Stern, Custodian for David Stern (1,300 shares of Series 2 Preferred), John Cregan (500 shares of Series 2 Preferred), and Frances Berger (1,350 shares of Series 2 Preferred). Copies of the foregoing Exchange Agreements will be provided to the Commission upon request.
     
31.1
 
Certification of Jack E. Golsen, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302.
     
31.2
 
Certification of Tony M. Shelby, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302.
     
32.1
 
Certification of Jack E. Golsen, Chief Executive Officer, furnished pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 906.
     
32.2
 
Certification of Tony M. Shelby, Chief Financial Officer, furnished pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 906.
 
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company has caused the undersigned, duly authorized, to sign this report on its behalf on this 8th day of November 2006.
 
 
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
 
 
By: /s/ Tony M. Shelby
 
 
Tony M. Shelby
Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
 
 
By: /s/ Jim D. Jones
 
 
Jim D. Jones
Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller and Treasurer
(Principal Accounting Officer)



Exhibit 99.3 2005 10K 10-K 1 d10k.htm FORM 10-K
Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
 
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
or
 
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission File Number: 1-7677
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 
Delaware   73-1015226
(State of Incorporation)  
(I.R.S. Employer)
Identification No.)
 
16 South Pennsylvania Avenue Oklahoma City, Oklahoma   73107
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)   (Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (405) 235-4546
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
Title of Each Class
 
Name of Each Exchange
On Which Registered
Common Stock, Par Value $.10   American Stock Exchange
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Preferred Share Purchase Rights and $3.25 Convertible Exchangeable Class C Preferred Stock, Series 2

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
(Facing Sheet Continued)
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
¨   Yes     x   No
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
¨   Yes     x   No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for the shorter period that the Registrant has had to file the reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days. x   Yes     ¨   No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer  ¨                    Accelerated filer  ¨                    Non-accelerated filer   x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ¨ Yes x No
The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, computed by reference to the price at which the voting common stock was last sold as of June 30, 2005 was approximately $63 million. For purposes of this computation, shares of the Registrant’s common stock beneficially owned by each officer and director and Jayhawk Capital Management, L.L.C. and its affiliates are deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed an admission that such officers, directors and such other beneficial owners of our common stock are, in fact, affiliates of the Registrant. In addition, this computation does not include the 1,009 shares of voting Convertible Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock (the “Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock”) held by non-affiliates of the Company. An active trading market does not exist for the shares of Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock.
As of March 20, 2006 the Registrant had 13,762,618 shares of common stock outstanding (excluding 3,321,607 shares of common stock held as treasury stock).
 

 
2

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
FORM 10-K OF LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
          Page
   PART I   
Item 1.
   Business    5
Item 1A.
   Risk Factors    17
Item 1B.
   Unresolved Staff Comments    24
Item 2.
   Properties    25
Item 3.
   Legal Proceedings    26
Item 4.
   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders    29
Item 4A.
   Executive Officers of the Registrant    29
   PART II   
Item 5.
   Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities    31
Item 6.
   Selected Financial Data    36
Item 7.
   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations    38
Item 7A.
   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk    61
Item 8.
   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data    63
Item 9.
   Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure    63
Item 9A.
   Controls and Procedures    63
Item 9B.
   Other Information    64
   PART III   
Item 10.
   Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant    68
 
3

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Item 11.
   Executive Compensation    72
Item 12.
   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters    79
Item 13.
   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions    87
Item 14.
   Principal Accountant Fees and Services    88
   PART IV   
Item 15.
   Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules    90
 
4

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
PART I
 
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
LSB Industries, Inc. (the “Company”, “Registrant”, “We”, “Us”, or “Our”) was formed in 1968 as an Oklahoma corporation, and became a Delaware corporation in 1977. We are a diversified holding company. Our wholly-owned subsidiary, ThermaClime, Inc. (“ThermaClime”) through its subsidiaries, owns substantially all of our core businesses consisting of the:
 
    Climate Control Business engaged in the manufacturing and selling of a broad range of heating, ventilation and air conditioning (“HVAC”) products used in commercial and residential new building construction, renovation of existing buildings and replacement of existing systems.
 
    Chemical Business engaged in the manufacturing and selling of chemical products produced from three plants in Texas, Arkansas and Alabama for the industrial, mining and agricultural markets.
Certain statements contained in this Part I may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
We believe our Climate Control Business has developed leadership positions in niche markets by offering extensive product lines, customized products and improved technologies. Under this focused strategy, we have developed what we believe to be the most extensive line of water source heat pumps and hydronic fan coils in the United States. Further, we were a pioneer in the use of geothermal technology in the climate control industry and have used it to create what we believe to be the most energy efficient climate control systems commercially available today. We employ highly flexible production capabilities that allow us to custom design units for new construction markets and for the retrofit and replacement markets, and our products are currently installed in some of the most recognizable commercial developments in the country, including Prudential Tower, Rockefeller Plaza, Trump Tower, Waldorf Astoria and Time Warner Center, and are slated to be in a number of developments currently under construction. In addition, we have a significant presence in the lodging industry with installations in numerous Hyatt, Marriott, Four Seasons, Starwood, Ritz Carlton and Hilton hotels. We also have a substantial share of resort destinations in Las Vegas where we have units installed in over 47,000 rooms for a number of premier properties, including the MGM Grand, Luxor, Venetian, Treasure Island, Bellagio, Mandalay Bay, Caesar’s Palace, Monte Carlo, Mirage, Golden Nugget, Hard Rock and Wynn resorts.
Our Chemical Business has three chemical production facilities located in Baytown, Texas (“Baytown Facility”), El Dorado, Arkansas (“El Dorado Facility”) and Cherokee, Alabama (“Cherokee Facility”). Our Chemical Business is a supplier to some of the world’s leading chemical and industrial companies, including Bayer Corporation, Koch Nitrogen Company, E.I. DuPont de Nemours, Afton Chemical (f/k/a Ethyl Corp) and Orica USA. By focusing on specific geographic areas, we believe that we have developed significant freight and distribution
 
5

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
advantages over many of our competitors and established leading regional market positions, a key element in the success of this business. The primary raw material feedstocks (anhydrous ammonia and natural gas) of the Chemical Business are commodities, subject to significant price fluctuations and are purchased at prices in effect at time of purchase. The Baytown Facility consumes approximately 100,000 tons of purchased anhydrous ammonia per year. Nearly all of the Baytown Facility’s production is sold pursuant to a long-term contract that provides for a pass-through of all costs, including the anhydrous ammonia costs, plus a profit. The El Dorado Facility purchases approximately 200,000 tons of anhydrous ammonia per year and produces and sells approximately 400,000 to 500,000 tons of nitrogen-based products per year. The anhydrous ammonia is purchased pursuant to a supply agreement whereby the El Dorado Facility purchases substantially all of its requirements of anhydrous ammonia from one supplier. Although anhydrous ammonia is produced from natural gas, the price does not necessarily follow the spot-price of natural gas in the U.S. because much of the anhydrous ammonia consumed in our geographical area is produced off shore and delivered to the El Dorado Facility from the Gulf of Mexico by pipeline. Our cost of anhydrous ammonia is based upon formulas indexed to published industry prices, primarily tied to import prices. The Cherokee Facility normally consumes 4 to 6 million mm BTU’s of production natural gas annually and produces and sells approximately 200,000 to 300,000 tons of nitrogen-based products per year.
Natural gas is a primary raw material for anhydrous ammonia. Natural gas costs have risen drastically since 2003 to a high of $15.00 per MCF during the later part of 2005. As of March 22, 2006, the price of natural gas was approximately $7.00 per MCF. Due to the uncertainty of the sales prices of our products in relation to the cost of anhydrous ammonia and natural gas, our Chemical Business has pursued a strategy of developing customers that purchase substantial quantities of products pursuant to sales agreements and/or formulas that provide for the pass through of raw material costs, variable costs, and some fixed costs, plus in most cases, a profit margin. These pricing arrangements help mitigate against the commodity risk inherent in the raw material feedstocks of natural gas and anhydrous ammonia. For 2005, approximately 67% of the Chemical Business’ sales were made pursuant to pass-through sales agreements. The remaining sales are primarily into agricultural markets at the price in effect at time of shipment. It is our goal to continue developing pass-through agreements with our customers. However, a customer of the Cherokee Facility that was purchasing 8,000 tons of urea-ammonium nitrate (“UAN”) per month under a pass-through agreement temporarily suspended its obligations to purchase UAN from our Cherokee Facility in October 2005 due to the disconnect between the high natural gas costs and their selling price of products to their customers. In December 2005, this customer had agreed to resume taking delivery of a limited amount of product from the Cherokee Facility as “spot purchases” as market conditions and the cost of natural gas permit. See Item 1A – Risk Factors and “Overview – Chemical Business” under Item 7 for discussion as to the temporary suspension of production at the Cherokee Facility due to the high price of natural gas. The anhydrous ammonia and natural gas feedstock costs are decoupled from the sales price of our agricultural products resulting in sales prices from time to time in recent periods not being sufficient to recover our full cost to produce the product in this market. Therefore, our Chemical Business continues to under-perform our expectations due, in part, to our inability to generate sufficient non-seasonal sales volume to operate our manufacturing facilities at optimum levels. Our primary efforts to improve the results of our Chemical Business include sales efforts to
 
6

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
increase the non-seasonal sales volumes with an emphasis on customers that will accept the commodity risk inherent with natural gas and anhydrous ammonia.
Segment Information and Foreign and Domestic Operations and Export Sales
Schedules of the amounts of net sales, gross profit, operating income (loss) and identifiable assets attributable to each of our lines of business and of the amount of our export sales in the aggregate and by major geographic area for each of the last three years appear in Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report.
Climate Control Business
General
Our Climate Control Business manufactures and sells a broad range of standard and custom designed water source heat pumps and hydronic fan coils as well as other niche products for use in commercial and residential HVAC systems including large custom air handlers and modular chiller systems. The construction of commercial, institutional and residential buildings including multi and single family homes, the renovation of existing buildings and the replacement of existing systems drive the demand for our Climate Control products. Our Climate Control commercial products are used in a wide variety of buildings, such as: hotels, motels, office buildings, schools, universities, apartments, condominiums, hospitals, nursing homes, extended care facilities, industrial and high tech manufacturing facilities, food and chemical processing facilities, and pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities. We target many of our products to meet increasingly stringent indoor air quality and energy efficiency standards.
The following table summarizes net sales information relating to our products of the Climate Control Business:
 
     2005     2004     2003  
Percentage of net sales of the Climate Control Business:
      
Water source heat pumps
   54 %   52 %   51 %
Hydronic fan coils
   34 %   35 %   40 %
Other HVAC products
   12 %   13 %   9 %
                  
   100 %   100 %   100 %
                  
Percentage of consolidated net sales:
      
Water source heat pumps
   21 %   20 %   19 %
Hydronic fan coils
   13 %   14 %   15 %
Other HVAC products
   5 %   5 %   4 %
                  
   39 %   39 %   38 %
                  
Water Source Heat Pumps
We believe we are a leading provider of water source heat pumps to the commercial construction and renovation markets in the United States. These highly efficient heating and
 
7

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
cooling products enable individual room climate control through the transfer of heat through a water pipe system which is connected to a centralized cooling tower or heat injector. Water source heat pumps enjoy a broad range of commercial applications, particularly in medium to large sized buildings with many small, individually controlled spaces. We believe the market for commercial water source heat pumps will continue to grow due to the relative efficiency and long life of such systems as compared to other air conditioning and heating systems, as well as to the emergence of the replacement market for those systems.
Our Climate Control Business has also developed the use of geothermal water source heat pumps in residential and commercial applications. Geothermal systems, which circulate water and antifreeze through an underground heat exchanger, are among the most energy efficient systems available. We believe the longer life, lower cost to operate, and relatively short payback periods of geothermal systems, as compared with air-to-air systems, will continue to increase demand for our geothermal products. We specifically target new residential construction of moderate and high-end multi and single-family homes.
Hydronic Fan Coils
We believe that our Climate Control Business is a leading provider of hydronic fan coils. Our Climate Control Business targets the commercial and institutional markets. Hydronic fan coils use heated or chilled water, provided by a centralized chiller or boiler through a water pipe system, to condition the air and allow individual room control. Hydronic fan coil systems are quieter and have longer lives and lower maintenance costs than other comparable systems used where individual room control is required. Important components of our strategy for competing in the commercial and institutional renovation and replacement markets include the breadth of our product line coupled with customization capability provided by a flexible manufacturing process. The lodging and hospitality industry is a significant user of hydronic fan coils. Subsequent to the September 11, 2001 tragedy, our hydronic fan coil operation experienced a decline of major lodging and hospitality construction projects in several key geographic markets. During 2005, this specific market continued to improve.
Water Source Heat Pump and Hydronic Fan Coil Market
We estimate the annual United States market for water source heat pumps and hydronic fan coils to be approximately $350 million. Levels of repair, replacement, and new construction activity generally drive demand in these markets. In aggregate, the United States market for water source heat pump and fan coil products is returning to historical levels. The previous decline in the total market in 2001 through 2003 was primarily a direct result of the slowdown in construction and refurbishment related to the lodging and hospitality industry and has been attributed to the events of September 11, 2001 and world unrest.
Production and Backlog
Most of our Climate Control production occurs on a specific order basis. We manufacture the units in many sizes and configurations, as required by the purchaser, to fit the space and capacity requirements of hotels, motels, schools, hospitals, apartment buildings, office buildings and other
 
8

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
commercial or residential structures. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the backlog of confirmed orders for our Climate Control Business was approximately $56.2 million and $28.4 million, respectively. The increase in our backlog relates primarily to the increase in demand for our water source heat pumps, large custom air handlers and hydronic fan coils. Past experience indicates that customers generally do not cancel orders after we receive them. As of the date of this report, our Climate Control Business had released the majority of the December 31, 2005 backlog to production. All of the December 31, 2005 backlog is expected to be filled during 2006.
In response to a record order intake level of our heat pump products, we have recently increased our unit output by over 25% through additional shifts and overtime. In addition, throughout 2005 and into 2006 over $4 million will have been invested in fabrication equipment and plant-wide process control systems. This investment is expected to further raise capacity and reduce overtime.
Marketing and Distribution
Distribution
Our Climate Control Business sells its products to mechanical contractors, original equipment manufacturers and distributors. Our sales to mechanical contractors primarily occur through independent manufacturers’ representatives, who also represent complementary product lines not manufactured by us. Original equipment manufacturers generally consist of other air conditioning and heating equipment manufacturers who resell under their own brand name the products purchased from our Climate Control Business in competition with us. The following table summarizes net sales to original equipment manufacturers relating to our products of the Climate Control Business:
 
     2005     2004     2003  
Net sales to original equipment manufacturers as a percentage of:
      
Net sales of the Climate Control Business
   22 %   21 %   23 %
Consolidated net sales
   9 %   8 %   9 %
Market
Our Climate Control Business depends primarily on the commercial construction industry, including new construction and the remodeling and renovation of older buildings, and on the residential construction industry for both new and replacement markets relating to their geothermal products.
Raw Materials
Numerous domestic and foreign sources exist for the materials used by our Climate Control Business, which materials include compressors, steel, electric motors, valves and copper. Periodically, our Climate Control Business enters into fixed-price copper contracts. We expect to
 
9

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
obtain our requirements for raw materials in 2006, however, changes in market supply and demand could result in increased costs. We believe the majority of cost increases, if any, will be passed to our customers in the form of higher prices and while we believe we will have sufficient materials, a shortage of raw materials could impact production of our Climate Control products. We do not expect to have any difficulties in obtaining any necessary materials for our Climate Control Business.
Competition
Our Climate Control Business competes primarily with eight companies, some of whom are also our customers. Some of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than we do. Our Climate Control Business manufactures a broader line of water source heat pump and fan coil products than any other manufacturer in the United States, and we believe that we are competitive as to price, service, warranty and product performance.
Continue to Introduce New Products
Our Climate Control Business will continue to launch new products and product upgrades in an effort to maintain and increase our current market position and to establish a presence in new markets. One of our new products, the SureFlow® system, is we believe, an effective solution to provide a long-lasting, quiet and high quality fan coil system at an attractive price to our customers. In addition, we recently began producing large custom air handlers. We believe that we can establish a strong presence within this considerable market.
Chemical Business
General
Our Chemical Business manufactures three principal product lines that are derived from natural gas, anhydrous ammonia, and sulfur:
 
    anhydrous ammonia, fertilizer grade ammonium nitrate, UAN and urea for the agricultural industry,
 
    concentrated, blended and regular nitric acid, metallurgical grade anhydrous ammonia and sulfuric acid for industrial applications and
 
    industrial grade ammonium nitrate and solutions for the mining industry.
As discussed above, our Chemical Business’ principal manufacturing facilities are the El Dorado Facility, the Cherokee Facility and the Baytown Facility.
 
10

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
The following table summarizes net sales information relating to our products of the Chemical Business:
 
     2005     2004     2003  
Percentage of net sales of the Chemical Business:
      
Agricultural products
   35 %   33 %   37 %
Industrial acids and other chemical products
   34 %   38 %   36 %
Mining products
   31 %   29 %   27 %
                  
   100 %   100 %   100 %
                  
Percentage of consolidated net sales:
      
Agricultural products
   21 %   20 %   22 %
Industrial acids and other chemical products
   20 %   22 %   22 %
Mining products
   18 %   17 %   17 %
                  
   59 %   59 %   61 %
                  
Agricultural Products
Our Chemical Business produces agricultural grade ammonium nitrate, a nitrogen-based fertilizer, at the El Dorado Facility and anhydrous ammonia, UAN and urea at the Cherokee Facility. The Cherokee Facility also has the ability to produce agricultural grade ammonium nitrate. Ammonium nitrate and UAN are two of several forms of nitrogen-based fertilizers which are derived from anhydrous ammonia. Although, to some extent, the various forms of nitrogen-based fertilizers are interchangeable, each has its own characteristics which produce agronomic preferences among end users. Farmers decide which type of nitrogen-based fertilizer to apply based on the crop planted, soil and weather conditions, regional farming practices and relative nitrogen fertilizer prices. We sell these agricultural products to farmers, ranchers, fertilizer dealers and distributors located in the Central and Southeastern United States.
Our Chemical Business’ agricultural markets have historically been in relatively close proximity to our El Dorado and Cherokee Facilities and include a high concentration of pastureland and row crops which favor our products. We develop our market position in these areas by emphasizing high quality products, customer service and technical advice. Recently we have been expanding further into the Southeastern and NorthCentral United States. Using a proprietary prilling process, our El Dorado Facility produces a high performance ammonium nitrate fertilizer that, because of its uniform size, is easier to apply than many competing nitrogen-based fertilizer products. We believe that our “E-2” brand ammonium nitrate fertilizer is recognized as a premium product within our primary market. In addition, our El Dorado Facility establishes long-term relationships with end-users through its network of wholesale and retail distribution centers and our Cherokee Facility sells directly to agricultural co-op customers.
Industrial Acids and Other Chemical Products
Our Chemical Business manufactures and sells industrial acids and other chemical products primarily to the polyurethane, paper, fibers and electronics industries. We are a major supplier of concentrated nitric acid and mixed nitrating acids, specialty products used in the manufacture of
 
11

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
fibers, gaskets, fuel additives, explosives, and other chemical products. In addition, we produce and sell blended and regular nitric acid, metallurgical grade ammonia and sulfuric acid. We compete on the basis of price and service, including on-time reliability and distribution capabilities. We also provide inventory management as part of the value-added services offered to our customers.
The Baytown Facility is one of the two largest single train nitric acid manufacturing units in the United States, with demonstrated capacity of 1,350 short tons per day. Subsidiaries within our Chemical Business entered into a series of agreements with Bayer Corporation (“Bayer”) (collectively, the “Bayer Agreement”). Under the Bayer Agreement, El Dorado Nitric Company (“EDNC”), a subsidiary within our Chemical Business, operates the Baytown Facility at Bayer’s Baytown, Texas operation. Under the terms of the Bayer Agreement, Bayer will purchase from EDNC all of its requirements for nitric acid at its Baytown operation for a term through at least May 2009. EDNC purchases from Bayer certain of its requirements for materials, utilities and services for the manufacture of nitric acid. Upon expiration of the initial ten-year term, the Bayer Agreement may be renewed for up to six renewal terms of five years each; however, prior to each renewal period, either party to the Bayer Agreement may opt against renewal.
Mining Products
Our Chemical Business manufactures industrial grade ammonium nitrate and 83% ammonium nitrate solution for the mining industry. One of our subsidiaries, El Dorado Chemical Company (“EDC”), is a party to a long-term cost-plus supply agreement. Under this supply agreement, EDC will supply Orica USA, Inc. (“Orica”) with approximately 190,000 tons of industrial grade ammonium nitrate per year for a term through at least March 2008, with provisions for renewal thereafter. EDC and Orica have agreed in principal to a new five year agreement beginning January 1, 2006, with the new agreement to provide for certain price increases and an increase in the amount of product that Orica will take from EDC each year and renewal provision thereafter. This new agreement is subject to finalization of a definitive agreement.
In addition, another subsidiary within our Chemical Business is party to a long-term cost-plus supply agreement under which it supplies a customer its requirements for 83% ammonium nitrate solution for a term through at least September 2006, with provisions for renewal thereafter. This customer has orally advised us that they may be reducing the amount of product that they take from our subsidiary.
Major Customers
The following summarizes net sales to major customers relating to our products of the Chemical Business:
 
     2005     2004     2003  
Net sales to Orica as a percentage of:
      
Net sales of the Chemical Business
   19 %   17 %   18 %
Consolidated net sales
   11 %   10 %   11 %
Net sales to Bayer as a percentage of:
      
Net sales of the Chemical Business
   15 %   18 %   19 %
Consolidated net sales
   9 %   11 %   12 %
 
12

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Raw Materials
Anhydrous ammonia and natural gas represent the primary components in the production of most of the products of our Chemical Business. Natural gas costs have risen dramatically from approximately $5.50 per MCF in 2003 to a high of $15.00 per MCF during the later part of 2005. As of March 22, 2006, the price of natural gas was approximately $7.00 per MCF. Natural gas is an integral raw material in the production of anhydrous ammonia. Prices of raw material feedstocks of natural gas and anhydrous ammonia remain volatile, and we have pursued a strategy of developing customers that purchase substantial quantities of products pursuant to sales agreements and/or formulas that provide for the pass-through of raw material costs, some variable costs, some fixed costs, and in most cases a profit margin. These pricing arrangements provide a hedge against the commodity risk inherent in the raw material feedstocks of natural gas and anhydrous ammonia. In addition, we hedge most sales commitments made at fixed sales prices.
The recent hurricanes caused substantial damage to the natural gas pipelines from the U.S. Gulf Coast to our Cherokee Facility. This initially restricted the natural gas supply to our Cherokee Facility, resulting in this facility having to temporarily suspend operations for a short period of time during September and October 2005. Although deliveries of natural gas have not yet begun on the pipeline as a result of a claim of force majeure by the pipeline, receipts of natural gas to the Cherokee Facility are not being materially affected. As of March 22, 2006, the natural gas supply from the Gulf of Mexico is approximately 86% of the pre-hurricane level.
Under an agreement, as amended, with its principal supplier of anhydrous ammonia, EDC will purchase substantially all of its anhydrous ammonia requirements using a market price-based formula plus transportation to the El Dorado Facility through December 31, 2006. We believe that we could obtain anhydrous ammonia from other sources in the event of a termination or interruption of service under the above-referenced contract. Our Chemical Business natural gas feedstock requirements are generally purchased at spot market price for delivery at our Cherokee Facility. Periodically, our Chemical Business also enters into fixed-price natural gas contracts for part of our requirements.
Seasonality
We believe that the only seasonal products of our Chemical Business are fertilizer and related chemical products sold to the agricultural industry. The selling seasons for those products are primarily during the spring and fall planting seasons, which typically extend from March through June and from September through November in the geographical markets in which the majority of our agricultural products are distributed. As a result, our Chemical Business increases its inventory of ammonium nitrate and UAN prior to the beginning of each planting season. In addition, the amount and timing of sales to the agricultural markets depend upon weather conditions and other circumstances beyond our control.
Regulatory Matters
Our Chemical Business is subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws, rules and regulations. See “Business - Environmental Matters” and “Legal Proceedings”.
 
13

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
As a result of growing concerns over ammonium nitrate, other nitrogen fertilizers and other potentially hazardous materials, there have been new and proposed federal, state and industry requirements to place additional security controls over the distribution, transportation and handling of these products.
We fully support these initiatives and believe they will not materially affect the viability of ammonium nitrate as a valued product to the agricultural industry.
Competition
Our Chemical Business competes with other chemical companies in our markets, many of whom have greater financial and other resources than the Company. We believe that competition within the markets served by our Chemical Business is primarily based upon price, location of production and distribution sites, service and product performance.
Employees
As of December 31, 2005 we employed 1,267 persons. As of that date, our Climate Control Business employed 833 persons, none of whom are represented by a union, and our Chemical Business employed 373 persons, with 123 represented by unions under agreements expiring in July through November of 2007.
Environmental Matters
Our operations are subject to numerous environmental laws (“Environmental Laws”) and to other federal, state and local laws regarding health and safety matters (“Health Laws”). In particular, the manufacture and distribution of chemical products are activities which entail environmental risks and impose obligations under the Environmental Laws and the Health Laws, many of which provide for certain performance obligations, substantial fines and criminal sanctions for violations. There can be no assurance that material costs or liabilities will not be incurred by us in complying with such laws or in paying fines or penalties for violation of such laws. The Environmental Laws and Health Laws and enforcement policies thereunder relating to our Chemical Business have in the past resulted, and could in the future result, in compliance expenses, cleanup costs, penalties or other liabilities relating to the handling, manufacture, use, emission, discharge or disposal of pollutants or other substances at or from our facilities or the use or disposal of certain of its chemical products. Historically, significant expenditures have been incurred by subsidiaries within our Chemical Business in order to comply with the Environmental Laws and Health Laws. Our Chemical Business could be required to make significant additional site or operational modifications involving substantial expenditures. We have a legal obligation to monitor certain discharge water outlets at our Chemical Business facilities should we discontinue the operations of a facility. We do not believe that the annual costs of the required monitoring activities would be significant and as we currently have no plans to discontinue the use of the facilities and the remaining life of either facility is indeterminable, an asset retirement liability has not been recognized. However, we will continue to review this obligation and record a liability when a reasonable estimate of the fair value can be made.
 
14

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Currently, there is insufficient information to estimate the fair value of the asset retirement obligation.
FASB Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations” requires recognition of a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. The Company has certain facilities that contain asbestos insulation around certain piping and heated surfaces. The asbestos insulation is in adequate condition to prevent leakage and can remain in place as long as the facility is operated or remains assembled. The Company plans to maintain the facilities in an adequate condition to prevent leakage through its standard repair and maintenance activities. The Company has not recorded a liability relating to the asbestos insulation, as management believes that it is not possible to reasonably estimate a settlement date for asbestos insulation removal because the facilities have an indeterminate life.
1. Discharge Water Matters
The El Dorado Facility generates process wastewater. The process water discharge and storm-water run off are governed by a state National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) water discharge permit issued by the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (“ADEQ”), which permit is to be renewed every five years. The ADEQ issued to EDC a new revised NPDES water discharge permit in 2004, and EDC has until June 2007 to meet the compliance deadline for the more restrictive limits under the recently issued NPDES permit. In order to meet EDC’s effluent limits under the permit, EDC had planned to utilize a pipeline to be built by the City of El Dorado, Arkansas (the “City”).
The City council approved the joint pipeline, but construction of the pipeline by the City is subject to the City receiving a permit from the ADEQ. The ADEQ has not issued the necessary permit to discharge wastewater into the pipeline and, as a result, this has caused a delay of unknown duration in construction of the pipeline. This delay may impact our ability to meet our compliance schedule under the NPDES permit. As a result, EDC has proposed to the ADEQ an extension of its compliance deadlines under its NPDES permit but there are no assurances that the ADEQ will grant such extension. If the City is not able to build its pipeline or can build it in a timely manner, EDC intends to discharge its wastewater through the City’s sewer system subject to obtaining a sewer discharge permit from the City and EDC building a pipeline to the City’s sewer system in a timely manner. The estimated remaining capital expenditures to meet the requirements of the NPDES permit ranges from $.5 million to $3.3 million plus approximately $2 million for our pro-rata portion of pipeline engineering and construction costs should the City build a pipeline.
In addition, EDC has entered into a CAO that recognizes the presence of nitrate contamination in the shallow groundwater at the El Dorado Facility. A new CAO is being completed to address the shallow groundwater contamination, which will include an evaluation of the current conditions and remediation based upon a risk assessment. The final remedy for shallow groundwater contamination, should any remediation be required, will be selected pursuant to the new CAO and based upon the risk assessment. There are no known users of this shallow groundwater in the area, and preliminary risk assessments have not identified any public
 
15

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
health risk that would require remediation. During 2005, we spent $325,000 relating to the dredging of our neutralization pond to increase its efficiency. At December 31, 2005 the estimated cost to complete the requested investigation and risk assessment is approximately $33,000 which liability has been recorded. This amount is not discounted to its present value. The cost of any additional remediation that may be required will be determined based on the results of the investigation and risk assessment and cannot currently be reasonably estimated. Therefore, it is reasonably possible that a change in estimate will occur in the near term.
2. Air Matters
Under the terms of a consent administrative order (“AirCAO”), which became effective in February 2004 resolving certain air regulatory alleged violations associated with EDC’s sulfuric acid plant and certain other alleged air emission violations, EDC is required to implement additional air emission controls at the El Dorado Facility no later than six years from the effective date of the AirCAO. The ultimate cost of any technology changes required cannot presently be determined but is believed to cost between $1.5 million to $3 million of capital expenditures, depending on the technology changes as may be required.
3. Other Environmental Matters
In April 2002, Slurry Explosive Corporation (“Slurry”), later renamed Chemex I Corp., a subsidiary within our Chemical Business, entered into a Consent Administrative Order (“Slurry Consent Order”) with the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (“KDHE”), regarding Slurry’s Hallowell, Kansas manufacturing facility (“Hallowell Facility”). The Slurry Consent Order addressed the release of contaminants from the facility into the soils and groundwater and surface water at the Hallowell Facility. There are no known users of the groundwater in the area. The adjacent strip pit is used for fishing. Under the terms of the Slurry Consent Order, Slurry is required to, among other things, submit an environmental assessment work plan to the KDHE for review and approval, and agree with the KDHE as to any required corrective actions to be performed at the Hallowell Facility.
In connection with the sale of substantially all of the operating assets of Slurry and Universal Tech Corporation (“UTeC”) in December 2002, which was accounted for as discontinued operations, both subsidiaries within our Chemical Business, UTeC leased the Hallowell Facility to the buyer under a triple net long-term lease agreement. However, Slurry retained the obligation to be responsible for, and perform the activities under, the Slurry Consent Order. In addition, certain of our subsidiaries agreed to indemnify the buyer of such assets for these environmental matters. Slurry placed prior owners Chevron of the Hallowell Facility on notice of their responsibility for contribution towards the costs to investigate and remediate this site. Representatives of Chevron have agreed to pay one-half of the costs of certain interim remediation of the site.
During October 2005, representatives of Slurry and Chevron met with the KDHE and proposed to remove the bulk of contaminated soil at the Hallowell site, which was orally agreed to by the KDHE subject to approval of a written work plan submitted to the KDHE. As a result of these meetings, we recorded provisions totaling of $644,000 for our share of these estimated costs. At December 31, 2005, our liability (which is included in other current and noncurrent
 
16

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
accrued liabilities) in connection with this remediation matter is $1,458,000 and our receivable (which is included in accounts receivable and other assets) from Chevron for one-half of these costs is $730,000. These amounts are not discounted to their present value. It is reasonably possible that a change in estimate of our liability and receivable will occur in the near term. For 2005, our share of these expenses are classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statement of income (there are no income tax benefits related to these expenses). It is expected that this soil remediation will occur over the next two years.
Grand Jury Investigation - Slurry - Hallowell Facility
The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“ATF”) previously conducted an investigation at Slurry. In August 2003, we learned that a federal grand jury for the District of Kansas was investigating Slurry and certain of its former employees relating to the alleged violations of explosive storage and related regulations at Slurry’s Hallowell Facility. Active operations at the Hallowell Facility were discontinued in February 2002 after its license to possess explosives was revoked by the ATF. In response to the Assistant U.S. Attorney’s suggestion, our counsel sent a letter to the U.S. Attorney offering to plead guilty to one count of a misdemeanor violation of explosive storage regulations with no monetary fine or forfeiture. The U.S. Attorney has not yet responded to our counsel’s offer. As of December 31, 2005, no liability has been recorded for any possible monetary fine or forfeiture because the decision from the U.S. Attorney is currently unknown. In the meantime, the U.S. government has continued to subpoena records for the grand jury and to examine witnesses in connection with this matter.
 
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Risks Related to Us and Our Business
Cost and availability of raw materials could materially affect our profitability and liquidity.
Our Chemical Business’ sales and profits are heavily affected by the costs and availability of its primary raw materials. Anhydrous ammonia and natural gas, which are purchased from unrelated third parties, represent the primary raw material feedstocks in the production of most of the products of the Chemical Business. The primary material utilized in anhydrous ammonia production is natural gas, and fluctuations in the price of natural gas can have a significant effect on the cost of anhydrous ammonia. During 2005, there were substantial increases in the cost of anhydrous ammonia and natural gas, and in many instances we were unable to increase our sales prices to cover all of the higher anhydrous ammonia and natural gas costs incurred. Although our Chemical Business has begun a program to enter into contracts with certain customers that provide for the pass-through of raw material costs, we have a substantial amount of sales by the Chemical Business that do not provide for these pass-throughs. Thus, in the future, we may not be able to pass along to all of our customers the full amount of increases in anhydrous ammonia and natural gas costs. Then, as a result of the high cost of natural gas, our Chemical Business suspended ammonia production at the Cherokee Facility on December 20, 2005, until on or about January 12, 2006, and a customer of our Cherokee Facility who was taking approximately 8,000 tons of UAN per month temporarily suspended its obligations under the contract due to the high prices of natural gas from October until December 2005 when it agreed to resume taking a
 
17

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
limited amount of product as spot purchases as market conditions and the cost of natural gas permits. We could from time to time, suspend production at this facility due to, among other things, continuing high cost of its primary raw material, natural gas. Accordingly, our results of operations and financial condition have in the past been, and will in the future be, materially affected by cost increases of raw materials, including anhydrous ammonia and natural gas.
In addition, our Climate Control Business depends on raw materials such as copper and steel, which have recently shown considerable price volatility. While we periodically enter into fixed-price contracts on copper to hedge against price increases, there can be no assurance that our Climate Control Business will effectively manage against price fluctuations in copper and other raw materials or that future price fluctuations in copper and other raw materials will not have an adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
In recent years our Chemical Business has been unable to generate significant positive cash flows.
Due, in part, to lower than optimum sales levels, margin problems and extensive capital expenditures, our Chemical Business has not generated significant positive cash flows in recent years. Continuing significant cash flow expenditures by this business could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and liquidity.
Our Climate Control Business and its customers are sensitive to economic cycles.
Our Climate Control Business is affected by cyclical factors, such as interest rates, inflation and economic downturns. Our Climate Control Business depends on sales to customers in the commercial construction and renovation industries, which are particularly sensitive to these factors. A decline in the economic activity in the United States has in the past, and could in the future, have a material adverse effect on our customers in the commercial construction and renovation industries in which our Climate Control Business sells a substantial amount of its products. Such a decline could result in a decrease in revenues and profits, and an increase in bad debts, in our Climate Control Business.
Weather conditions adversely affect our Chemical Business.
The agricultural products produced and sold by our Chemical Business have in the past, and could continue in the future, to be materially affected by adverse weather conditions outside of our control (such as excessive rains or drought) in the primary markets for our fertilizer and related agricultural products. If any of these unusual weather events occur during the primary seasons for sales of our agricultural products (March-June and September-November), this could have a material adverse effect on the agricultural sales of our Chemical Business and our financial condition and results of operation.
Environmental and regulatory matters entail significant risk for us.
As discussed under “Environmental Matters” of Item 1, our Chemical Business is subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations. The manufacture and distribution of chemical products are activities which entail environmental risks and impose obligations under
 
18

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
environmental laws and regulations, many of which provide for substantial fines and potential criminal sanctions for violations. Our Chemical Business has in the past, and may in the future, be subject to fines, penalties and sanctions for violations of environmental laws and substantial expenditures for cleanup costs and other liabilities relating to the handling, manufacture, use, emission, discharge or disposal of pollutants or other substances at or from the Chemical Business’ facilities. Further, a number of our Chemical Business’ facilities are dependent on environmental permits to operate, the loss of which could have a material adverse effect on its operations and our financial condition.
A substantial portion of our sales is dependent upon a limited number of customers.
During 2005, five customers of our Chemical Business accounted for 53% of its net sales and 31% of our consolidated sales, and during 2005, our Climate Control Business had one customer that accounted for 18% of its net sales and 7% of our consolidated sales. The loss of, or a material reduction in purchase levels by, one or more of these customers could have a material adverse effect on our business and our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity if we are unable to replace a customer on substantially similar terms.
Our working capital requirements fluctuate because of the seasonal nature of our Chemical Business’ agricultural products.
Because of the seasonal nature of our Chemical Business’ agricultural products, our working capital requirements are significantly higher at certain times of the year due to increases in inventories of ammonium nitrate, UAN and other agricultural products prior to the beginning of each planting season. If additional working capital is required and not available under our revolving credit facility, this could have a negative impact on our other operations, including our Climate Control Business.
There is intense competition in the Climate Control and Chemical industries.
Substantially all of the markets in which we participate are highly competitive with respect to product quality, price, design innovations, distribution, service, warranties, reliability and efficiency. We compete with a number of established companies that have greater financial, marketing and other resources than we have and are less highly leveraged than we are. Competitive factors could require us to reduce prices or increase spending on product development, marketing and sales that would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operation and financial condition.
We are effectively controlled by the Golsen Group.
As discussed under “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” of Item 12, Jack E. Golsen, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), members of his immediate family (spouse and children), including Barry H. Golsen, our Vice Chairman and President, entities owned by them and trusts for which they possess voting or dispositive power as trustee (the “Golsen Group”) beneficially owned as of March 20, 2006, an aggregate of 4,845,288 shares of our common stock or 31.9%, which includes 1,441,668 shares that the
 
19

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Golsen Group has the right to acquire upon the conversion of preferred stock, stock options and a promissory note. Thus, the Golsen Group may be considered to effectively control us. As a result, the ability of other stockholders to influence our management and policies could be limited.
Loss of key personnel could negatively affect our business.
We believe that our performance has been and will continue to be dependent upon the efforts of our principal executive officers. We cannot promise you that our principal executive officers will continue to be available. Jack E. Golsen has an employment agreement with us. No other principal executive has an employment agreement with us. The loss of some of our principal executive officers could have a material adverse effect on us. We believe that our future success will depend in large part on our continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel.
We may have inadequate insurance.
While we maintain liability insurance, including certain coverage for environmental contamination, it is subject to coverage limits and policies may exclude coverage for some types of damages. Although there may currently be sources from which such coverage may be obtained, it may not continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms or the possible types of liabilities that may be incurred by us may not be covered by our insurance. In addition, our insurance carriers may not be able to meet their obligations under the policies or the dollar amount of the liabilities may exceed our policy limits. Even a partially uninsured claim, if successful and of significant magnitude, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Our warranty claims are not generally covered by our insurance.
The development, manufacture, sale and use of products by our Climate Control Business involve a risk of warranty and product liability claims. Warranty claims are not generally covered by our product liability insurance and there may be types of product liability claims that are not covered by our product liability insurance. A successful warranty or product liability claim not covered by our insurance could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
We have not declared or paid dividends on our outstanding common stock in many years and have a substantial amount of accrued and unpaid dividends on our outstanding series of cumulative preferred stock.
We have not paid cash dividends on our outstanding common stock in many years, and since January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2005, we did not pay any accrued dividends on our outstanding cumulative preferred stock. As of December 31, 2005, there was approximately $14.5 million of accrued and unpaid dividends on our outstanding cumulative preferred stock. We intend to retain most of our future earnings, if any, to provide funds for our operations and/or expansion of our businesses. However, on January 17, 2006, our Board of Directors declared nominal dividends, payable March 15, 2006, to holders of record as of February 15, 2006, on
 
20

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
certain outstanding series of our preferred stock, as follows: $.10 per share on our outstanding $3.25 Convertible Exchangeable Class C, Series 2, which has 623,550 shares outstanding, $.37 on our outstanding Series B 12% Cumulative Convertible Preferred, which has 20,000 shares outstanding, and $.31 a share on our outstanding Non-Cumulative Preferred, which has 871 shares outstanding. These dividends are not for the full amount of the required quarterly dividends pursuant to the terms of all of our outstanding series of preferred stock. As a result, the amount of accrued and unpaid dividends on our outstanding cumulative preferred stock increased to approximately $14.9 million as of March 15, 2006. There are no assurances that we will in the future pay any additional quarterly dividends on any of our outstanding shares of preferred stock. We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our outstanding common stock in the foreseeable future, and until all accrued and unpaid dividends are paid on our outstanding cumulative preferred stock, no dividends may be paid on our common stock. In the event of our liquidation, winding up or dissolution, there can be no distributions on our common stock until all of the liquidation preference and stated value amounts of our outstanding preferred stock and all accrued and unpaid dividends due on our outstanding cumulative preferred stock are paid in full. Further, not paying all of cumulative accrued dividends on our outstanding preferred stock could adversely affect the marketability of our common stock and our ability to raise additional equity capital.
Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war, including the military conflict in Iraq and natural disasters (such as hurricanes), have and could negatively impact the U.S. and foreign companies, the financial markets, the industries where we operate, our operations and profitability.
Terrorist attacks and natural disasters (such as hurricanes) have in the past, and can in the future, negatively affect our operations. We cannot promise that there will be no further terrorist attacks and natural disasters in the United States and elsewhere. These attacks or natural disasters have contributed economic instability in the United States and elsewhere, and further acts of terrorism, violence, war or natural disasters could further affect the industries where we operate, our ability to purchase raw materials, our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, terrorist attacks and natural disasters may directly impact our physical facilities, especially our chemical facilities, or those of our suppliers or customers and could impact our sales, our production capability and our ability to deliver products to our customers. As a result of Hurricane Katrina, the natural gas pipeline to our Cherokee Facility was damaged causing us to shutdown this facility for several weeks in September and October 2005. Although we resumed production at the Cherokee Facility in October 2005, the damaged pipeline was not repaired, resulting, in part, in this facility operating at less than full capacity from October 2005, until we suspended production at this facility on December 20, 2005, due to high cost of natural gas. We resumed production at the Cherokee Facility on or about January 12, 2006. The effect of the damaged pipeline on this facility until it is repaired is unknown. The consequences of any terrorist attacks or hostilities or natural disasters are unpredictable, and we may not be able to foresee events that could have an adverse effect on our operations.
 
21

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Our net loss carryovers are subject to various limitations and have not been approved by the Internal Revenue Service.
Our net loss carryovers have resulted from certain losses, and we anticipate they may be used to reduce the federal income tax payments which we would otherwise be required to make with respect to income, if any, generated in future years. We had available regular-tax net operating loss carryovers of approximately $67 million at December 31, 2005. The use of the net operating loss carryovers is, however, subject to certain limitations and will expire to the extent not utilized by the years 2009 through 2021. In addition, the amount of these carryovers has not been audited or approved by the Internal Revenue Service, and, accordingly, we cannot promise that such carryovers will not be reduced as a result of audits in the future.
Recent restatements and amendments to our 2004 audited financial statements and certain matters related to our disclosure controls and procedures may present a risk of future restatements and could in turn lead to legal exposure.
As a result of comments from the SEC, our 2004 Form 10-K and other changes we made internally, we have recently restated and amended our 2004 audited financial statements and filed a Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for year ended December 31, 2004. As a result of the restatement and amendments to our 2004 audited financial statements and SEC comments, we also filed an amended Form 10-Q/A for each of the quarters ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005.
As a result of this restatement to our 2004 financial statements, we also revised our 2004 Form 10-K and first two quarters 2005 Form 10-Qs to provide that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2004, March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005, in our Form 10-K/A and Forms 10-Q/A, as a result of assessing that the change from the LIFO method to the FIFO method of accounting was not material resulting in the decision at the time of the change not to disclose and not to restate the prior years financial statements. We believe that during December 2005, we corrected the weakness to our disclosure controls and procedures by, among other things, establishing a Disclosure Committee to maintain oversight activities and to examine and reevaluate our policies, procedures and criteria to determine materiality of items relative to our financial statements taken as a whole. Restatements by others have, in some cases, resulted in the filing of class action lawsuits against such companies and their management. Any similar lawsuit against us could result in substantial defense and/or liability costs and would likely consume a material amount of management’s attention that might otherwise be applied to our business. Under certain circumstances, these costs might not be covered by, or might exceed the limits of, our insurance coverage.
We are subject to a variety of factors that could discourage other parties from attempting to acquire us.
Our certificate of incorporation provides for a staggered board of directors and, except in limited circumstances, a two-thirds vote of outstanding voting shares to approve a merger, consolidation or sale of all, or substantially all, of our assets. In addition, we have entered into severance agreements with our executive officers and some of the executive officers of our
 
22

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
subsidiaries that provide, among other things, that if, within a specified period of time after the occurrence of a change in control of our company, these officers are terminated, other than for cause, or the officer terminates his employment for good reason, we must pay such officer an amount equal to 2.9 times the officer’s average annual gross salary for the last five years preceding the change in control.
We have authorized and unissued (including shares held in treasury) 61,239,342 shares of common stock and 3,398,541 shares of preferred stock as of December 31, 2005. These unissued shares could be used by our management to make it more difficult, and thereby discourage an attempt to acquire control of us.
We have further adopted a preferred share purchase plan, which is designed to ensure that all of our stockholders receive fair and equal treatment in the event of a proposed takeover or abusive tender offer.
The foregoing provisions and agreements are designed to discourage a tender offer or proxy contest for control of us and could have the effect of making it more difficult to remove incumbent management.
Delaware has adopted an anti-takeover law which, among other things, will delay for three years business combinations with acquirers of 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of publicly-held companies (such as us), unless (1) the acquirer owned at least 85% of the outstanding voting stock of such company prior to commencement of the transaction, or (2) two-thirds of the stockholders, other than the acquirer, vote to approve the business combination after approval thereof by the board of directors, and (3) the stockholders decide to opt out of the statute.
We are a holding company and depend, in large part, on receiving funds from our subsidiaries to fund our indebtedness.
Because we are a holding company and operations are conducted through our subsidiaries, principally ThermaClime and its subsidiaries, our ability to make scheduled payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness depend on operating performance and cash flows of our subsidiaries and the ability of our subsidiaries to make distributions and pay dividends to us. Under its loan agreements, ThermaClime and its subsidiaries may only make distributions and pay dividends to us under limited circumstances and in limited amounts. If ThermaClime is unable to make distributions or pay dividends to us, or the amounts of such distributions or dividends are not sufficient for us to service our debts, we may not be able to pay the principal or interest, or both, due on our indebtedness.
We are highly leveraged, which could affect our ability to pay our indebtedness.
We have a substantial amount of debt. At December 31, 2005, after giving effect to the sale of $18 million in convertible senior subordinated debentures that we completed in March 2006, and the application of the net proceeds thereof, our aggregate consolidated debt was approximately $113.6 resulting in total debt as a percentage of total capitalization of 89.2%.
 
23

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
The degree to which we are leveraged could have important consequences to us, including the following:
 
    our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for refinancing indebtedness, acquisitions, working capital, capital expenditures or other purposes may be impaired;
 
    funds available to us for our operations and general corporate purposes or for capital expenditures will be reduced because a substantial portion of our consolidated cash flow from operations could be dedicated to the payment of the principal and interest on our indebtedness;
 
    we may be more highly leveraged than some of our competitors, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage;
 
    the agreements governing our long-term indebtedness, including indebtedness under the debentures, and those of our subsidiaries (including indebtedness under the debentures) and bank loans contain certain restrictive financial and operating covenants;
 
    an event of default, which is not cured or waived, under financial and operating covenants contained in these debt instruments could occur and have a material adverse effect on us; and
 
    we may be more vulnerable to a downturn in general economic conditions.
Our ability to make principal and interest payments, or to refinance indebtedness, will depend on our future operating performance and cash flow, which are subject to prevailing economic conditions and other factors affecting us, many of which are beyond our control.
Future issuance or potential issuance of our common stock could adversely affect the price of our common stock, our ability to raise funds in new stock offerings and dilute your percentage interest in our common stock.
At March 20, 2006, we had outstanding $18 million in debentures and had outstanding various series of preferred stock, all of which are convertible into an aggregate of approximately 5.8 million shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment from time to time. In addition, we may, at our option, pay the redemption price of the debentures in shares of common stock under certain conditions, and we may also pay up to one-half of the debentures at maturity in our common stock under certain conditions. We also have outstanding warrants and options that are exercisable into approximately 2 million shares of our common stock, subject to adjustment. The issuance or potential issuance of these shares of common stock could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through offerings of equity or equity related securities. Future issuance of our common stock in connection with our outstanding debentures, preferred stock and exercise of our outstanding warrants and options will also significantly reduce the percentage ownership of our existing common stockholders.
 
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
 
24

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Climate Control Business
Our Climate Control Business manufactures most of its heat pump products in a 270,000 square foot facility in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. We lease this facility, with an option to buy, through May 2016, with options to renew for three additional five-year periods. For 2005, 84% of the productive capacity of this manufacturing facility was being utilized, based on two ten-hour shifts per day and a four-day week in one department and one ten-hour shift per day and a four-day week in all other departments. See discussion under “Production and Backlog” of Item 1.
Our Climate Control Business conducts its fan coil manufacturing operations in a facility located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, consisting of approximately 265,000 square feet. We own this facility subject to a mortgage. For 2005, our Climate Control Business was using 85% of the productive capacity, based on one eight-hour shift per day and a five-day week.
All of the properties utilized by our Climate Control Business are considered by our management to be suitable to meet the current needs of that business. However, we plan to utilize additional space at some of our other facilities for distribution purposes as the result of the record order intake level of our heat pump products as discussed under “Production and Backlog” in Item 1.
Chemical Business
Our Chemical Business primarily conducts manufacturing operations (a) on 150 acres of a 1,400 acre tract of land located at the El Dorado Facility, (b) on 160 acres of a 1,300 acre tract of land located at the Cherokee Facility and (c) in a nitric acid plant at the Baytown Facility. The Company and/or its subsidiaries own all of its manufacturing facilities except the Baytown Facility. The Baytown Facility is being leased pursuant to a long-term lease with an unrelated third party. As discussed in Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, the El Dorado Facility and the Cherokee Facility (with certain exceptions) are being used to secure a $50 million term loan. For 2005, the following facilities were utilized based on continuous operation:
 
     Percentage of
Capacity
 
El Dorado Facility (1)
   81 %
Cherokee Facility (2)
   82 %
Baytown Facility (3)
   72 %
 
(1) The above percentage of capacity for the El Dorado Facility relates to its nitric acid capacity. The El Dorado Facility has capacity to produce other nitrogen products in excess of its nitric acid capacity. The 2005 nitric acid utilization percentage is lower than normal due to the lost production resulting from the mechanical failure of one of the El Dorado Facility’s four nitric acid plants. This plant that normally produces 10,000 tons per month was down from October 2004 until June 2005. This plant was restored to normal production in June 2005.
 
25

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
(2) The above percentage of capacity for the Cherokee Facility relates to its ammonia production capacity. If production is reduced as a result of lower product requirements of certain customers as discussed under “Mining Products” of Item 1 and “Chemical Business” of Item 7 the utilization percentage in 2006 could be lower than in 2005.The Cherokee Facility has substantial capacity for nitric acid, ammonium nitrate and urea in excess of its ammonia capacity. See discussion concerning the temporary shutdowns of the Cherokee Facility under Item 1A.
 
(3) Production projects were completed at the Baytown Facility during 2004 and 2005 which increased nameplate capacity by nearly 7%.
In addition to the El Dorado and Cherokee Facilities, our Chemical Business distributes its agricultural products through 17 wholesale and retail distribution centers, with 14 of the centers located in Texas (11 of which we own and 3 of which we lease); 2 centers located in Tennessee (owned); and 1 center located in Missouri (owned).
All of the properties utilized by our Chemical Business are considered by our management to be suitable and adequate to meet the current needs of that business.
 
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
1. Environmental See “Business-Environmental Matters” for a discussion as to:
 
    A proposal to the KDHE to remove contaminated soil at the Hallowell site.
 
    A federal grand jury investigating Slurry and certain of its former employees in connection with alleged violations of federal explosives statutes at the Hallowell Facility.
2. Climate Control Business
Trison Construction, Inc. (“Trison”), a subsidiary within our Climate Control Business, is involved in a lawsuit brought against it by Trade Mechanical Construction, Inc. (“Trade”). The lawsuit is styled Trade Mechanical Contractors, Inc., et al. v. Trison Construction, Inc., and is pending in the District Court, State of Oklahoma, Pontotoc County. Trison entered into a contract with Johnson Controls, Inc. (“JCI”) to design, remove and install selected components on existing air conditioning systems at a project in Oklahoma (“Project”). In connection with the Project, Trison entered into a subcontract with Trade to provide certain services for Trison relating to the Project and disputes arose over the performance of the subcontract. During the first quarter of 2006, this lawsuit was settled by Trison agreeing to pay $125,000 to Trade which was accrued at December 31, 2005.
In connection with the Project, JCI alleged that Trison’s work on the Project contained certain defects and purported inadequacies and claimed that Trison defaulted on its contract with JCI. JCI made demand under Trison’s performance bond seeking recovery of costs alleged to have been required to correct and complete Trison’s work under its contract with JCI. In June 2004, JCI filed for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association claiming damages in the amount of approximately $1,700,000. Trison denies that its work was defective or otherwise
 
26

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
incomplete and filed a counterclaim against JCI in the arbitration. On January 16, 2006, the arbitrator issued an interim award in this matter, as follows:
 
    Denying JCI’s claims for breach of contract in their entirety;
 
    Denying JCI’s claims for breach of the performance bond and bad faith against Trison’s bonding company;
 
    Holding that JCI’s claims for termination for default by Trison was not sustainable and, therefore, Trison’s termination was a termination for convenience as required under the subcontract between Trison and JCI;
 
    Holding that JCI is not entitled to any damages from Trison or its bonding company; and
 
    Holding that Trison and its bonding company are the prevailing parties and under the subcontract are entitled to recover from JCI all reasonable costs and expenses including attorney fees incurred in this proceeding, the amount of which is to be determined at a further hearing.
JCI has reasserted a motion to disqualify the arbitrator based on alleged bias in the arbitration proceedings and to set aside the interim award. JCI’s original motion alleging arbitrator bias was denied by the American Arbitration Association.
We have spent approximately $1.3 million in attorneys’ fees and expenses in connection with this arbitration as of December 31, 2005. There are no assurances that we will recover the total amount of fees and expenses that we have incurred in connection with this matter.
There was no accounting recognition for this interim award issued on January 16, 2006, as of December 31, 2005. When the final award is realized, it will be recorded in the financial statements at that time.
The Company and one of our subsidiaries within the Climate Control Business, ClimaCool Corp., have been sued, together with two unrelated companies, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, in a case styled Multistack LLC v. ClimaCool Corp., et al., alleging that we, ClimaCool and others infringed on a patent in connection with certain modular air chillers that ClimaCool purchased from a French air conditioning company for resale in the United States. During the first quarter of 2006, the plaintiff dismissed this lawsuit without prejudice.
3. Chemical Business
Cherokee Nitrogen, Inc. (“Cherokee”), a subsidiary within our Chemical Business, has been sued for an undisclosed amount of monies based on a claim that Cherokee breached an agreement by overcharging the plaintiff, Nelson Brothers, LLC, (“Nelson”) for ammonium nitrate as a result of inflated prices for natural gas used to manufacture the ammonium nitrate. The suit is Nelson Brothers, LLC v. Cherokee Nitrogen v. Dynegy Marketing, and is pending in Alabama state court in Colbert County. Cherokee has filed a third-party complaint against Dynegy and a subsidiary (“Dynegy”) asserting that Dynegy was the party responsible for fraudulently causing artificial natural gas prices to exist and seeking an undisclosed amount from
 
27

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Dynegy, including any amounts which may be recovered by Nelson. Dynegy has filed a counterclaim against Cherokee for $600,000 allegedly owed on account, which has been recorded by Cherokee. Although there is no assurance, counsel for Cherokee has advised us that, at this time, they believe that Cherokee will recover monies from Dynegy and the likelihood of Dynegy recovering from Cherokee is remote. Our counsel also has advised us that they believe that the likelihood of Nelson recovering monies from Cherokee over and above any monies which may be recovered from Dynegy by Cherokee is remote.
Cherokee has filed suit against Meecorp Capital Markets, LLC (“Meecorp”) and Lending Solutions, Inc. in Alabama State Court, in Etowah County, Alabama, for recovery of actual damages plus punitive damages, relating to a loan transaction. Meecorp counterclaimed for the balance of an alleged commitment fee of $100,000, an alleged equity kicker of $200,000 and $3,420,000 for loss of opportunity. Cherokee is vigorously pursuing this matter, and counsel for Cherokee has advised that they believe there is a substantial likelihood Cherokee will recover from the defendants and that the likelihood of Meecorp recovering from Cherokee is remote.
4. Other
Zeller Pension Plan
In February 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized management to proceed with the sale of the automotive products business, since the automotive products business was no longer a “core business” of the Company. In May 2000, the Company sold substantially all of its assets in its automotive products business. After the authorization by the board, but prior to the sale, the automotive products business purchased the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Zeller Corporation (“Zeller”). The liabilities of Zeller assumed by the automotive products business included Zeller’s pension plan, which is not a multi-employer pension plan. In June 2003, the principal owner (“Owner”) of the buyer of the automotive products business was contacted by a representative of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) regarding the plan. The Owner has been informed by the PBGC of a possible under-funding of the plan and a possible takeover of the plan by the PBGC. The Owner has notified the Company of these events. The Company has also been contacted by the PBGC and has been advised that the PBGC considers the Company to be potentially liable for the under-funding of the Zeller Plan in the event that the plan is taken over by the PBGC and has alleged that the under-funding is approximately $.6 million. The Company has been advised by ERISA counsel that, based upon numerous representations made by the Company and the assumption that the trier of fact determining the Company’s obligations with respect to the plan would find that: we disposed, in May 4, 2000 of interest in the automotive products business including the Zeller assets and business pursuant to a bona fide purchase agreement under the terms of which the purchaser assumed all obligations with respect to the operation, including funding of the Zeller plan, the purpose of the sale of the automotive products business did not include an attempt to evade liability for funding the Zeller plan, at the time we disposed of our interest in the automotive products business, the Zeller plan was adequately funded, on an ongoing basis and all required contributions had been made, and the Zeller plan did not terminate at anytime that any member of the Company’s controlled group of entities was a contribution sponsor to the Zeller plan, that
 
28

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
the possibility of an unfavorable outcome to us in a lawsuit if the PBGC attempts to hold us liable for the under-funding of the Zeller plan is remote.
Asserting Financing Fee
On December 4, 2003, the Company and Southwest Securities, Inc. (“Southwest”) entered into a letter agreement whereby the Company agreed to retain Southwest to assist the Company in obtaining financing for the Company. Southwest’s right to a fee under the Agreement is limited to a refinancing occurring during “a period of sixty days, to be extended if a transaction is ongoing.” A financing did not occur within sixty days of the date of the Agreement, nor was a funding transaction “ongoing” at the end of that period. In September 2004, more than ten months after the date of the Agreement between the Company and Southwest, ThermaClime borrowed $50 million from Orix Capital Markets, LLC (“Orix”). It is the Company’s position that the Orix financing transaction was not the result of any efforts by Southwest, nor was it the culmination of any negotiations or transaction commenced during the sixty-day term of the Agreement. Nonetheless, Southwest has asserted that it is entitled to a fee of $1.7 million pursuant to the Agreement. The Company brought an action against Southwest in Oklahoma state court in a lawsuit styled LSB Industries, Inc. v. Southwest Securities, Inc. pending in the Oklahoma District Court, Oklahoma County, for a declaratory judgment that the Company is not liable to Southwest under the Agreement as a result of the Orix financing transaction. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against the claim by Southwest, and counsel handling this matter for the Company has advised that the Company’s prospects for a favorable outcome in this matter appears likely. Our counsel has advised us that prospects for an adverse result against us is remote, but that discovery is continuing and counsel’s judgment may change depending upon the nature of additional evidence. Recently, the parties attempted to mediate this matter but were unable to agree on a settlement. No liability has been established relating to the fee asserted by Southwest as of December 31, 2005.
We are also involved in various other claims and legal actions which in the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, if determined adversely to us, would not have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
 
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during the fourth quarter of 2005.
 
ITEM 4A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Our officers serve one-year terms, renewable on an annual basis by the Board of Directors. Information regarding the Company’s executive officers is as follows:
 
Jack E. Golsen (1)
   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. See information regarding Mr. Golsen under “Directors” in Item 10.
Barry H. Golsen (1)
   Vice Chairman of the Board, President, and President of the Climate Control Business. See information regarding Mr. Golsen under “Directors” in Item 10.
 
29

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
David R. Goss
   Executive Vice President of Operations and Director. See information regarding Mr. Goss under “Directors” in Item 10.
Tony M. Shelby
   Executive Vice President of Finance and Director. See information regarding Mr. Shelby under “Directors” in Item 10.
Jim D. Jones
   Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller and Treasurer. Mr. Jones, age 63, has been Senior Vice President, Controller and Treasurer since July 2003, and has served as an officer of the Company since April 1977. Mr. Jones is a Certified Public Accountant and was with the accounting firm of Arthur Young & Co., a predecessor to Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Jones is a graduate of the University of Central Oklahoma.
David M. Shear (1)
   Senior Vice President and General Counsel. Mr. Shear, age 45, has been Senior Vice President since July 2004 and General Counsel and Secretary since 1990. Mr. Shear attended Brandeis University, graduating cum laude in 1981. At Brandeis University, Mr. Shear was the founding Editor-In-Chief of Chronos, the first journal of undergraduate scholarly articles. Mr. Shear attended the Boston University School of Law, where he was a contributing Editor of the Annual Review of Banking Law. Mr. Shear acted as a staff attorney at the Bureau of Competition with the Federal Trade Commission from 1985 to 1986. From 1986 through 1989, Mr. Shear was an associate in the Boston law firm of Weiss, Angoff, Coltin, Koski and Wolf. Also see discussion under “Family Relationships” in Item 10.
 
(1) Barry H. Golsen is the son of Jack E. Golsen and David M. Shear is married to the niece of Jack E. Golsen.
 
30

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
PART II
 
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Market Information
Our Common Stock is listed for trading on the American Stock Exchange. The following table shows, for the periods indicated, the high and low bid information for our Common Stock which reflects inter-dealer prices, without retail markup, markdown or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.
 
     Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
     2005    2004
Quarter
   High    Low    High    Low
First
   $ 7.85    $ 5.98    $ 8.63    $ 6.00
Second
   $ 7.49    $ 6.15    $ 8.45    $ 6.97
Third
   $ 7.30    $ 6.10    $ 9.49    $ 6.95
Fourth
   $ 6.68    $ 4.95    $ 9.59    $ 7.43
Stockholders
As of March 20, 2006 we had 776 record holders of our common stock. This number does not include investors whose ownership is recorded in the name of their brokerage company.
Dividends
We are a holding company and, accordingly, our ability to pay cash dividends on our Preferred Stock and our Common Stock depends in large part on our ability to obtain funds from our subsidiaries. The ability of ThermaClime (which owns substantially all of the companies comprising the Climate Control Business and Chemical Business) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries to pay dividends and to make distributions to us is restricted by certain covenants contained in the Working Capital Revolver Loan and Senior Secured Loan agreements to which they are parties.
Under the terms of the Working Capital Revolver Loan and Senior Secured Loan agreements, ThermaClime cannot transfer funds to us in the form of cash dividends or other distributions or advances, except for (a) the amount of income taxes that ThermaClime would be required to pay if they were not consolidated with us, (b) an amount not to exceed fifty percent (50%) of ThermaClime’s consolidated net income during each fiscal year determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles plus amounts paid to us under clause (a) above, provided that certain other conditions are met, (c) the amount of direct and indirect costs and expenses incurred by us on behalf of ThermaClime pursuant to a certain services agreement and (d) amounts under a certain management agreement between us and
 
31

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
ThermaClime, provided certain conditions are met. See Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.
Holders of our Common Stock are entitled to receive dividends only if and when declared by our Board of Directors. No cash dividends may be paid on our Common Stock until all required dividends are paid on the outstanding shares of our Preferred Stock, or declared and amounts set apart for the current period, and, if cumulative, prior periods.
As of December 31, 2005 we have issued and outstanding, 605,250 shares of $3.25 Convertible Exchangeable Class C Preferred Stock, Series 2 (“Series 2 Preferred”), 1,000,000 shares of Series D Cumulative Convertible Class C Preferred Stock (“Series D Preferred”), 871 shares of a series of Convertible Non Cumulative Preferred Stock (“Non Cumulative Preferred Stock”) and 20,000 shares of Series B 12% Convertible, Cumulative Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred”). Each share of Preferred Stock is entitled to receive an annual dividend, if and when declared by our Board of Directors, payable as follows: (a) Series 2 Preferred at the annual rate of $3.25 a share payable quarterly in arrears on March 15, June 15, September 15 and December 15, which dividend is cumulative, (b) Series D Preferred at the rate of $.06 a share payable on October 9, which dividend is cumulative but will be paid only after accrued and unpaid dividends are paid on the Series 2 Preferred, (c) Non Cumulative Preferred Stock at the rate of $10.00 a share payable April 1, which are non-cumulative and (d) Series B Preferred at the rate of $12.00 a share payable January 1, which dividend is cumulative.
We have not paid cash dividends on our outstanding common stock in many years, and since January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2005, we did not pay any accrued dividends on our outstanding cumulative preferred stock. As of December 31, 2005, there was approximately $14.5 million of accrued and unpaid dividends on our outstanding cumulative preferred stock. We intend to retain most of our future earnings, if any, to provide funds for our operations and/or expansion of our business. However, on January 17, 2006, our Board of Directors declared nominal dividends, payable March 15, 2006, to holders of record as of February 15, 2006, on certain outstanding series of our preferred stock. These dividends are not for the full amount of the required quarterly dividends pursuant to the terms of all of our outstanding series of preferred stock. As a result, the amount of accrued and unpaid dividends on our outstanding cumulative preferred stock increased to $14.9 million as of March 15, 2006. There are no assurances that we will in the future pay any additional quarterly dividends on any of our outstanding shares of preferred stock. We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our outstanding common stock in the foreseeable future, and until all accrued and unpaid dividends are paid on our outstanding cumulative preferred stock, no dividends may be paid on our common stock. See “Risk Factors”.
No dividends or other distributions, other than dividends payable in Common Stock, shall be declared or paid, and no purchase, redemption or other acquisition shall be made, by us in connection with any shares of Common Stock until all cumulative and unpaid dividends on the Series 2 Preferred, Series D Preferred and Series B Preferred shall have been paid. As of December 31, 2005 the aggregate amount of unpaid dividends in arrears on our Series 2 Preferred, Series D Preferred and Series B Preferred totaled approximately $12.8 million, $.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively.
 
32

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
In January 2006, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of $.10 a share on the Series 2 Preferred, a dividend of $.37 a share on the Series B Preferred and a dividend of $.31 a share on the Non Cumulative Preferred Stock, all payable on March 15, 2006 to shareholders of record on February 15, 2006. These dividends were declared on a pro-rata basis.
Sale of Unregistered Securities
On March 14, 2006, the Company completed a private placement to six qualified institutional buyers (“QIBs”), pursuant to which the Company sold $18 million aggregate principal amount of its 7% Convertible Senior Subordinated Debentures due 2011 (the “Debentures”) pursuant to the exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), afforded by Section 4(2) of the Act and/or Regulation D promulgated under the Act. The Debentures are eligible for resale by the investors under Rule144A under the Act prior to registration of the Debentures. J. Giordano Securities Group acted as the Company’s exclusive placement agent for this transaction and was paid an aggregate of 6% of the aggregate gross proceeds in the financing. Aggregate estimated offering expenses in connection with the transaction, including discounts and commissions, were approximately $.4 million. In connection with the closing, the Company entered into an indenture (the “Indenture”) with UMB Bank, n.a., as trustee (the “Trustee”), governing the Debentures. The Trustee is also the Company’s transfer agent. The Trustee receives customary compensation from the Company for such services.
Jayhawk Institutional Partners, L.P., who together with its affiliates, Kent C. McCarthy and Jayhawk Capital Management, L.L.C., owned beneficially approximately 17.4% our common stock (including shares issuable upon conversion of our preferred stock and exercise of an outstanding warrant) prior to the closing of the private placement, purchased $1 million principal amount of the Debentures. See “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholders Matters”.
The Debentures are convertible by holders in whole or in part into shares of the Company’s common stock prior to their maturity on March 1, 2011. The conversion rate of the Debentures for holders electing to convert all or any portion of a debenture prior to September 1, 2006 will be 125 shares per $1,000 principal amount of debentures (representing a conversion price of $8.00 per share). Holders of debentures electing to convert all or any portion of a debenture on or after September 1, 2006 and before March 1, 2009 will obtain the following conversion rate per $1,000 principal amount of debentures during the dates indicated: September 1, 2006 to February 28, 2007, 141.25 shares (representing a conversion price of approximately $7.08 per share); March 1, 2007 to August 31, 2007, 141.04 shares (representing a conversion price of approximately $7.09 per share); September 1, 2007 to February 29, 2008, 137.27 shares (representing a conversion price of approximately $7.28 per share); March 1, 2008 to August 31, 2008, 133.32 shares (representing a conversion price of approximately $7.50 per share); and September 1, 2008 to February 28, 2009, 129.23 shares (representing a conversion price of approximately $7.74 per share). On March 1, 2009, the conversion rate returns to 125 shares per $1,000 principal amount of debentures (representing a conversion price of $8.00 per share), until their maturity on March 1, 2011. The conversion price will be adjusted to reflect dividends, stock splits, issuances of rights to purchase shares of common stock and other events, as set forth in the Indenture.
 
33

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
The Debentures may be redeemable beginning March 1, 2009, under certain conditions. The redemption price is payable at our option in cash or, subject to certain conditions, in shares of our common stock. At maturity, we may elect to pay up to one-half of the principal amount of the Debentures, plus accrued and unpaid interest due thereon at maturity, in shares of our common stock under certain conditions. If we pay the redemption price on any portion of the Debentures at maturity on our common stock, our common stock is to be valued for those purposes at 95% of the weighted average of the closing sales price of our common stock for the 20 consecutive trading days ending on the 5th trading day prior to the applicable redemption date or maturity date.
We will use all, or substantially all, of the net proceeds for the repayment or purchase of our higher interest rate debt or debt of our subsidiaries, including our subsidiary’s 10 3/4% debentures due 2007, and the remaining balance, if any, for general corporate purposes. Pending such uses, the net proceeds of this offering will be invested in investments with highly rated money market funds, U.S. government securities, treasury bills and/or short-term commercial paper.
We are obligated to register the Debentures and the common stock issuable upon conversion of the Debentures pursuant to the terms and conditions of a Registration Rights Agreement entered into between us and each of the OIBs.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The following table includes information relating to purchases of equity securities by the Company and affiliated purchasers, as defined, for the three months ended December 31, 2005:
Common Stock
 
Period
  
(a) Total
number of
shares of
common stock
purchased
  
(b) Average
price paid per
share of
common stock
  
(c) Total number
of shares of common
stock purchased as part
of publicly announced
plans or programs
  
(d) Maximum number (or
approximate dollar value)
of shares of common
stock that may yet be
purchased under the
plans or programs
October 1, 2005 - October 31, 2005
   —      $ —      —      —  
November 1, 2005 - November 30, 2005
   6,000    $ 5.08    —      —  
December 1, 2005 - December 31, 2005
   215,900    $ 5.10    —      —  
                     
Total
   221,900    $ 5.10    —      —  
                     
During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Golsen Group purchased 221,900 shares of our common stock in the open market.
 
34

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Preferred Stock
 
Period
  
(a) Total
number of
shares of
preferred stock
purchased
  
(b) Average
price paid per
share of
preferred stock
  
(c) Total number of
shares of preferred
stock purchased as part
of publicly announced
plans or programs
  
(d) Maximum number (or
approximate dollar value)
of shares of preferred
stock that may yet be
purchased under the
plans or programs
October 1, 2005 - October 31, 2005
   —      $ —      —      —  
November 1, 2005 - November 30, 2005
   —      $ —      —      —  
December 1, 2005 - December 31, 2005
   3,300    $ 44.30    —      —  
                     
Total
   3,300    $ 44.30    —      —  
                     
During the fourth quarter of 2005, we purchased 3,300 shares of Series 2 Preferred in the open market. These shares are being held as treasury stock.
 
35

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
     Years ended December 31,
     2005     2004     2003    2002     2001
     (Dollars in Thousands, except per share data)
Selected Statement of Operations Data:
           
Net sales (1)
   $ 396,722     $ 363,608     $ 316,661    $ 283,239     $ 314,254
                                     
Interest expense (1) (2)
   $ 11,407     $ 7,393     $ 6,097    $ 8,218     $ 13,972
                                     
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting changes (1) (3)
   $ 5,746     $ 1,906     $ 2,913    $ 2,723     $ 7,326
                                     
Cumulative effect of accounting changes
   $ —       $ (536 )   $ —      $ 860     $ —  
                                     
Net income
   $ 5,102     $ 1,370     $ 2,913    $ 122     $ 8,553
                                     
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock
   $ 2,819     $ (952 )   $ 586    $ (2,205 )   $ 6,286
                                     
Income (loss) per common share applicable to common stock:
           
Basic:
           
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting changes
   $ .26     $ (.03 )   $ .05    $ .04     $ .43
                                     
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net
   $ (.05 )   $ —       $ —      $ (.29 )   $ .10
                                     
Cumulative effect of accounting changes
   $ —       $ (.04 )   $ —      $ .07     $ —  
                                     
Net income (loss)
   $ .21     $ (.07 )   $ .05    $ (.18 )   $ .53
                                     
Diluted:
           
                                     
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting changes
   $ .23     $ (.03 )   $ .04    $ .03     $ .41
                                     
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net
   $ (.04 )   $ —       $ —      $ (.27 )   $ .09
                                     
Cumulative effect of accounting changes
   $ —       $ (.04 )   $ —      $ .07     $ —  
                                     
Net income (loss)
   $ .19     $ (.07 )   $ .04    $ (.17 )   $ .50
                                     
 
(1) Amounts are shown excluding balances related to businesses disposed of.
 
(2) In May 2002, the repurchase of Senior Unsecured Notes using proceeds from a Financing Agreement was accounted for as a voluntary debt restructuring. As a result, subsequent interest payments associated with the Financing Agreement debt were recognized against the unrecognized gain on the transaction. The Financing Agreement debt was repaid in September 2004.
 
(3) Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting changes includes gains on sales of property and equipment of $6.6 million for 2001 and gains on extinguishment of debt of $4.4 million, $1.5 million and $2.6 million for 2004, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
 
36

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA (CONTINUED)
 
     Years ended December 31,  
     2005    2004    2003    2002    2001  
     (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)  
Selected Balance Sheet Data:
              
Total assets
   $ 188,963    $ 167,568    $ 161,813    $ 166,276    $ 182,745  
                                    
Redeemable preferred stock
   $ 83    $ 97    $ 103    $ 111    $ 123  
                                    
Long-term debt, including current portion (1)
   $ 112,124    $ 106,507    $ 103,275    $ 113,361    $ 131,620  
                                    
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
   $ 13,456    $ 8,398    $ 6,184    $ 1,204    $ (1,284 )
                                    
Selected other data:
              
Cash dividends declared per common share
   $ —      $ —      $ —      $ —      $ —    
                                    
 
(1) Amounts are shown excluding balances related to businesses disposed of.
 
37

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with a review of the other Items included in this Form 10-K and our December 31, 2005 Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report.
Certain statements contained in this MD&A may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. See “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”
Overview
General
We are a diversified holding company. Our wholly-owned subsidiary, ThermaClime, through its subsidiaries, owns substantially all of our core businesses consisting of the:
 
    Climate Control Business engaged in the manufacturing and selling of a broad range of air conditioning and heating products consisting of water source heat pumps including geothermal heat pumps, hydronic fan coils, large custom air handlers and other products used in commercial and residential new building construction, renovation of existing buildings and replacement of existing systems.
 
    Chemical Business engaged in the manufacturing and selling of chemical products produced from three plants in Texas, Arkansas and Alabama for the industrial, mining and agricultural markets.
Climate Control Business
Most of the products of the Climate Control Business are produced to customer orders that are placed well in advance of required delivery dates. As a result, the Climate Control Business carries significant backlogs that eliminate the necessity to carry substantial inventories other than for firm customer orders. The backlog of confirmed orders in our Climate Control Business has increased to approximately $56.2 million as of December 31, 2005 as compared to a backlog of approximately $28.4 million at December 31, 2004. The increase in our backlog relates primarily to the increase in demand for our water source heat pumps, large custom handlers and hydronic fan coils. We anticipate shipping this backlog during 2006.
In response to a record order intake level of our heat pump products, we have recently increased our unit output by over 25% through additional shifts and overtime. In addition, throughout 2005 and into 2006 over $4 million will have been invested in fabrication equipment and plant-wide process control systems. This investment is expected to further raise capacity and reduce overtime.
The Climate Control Business has historically generated consistent annual profits and positive cash flows and continues to do so. Management’s objectives for the Climate Control Business include the continued emphasis on increasing the sales and operating margins of all products and to continue to develop new products.
 
38

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Our Climate Control Business will continue to launch new products and product upgrades in an effort to maintain our current market position and to establish presence in new markets. In recent periods, the Climate Control Business’ profitability was affected by operating losses of certain new product lines being developed over the past few years. In 2005, the emphasis has been to increase the sales levels of these operations above the breakeven point. During 2005, the results for these new products did not improve significantly, although we continued to see improvement in the long-term prospects for these new products. From October 2005 through January 2006, our Climate Control Business received approximately $10.7 million in new orders for these new products.
Chemical Business
The Chemical Business has nitrogen production facilities in Baytown, Texas (“Baytown Facility”), El Dorado, Arkansas (“El Dorado Facility”) and Cherokee, Alabama (“Cherokee Facility”). The El Dorado and Baytown Facilities produce nitrogen products from anhydrous ammonia that is delivered by pipeline. The Cherokee Facility produces nitrogen products from natural gas that is delivered by pipeline.
Anhydrous ammonia and natural gas are commodities, subject to significant price fluctuations, generally purchased at prices in effect at time of purchase. Due to the uncertainty of the sales prices of our products in relation to the cost of anhydrous ammonia and natural gas, we have developed some customers that purchase substantial quantities of products pursuant to sales agreements and/or formulas that provide for the pass through of raw material costs, variable costs, and certain fixed costs, plus in most cases, a profit margin. These pricing arrangements help mitigate the commodity risk inherent in natural gas and anhydrous ammonia. One of the customers who purchases a substantial amount of product pursuant to these pricing arrangements from our Cherokee Facility temporarily suspended their purchases in October 2005 due to the hurricane induced high cost of natural gas and resumed taking a limited amount of product in December 2005, as spot purchases and as long as market conditions and the price of natural gas permit.
Although anhydrous ammonia is produced from natural gas, the price does not necessarily follow the spot price of natural gas in the United States because much of the anhydrous ammonia consumed in our geographical area is produced off shore and delivered by pipeline that originates in the Gulf of Mexico. Our cost is based upon formulas indexed to published industry prices, primarily tied to import prices.
The production from our Baytown Facility is sold pursuant to a long-term supply agreement that provides for the pass through of certain production costs including anhydrous ammonia. This facility continues to generate consistent operating profits.
The El Dorado Facility produces approximately 500,000 tons of product per year. Approximately 51% of the El Dorado Facility’s products sold in 2005 were sold pursuant to pricing arrangements that transfer the cost of anhydrous ammonia to the customer. The balance of the products sold was at the spot price in effect at time of shipment. The El Dorado Facility’s results for 2005 are significantly improved from 2004 despite the lost production of one of its four nitric acid plants during the first two quarters of 2005. The improvement in 2005 is
 
39

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
primarily due to a more favorable balance between supply and demand in the markets for nitrogen products produced at the El Dorado Facility resulting in improved margins.
The Cherokee Facility produces nitrogen products from natural gas. As a result of the sudden climb in the market price of natural gas during 2005 and delivery interruptions resulting from the hurricanes, the Cherokee Facility encountered a significant disruption in its operations. The Cherokee Facility suspended production on September 23rd due to the inability to receive an adequate and reliable supply of natural gas from its natural gas pipeline. Due to damage to its delivery infrastructure caused by Hurricane Katrina, the pipeline had declared force majeure. Although the pipeline was still under force majeure, the Cherokee Facility was able to purchase interruptible delivery natural gas. By October 21st, the Cherokee Facility resumed production.
During November and December 2005, natural gas prices continued to climb to a high of approximately $15 per MCF and management announced in December that production was being suspended again. In mid-January 2006, Cherokee resumed production at approximately two-thirds normal production rates, although gas prices continued to be well above normal. The inability to receive natural gas and the high natural gas costs resulting from both the hurricanes, the effect of the two shut downs and the loss of sales volume had a significant negative effect on the facility’s results of operations for the third and fourth quarters of 2005 and continued to affect the results for the first quarter of 2006. As of March 22, 2006, the price of natural gas decreased to approximately $7.00 per MCF. We believe that the current market outlook justifies continuing production at the Cherokee Facility for the foreseeable future. However, we could from time to time, suspend production at this facility due to, among other things, continuing high cost of its primary raw material, natural gas. Accordingly, our results of operations and financial condition have in the past been, and will in the future be, materially affected by cost increases of raw materials.
In addition, the Cherokee Facility has a cost-plus contract to supply a customer with its requirements for product each year through at least September 2006 which represented approximately 5.5% of our Chemical Business’s revenues during 2005. This customer has recently orally advised us that, although they have not made a final decision, they may be reducing the amount of product they purchase each year from the Cherokee Facility.
Our Baytown Facility was also closed from September 22, 2005 until October 3, 2005 as a precautionary measure due to Hurricane Rita. This facility did not sustain any damage due to the hurricane and its net operating results were not significantly impacted.
EDC is a party to a supply agreement with Orica USA, Inc. (“Orica”) to supply Orica approximately 190,000 tons of ammonia nitrate per year through at least March 2008. During 2005, sales to Orica represented approximately 19% of our Chemical Business’s revenues and approximately 11% of our consolidated revenues. EDC and Orica have agreed in principal to enter into a new five-year agreement beginning January 1, 2006, with such new agreement to provide for certain price increases and an increase in the amount of product Orica will take from EDC each year. This new agreement is subject to finalization of a definitive agreement.
 
40

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As a diversified holding company, cash requirements are primarily dependent upon credit agreements and our ability to obtain funds from our ThermaClime and non-ThermaClime subsidiaries.
During March 2006, we completed a private placement of $18 million of our 7% convertible senior subordinated debentures due 2011 to qualified institutional buyers. These debentures are unsecured obligations, bear an interest rate of 7% per annum and are convertible into our common stock at various conversion rates prior to their maturity on March 1, 2011. We may redeem these debentures at anytime on or after March 1, 2009 under certain conditions. The redemption price is payable at our option in cash or, subject to certain conditions, in shares of our common stock. At maturity, we may also elect to pay up to one-half of the principal amount of the debentures, plus accrued and unpaid interest due thereon at maturity, in shares of our common stock. If we pay the redemption price on any portion of the debentures at maturity in our common stock, our common stock is to be valued for these purposes at 95% of the weighted average of the closing sales price of our common stock for the 20 consecutive trading days ending on the 5th trading day prior to the applicable redemption date or maturity date. We intend to use all or a substantial portion of the net proceeds from the sale of the debentures (which we estimate to be approximately $16.5 million after paying commissions to the placement agent and our expenses relating to the offering) to repay or purchase our debt or debt of our subsidiaries, including our subsidiary’s $13.3 million senior unsecured debentures due 2007, and the balance, if any, for general corporate purposes. Pending such uses, the net proceeds will be invested in investments with highly rated money market funds, U.S. government securities, treasury bills and/or short-term commercial paper.
Historically, ThermaClime’s primary cash needs have been for working capital and capital expenditures. ThermaClime and its subsidiaries depend upon their Working Capital Revolver Loan, internally generated cash flows, and secured equipment financing in order to fund operations and pay obligations.
The Working Capital Revolver Loan and the Senior Secured Loan have financial covenants that are discussed below under “Loan Agreements - Terms and Conditions”.
ThermaClime’s ability to maintain an adequate amount of borrowing availability under its Working Capital Revolver Loan depends on its ability to comply with the terms and conditions of its loan agreements and its ability to generate cash flow from operations. ThermaClime is restricted under its credit agreements as to the funds it may transfer to LSB and its non-ThermaClime affiliates and certain ThermaClime subsidiaries. This limitation does not prohibit payment to LSB of amounts due under a Services Agreement, Management Agreement and a Tax Sharing Agreement. As of December 31, 2005 ThermaClime had availability for additional borrowing under its Working Capital Revolver Loan of $15.9 million.
Although the Chemical Business’ results for 2005 are improved from 2004, the Chemical Business in recent years prior to 2005 has not generated significant positive cash flows due to lower than optimum sales volume levels, margin problems and extensive capital expenditures.
 
41

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
As evident in the above discussion of the Cherokee Facility, the ability to generate a positive margin on Chemical sales is affected by the volatility of the raw material feedstocks as well as the necessity to produce at the optimum production levels to fully absorb the fixed plant costs. The predominant production costs of a process chemical plant, other than the raw material costs, tend to be fixed costs.
Our primary efforts to improve the results of the Chemical Business include sales efforts to increase the non-seasonal sales volumes of the Cherokee and El Dorado Facilities with an emphasis on customers that will accept the commodity risk inherent with natural gas and anhydrous ammonia.
Beginning in October 2004 and continuing into June 2005, the Chemical Business’ results were adversely affected as a result of the loss of production due to a mechanical failure of one of the four nitric acid plants at the El Dorado Facility. The plant was restored to normal production in June 2005. We filed a property damage insurance claim for $3.8 million, net of a $1 million deductible. In 2005, we recognized insurance recoveries of $2.7 million under our replacement cost property insurance policy relating to this property damage claim. The effect of this property insurance recovery to the accompanying consolidated statement of income was $1.5 million for 2005 which is included in other income. The proceeds from property insurance recoveries are classified as cash inflows from investing activities in the accompanying consolidated statement of cash flows. The Company used these proceeds for working capital purposes. The insurers are contesting the remaining claim and we have instituted litigation against the insurers in connection with this claim. Additional recoveries, if any, upon final resolution will be recognized when realized.
In addition, we filed a claim for recovery of the business interruption losses related to this incident. Our business interruption insurance policy contains a forty-five day waiting period before covering losses resulting from business interruptions. The claim is for $4.7 million, net of the forty-five day waiting period. In November 2005, we realized insurance recoveries of $1.9 million relating to this claim which is recorded as a reduction to cost of sales. The proceeds from business interruption insurance recoveries are classified as cash inflows from operating activities in the accompanying consolidated statement of cash flows. The Company used the proceeds for general working capital purposes. The negative impact on gross profit resulting from the lost production was approximately $4.1 million in 2005 and approximately $1 million in 2004. As of March 20, 2006, additional business interruption insurance payments totaling $554,000 were agreed to and paid by our insurers in 2006 which will be recognized in the first quarter of 2006. We have instituted litigation for the remaining balance. Additional recoveries, if any, related to this business interruption will be recognized when realized.
In 2005, we received proceeds of $1.4 million from key individual life insurance policies due to the untimely death of one of our executives in January 2005. The effect from the life insurance proceeds to the accompanying statement of income was $1.2 million for 2005 which is included in non-operating other income, net. These proceeds (excluding a minimal amount relating to the cash surrender value of the underlying policies) are classified as cash inflows from operating activities in the accompanying statement of cash flows. The Company used the proceeds for general working capital purposes.
 
42

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Capital Expenditures
Our Chemical Business has historically required significant investment to fund capital expenditures, while our Climate Control Business has been much less capital intensive. We believe we have approximately $8.3 million of committed capital expenditures for 2006 which includes $5.6 million for our Chemical Business and $2.7 million for a Climate Control Business. The $8.3 million includes $7.3 million relating to operations and $1 million for environmental compliance. We believe that we can fund the projected capital expenditures for 2006 from our working capital.
As discussed under “Environmental Matters” in Item 1, the ADEQ issued to EDC a new revised NPDES water discharge permit in 2004, and EDC has until June 2007 to meet the compliance deadline for the more restrictive limits under the recently issued NPDES permit. In order to meet EDC’s effluent limits under the permit, EDC had planned to utilize a pipeline to be built by the City of El Dorado, Arkansas (the “City”). The City council approved the joint pipeline, but construction of the pipeline by the City is subject to the City receiving a permit from the ADEQ. The ADEQ has not issued the necessary permit to discharge wastewater into the pipeline and, as a result, this has caused a delay of unknown duration in construction of the pipeline. This delay may impact our ability to meet our compliance schedule under the NPDES permit. As a result, EDC has proposed to the ADEQ an extension of its compliance deadlines under its NPDES permit but there are no assurances that the ADEQ will grant such extension. If the City is not able to build its pipeline or can build it in a timely manner, EDC intends to discharge its wastewater through the City’s sewer system subject to obtaining a sewer discharge permit from the City and EDC building a pipeline to the City’s sewer system in a timely manner. The estimated remaining capital expenditures to meet the requirements of the NPDES permit ranges from $.5 million to $3.3 million plus approximately $2 million for our pro-rata portion of pipeline engineering and construction costs should the City build a pipeline. In addition, certain additional capital expenditures will be required to bring the sulfuric acid plant’s air emissions to lower limits. The ultimate cost is believed to be between $1.5 million and $3 million, to be expended through February 2010, which began with minimal expenditures since 2004.
Other capital expenditures are believed to be discretionary and are dependent upon an adequate amount of liquidity and/or obtaining acceptable funding. We have carefully managed those expenditures to projects necessary to execute our business plans and those for environmental and safety compliance.
Dividends
We have not paid cash dividends on our outstanding common stock in many years, and since January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2005, we did not pay any accrued dividends on our outstanding cumulative preferred stock. As of December 31, 2005, there was approximately $14.5 million of unpaid dividends on our outstanding cumulative preferred stock. We intend to retain most of our future earnings, if any, to provide funds for our operations and/or expansion of our business. However, on January 17, 2006, our Board of Directors declared a nominal quarterly dividend, payable March 15, 2006, to holders of record as of February 15, 2006, on certain outstanding series of our preferred stock. This dividend is not for the full amount of the required quarterly dividend pursuant to the terms of all of our outstanding series of preferred stock. As a result, the amount of unpaid dividends on our outstanding cumulative preferred stock increased to $14.9 million as of March 15, 2006. There are no assurances that we will in the future pay any additional quarterly dividends on any of our outstanding shares of preferred stock. We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our outstanding common stock in the foreseeable future, and until all unpaid dividends are paid on our outstanding cumulative preferred stock, no dividends may be paid on our common stock.
 
43

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Compliance with Long-Term Debt Covenants
As discussed below under “Loan Agreements - Terms and Conditions”, the Senior Secured Loan and Working Capital Revolver Loan, as amended, of ThermaClime and its subsidiaries require, among other things, that ThermaClime meet certain lender defined earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), capital expenditure limitation amounts and achieve minimum fixed charge coverage ratios quarterly, on a trailing twelve-month basis. ThermaClime’s forecasts for 2006 indicate that ThermaClime will be able to meet all required covenant tests for all quarters and the year ending December 2006.
Summary
Cash flow and liquidity will continue to be managed very carefully. We believe, with the infusion of new capital as a result of the recently completed debenture offering and based upon current forecasts, that we will have adequate cash in 2006 from internal cash flows and financing sources to enable us to satisfy our cash requirements as they become due in 2006. Due to the volatility of the cost for major raw materials, we have historically experienced revisions to financial forecasts on a frequent basis during the course of a year. As a result, actual results may differ significantly from our forecast, which could have a material impact on our liquidity and future operating results. In addition, our subsidiary, ThermaClime, has its $13.3 million in outstanding 10 3/4% debentures becoming due in 2007. We intend to use the proceeds of the recent debentures offering to purchase or pay the 10 3/4% debentures.
Loan Agreements - Terms and Conditions
Working Capital Revolver Loan- ThermaClime finances its working capital requirements through borrowings under a Working Capital Revolver Loan. Under the Working Capital Revolver Loan, ThermaClime and its subsidiaries may borrow on a revolving basis up to $50 million based on specific percentages of eligible accounts receivable and inventories. Effective February 28, 2005 the Working Capital Revolver Loan was amended which, among other things, extended the maturity date to April 2009 and removed language considered as a subjective acceleration provision. As of December 31, 2005, borrowings outstanding were $32 million and the net credit available for additional borrowings was $15.9 million. The Working Capital Revolver Loan requires that ThermaClime and its Climate Control Business meet certain financial covenants and minimum EBITDA amounts. The EBITDA requirements are measured quarterly on a trailing twelve-month basis. ThermaClime and its Climate Control Business were in compliance with the required minimum EBITDA amounts for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2005. The trailing twelve-month EBITDA requirements for 2006 ranges from $16.4 million to $20.6 million for ThermaClime and $10 million for the Climate Control Business. The EBITDA requirements were set at amounts based upon our forecasts which are presently considered by management to be achievable. See discussion under “Liquidity and Capital Resources - Summary” as to the historical viability of our forecasts.
Senior Secured Loan- In September 2004, ThermaClime and certain of its subsidiaries (the “Borrowers”) completed a $50 million term loan (“Senior Secured Loan”) with a certain lender (the “Lender”). The Senior Secured Loan is to be repaid as follows:
 
    quarterly interest payments which began September 30, 2004;
 
44

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
    quarterly principal payments of $312,500 beginning September 30, 2007;
 
    a final payment of the remaining outstanding principal of $47.5 million and accrued interest on September 16, 2009.
The Senior Secured Loan accrues interest at the applicable LIBOR rate, as defined, plus an applicable LIBOR margin, as defined or, at the election of the Borrowers, the alternative base rate, as defined, plus an applicable base rate margin, as defined, with the annual interest rate not to exceed 11% or 11.5% depending on the leverage ratio. At December 31, 2005 the annual interest rate was 11.5%.
The Borrowers are subject to numerous affirmative and negative covenants under the Senior Secured Loan agreement including, but not limited to, limitation on the incurrence of certain additional indebtedness and liens, limitations on mergers, acquisitions, dissolution and sale of assets, and limitations on declaration of dividends and distributions to us, all with certain exceptions. The Borrowers are also subject to a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, measured quarterly on a trailing twelve-month basis. The Borrowers were in compliance with the required minimum ratio for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2005 and the coverage ratio is considered to be achievable for 2006. The maturity date of the Senior Secured Loan can be accelerated by the Lender upon the occurrence of a continuing event of default, as defined.
Cross - Default Provisions- The Working Capital Revolver Loan agreement and the Senior Secured Loan contain cross-default provisions. If ThermaClime fails to meet the financial covenants of the Senior Secured Loan, the lender may declare an event of default, making the debt due on demand. If this should occur, there are no assurances that we would have funds available to pay such amount or that alternative borrowing arrangements would be available. Accordingly, ThermaClime could be required to curtail operations and/or sell key assets. These actions could result in the recognition of losses that may be material.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and disclosures of contingencies. We had the following changes in accounting estimates during 2005:
 
    the recognition of $644,000 of soil remediation costs classified as discontinued operations as discussed under “Environmental Matters” of Item 1 and
 
    the recognition of $351,000 relating to a death benefit obligation classified as a selling, general and administrative expense due to the change in our CEO’s estimated remaining service period.
In addition, the more significant areas of financial reporting impacted by management’s judgment, estimates and assumptions include the following:
Receivables and Credit Risk- Our sales to contractors and independent sales representatives are generally subject to a mechanics lien in the Climate Control Business. Our other sales are generally unsecured. Credit is extended to customers based on an evaluation of
 
45

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
the customer’s financial condition and other factors. Credit losses are provided for in the financial statements based on historical experience and periodic assessment of outstanding accounts receivable, particularly those accounts which are past due (determined based upon how recently payments have been received). Our periodic assessment of accounts and credit loss provisions are based on our best estimate of amounts that are not recoverable. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited due to the large number of customers comprising our customer bases and their dispersion across many different industries and geographic areas, however, four customers account for approximately 25% of our total net receivables at December 31, 2005. We do not believe this concentration in these four customers represents a significant credit risk due to the financial stability of these customers. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, our trade accounts receivable were net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2.7 million and $2.3 million, respectively.
Inventory Valuations- Inventories are priced at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined using the first-in, first-out basis. Finished goods and work-in-process inventories include material, labor and manufacturing overhead costs. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the carrying value of certain nitrogen-based inventories produced by our Chemical Business was reduced to market because cost exceeded the net realizable value by $1.4 million and $1.3 million, respectively. In addition, the carrying value of certain slow-moving inventory items (primarily Climate Control products) was reduced to market because cost exceeded the net realizable value by $1 million and $.9 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Precious Metals-Precious metals are used as a catalyst in the Chemical Business manufacturing processes. Precious metals are carried at cost, with cost being determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) basis. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, precious metals were $5 million and $5.6 million, respectively, and are included in supplies, prepaid items and other in the consolidated balance sheets. Because some of the catalyst consumed in the production process cannot be readily recovered and the amount and timing of recoveries are not predictable, we follow the practice of expensing precious metals as they are consumed. For 2005, 2004 and 2003, the amounts expensed for precious metals were approximately $3.5 million, $3.3 million and $3.3 million, respectively, and are included in cost of sales. Periodically, during major maintenance or capital projects we may be able to perform procedures to recover precious metals (previously expensed) which have accumulated within the manufacturing equipment. For 2005, 2004 and 2003, we recognized recoveries of precious metals at historical FIFO costs of approximately $2.1 million, $.2 million and $1.9 million, respectively, which are reductions to cost of sales.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets including Goodwill- Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If assets to be held and used are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is the amount by which the carrying amounts of the assets exceed the fair values of the assets as measured by the present value of future net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets or their appraised value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amounts of the assets or fair values less costs to sell. At December 31, 2005 we had no long-lived assets that met the criteria presented in SFAS 144 to be classified as assets held for sale. We have considered impairment of our long-lived assets and related goodwill. We obtained third party appraisals of the fair values associated with the Cherokee Facility and made
 
46

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
estimates of fair values for others. The timing of impairments cannot be predicted with reasonable certainty and are primarily dependent on market conditions outside our control. Should sales prices drop dramatically without a similar decline in the raw material costs or should other matters, including the environmental requirements and/or operating requirements set by Federal and State agencies change substantially from our current expectations, a provision for impairment may be required based upon such event or events. See Item 1 “Business-Environmental Matters.” During 2005, 2004 and 2003, based on estimates obtained from external sources and internal estimates based on inquiry and other techniques, we recognized impairments relating to certain non-core equipment of $120,000, $375,000 and $300,000, respectively, relating to Corporate assets and $117,000, $362,000 and $200,000, respectively, relating to certain capital spare parts and idle assets in our Chemical Business. These impairments are included in other expense in the consolidated statements of income.
Accrued Insurance Liabilities-We are self-insured up to certain limits for group health, workers’ compensation and general liability insurance claims. Above these limits, we have insurance coverage, which management considers to be adequate. Our accrued insurance liabilities are based on estimates of the self-insured portions of the claims, which include the incurred claims amounts plus estimates of future claims development calculated by applying our historical claims development factors to our incurred claims amounts. We also consider the reserves established by our insurance adjustors and/or estimates provided by attorneys handling the claims, if any. In addition, our accrued insurance liabilities include estimates of incurred, but not reported, claims and other insurance-related costs. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, our claims liabilities are $1.4 million and $1.4 million, respectively and are included in accrued liabilities.
Product Warranty-Our Climate Control Business sells equipment for which we provide warranties covering defects in materials and workmanship. Generally the warranty coverage for manufactured equipment is limited to 18 months from the date of shipment or 12 months from the date of start-up, whichever is shorter, and to 90 days for spare parts. In some cases, the customer may purchase an extended warranty. Our accounting policy and methodology for warranty arrangements is to periodically measure and recognize the expense and liability for such warranty obligations using a percentage of net sales, based on historical warranty costs. It is possible that future warranty costs could exceed our estimates. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, our accrued product warranty obligations were $2.3 million and $2 million, respectively and are included in accrued and other noncurrent liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
Accrued Plant Turnaround Costs- We accrue in advance the cost expected to be incurred in the next planned major maintenance activities (“Turnarounds”) of our Chemical Business. Turnaround costs are accrued on a straight-line basis over the scheduled period between Turnarounds, which generally ranges from 12 to 24 months. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, accrued and other noncurrent liabilities include $1.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively, relating to Turnarounds.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) is currently working on a project to clarify guidance on the accounting for Turnarounds. In March 2006, FASB decided to issue guidance in the form of a FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) to eliminate the accrue-in-advance method of accounting for Turnarounds and to address transition guidance at a future FASB
 
47

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
meeting and directed their staff (“Staff”) to research the practicability of retrospective application. The Staff’s immediate plans are to provide FASB with a recommendation on transition guidance after researching the practicability of accounting for the adoption of the provisions in the FSP as a change in accounting principle with retrospective application as described in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154-Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. As discussed above, we are using the accrue-in-advance method for Turnarounds that FASB may eliminate in the near future. If the FSP was effective as of December 31, 2005, the pro forma effect on our consolidated balance sheet would be a decrease in accrued and other noncurrent liabilities and an increase in stockholders’ equity of $1,405,000. Depending on the transition guidance provided, our preliminary analysis of the pro form effect on our consolidation statements of income would be (a) an increase in net income of $1,405,000 as a cumulative effect of accounting change for 2005 or (b) an increase (decrease) in net income of $(112,000), $(1,161,000) and $792,000 for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and an increase in stockholders’ equity of $1,886,000 at December 31, 2002.
Executive Benefit Agreements- We have entered into benefit agreements with certain key executives. Costs associated with these individual benefit agreements are accrued when they become probable over the estimated remaining service period. Total costs accrued equal the present value of specified payments to be made after benefits become payable. In 1992, we entered into individual benefit agreements with certain key executives (“1992 Agreements”) that provide for annual benefit payments for life (in addition to salary). As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the liability for these benefits under the 1992 Agreements is $938,000 and $960,000, respectively, which is included in accrued liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets (See “Other Plans” under Item 11).
In 1981, we entered into individual death benefit agreements with certain key executives. In addition, as part of the 1992 Agreements, should the executive die prior the age of 65, we will pay the beneficiary named in the agreement in 120 equal monthly installments aggregating to an amount specified in the agreement. As discussed under “Other Plans” in Item 11, on May 12, 2005 we entered into a death benefit agreement with our CEO. As of December 31, 2005, the liability for death benefits is $869,000 (none at December 31, 2004) which is included in accrued and other noncurrent liabilities. The increase in the liability relates to the untimely death of one of our executives in January 2005 and the change in accounting estimate for CEO’s remaining service period as discussed above.
Environmental and Regulatory Compliance- The Chemical Business is subject to specific federal and state regulatory and environmental compliance laws and guidelines. We have developed policies and procedures related to environmental and regulatory compliance. We must continually monitor whether we have maintained compliance with such laws and regulations and the operating implications, if any, and amount of penalties, fines and assessments that may result from noncompliance. At December 31, 2005, liabilities totaling $1,491,000 have been accrued relating to a new consent administrative order (“CAO”) and the Slurry Consent Order. These liabilities are based on current estimates that may be revised in the near term based on results of our investigation, risk assessment and remediation pursuant to the new CAO and Slurry Consent Order. In addition, we will be required to make capital expenditures as it relates to the NPDES permit and Air CAO.
 
48

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Asset Retirement Obligations- We have a legal obligation to monitor certain discharge water outlets at our Chemical Business facilities should we discontinue the operations of a facility. We do not believe that the annual costs of the required monitoring activities would be significant and as we currently have no plans to discontinue the use of the facilities and the remaining life of either facility is indeterminable, an asset retirement liability has not been recognized. However, we will continue to review this obligation and record a liability when a reasonable estimate of the fair value can be made. Currently, there is insufficient information to estimate the fair value of the asset retirement obligation.
Deferred Income Taxes- Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes, and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Valuation allowances are provided against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We are able to realize deferred tax assets up to an amount equal to the future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences. The taxable temporary differences will turn around in the loss carry forward period as the differences reverse. Other differences will turn around as the assets are realized or liabilities are paid in the normal course of business. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, our deferred tax assets were net of a valuation allowance of $26.1 million and $27.9 million, respectively. (See Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
Contingencies- We accrue for contingent losses when such losses are probable and reasonably estimable. In addition, we recognize contingent gains when such gains are realized. We are a party to various litigation and other contingencies, the ultimate outcome of which is not presently known. Should the ultimate outcome of these contingencies be adverse, such outcome could create an event of default under ThermaClime’s Working Capital Revolver Loan and the Senior Secured Loan and could adversely impact our liquidity and capital resources.
Revenue Recognition- We recognize revenue for substantially all of our operations at the time title to the goods transfers to the buyer and there remains no significant future performance obligations by us. If revenue relates to construction contracts, we recognize revenue using the percentage-of-completion method based primarily on contract costs incurred to date compared with total estimated contract costs. Changes to total estimated contract costs or losses, if any, are recognized in the period in which they are determined.
Recognition of Insurance Recoveries- If our insurance claim relates to a recovery of losses, we recognize the recovery when it is probable and reasonably estimable. If our insurance claim relates to a contingent gain, we recognize the recovery when it is realized.
Management’s judgment and estimates in these areas are based on information available from internal and external resources at that time. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates and judgments, as additional information becomes known.
Results of Operations
The following Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 and accompanying notes and the discussions above under “Overview” And “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
 
49

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
The following table contains certain information about our continuing operations in different industry segments for each of the three years ended December 31:
 
     2005     2004     2003  
     (In thousands)  
Net sales:
      
Climate Control
   $ 156,466     $ 140,638     $ 119,032  
Chemical
     233,447       216,264       193,168  
Other
     6,809       6,706       4,461  
                        
   $ 396,722     $ 363,608     $ 316,661  
                        
Gross profit:
      
Climate Control
   $ 47,315     $ 42,049     $ 36,139  
Chemical
     16,426       8,917       12,281  
Other
     2,330       2,145       1,491  
                        
   $ 66,071     $ 53,111     $ 49,911  
                        
Operating income (loss):
      
Climate Control
   $ 14,097     $ 11,707     $ 11,519  
Chemical
     7,703       (877 )     3,043  
General corporate expense and other business operations, net
     (6,835 )     (7,586 )     (6,560 )
                        
     14,965       3,244       8,002  
Interest expense
     (11,407 )     (7,393 )     (6,097 )
Provision for loss on notes receivable-Climate Control
     —         (1,447 )     —    
Gains on extinguishment of debt
     —         4,400       258  
Non-operating income (expense), net:
      
Chemical
     362       2,463       511  
Corporate and other business operations
     1,199       (29 )     220  
Provision for income taxes
     (118 )     —         —    
Equity in earnings of affiliate - Climate Control
     745       668       19  
                        
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change
   $ 5,746     $ 1,906     $ 2,913  
                        
 
50

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2004
Net Sales
Our Climate Control Business’ net sales for 2005 were $156.5 million compared to $140.6 million for 2004, an 11.3% increase. Net sales of our heat pump products increased $11.3 million, or 15.4%, primarily as a result of stronger customer demand, a 7% increase in overall average unit sales prices due to the increase in our raw material costs as discussed below, and change in product mix. Net sales of our hydronic fan coils increased $4.8 million, or 9.9%, primarily due to a 6% increase in overall average unit sales prices due to the increase in our raw material costs as well as an improvement in product mix. Net sales of our other HVAC products decreased $.3 million. For 2004, net sales of other HVAC products includes $3.8 million as a result of consolidating MultiClima’s operating results in the second quarter of 2004 as required under FIN 46. Effective July 1, 2004, we were no longer required to consolidate MultiClima’s operating results. Excluding the effect of MultiClima, sales of other HVAC products increased $3.5 million which includes an increase in sales of $1.1 million relating to our modular chiller systems, $.9 million relating to our large custom air handlers, $.9 million as a result of an increase in construction projects and $.7 million relating to a new product line with increasing demand.
Our Chemical Business’ net sales for 2005 were $233.4 million compared to $216.3 million for 2004 or a 7.9% increase. This overall increase of $17.1 million reflects, in part, higher sales prices resulting from the increased cost of a raw material feedstocks (anhydrous ammonia and natural gas) as discussed below. Sales prices increased overall by 13% but overall volume of tons sold decreased 5%. The volume of tons sold at the Baytown Facility were down 14% due to lower demand for nitric acid by Bayer resulting from the shutdown of one of North America’s consuming locations. The decrease in volume also includes a decrease of 4% due primarily to the suspension of production at the Cherokee Facility as discussed above under “Overview-Chemical Business.” The increase in net sales includes an increase of $10.5 million relating to our mining products, an increase of $8.5 million relating to our agricultural products, offset, in part, by a decrease of $1.8 million relating to our industrial acid and other chemical products.
Net sales classified as “Other” consists of sales of industrial machinery and related components. Net sales for 2005 were $6.8 million compared to $6.7 million for 2004 or an increase of $.1 million.
Gross Profit
Gross profit by industry segment represents net sales less cost of sales.
Our Climate Control Business’ gross profit was $47.3 million or 30.2% as a percentage of net sales for 2005 compared to $42 million or 29.9% for 2004. The net increase in gross profit of $5.3 million resulted primarily by the increase in sales of our heat pump and hydronic fan coil products as discussed above. This increase in gross profit was partially offset by a change in product/customer mix and our inability to fully pass on to our customers in the form of product price increases the increase in the raw material cost of copper. The spot market increases through the twelve months of 2005 for copper were approximately 40%. In addition, a decrease of $.8 million relates to MultiClima in the second quarter of 2004 as discussed above.
 
51

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Our Chemical Business’ gross profit was $16.4 million or 7 % as a percentage of net sales for 2005 compared to $8.9 million or 4.1% for 2004. The net increase in gross profit of $7.5 million is due primarily to improved margins on certain agricultural and industrial acid products and cost recoveries during 2005 of $2.1 million of production catalyst (precious metals) used in our manufacturing processes compared to $.2 million during 2004. The increase in gross profit was offset, in part, by our inability to fully pass on to our customers the 25% increase in costs of anhydrous ammonia during the spring and fall planting seasons incurred by the El Dorado Facility, the 34% increase in costs of natural gas sustained by our Cherokee Facility and the suspension of production at the Cherokee Facility as discussed above under “Overview-Chemical Business”. The Cherokee Facility also incurred an increase of $2.2 million of electricity costs primarily as the result of increased rates charged by their utility company. In addition in 2004, net settlements of $1.5 million (which increased gross profit) were reached with insurance carriers relating to a vendor’s faulty repair work to a chemical plant boiler.
As discussed under “Liquidity and Capital Resources”, beginning in October 2004 and continuing into June 2005, the Chemical Business’ results were adversely affected as a result of the loss of production due to a mechanical failure of one of the four nitric acid plants at the El Dorado Facility. The plant was restored to normal production in June 2005. We recognized insurance recoveries of $1.9 million under our business interruption insurance policy relating to this claim for 2005 which is recorded as a reduction to cost of sales. The negative impact on gross profit resulting from the lost production was approximately $4.1 million in 2005 and approximately $1 million in 2004.
Gross profit classified as “Other” (see discussion above) was $2.3 million or 34.2% as a percentage of net sales for 2005 compared to $2.1 million or 32% for 2004 or an increase of $.2 million.
Operating Income (Loss)
Our chief operating decision makers use operating income (loss) by industry segment for purposes of making decisions which include resource allocations and performance evaluations. Operating income (loss) by industry segment represents gross profit by industry segment less selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) incurred by each industry segment plus other income and other expense earned/incurred by each industry segment before general corporate expenses and other business operations, net. General corporate expenses and other business operations, net consist of unallocated portions of gross profit, SG&A, other income and other expense.
Operating Income - Climate Control: Our Climate Control Business’ operating income was $14.1 million for 2005 compared to $11.7 million for 2004. The net increase in operating income of $2.4 million resulted primarily by selling, general and administrative expenses of $1.4 million relating to MultiClima in the second quarter of 2004 and the net increase in gross profit of $5.3 million as discussed above. This increase in operating income was partially offset by increased shipping and handling costs of $1 million as a result of increased sales volume and rising fuel costs, increased professional fees of $.9 million primarily relating to litigation and related arbitrations between one of our subsidiaries, Trison, and a customer (also see discussions under “Climate Control Business” of Item 3), increased commissions of $.8 million due to
 
52

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
increased sales volume, increased personnel costs of $.6 million due primarily to increased group health insurance costs and increased provision for losses on accounts receivable of $.5 million due primarily to lower than usual incidence in 2004 and the increased sales volumes in 2005.
Operating Income (Loss) - Chemical: Our Chemical Business’ operating income was $7.7 million for 2005 compared to an operating loss of $.9 million for 2004. The net increase in operating income of $8.6 million included the net increase in gross profit of $7.6 million as discussed above and gains of $1.6 million from replacement cost property insurance recoveries which includes the $1.5 million as discussed above under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” and a decrease in personnel costs of $.3 million as a result of a reduction in personnel at the El Dorado Facility. This increase was partially offset by an increase in handling costs of $1 million due primarily to higher railcar lease and maintenance costs as the result of increasing the number of railcars used to support our agricultural business.
General Corporate Expense and Other Business Operations, Net: Our general corporate expense and other business operations, net were $6.8 million for 2005 compared to $7.6 million for 2004. The net decrease of $.8 million relates primarily to an increase in gains of $.7 million in from the sales of corporate assets, a decrease in professional fees of $.3 million which includes costs incurred during 2004 relating to a proposed unregistered offering of Senior Secured Notes which was terminated, a decrease of $.3 million of provisions for impairments on corporate assets and a decrease of approximately $.6 million due to other individually immaterial items. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in personnel costs of $1.1 million which includes the recognition of death benefit obligations (see discussion above under “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates”), an increase in group health insurance costs and net premium costs associated with key individual life insurance policies including policies associated with a death benefit agreement entered into with our CEO during the second quarter of 2005 (also see discussion under “Other Plans” of Item 11).
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $11.4 million for 2005 compared to $7.4 million for 2004. The increase of $4 million relates primarily to interest expense incurred on the $50 million term loan that was completed in September 2004 as discussed under “Loan Agreements - Terms and Conditions.” A portion of the proceeds of the Senior Secured Loan was used to repay the outstanding balance under a former financing agreement (“Financing Agreement”). There was no interest expense recognition on the Financing Agreement indebtedness from May 2002 through September 2004 since that transaction was accounted for as a voluntary debt restructuring in 2002. This increase was partially offset due to the repurchase of $5 million of the Senior Unsecured Notes in September 2004.
Provision for Loss on Notes Receivable
Based on our assessment of the liquidity and results of operations of MultiClima and its parent company, we concluded that the outstanding notes receivable were not recoverable. As a result, effective July 1, 2004 we forgave and canceled the loan agreements in exchange for extending the Option’s expiration date from June 15, 2005 to June 15, 2008 with an estimated value of zero. We recognized a provision for loss of $1.4 million for 2004.
 
53

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt
As a result of the repayment in September 2004 of the Financing Agreement prior to the maturity date of June 30, 2005, we recognized the remaining unearned interest of $4.4 million as a gain on extinguishment of debt (also see Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
Non-Operating Other Income, net
Our non-operating other income, net was $1.6 million for 2005 compared to $2.4 million for 2004, a decrease of $.8 million. In 2005, we received net proceeds from key individual life insurance policies of $1.2 million. In addition, we recognized gains of $.2 million from the sales of certain current assets (primarily precious metals) in 2005 compared to gains of $2.3 million in 2004.
Loss from Discontinued Operations
In December 2002, in connection with the sale of substantially all of the operating assets of Slurry and UTeC which was accounted for as discontinued operations, UTeC leased the Hallowell Facility to the buyer under a triple net long-term lease agreement. However, Slurry retained the obligation to be responsible for, and perform the activities under, the Slurry Consent Order. In addition, certain of our subsidiaries agreed to indemnify the buyer of such assets for these environmental matters. Slurry placed prior owners Chevron of the Hallowell Facility on notice of their responsibility for contribution towards the costs to investigate and remediate this site. Representatives of a prior owner agreed to pay one-half of the costs of the investigation and remediation on an interim, non-binding basis.
During October 2005, representatives of Slurry and a prior owner met with the KDHE and proposed to remove the bulk of contaminated soil at the Hallowell site, which was orally agreed to by the KDHE subject to approval of a written work plan submitted to the KDHE. As a result of these meetings, provisions totaling of $.6 million were recorded for our share of these costs for 2005. There are no income tax benefits related to these expenses.
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change
Effective March 31, 2004 we included in our condensed consolidated balance sheet the consolidated assets and liabilities of the parent company of MultiClima as required under FIN 46 (also see Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). As a result, we recorded a cumulative effect of accounting change of $.5 million primarily relating to the elimination of embedded profit included in the cost of inventory which was purchased from MultiClima by certain of our subsidiaries.
 
54

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Year Ended December 31, 2004 compared to Year Ended December 31, 2003
Net Sales
Our Climate Control Business’ net sales for 2004 were $140.6 million compared to $119 million for 2003, an 18.2% increase. Net sales of our heat pump products increased $13.1 million, or 21.6%, primarily as a result of an 18% increase in the number of units sold in the non-OEM commercial and residential markets, a 3% increase in overall average unit sales prices due to price increases related to raw material costs and product mix, and higher customer order levels. Net sales of our hydronic fan coils increased $1.3 million, or 2.8%, primarily due to a 2% increase in overall average unit sales prices due to product price increases related to raw material cost increases and product mix, as well as an increase in unit volume related to market recovery since the September 11, 2001 tragedy. Net sales of our other HVAC products increased $7.2 million. As previously discussed, for 2004, net sales of other HVAC products includes $3.8 million as a result of consolidating MultiClima’s operating results in the second quarter of 2004 as required under FIN 46. Excluding the effect of MultiClima, sales of other HVAC products increased $3.4 million which includes an increase in sales of $1.7 million relating to our large custom air handlers and $.7 million relating to a new product line as a result of improved customer order intake and $.7 million relating to an increase in construction projects.
Our Chemical Business’ net sales for 2004 were $216.3 million compared to $193.2 million for 2003 or a 12% increase. This overall increase of $23.1 million reflects, in part, higher sales prices resulting from the increased cost of a raw material feedstocks (anhydrous ammonia and natural gas) as discussed below. Sales prices increased overall by 9% while volume of tons sold increased 4%. The increase in volume includes an increase of 13% at the Cherokee Facility due primarily to an increase in demand for UAN partially offset by the suspension of production of agricultural grade ammonium nitrate and an increase of 7% at the Baytown Facility as a result of the increase in demand for nitric acid. The increase in net sales includes an increase of $11.8 million relating to our industrial acid and other chemical products, an increase of $9.9 million relating to our mining products and an increase of $1.4 million relating to our agricultural products.
Net sales classified as “Other” consists of sales of industrial machinery and related components. Net sales for 2004 were $6.7 million compared to $4.5 million for 2003 or an increase of $2.2 million.
Gross Profit
Gross profit by industry segment represents net sales less cost of sales.
Our Climate Control Business’ gross profit was $42 million or 29.9% as a percentage of net sales for 2004 compared to $36.1 million or 30.4% for 2003. The net increase in gross profit of $5.9 million resulted primarily by the increase in sales of our heat pump products and construction projects as discussed above. In addition, an increase of $.8 million relates to MultiClima in the second quarter of 2004 as discussed above. This increase in gross profit was partially offset by our inability to fully pass on to our customers the increases in raw material costs of steel and copper, estimated to be 75% and 40%, respectively, through 2004.
 
55

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Our Chemical Business’ gross profit was $8.9 million or 4.1 % as a percentage of net sales for 2004 compared to $12.3 million or 6.4% for 2003. The net decrease in gross profit of $3.4 million is due primarily to the negative impact of the lost production at the El Dorado Facility as a result of the mechanical failure discussed above in “Liquidity and Capital Resources”, our inability to fully pass on to our customers the 15% increase in costs of anhydrous ammonia incurred by the El Dorado Facility and the 10% increase in costs of natural gas sustained by our Cherokee Facility. In addition, cost recoveries of $1.9 million during 2003 were recognized for the recoveries of production catalyst (precious metals) used in the manufacturing processes compared to $.2 million during 2004. This increase was offset, in part, by net settlements of $1.5 million (which increased gross profit) that were reached with insurance carriers relating to a vendor’s faulty repair work to a chemical plant boiler in 2004.
Gross profit classified as “Other” (see discussion above) was $2.1 million or 32% as a percentage of net sales for 2004 compared to $1.5 million or 33.4% for 2003 or an increase of $.6 million.
Operating Income (Loss)
See discussion above for definition of operating income (loss) by industry segment.
Operating Income - Climate Control: Our Climate Control Business’ operating income was $11.7 million for 2004 compared to $11.5 million for 2003. The net increase in operating income of $.2 million resulted primarily by the net increase in gross profit of $5.9 million as discussed above. This increase in operating income was partially offset by the increase in personnel costs of $1.5 million due primarily to the increase in personnel associated with higher volume and the related support required and increased group health insurance costs, increased shipping and handling costs of $1.4 million as a result of increased sales volumes and rising fuel costs, increased warranty costs of $.3 million due to increased sales volume, increased advertising cost of $.3 million as a result of our focus on increasing market share and increased commission of $.3 million due to the increase in sales volume and selling, general and administrative expenses of $1.4 million relating to MultiClima in the second quarter of 2004.
Operating Income (Loss) - Chemical: Our Chemical Business’ operating loss was $.9 million for 2004 compared to operating income of $3 million for 2003. The net decrease of $3.9 million relates primarily to the net decrease in gross profit of $3.4 million as discussed above.
General Corporate Expense and Other Business Operations, Net: Our general corporate expense and other business operations, net were $7.6 million for 2004 compared to $6.6 million for 2003. The net increase of $1 million relates primarily to professional fees of $.9 million incurred during 2004 relating to a proposed unregistered offering of Senior Secured Notes which was terminated and an increase in personnel costs of $.4 million relating to the increase in personnel and increases in group health insurance costs partially offset by the increase in gross profit of $.6 million classified as “Other” as discussed above.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $7.4 million for 2004 compared to $6.1 million for 2003. The increase
 
56

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
of $1.3 million relates primarily to interest expense incurred on the $50 million term loan that was completed in September 2004 as discussed above. This increase was partially offset due to the repurchase of $5 million of the Senior Unsecured Notes in September 2004.
Provision for Loss on Notes Receivable
See previous discussion under “Provision for Loss on Notes Receivables”.
Gain on Extinguishment of Debt
See previous discussion under “Gain on Extinguishment of Debt”.
Non-Operating Other Income, net
Our non-operating other income, net was $2.4 million for 2004 compared to $.7 million for 2003, an increase of $1.7 million. In 2004, we recognized gains of $2.3 million from the sales of certain current assets (primarily precious metals) compared to gains of $.5 million in 2003.
Equity in Earnings of Affiliate
Our equity in earnings of affiliate was $668,000 in 2004 compared to $19,000 in 2003. The increase is the result of the renegotiation of a sales contract with a customer of the joint venture.
Cash Flow From Operating Activities
Historically, our primary cash needs have been for operating expenses, working capital and capital expenditures. We have financed our cash requirements primarily through internally generated cash flow, borrowings under our revolving credit facilities, secured asset financing and the sale of assets. See additional discussion concerning cash flows from our Climate Control and Chemical Businesses in “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
For 2005, net cash provided by continuing operating activities was $11 million, including net income plus depreciation and amortization less other non-cash adjustments offset by cash used by changes in assets and liabilities.
Accounts receivable increased $8.7 million including:
 
    a net increase of $5.3 million relating to the Chemical Business as the result of increased sales from the El Dorado and Cherokee Facilities due to higher sales prices and increased volumes sold in December 2005 compared to December 2004. In December 2004, one of the four nitric plants at the El Dorado Facility was down as discussed under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.” This increase was partially offset by a decrease in the number of days EDNC’s receivables were outstanding and a decrease in their volumes sold in December 2005 compared to December 2004 due to a lower demand for nitric acid.
 
    an increase of $3.6 million relating to the Climate Control Business due primarily to increased sales of hydronic fan coils, heat pumps and large custom air handlers.
 
57

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Inventories increased $8.9 million including:
 
    an increase of $6.3 million relating to the Chemical Business primarily as the result of higher costs of our raw material feedstocks and increased volumes on hand at the El Dorado and Cherokee Facilities. The increase in volumes on hand is due, in part, to one of the four nitric plants at the El Dorado Facility being down during the fourth quarter of 2004 as discussed under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
 
    an increase of $2 million relating to the Climate Control Business due primarily to an increase in raw materials on hand to supply the increase in production of our heat pump products as the result of the increase backlog as discussed under “Production and Backlog” of Item 1.
 
    an increase of $.6 million of industrial machinery and components primarily as the result of expanding our product lines.
Supplies, prepaid items and other decreased $.8 million including:
 
    a decrease of prepaid insurance of $1 million as the result of changes in our insurance programs, policy periods and payment methods and
 
    a decrease of precious metals of $.6 million primarily due to the sale of excess metals on hand offset, in part, by an increase in maintenance and repair supplies relating to the Chemical Business.
Accounts payable increased $4 million primarily due to the increase in production and the purchases of additional production equipment in our Climate Control Business.
Customer deposits decreased $1.5 million primarily due to the decrease in the amount of prepaid sales of our agricultural products in the Chemical Business offset, in part, by a deposit received as a down payment on an order of large custom air handlers in the Climate Control Business.
The change in deferred rent expense of $6 million is due to the rent expense recognized on a straight-line basis exceeding the scheduled lease payments for 2005.
The increase in other accrued and noncurrent liabilities of $2.5 million includes an increase of death benefit obligations of $.9 million which primarily relates to the untimely death of one of our executives in January 2005 and the change in accounting estimate for our CEO’s remaining service period as discussed above under “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” and an increase in accrued payroll and related benefits and commissions of $.7 million primarily relating to the Climate Control Business.
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
Net cash used by investing activities was $10.6 million for 2005 which included $15.3 million for capital expenditures of which $10.8 million is for the benefit of our Chemical Business. A portion of these expenditures relating to the Chemical Business are the result of the mechanical failure of the acid plant discussed above under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.” In
 
58

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
addition, the $.5 million used for other assets included the purchase of two interest rate cap contracts as discussed under “Interest Rate Risk” of Item 7A.
Cash provided by investing activities included $2.9 million of proceeds from property insurance recoveries and $2.4 million of proceeds from sales of property and equipment.
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $3.3 million. Net cash provided by financing activities primarily consisted of proceeds from short-term financing and drafts payable of $5.1 million, a net increase in revolving debt facilities of $4.2 million and other long-term borrowings of $3.6 million partially offset by payments on short-term financing and drafts payable of $6 million, payments on other long-term debt of $3.3 million and the purchase of 13,300 shares of our Series 2 Preferred for $.6 million.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
Our aggregate contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005 are summarized in the following table. See discussion in “Liquidity and Capital Resources” and Notes 9 and 11 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
59

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
     Payments Due in the Year Ending December 31,
Contractual Obligations
   Total    2006    2007    2008    2009    2010    Thereafter
     (in thousands)
Long-term debt:
                    
Working Capital Revolver Loan
   $ 31,975    $ —      $ —      $ —      $ 31,975    $ —      $ —  
Senior Unsecured Notes due 2007
     13,300      —        13,300      —        —        —        —  
Senior Secured Loan due 2009
     50,000      —        625      1,250      48,125      —        —  
Capital leases
     1,200      488      336      365      11      —        —  
Other
     15,649      2,860      5,224      2,640      942      999      2,984
                                                
Total long-term debt
     112,124      3,348      19,485      4,255      81,053      999      2,984
Interest payments on long-term debt (1)
     36,198      10,933      10,456      8,677      5,185      256      691
Capital expenditures (2)
     8,300      8,300      —        —        —        —        —  
Operating leases:
                    
Baytown lease
     33,457      8,175      9,227      11,173      4,882      —        —  
Other operating leases
     10,889      2,702      1,883      1,237      876      687      3,504
Exchange-traded futures contracts
     821      821      —        —        —        —        —  
Purchase obligations
     4,553      976      976      976      976      649      —  
Other long-term liabilities
     5,687      —        1,758      722      548      347      2,312
                                                
Total
   $ 212,029    $ 35,255    $ 43,785    $ 27,040    $ 93,520    $ 2,938    $ 9,491
                                                
 
(1) The estimated interest payments relating to variable interest rate debt are based on the effective interest rates at December 31, 2005. In addition, we used the balance of the Working Capital Revolver Loan at December 31, 2005 as the average outstanding balance of the Working Capital Revolver Loan through maturity.
 
(2) Capital expenditures include only non-discretionary amounts in our 2006 capital expenditure budget. These amounts do not include, as discussed in “Environmental Matters” under Item 1, an estimated $.5 to $3.3 million as required under a NPDES permit effective June 2007 based on current assumptions; an estimated $2 million for our pro-rata portion of pipeline engineering and construction costs if EDC uses the City of El Dorado’s proposed pipeline; and an estimated $1.5 to $3 million over the next five years relating to the Air CAO.
 
60

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Availability of Company’s Loss Carry-Overs
For a discussion on our net operating loss carry-overs, see Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
General
Our results of operations and operating cash flows are impacted by changes in market interest rates and changes in market prices of copper, steel, anhydrous ammonia and natural gas.
Forward Sales Commitments Risk
Periodically our Climate Control and Chemical Businesses enter into forward sales commitments of products for deliveries in future periods. As a result, we could be exposed to embedded losses should our product costs exceed the firm sales prices. At December 31, 2005, there were no embedded losses associated with sales commitments with firm sales prices.
Commodity Price Risk
Our Climate Control Business buys substantial quantities of copper and steel for use in manufacturing processes and our Chemical Business buys substantial quantities of anhydrous ammonia and natural gas as feedstocks generally at market prices. Periodically, our Climate Control Business enters into exchange-traded futures for copper and our Chemical Business enters into exchange-traded futures for natural gas, which contracts are generally accounted for on a mark-to-market basis in accordance with SFAS No. 133. At December 31, 2005 our purchase commitments under these contracts were for 600,000 pounds of copper through December 2006 at a weighted average cost of $1.37 per pound ($821,000) and a weighted average market value of $1.98 per pound ($1,187,000).
Interest Rate Risk
Our interest rate risk exposure results from our debt portfolio which is impacted by short-term rates, primarily prime rate-based borrowings from commercial banks, and long-term rates, primarily fixed-rate notes, some of which prohibit prepayment or require substantial prepayment penalties.
We purchased two interest rate cap contracts for a cost of $590,000 in March 2005 to help minimize our interest rate risk exposure relating to the Working Capital Revolver Loan. These contracts set a maximum three-month LIBOR base rate of 4.59% on $30 million. These contracts mature on March 29, 2009. These contracts are free-standing derivatives and are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis in accordance with SFAS No.133. At December 31, 2005 the market value of these contracts was $429,000.
 
61

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
The following table presents principal amounts and related weighted-average interest rates by maturity date for our interest rate sensitive financial instruments as of December 31, 2005.
 
     YEARS ENDING DECEMBER 31,  
     2006     2007     2008     2009     2010     THEREAFTER     TOTAL  
     (Dollars in thousands)  
Expected maturities of long-term debt:
              
Variable rate debt
   $ 565     $ 1,732     $ 1,627     $ 80,350     $ 272     $ 651     $ 85,197  
Weighted average interest rate (1)
     9.56 %     9.58 %     9.59 %     9.55 %     7.18 %     7.18 %     9.51 %
Fixed rate debt (2)
   $ 2,783     $ 17,753     $ 2,628     $ 703     $ 727     $ 2,333     $ 26,927  
Weighted average interest rate (2)
     9.36 %     8.99 %     7.08 %     6.69 %     6.50 %     6.35 %     8.49 %
 
(1) Interest rate is based on the aggregate amount of debt outstanding as of December 31, 2005. On ThermaClime’s Working Capital Revolver Loan, the interest rate is based on the lender’s prime rate plus .75% per annum, or at its option, LIBOR plus 2% per annum.
 
(2) The fixed rate debt and weighted average interest rate are based on the aggregate amount of debt outstanding as of December 31, 2005.
 
62

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
     December 31, 2005    December 31, 2004
     Estimated
Fair Value
   Carrying
Value
   Estimated
Fair Value
   Carrying
Value
     (in thousands)
Variable Rate:
           
Senior Secured Loan (1)
   $ 48,695    $ 50,000    $ 50,000    $ 50,000
Bank debt and equipment financing
     35,197      35,197      31,740      31,740
Fixed Rate:
           
Bank debt and equipment financing
     13,574      13,627      12,574      11,467
Senior Unsecured Notes due 2007 (2)
     6,118      13,300      6,071      13,300
                           
   $ 103,584    $ 112,124    $ 100,385    $ 106,507
                           
 
(1) The Senior Secured Loan has a variable interest rate not to exceed 11% or 11.5% depending on ThermaClime’s leverage ratio.
 
(2) The estimated fair value was based on market quotations; however, there has been a low volume of trading activity. In March 2006, we purchased approximately $6 million of these Notes at carrying value.
 
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
We have included the financial statements and supplementary financial information required by this item immediately following Part IV of this report and hereby incorporate by reference the relevant portions of those statements and information into this Item 8.
 
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
 
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As noted on the cover of this Form 10-K, we are not an “accelerated filer.” Due to the definitions, certain areas contained within the disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), overlap with the definition of internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act).
It is our goal to maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management. Based on our most recent evaluation, which was completed as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
 
63

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
procedures. Although during the evaluation we noted several significant deficiencies in our disclosure controls and procedures, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of December 31, 2005.
In our 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2004, we reported that our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2004, were not effective as a result of a material weakness identified resulting in incorrectly assessing the materiality of a change from LIFO and FIFO method of accounting of certain inventory to net income. This weakness was remediated during the quarter ended December 31, 2005, by formalizing our Disclosure Committee, which reports to our CEO and CFO, and adopting a charter for the Committee.
Except for formalizing our Disclosure Committee, there were no other significant changes to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2005.
 
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
 
64

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements contained within this report may be deemed “Forward-Looking Statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements in this report other than statements of historical fact are Forward-Looking Statements that are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual results and performance of the Company to differ materially from such statements. The words “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “will”, and similar expressions identify Forward-Looking Statements. Forward-Looking Statements contained herein relate to, among other things,
 
    our Climate Control Business has developed leadership positions in niche markets by offering extensive product lines, customized products and improved technologies,
 
    we have developed the most extensive line of water source heat pumps and hydronic fan coils in the United States,
 
    we have used geothermal technology in the climate control industry to create the most energy efficient climate control systems commercially available today,
 
    we are a leading provider of water source heat pumps to the commercial construction and renovation markets in the United States,
 
    the market for commercial water source heat pumps will continue to grow due to the relative efficiency and long life of such systems as compared to other air conditioning and heating systems, as well as to the emergence of the replacement market for those systems,
 
    the longer life, lower cost to operate, and relatively short payback periods of geothermal systems, as compared with air-to-air systems, will continue to increase demand for our geothermal products,
 
    our Climate Control Business is a leading provider of hydronic fan coils,
 
    the majority of raw material cost increases, if any, will be passed to our customers in the form of higher prices and while we believe we will have sufficient materials, a shortage of raw materials could impact production of our Climate Control products,
 
    our Climate Control Business will continue to launch new products and product upgrades in an effort to maintain and increase our current market position and to establish a presence in new markets,
 
    one of our new products, the SureFlow® system, is an effective solution to provide a long-lasting, quiet and high quality fan coil system at an attractive price to our customers,
 
    we can establish a strong presence within the large custom air handlers market,
 
    our investment in fabrication equipment and plant-wide process control systems will raise capacity and reduce overtime relating to the Climate Control Business,
 
    we have developed significant freight and distribution advantages over many of our competitors and established leading regional market positions in our Chemical Business
 
    the current market outlook justifies continuing production at the Cherokee Facility for the foreseeable future; however, we could from time to time, suspend production at this facility due to, among other things, continuing high cost of its primary raw material, natural gas,
 
    the soil remediation at the former Hallowell facility will occur over the next two years,
 
    our performance has been and will continue to be dependent upon the efforts of our principal executive officers and our future success will depend in large part on our continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel,
 
65

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
    with the infusion of new capital as a result of the recently completed debenture offering and based upon current forecasts, that we will have adequate cash in 2006 from internal cash flows and financing sources to enable us to satisfy our cash requirements as they become due in 2006,
 
    our net loss carryovers may be used to reduce the federal income tax payments which we would otherwise be required to make with respect to income, if any, generated in future years,
 
    retain most of our future earnings, if any, to provide funds for our operations and/or expansion of our businesses,
 
    use all or a substantial portion of the net proceeds from the sale of the debentures (which we estimate to be approximately $16.5 million after paying commissions to the placement agent and our expenses relating to the offering) to repay or purchase our debt or debt of our subsidiaries, including our subsidiary’s $13.3 million senior unsecured debentures due 2007, and the balance, if any, for general corporate purposes and pending such uses, the net proceeds to be invested in investments with highly rated money market funds, U.S. government securities, treasury bills and/or short-term commercial paper,
 
    our ability to make principal and interest payments, or to refinance indebtedness, depends on our future operating performance and cash flow, which are subject to prevailing economic conditions and other factors affecting us, many of which are beyond our control,
 
    four customers account for approximately 25% of our total net receivables at December 31, 2005 which we do not believe this concentration represents a significant credit risk due to the financial stability of these customers,
 
    during December 2005, we corrected the weakness to our disclosure controls and procedures by, among other things, establishing a Disclosure Committee to maintain oversight activities and to examine and reevaluate our policies, procedures and criteria to determine materiality of items relative to our financial statements taken as a whole,
 
    the “E-2” brand ammonium nitrate fertilizer is recognized as a premium product,
 
    the agricultural products are the only seasonal products,
 
    competition within the Chemical and Climate Control Businesses is primarily based on price, location of production and distribution sites, service, warranty and product performance,
 
    the backlog of confirmed orders for Climate Control products at December 31, 2005 will be filled during 2006,
 
    we expect to obtain our requirements for raw materials in 2006,
 
    the amount of committed capital expenditures, for 2006,
 
    amounts to be spent relating to compliance with federal, state and local environmental laws at the El Dorado Facility including matters relating to the sulfuric acid plant,
 
    liquidity and availability of funds,
 
    anticipated financial performance,
 
    adequate resources to meet our obligations as they come due,
 
    ability to make planned capital improvements,
 
    amount of and ability to obtain financing for the Discharge Water disposal project,
 
    new and proposed requirements to place additional security controls over ammonium nitrate and other nitrogen fertilizers will not materially affect the viability of ammonium nitrate as a valued product,
 
    we could obtain anhydrous ammonia from other sources in the event of a termination or interruption of service under our existing purchase agreement,
 
66

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
    under the terms of an agreement with a supplier, EDC purchasing substantially all of its anhydrous ammonia requirements through December 31, 2006,
 
    under the terms of an agreement with a customer, EDC supplying this customer with approximately 190,000 tons of industrial grade ammonium nitrate per year through at least March 2008,
 
    under the terms of an agreement, Bayer purchasing from EDNC all of its requirements for nitric acid at its Baytown operation through at least May 2009,
 
    ThermaClime’s forecasts for 2006 for ThermaClime’s operating results meeting all required covenant tests for all quarters and the year ending in 2006,
 
    the amount of capital expenditures required under the Discharge Water permit, and
 
    the amount of additional expenditures relating to the Air CAO.
While we believe the expectations reflected in such Forward-Looking Statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance such expectations will prove to have been correct. There are a variety of factors which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those described in this report, including, but not limited to,
 
    decline in general economic conditions, both domestic and foreign,
 
    material reduction in revenues,
 
    material increase in interest rates,
 
    ability to collect in a timely manner a material amount of receivables,
 
    increased competitive pressures,
 
    changes in federal, state and local laws and regulations, especially environmental regulations, or in interpretation of such, pending,
 
    additional releases (particularly air emissions) into the environment,
 
    material increases in equipment, maintenance, operating or labor costs not presently anticipated by us,
 
    the requirement to use internally generated funds for purposes not presently anticipated,
 
    the inability to secure additional financing for planned capital expenditures,
 
    the cost for the purchase of anhydrous ammonia and natural gas,
 
    changes in competition,
 
    the loss of any significant customer,
 
    changes in operating strategy or development plans,
 
    inability to fund the working capital and expansion of our businesses,
 
    adverse results in any of our pending litigation,
 
    inability to obtain necessary raw materials,
 
    other factors described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation” contained in this report, and
 
    other factors described in “Risk Factors”.
Given these uncertainties, all parties are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such Forward-Looking Statements. We disclaim any obligation to update any such factors or to publicly announce the result of any revisions to any of the Forward-Looking Statements contained herein to reflect future events or developments.
 
67

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
PART III
 
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
General The Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws of the Company provide for the division of the Board of Directors into three classes, each class consisting as nearly as possible of one-third of the whole. The term of office of one class of directors expires each year, with each class of directors elected for a term of three years and until the shareholders elect their qualified successors.
The Company’s By-laws provide that the Board of Directors, by resolution from time to time, may fix the number of directors that shall constitute the whole Board of Directors. The By-laws presently provide that the number of directors may consist of not less than 3 nor more than 13. The Board of Directors currently has set the number of directors at 13.
The By-laws of the Company further provide that only persons nominated by or at the direction of: (a) the Board of Directors of the Company, or (b) any stockholder of the Company entitled to vote for the election of the directors that complies with certain notice procedures, shall be eligible for election as a director of the Company. Any stockholder desiring to nominate any person as a director of the Company must give written notice to the Secretary of the Company at the Company’s principal executive office not less than 50 days prior to the date of the meeting of stockholders to elect directors; except, if less than 60 day’s notice or prior disclosure of the date of such meeting is given to the stockholders, then written notice by the stockholder must be received by the Secretary of the Company not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. In addition, if the stockholder proposes to nominate any person, the stockholder’s written notice to the Company must provide all information relating to the person whom the stockholder desires to nominate that is required to be disclosed in solicitation of proxies pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Series 2 Preferred The terms of the $3.25 Convertible Exchangeable Class C Preferred Stock, Series 2 (“Series 2 Preferred”) provide that whenever dividends on the Series 2 Preferred are in arrears and unpaid in an amount equal to at least six quarterly dividends: (a) the number of members of the Board of Directors of the Company shall be increased by two effective as of the time of election of such directors; (b) the Company shall, upon the written request of the record holder of 10% of the shares of Series 2 Preferred, call a special meeting of the Preferred Stockholders for the purpose of electing such two additional directors; and (c) the Preferred Stockholders have the exclusive right to vote for and elect such two additional directors. In March 2002, the holders of the Company’s Series 2 Preferred elected Dr. Allen Ford and Mr. Grant Donovan to serve as members of the Company’s Board of Directors pursuant to the terms of the Series 2 Preferred.
The terms of the Series 2 Preferred provide that the right of the holders of the Series 2 Preferred to vote for such two additional directors shall terminate, subject to re-vesting in the event of a subsequent similar arrearage, when all cumulative and unpaid dividends on the Series 2 Preferred have been declared and set apart for payment. Also, pursuant to the terms of the Series 2 Preferred, the term of office for such directors will terminate immediately upon the
 
68

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
termination of the right of the Series 2 Preferred holders to vote for such directors, subject to the requirements of Delaware law. The Series 2 Preferred holders have the right to remove without cause at any time and replace either of the two directors that the Series 2 Preferred holders have elected.
Directors Information regarding the Company’s directors is as follows:
Raymond B. Ackerman, age 83. Mr. Ackerman first became a director in 1993. His term will expire in 2008. From 1972 until his retirement in 1992, Mr. Ackerman served as Chairman of the Board and President of Ackerman McQueen, Inc., the largest advertising and public relations firm headquartered in Oklahoma. He currently serves as Chairman Emeritus of the firm. He retired as a Rear Admiral in the United States Naval Reserve. He is a graduate of Oklahoma City University, and in 1996, was awarded an honorary doctorate from the school. He was elected to the Oklahoma Commerce and Industry Hall of Fame in 1993.
Robert C. Brown, M.D., age 75. Dr. Brown first became a director in 1969. His term will expire in 2006. Dr. Brown has practiced medicine for many years and is Vice President and Treasurer of Plaza Medical Group, P.C. and President and CEO of ClaimLogic L.L.C. Dr. Brown is a graduate of Tufts University and received his medical degree from Tufts University after which he spent two years in the United States Navy as a doctor and over three years at the Mayo Clinic.
Charles A. Burtch, age 70. Mr. Burtch first became a director in 1999. His term will expire in 2007. Mr. Burtch was formerly Executive Vice-President and West Division Manager of BankAmerica, where he managed BankAmerica’s asset-based lending division for the western third of the United States. He retired in 1998 and has since been engaged as a private investor. Mr. Burtch is a graduate of Arizona State University.
Barry H. Golsen, J.D., age 55. Mr. Golsen first became a director in 1981. His term will expire in 2006. Mr. Golsen was elected President of the Company in 2004. Mr. Golsen has served as our Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors since August 1994, and has been the President of our Climate Control Business for more than five years. Mr. Golsen has both his undergraduate and law degrees from the University of Oklahoma.
Jack E. Golsen, age 77. Mr. Golsen first became a director in 1969. His term will expire in 2007. Mr. Golsen, founder of the Company, is our Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer and has served in that capacity since our inception in 1969. During 1996, he was inducted into the Oklahoma Commerce and Industry Hall of Honor as one of Oklahoma’s leading industrialists. Mr. Golsen has a Bachelor of Science degree from the University of New Mexico in biochemistry.
David R. Goss, age 65. Mr. Goss first became a director in 1971. His term will expire in 2006. Mr. Goss, a certified public accountant, is our Executive Vice President of Operations and has served in substantially the same capacity for more than five years. Mr. Goss is a graduate of Rutgers University.
 
69

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Bernard G. Ille,age 79. Mr. Ille first became a director in 1971. His term will expire in 2008. Mr. Ille served as President and Chief Executive Officer of United Founders Life from 1966 to 1988. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of First Life Assurance Company from 1988, until it was acquired by another company in 1994. During his tenure as President of these two companies he served as Chairman of the Oklahoma Guaranty Association for ten years and was President of the Oklahoma Association of Life Insurance Companies for two terms. He is a director of Landmark Land Company, Inc., which was the parent company of First Life. He is also a director for Quail Creek Bank, N.A. Mr. Ille is currently President of BML Consultants and a private investor. He is a graduate of the University of Oklahoma.
Horace G. Rhodes, age 78. Mr. Rhodes first became a director in 1996. His term will expire in 2007. Mr. Rhodes is the Chairman of the law firm of Kerr, Irvine, Rhodes & Ables and has served in such capacity and has practiced law for many years. From 1972 until 2001, he served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel for the Association of Oklahoma Life Insurance Companies and since 1982 served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel for the Oklahoma Life and Health Insurance Guaranty Association. Mr. Rhodes received his undergraduate and law degrees from the University of Oklahoma.
Tony M. Shelby,age 64. Mr. Shelby first became a director in 1971. His term will expire in 2008. Mr. Shelby, a certified public accountant, is our Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, a position he has held for more than five years. Prior to becoming our Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, he served as Chief Financial Officer of a subsidiary of the Company and was with the accounting firm of Arthur Young & Co., a predecessor to Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Shelby is a graduate of Oklahoma City University.
John A. Shelley, age 55. Mr. Shelley first became a director in 2005. His term will expire in 2006. Mr. Shelley is the President and Chief Executive Officer of The Bank of Union (“Bank of Union”) located in Oklahoma. He has held this position since 1997. Prior to 1997, Mr. Shelley held various senior level positions in financial institutions in Oklahoma including the position of President of Equity Bank for Savings, N.A., a savings and loan that was owned by the Company prior to 1994. Mr. Shelley is a graduate of the University of Oklahoma.
Donald W. Munson,age 73. Mr. Munson first became a director in 1997. His term will expire in 2008. From 1988, until his retirement in 1992, Mr. Munson served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Lennox Industries. Prior to 1998, he served as Executive Vice President of Lennox Industries’ Division Operations, President of Lennox Canada and Managing Director of Lennox Industries’ European Operations. Prior to joining Lennox Industries, Mr. Munson served in various capacities with the Howden Group, a company located in Scotland, and The Trane Company, including serving as the managing director of various companies within the Howden Group and Vice President Europe for The Trane Company. He is currently a consultant. Mr. Munson is a resident of England. He has degrees in mechanical engineering and business administration from the University of Minnesota.
Continuing Directors elected by the holders of Series 2 Preferred:
Grant J. Donovan, age 49. Mr. Donovan first became a director in 2002. Mr. Donovan is President and founder of Galehead, Inc., a company specializing on the collections of accounts receivable in the international maritime trade business. Prior to forming Galehead, Inc.,
 
70

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Mr. Donovan was a partner in a real estate development firm specializing in revitalizing functionally obsolete industrial buildings. Mr. Donovan received his MBA from Stanford University and his undergraduate degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Vermont. He currently is on the board of directors of EngenderHealth, a 50 year-old international aid organization focused on improving women’s healthcare.
Dr. N. Allen Ford, age 63. Dr. Ford first became a director in 2002. Dr. Ford joined the University of Kansas in 1976 where his teaching and research duties focus mainly on taxation. At the University of Kansas, Professor Ford has won several teaching awards and is the Larry D. Horner/KPMG Peat Marwick Distinguished Professor of Accounting. Dr. Ford teaches the following courses in taxation: individual, corporate, partnership, S corporation, gift and estate tax. He is active in professional organizations such as the American Taxation Association and the American Accounting Association. He received his Ph.D. in Accounting from the University of Arkansas.
Family Relationships Jack E. Golsen is the father of Barry H. Golsen and the brother-in-law of Robert C. Brown, M.D. Robert C. Brown, M.D. is the uncle of Barry H. Golsen. David M. Shear is the nephew by marriage to Jack E. Golsen and son-in-law of Robert C. Brown, M.D.
Executive Officers See information regarding the Company’s executive officers under Item 4A.
Audit Committee The Company has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Bernard Ille (Chairman), Charles Burtch, Horace Rhodes, and Ray Ackerman. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent, as defined in the listing standards of the American Stock Exchange (“AMEX”) as of the Company’s fiscal year end. During 2005, the Audit Committee had seven meetings.
Audit Committee Financial Expert While the Board of Directors endorses the effectiveness of our Audit Committee, its membership does not presently include a director that qualifies for designation as an “Audit Committee Financial Expert.” However, each of the current members of the Audit Committee is able to read and understand fundamental financial statements and at least one of its members is “financially sophisticated” as defined by applicable AMEX rules. The Board of Directors believes that the background of each member of the Audit Committee is sufficient to fulfill the duties of the Audit Committee. For these reasons, although members of our Audit Committee are not professionally engaged in the practice of accounting or auditing, our Board of Directors has concluded that the ability of our Audit Committee to perform its duties would not be impaired by the absence of an “Audit Committee Financial Expert.”
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Based solely on a review of copies of the Forms 3, 4 and 5 and amendments thereto furnished to the Company with respect to 2005, or written representations that no such reports were required to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company believes that during 2005 all directors and officers of the Company and beneficial owners of more than 10% of any class of equity securities of the Company registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act filed their required Forms 3, 4,
 
71

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
or 5, as required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, on a timely basis, except for Kent McCarthy and his affiliates inadvertently filed one late Form 5 to report one transaction; Dr. Ford inadvertently filed one late Form 5 to report one transaction; and Mr. Goss filed an amended Form 4 to report two gifts.
Code of Ethics The Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the principal accounting officer, and the controller of the Company and each of the our subsidiaries, or persons performing similar functions, are subject to our Code of Ethics.
We and all of our subsidiary companies have adopted a Statement of Policy Concerning Business Conduct applicable to our employees. This policy was amended in May 2005. Our Amended Statement of Policy Concerning Business Conduct and the Code of Ethics is available on our website at http://www.lsb-okc.com. We will post any amendments to these documents, as well as any waivers that are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules of either the Securities and Exchange Commission or the AMEX, on our website.
 
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following table shows the aggregate compensation which we and our subsidiaries paid or accrued to our Chief Executive Officer and each of our other four most highly-paid executive officers (which includes our Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors who also serves as President of the Company and its Climate Control Business) (together, the “named executive officers”). The table includes compensation for services rendered during 2005, plus any compensation paid during 2005 for services rendered in a prior year, less any amount relating to those services previously included in the summary compensation table for a prior year.
Summary Compensation Table
 
          Annual Compensation    All Other
Compensation
($)
 
Name and Position
   Year    Salary
($) (1)
  
Bonus
($) (2)
  
Jack E. Golsen,
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer
   2005
2004
2003
   477,400
495,762
477,400
   —  
—  
—  
   —  
61,133 
23,000 
 
(3)
(3)
Barry H. Golsen,
Vice Chairman of the Board of
Directors, President, and President
of the Climate Control Business
   2005
2004
2003
   411,600
339,162
326,600
   35,000
85,000
85,000
   —  
—  
—  
 
 
 
David R. Goss,
Executive Vice President of
Operations
   2005
2004
2003
   260,500
239,366
209,577
   —  
30,000
—  
   —  
—  
—  
 
 
 
Tony M. Shelby,
Executive Vice President of Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
   2005
2004
2003
   240,000
249,231
214,108
   35,000
30,000
—  
   —  
—  
—  
 
 
 
David M. Shear,
Senior Vice President and General
Counsel
   2005
2004
2003
   212,558
212,885
184,077
   30,000
30,000
—  
   —  
—  
—  
 
 
 
 
(1) We pay the executive officers on a bi-weekly basis. For 2004, there were 27 bi-weekly payments compared to 26 in 2005 and 2003.
 
72

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
(2) Bonuses are paid for services rendered in the prior year.
 
(3) Life insurance premiums paid by the Company under a $3 million split dollar endorsement life insurance policy purchased in 1996 by the Company on the life of Mr. Golsen (the “Split Dollar Policy”). The Split Dollar Policy was replaced in 2005. Mr. Golsen has no obligation to repay the Company any amounts paid by the Company under the Split Dollar Policy. In 2005, the Company purchased and now owns three whole life insurance policies on Mr. Golsen’s life, which policies were purchased in connection with the Death Benefit Agreement between the Company and Mr. Golsen. See “Other Plans” under this Item 11 for a description of the Death Benefit Agreement.
Option Grants in 2005 The Company did not grant stock options to any of the named executive officers during 2005.
Aggregated Option Exercises in 2005 and Year-End Option Values
The following table sets forth information concerning the number and year-end value of stock options held by each of the named executive officers during 2005.
 
Name
   Shares
Acquired
on
Exercise
   Value
Realized
  
Number of Securities
Underlying Unexercised
Options at FY End
(1)
Exercisable/Unexercisable
  
Value of Unexercised
In-the-Money Options at
Fiscal Year End
(1) (2)
Exercisable/Unexercisable
Jack E. Golsen
   —      —      176,500 / -    $864,850 / $ -
Barry H. Golsen
   —      —      75,000 /-    $335,538/ $ -
David R. Goss
   —      —      200,000 / -    $709,675 / $ -
Tony M. Shelby
   —      —      200,000 / -    $709,675 / $ -
David M. Shear
   —      —      164,544 / -    $597,066 / $ -
 
(1) The stock options granted under the Company’s stock option plans became exercisable 20% after one year from date of grant, an additional 20% after two years, an additional 30% after three years, and the remaining 30% after four years.
 
(2) The values are based on the difference between (a) the price of the Company’s Common Stock on the AMEX at the close of trading on December 30, 2005 of $6.15 per share and (b) the exercise price of the option. The actual value realized by a named executive officer on the exercise of these options depends on the market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of exercise.
Other Plans The Board of Directors has adopted an LSB Industries, Inc., Employee Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”) for the employees (including executive officers) of the Company and its
 
73

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
subsidiaries, excluding employees covered under union agreements and certain other employees. The 401(k) Plan is funded by employee contributions, and the Company and its subsidiaries make no contributions to the 401(k) Plan (with limited matching exceptions at three subsidiary locations). The amount that an employee may contribute to the 401(k) Plan equals a certain percentage of the employee’s compensation, with the percentage based on the employee’s income and certain other criteria as required under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company or subsidiary deducts the amounts contributed to the 401(k) Plan from the employee’s compensation each pay period, in accordance with the employee’s instructions, and pays the amount into the 401(k) Plan for the employee’s benefit. The salary and bonus set forth in the Summary Compensation Table above includes any amounts contributed during the 2005, 2004, and 2003 fiscal years pursuant to the 401(k) Plan by the named executive officers of the Company.
On May 12, 2005, the Company entered into a certain death benefit agreement (“2005 Agreement”) with Jack E. Golsen. This agreement replaces certain existing benefits that were payable to Mr. Golsen under a split dollar insurance policy purchased by the Company on Mr. Golsen’s life in 1996 and a second policy purchased in 2002, each of which were replaced in 2005. The 2005 Agreement provides that, upon Mr. Golsen’s death, the Company will pay to Mr. Golsen’s family or designated beneficiary $2.5 million to be funded from the net proceeds received by the Company under certain new life insurance policies on Mr. Golsen’s life that have been purchased and are owned by the Company. The new life insurance policies owned by the Company provide a stated death benefit of $7 million. The Company is obligated to keep in existence no less than $2.5 million of the stated death benefit.
During 1981, the Company entered into individual death benefit agreements (the “1981 Agreements”) with certain key employees. Under the 1981 Agreements, the designated beneficiary of an employee will receive a monthly benefit for a period of ten years if the employee dies while in the employment of the Company or a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The 1981 Agreements provide that the Company may terminate the agreement as to any employee at anytime prior to the employee’s death. The Company has purchased life insurance on the life of each employee covered under the 1981 Agreements to provide a source of funds for the Company’s obligations under the 1981 Agreements. The Company is the owner and sole beneficiary of each of the insurance policies and the proceeds are payable to the Company upon the death of the employee. The following table sets forth the amounts of annual benefits payable to the designated beneficiary or beneficiaries of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table under the 1981 Agreements.
 
Name of Individual
   Amount of
Annual Payment
Jack E. Golsen
   $ 175,000
Barry H. Golsen
   $ 30,000
David R. Goss
   $ 35,000
Tony M. Shelby
   $ 35,000
David M. Shear
   $ N/A
 
74

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
During 1992, the Company entered into a non-qualified arrangement with certain key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries to provide compensation to such individuals in the event that they are employed by the Company or a subsidiary of the Company at age 65 (the “1992 Agreements”). Under the 1992 Agreements, the employee is eligible to receive a designated benefit (“Benefit”) as set forth in the 1992 Agreements. If prior to attaining the age 65, the employee dies while in the employment of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company, the designated beneficiary of the employee will receive a monthly benefit (“Death Benefit”) for a period of ten years. The 1992 Agreements provide that the Company may terminate the agreement as to any employee at any time and for any reason prior to the death of the employee. The Company has purchased insurance on the life of each employee covered under the 1992 Agreements where the Company is the owner and sole beneficiary of the insurance policy, and the proceeds are payable to the Company to provide a source of funds for the Company’s obligations under the 1992 Agreements. Under the terms of the 1992 Agreements, if the employee becomes incapacitated prior to retirement or prior to reaching age 65, the employee may request the Company to cash-in any life insurance on the life of such employee purchased to fund the Company’s obligations under the 1992 Agreements. Jack E. Golsen does not participate in the 1992 Agreements. The following table sets forth the amounts of annual benefits payable to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table under the 1992 Agreements.
 
Name of Individual
   Amount of
Annual Benefit
   Amount of
Annual Death
Benefit
Barry H. Golsen
   $ 17,480    $ 11,596
David R. Goss
   $ 17,403    $ —  
Tony M. Shelby
   $ 15,605    $ 16,486
David M. Shear
   $ 17,822    $ 7,957
Compensation of Directors In 2005, we compensated our non-employee directors for their services as directors on our Board. Certain non-employee directors also served on the Board of Directors of our subsidiary, ThermaClime, without additional compensation. Our non-employee directors also received compensation for each meeting of the Board of Directors attended during 2005. The aggregate compensation paid in 2005 to our Directors for Board-related services was $218,660.
Mr. Ackerman received additional compensation for his services on the Audit and Public Relations and Marketing Committees. Dr. Brown received additional compensation for his services on the Benefits and Programs Committee and as a medical director for the Company’s employee medical plan. Mr. Burtch received additional compensation for his services on the Audit Committee. Mr. Ille received additional compensation for his services on the Audit, Public Relations and Marketing, and Executive Salary Review Committees. Mr. Munson received additional compensation for consulting services in connection with developing our European business. Mr. Rhodes received additional compensation for his services on the Audit and Executive Salary Review Committees.
 
75

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
The following table shows the compensation of our non-employee directors during 2005:
 
     Committee and
Consulting Services
   Director
Services
Mr. Ackerman
   $ 20,000    $ 12,500
Dr. Brown
   $ 20,000    $ 12,500
Mr. Burtch
   $ 20,000    $ 12,000
Mr. Donovan
   $ —      $ 12,500
Dr. Ford
   $ —      $ 12,000
Mr. Ille
   $ 20,000    $ 12,000
Mr. Munson
   $ 15,160    $ 11,500
Mr. Rhodes
   $ 20,000    $ 12,500
Mr. Shelley
   $ —      $ 6,000
Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change in Control Arrangements
(a) Termination of Employment and Change in Control Agreements We have entered into severance agreements with each of Jack E. Golsen, Barry H. Golsen, Tony M. Shelby, David R. Goss, David M. Shear, and certain other officers.
Each severance agreement provides (among other things) that if, within 24 months after the occurrence of a change in control (as defined) of the Company, the Company terminates the officer’s employment other than for cause (as defined), or the officer terminates his employment for good reason (as defined), the Company must pay the officer an amount equal to 2.9 times the officer’s base amount (as defined). The phrase “base amount” means the average annual gross compensation paid by the Company to the officer and includable in the officer’s gross income during the most recent five year period immediately preceding the change in control. If the officer has been employed by the Company for less than five years, the base amount is calculated with respect to the most recent number of taxable years ending before the change in control that the officer worked for the Company.
The severance agreements provide that a “change in control” means a change in control of the Company of a nature that would require the filing of a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission and, in any event, would mean when: (a) any individual, firm, corporation, entity, or group (as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 30% or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s outstanding voting securities having the right to vote for the election of directors, except acquisitions by (i) any person, firm, corporation, entity, or group which, as of the date of the severance agreement, has that ownership, or (ii) Jack E. Golsen, his wife; his children and the spouses of his children; his estate; executor or administrator of any estate, guardian or custodian for Jack E. Golsen, his wife, his children, or the spouses of his children, any corporation, trust, partnership, or other entity of which Jack E. Golsen, his wife, children, or the spouses of his children own at least 80% of the outstanding beneficial voting or equity interests, directly or indirectly, either by any one or more of the above-described persons, entities, or estates; and certain affiliates and associates of any of the
 
76

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
above-described persons, entities, or estates; (b) individuals who, as of the date of the severance agreement, constitute the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Incumbent Board”) and who cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the Board of Directors except that any person becoming a director subsequent to the date of the severance agreement, whose election or nomination for election is approved by a majority of the Incumbent Board (with certain limited exceptions), will constitute a member of the Incumbent Board; or (c) the sale by the Company of all or substantially all of its assets.
Except for the severance agreement with Jack E. Golsen, the termination of an officer’s employment with the Company “for cause” means termination because of: (a) the mental or physical disability from performing the officer’s duties for a period of 120 consecutive days or one hundred eighty days (even though not consecutive) within a 360 day period; (b) the conviction of a felony; (c) the embezzlement by the officer of Company assets resulting in substantial personal enrichment of the officer at the expense of the Company; or (d) the willful failure (when not mentally or physically disabled) to follow a direct written order from the Company’s Board of Directors within the reasonable scope of the officer’s duties performed during the 60 day period prior to the change in control. The definition of “Cause” contained in the severance agreement with Jack E. Golsen means termination because of: (a) the conviction of Mr. Golsen of a felony involving moral turpitude after all appeals have been completed; or (b) if due to Mr. Golsen’s serious, willful, gross misconduct or willful, gross neglect of his duties has resulted in material damages to the Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, provided that (i) no action or failure to act by Mr. Golsen will constitute a reason for termination if he believed, in good faith, that such action or failure to act was in the Company’s or its subsidiaries’ best interest, and (ii) failure of Mr. Golsen to perform his duties hereunder due to disability shall not be considered willful, gross misconduct or willful, gross negligence of his duties for any purpose.
The termination of an officer’s employment with the Company for “good reason” means termination because of (a) the assignment to the officer of duties inconsistent with the officer’s position, authority, duties, or responsibilities during the 60 day period immediately preceding the change in control of the Company or any other action which results in the diminishment of those duties, position, authority, or responsibilities; (b) the relocation of the officer; (c) any purported termination by the Company of the officer’s employment with the Company otherwise than as permitted by the severance agreement; or (d) in the event of a change in control of the Company, the failure of the successor or parent company to agree, in form and substance satisfactory to the officer, to assume (as to a successor) or guarantee (as to a parent) the severance agreement as of no change in control had occurred.
Except for the severance agreement with Jack E. Golsen, each severance agreement runs until the earlier of: (a) three years after the date of the severance agreement, or (b) the officer’s normal retirement date from the Company; however, beginning on the first anniversary of the severance agreement and on each annual anniversary thereafter, the term of the severance agreement automatically extends for an additional one-year period, unless the Company gives notice otherwise at least 60 days prior to the anniversary date. The severance agreement with Jack E. Golsen is effective for a period of three years from the date of the severance agreement; except that, commencing on the date one year after the date of such severance agreement and on each annual anniversary thereafter, the term of such severance agreement shall be automatically
 
77

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
extended so as to terminate three years from such renewal date, unless the Company gives notices otherwise at least one year prior to the renewal date.
(b) Employment Agreement We have an employment agreement with Jack E. Golsen, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, which requires the Company to employ Mr. Golsen as an executive officer of the Company. The current term of the employment agreement will expire March 21, 2008; however, pursuant to an amendment to the employment agreement approved by the Board of Directors, the term will be automatically renewed for up to three additional three-year periods. The employment agreement may be terminated by either party by written notice at least one year prior to the expiration of the then current term. Under the terms of such employment agreement, Mr. Golsen (a) shall be paid an annual base salary at his 1995 base rate, as adjusted from time to time by the Executive Salary Review Committee, but such shall never be adjusted to an amount less than Mr. Golsen’s 1995 base salary, (b) shall be paid an annual bonus in an amount as determined by the Executive Salary Review Committee, and (c) shall receive from the Company certain other fringe benefits. The employment agreement was amended in 2005 to reflect the termination of a split dollar life insurance policy on Mr. Golsen’s life and the new Death Benefit Agreement, as discussed above under “Other Plans.”
The employment agreement provides that Mr. Golsen’s employment may not be terminated, except (a) upon conviction of a felony involving moral turpitude after all appeals have been exhausted, (b) Mr. Golsen’s serious, willful, gross misconduct or willful, gross negligence of duties resulting in material damage to the Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, unless Mr. Golsen believed, in good faith, that such action or failure to act was in the Company’s or its subsidiaries’ best interest, and (c) Mr. Golsen’s death. However, no such termination under (a) or (b) above may occur unless and until the Company has delivered to Mr. Golsen a resolution duly adopted by an affirmative vote of three-fourths of the entire membership of the Board of Directors at a meeting called for such purpose after reasonable notice given to Mr. Golsen finding, in good faith, that Mr. Golsen violated (a) or (b) above.
If Mr. Golsen’s employment is terminated in breach of the employment agreement, then he shall, in addition to his other rights and remedies, receive and the Company shall pay to Mr. Golsen (a) in a lump sum cash payment, on the date of termination, a sum equal to the amount of Mr. Golsen’s annual base salary at the time of such termination and the amount of the last bonus paid to Mr. Golsen prior to such termination times the number of years remaining under the then current term of the employment agreement and (b) provide to Mr. Golsen all of the fringe benefits that the Company was obligated to provide during his employment under the employment agreement for the remainder of the term of the employment agreement.
If there is a change in control (as defined in the severance agreement between Mr. Golsen and the Company) and within 24 months after such change in control Mr. Golsen is terminated, other than for Cause (as defined in the severance agreement), then in such event, the severance agreement between Mr. Golsen and the Company shall be controlling.
In the event Mr. Golsen becomes disabled and is not able to perform his duties under the employment agreement as a result thereof for a period of 12 consecutive months within any
 
78

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
two-year period, the Company shall pay Mr. Golsen his full salary for the remainder of the term of the employment agreement and thereafter 60% of such salary until Mr. Golsen’s death.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation Our Executive Salary Review Committee has the authority to set the compensation of all our officers. This Committee generally considers and approves the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer does not make a recommendation regarding his own salary. The members of the Executive Salary Review Committee are the following non-employee directors: Bernard G. Ille and Horace G. Rhodes. Neither Mr. Ille nor Mr. Rhodes is, or ever has been, an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. During 2005, the Executive Salary Review Committee had two meetings.
See “Compensation of Directors” for information concerning compensation paid to each non-employee director of the Company during 2005 for services as a director to the Company.
 
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS
The following table sets forth the information as of December 31, 2005, with respect to our equity compensation plans.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
 
Plan Category
  
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights (a)
  
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights (b)
  
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a)) (c)
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders (1)
   975,704    $ 2.64    295,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders (2)
   915,600    $ 2.08    —  
                
Total
   1,891,304    $ 2.37    295,000
                
 
(1) Stockholder Approved Plans Our equity compensation plans which are approved by our stockholders are the following:
 
    1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “1993 Plan”). As of December 31, 2005, 376,500 shares are issuable under outstanding options granted under the 1993 Plan, and no additional shares are available for future issuance.
 
    1998 Stock Option Plan (the “1998 Plan”). As of December 31, 2005, 509,204 shares are issuable under outstanding options granted under the 1998 Plan, and no additional shares are available for future issuance.
 
79

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
    Outside Directors Stock Option Plan (the “Outside Directors Plan”). As of December 31, 2005, 90,000 shares are issuable under outstanding options granted under the Outside Directors Plan and 295,000 additional shares are available for future issuance. The Outside Directors Plan authorizes the Company to grant options to purchase common stock to each member of our Board of Directors who is not an officer or employee of the Company or its subsidiaries. These options become fully exercisable after six months and one day from the date of grant and lapse at the end of ten years. The exercise price of options granted under the Outside Directors Plan is equal to the market value of our common stock at the date of grant.
The 1993 Plan and 1998 Plan each authorize the Company to grant options to purchase common stock to our employees. All outstanding options granted to employees under these plans have a term of ten years and become exercisable as to 20% of the underlying shares after one year from date of grant, 40% after two years, 70% after three years, and 100% after four years. However effective December 31, 2005, our Board of Directors approved the acceleration of the vesting schedule of 61,500 shares of stock options under the 1998 Plan which would otherwise have been fully vested on November 17, 2009, to avoid the recognition of compensation expense in our future financial statements relating to these stock options. As a result, all outstanding options under the 1998 Plan were exercisable at December 31, 2005. Based on FASB Interpretation No. 44 “(FIN 44”), because this modification to the vesting schedule did not renew or increase the life of these stock options, a remeasurement of the stock options was not required and no stock-based compensation was recognized in 2005.
The exercise price of outstanding options granted under these plans is equal to the market value of our common stock at the date of grant. However, with respect to participants who own 10% or more of our common stock at the date of grant, the options have a term of five years, and the exercise price is 110% of the market value at the date of grant.
 
(2) Non-Stockholder Approved Plans From time to time, our Board of Directors has approved the grants of certain nonqualified stock options as the Board has determined to be in our best interest to compensate directors, officers, or employees for service to the Company. Unless otherwise indicated below, (a) the price of each such option is equal to the market value of our common stock at the date of grant, (b) the options become exercisable as to 20% of the underlying shares after one year from the date of grant, 40% after two years, 70% after three years, and 100% after four years, and (c) each option expires ten years from the grant date. However effective December 31, 2005, our Board of Directors approved the acceleration of the vesting schedule of (x) 30,000 shares of options that were granted on April 22, 1998 which otherwise would have been fully vested on April 22, 2008, and (y) 15,000 shares of options that were granted on November 7, 2002 which otherwise would have been fully vested on November 7, 2006, to avoid the recognition of compensation expense in our future financial statements relating to these stock options. As a result, all outstanding options under these plans were exercisable at December 31, 2005. Based on FIN 44 as discussed above, no stock-based compensation was recognized in 2005.
 
80

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Our equity compensation plans, which have not been approved by the stockholders, are the following:
 
    Effective December 1, 2002, we granted nonqualified options to purchase up to an aggregate 112,000 shares of common stock to former employees of two former subsidiaries. These options were part of the employees’ severance compensation arising from the sale of the former subsidiaries’ assets. Each recipient of a grant received options for the same number of shares and having the same exercise price as under the recipient’s vested incentive stock options which expired upon the sale. Each nonqualified option was exercisable as of the date of grant and has a term of ten years from the original date of grant. As of December 31, 2005, 7,000 shares are issuable under the following options: 3,000 have an exercise price of $4.188 per share and expire April 22, 2008 and 4,000 have an exercise price of $2.73 per share and expire November 21, 2011.
 
    On November 7, 2002, we granted to an employee of the Company a nonqualified stock option to acquire 50,000 shares of common stock in consideration of services rendered to the Company. As of December 31, 2005, 30,000 shares are issuable at an exercise price of $2.62 per share.
 
    On November 29, 2001, we granted to employees of the Company nonqualified stock options to acquire 102,500 shares of common stock in consideration of services to the Company. As of December 31, 2005, 74,500 shares are issuable at an exercise price of $2.73 per share.
 
    On July 20, 2000, we granted nonqualified options to a former employee of the Company to acquire 185,000 shares of common stock in consideration of services to the Company. The following are the exercise prices per share for these options: 5,000 shares at $5.362; 80,000 shares at $4.538; 60,000 shares at $1.375; and 40,000 shares at $1.25. These options were for the same number of shares and the same exercise prices as under the stock options held by the former employee prior to leaving the Company. These options were fully vested at the date of grant and expire, as to 100,000 shares, nine years from the date of grant and as to the remaining 85,000 shares, seven years from the date of grant.
 
    On July 8, 1999, in consideration of services to the Company, we granted nonqualified stock options to acquire 371,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.25 per share to Jack E. Golsen (176,500 shares), Barry H. Golsen (55,000 shares) and Steven J. Golsen (35,000 shares), David R. Goss (35,000 shares), Tony M. Shelby (35,000 shares), and David M. Shear (35,000 shares) and also granted to certain other employees nonqualified stock options to acquire a total of 165,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.25 per share in consideration of services to the Company. As of December 31, 2005, 516,500 shares are issuable.
 
    On April 22, 1998, we granted to certain employees and to each member of our Board of Directors who was not an officer or employee of the Company or its subsidiaries nonqualified stock options to acquire shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.1875 per share in consideration of services to the Company. As of December 31, 2005 102,600 shares are issuable under outstanding options under these agreements.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners The following table sets forth certain information as of March 20, 2006, regarding the ownership of our voting Common Stock and voting Preferred Stock by (a) each person (including any “group” as used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended) that we know to be beneficial owner of more than 5% of our voting Common Stock and voting Preferred Stock. A person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of shares of the Company which he or she could acquire within 60 days of March 20, 2006.
 
81

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
   Title of Class    Amounts of
Shares
Beneficially
owned (1)
    Percent
of
Class+
 
Jack E. Golsen and members of his family (2)
   Common
Voting Preferred
   4,845,288
1,020,000
(3)(5)(6)
(4)(6)
  31.9
99.9
%
%
Kent C. McCarthy & affiliates (7)
   Common    2,770,793 (7)   18.1 %
Paul J. Denby (8)
   Common    1,143,752 (8)   8.2 %
James W. Sight (9)
   Common    875,521 (9)   6.3 %
 
+ Because of the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission as to the method of determining the amount of shares an individual or entity may own beneficially, the amount shown for an individual may include shares also considered beneficially owned by others. Any shares of stock which a person does not own, but which he or she has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 20, 2006 are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding stock of the class owned by such person but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of the class owned by any other person.
 
(1) We based the information with respect to beneficial ownership on information furnished by the above-named individuals or entities or contained in filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Company’s records.
 
(2) Includes Jack E. Golsen and the following members of his family: wife, Sylvia H. Golsen; son, Barry H. Golsen (a Director, Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors, President of the Company and its Climate Control Business); son, Steven J. Golsen (Executive officer of several subsidiaries of the Company); and daughter, Linda F. Rappaport. The address of Jack E. Golsen, Sylvia H. Golsen, Barry H. Golsen, and Linda F. Rappaport is 16 South Pennsylvania Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73107; and Steven J. Golsen’s address is 7300 SW 44th Street, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73179.
 
(3)
Includes (a) the following shares over which Jack E. Golsen (“J. Golsen”) has the sole voting and dispositive power: (i) 25,000 shares that he owns of record, (ii) 4,000 shares that he has the right to acquire upon conversion of a promissory note, (iii) 133,333 shares that he has the right to acquire upon the conversion of 4,000 shares of the Company’s Series B 12% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred”) owned of record by a trust, of which he is the sole trustee, (iv) 119,929 shares owned of record by a trust, of which he is the sole trustee, and (v) 176,500 shares that he has the right to acquire within the next 60 days under the Company’s stock option plans; (b) 838,747 shares owned of record by a trust, of which Sylvia H. Golsen is the sole trustee, over which she and her husband, J. Golsen share voting and dispositive power; (c) 302,889 shares over which Barry H. (“B. Golsen”) has the sole voting and dispositive power, 533 shares owned of record by B. Golsen’s wife, over which he shares the voting and dispositive power, and 75,000 shares that he has the right to acquire within the next 60 days under the Company’s stock option plans; (d) 240,165 shares over which Steven J. Golsen (“S. Golsen”) has the sole voting and dispositive power and 55,000 shares that he has the right to acquire within the next 60 days under the Company’s stock option plans; (e) 178,606 shares held in trust for the grandchildren and great grandchild of J. Golsen and Sylvia H. Golsen of which B.
 
82

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
 
Golsen, S. Golsen and Linda F. Rappaport (“L. Rappaport”) jointly share voting and dispositive power; (f) 82,552 shares owned of record by L. Rappaport over which she has sole voting and dispositive power; (g) 1,527,099 shares owned of record by SBL Corporation (“SBL”), 39,177 shares that SBL has the right to acquire upon conversion of 9,050 shares of the Company’s non-voting $3.25 Convertible Exchangeable Class C Preferred Stock, Series 2 (the “Series 2 Preferred”), 400,000 shares that SBL has the right to acquire upon conversion of 12,000 shares of Series B Preferred owned of record by SBL, and 250,000 shares that SBL has to right to acquire upon conversion of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s Series D 6% cumulative, convertible Class C preferred stock (“Series D Preferred”) owned of record by SBL and (h) 88,100 shares owned of record by Golsen Petroleum Corporation (“GPC”), which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SBL, 133,333 shares that GPC has the right to acquire upon conversion of 4,000 shares of Series B Preferred owned of record by GPC and 175,325 shares that GPC has the right to acquire upon conversion of 40,500 shares of Series 2 Preferred owned of record by GPC.
Each share of Series D Preferred has, among other things, .875 votes and the right to vote as a single class with the Series B Preferred and the Common Stock; cumulative dividends at the rate of 6% per annum; and is convertible into the Common Stock on the basis of four shares of Series D Preferred into one share of Common Stock. Dividends on the Series D Preferred will be paid only after accrued and unpaid dividends are paid on the Series 2 Preferred. As of the March 20, 2006, the amount of the accrued and unpaid dividends on the Series D Preferred was $240,000. SBL is wholly-owned by Sylvia H. Golsen (40% owner), B. Golsen (20% owner), S. Golsen (20% owner), and L. Rappaport (20% owner) and, as a result, SBL, J. Golsen, Sylvia H. Golsen, B. Golsen, S. Golsen, and L. Rappaport share the voting and dispositive power of the shares beneficially owned by SBL. SBL’s address is 16 South Pennsylvania Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73107.
 
(4) Includes: (a) 4,000 shares of Series B Preferred owned of record by a trust, of which J. Golsen is the sole trustee, over which he has the sole voting and dispositive power; (b) 12,000 shares of Series B Preferred owned of record by SBL; (c) 4,000 shares Series B Preferred owned of record by SBL’s wholly-owned subsidiary, GPC, over which SBL, J. Golsen, Sylvia H. Golsen, B. Golsen, S. Golsen, and L. Rappaport share the voting and dispositive power and (d) 1,000,000 shares of Series D Preferred owned of record by SBL.
 
(5) Does not include 70,200 shares of Common Stock that L. Rappaport’s husband owns of record and 185,000 shares which he has the right to acquire within the next 60 days under the Company’s stock option plans, all of which L. Rappaport disclaims beneficial ownership. Does not include 256,120 shares of Common Stock owned of record by certain trusts for the benefit of B. Golsen, S. Golsen, and L. Rappaport over which B. Golsen, S. Golsen and L. Rappaport have no voting or dispositive power. Heidi Brown Shear, an officer of the Company and the niece of J. Golsen, is the Trustee of each of these trusts.
 
(6)
J. Golsen disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares that B. Golsen, S. Golsen, and L. Rappaport each have the sole voting and investment power over as noted in footnote (3) above. B. Golsen, S. Golsen, and L. Rappaport disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares that J. Golsen has the sole voting and investment power over as noted in footnotes (3) and (4) and the shares owned of record by Sylvia H. Golsen. Sylvia H. Golsen disclaims beneficial ownership of
 
83

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
 
the shares that J. Golsen has the sole voting and dispositive power over as noted in footnotes (3) and (4) above.
 
(7) Kent C. McCarthy, manager of Jayhawk Capital Management, L.L.C. (“Jayhawk”), a Delaware limited liability company and investment advisor, is deemed to beneficially own 2,770,793 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (which includes 1,547,293 shares of Common Stock receivable upon conversion of 328,550 shares of Series 2 Preferred, 112,500 shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon exercise of warrants, and 125,000 shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon conversion of $1 million principal amount of our 7% Convertible Senior Subordinated Debenture due 2011 (the “2006 Debentures”)). This number of shares includes the shares Mr. McCarthy personally owns, as well as the shares he controls as manager and sole member of Jayhawk. As manager and sole member of Jayhawk, Mr. McCarthy has sole voting and dispositive power over the Common Stock beneficially owned by Jayhawk. Jayhawk is deemed to have beneficial ownership of 2,496,763 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (which includes 1,444,263 shares of Common Stock receivable upon conversion of 304,750 shares of Series 2 Preferred, 112,500 shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon exercise of warrants and 125,000 shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon conversion of $1 million principal amount of our 2006 Debentures), all of which shares are held in portfolios of (a) Jayhawk Institutional Partners, L.P. (“Jayhawk Institutional”), a Delaware limited partnership, (1,905,854 shares of Common Stock which includes 853,354 shares of Common Stock receivable upon conversion of 168,250 shares of Series 2 Preferred, 112,500 shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon exercise of warrants and 125,000 shares of Common Stock that may be acquired upon conversion of $1 million principal amount of our 2006 Debentures), and (b) Jayhawk Investments, L.P.( “Jayhawk Investments”), a Delaware limited partnership, (590,909 shares of Common Stock receivable upon conversion of 136,500 shares of Series 2 Preferred). The foregoing beneficial ownership is based on a conversion rate of 125 shares per $1,000 principal amount of 2006 Debentures. Such beneficial ownership is subject to change based upon the terms of our 2006 Debentures, which provide that (a) at any time prior to September 1, 2006 and on or after March 1, 2009, the conversion rate is 125 shares per $1,000 principal amount of 2006 Debentures, and (b) during the period from September 1, 2006 to February 28, 2009, the conversion rate declines every six months, starting at 141.25 shares and ending at 129.23 shares per $1,000 principal amount of 2006 Debentures. Jayhawk is the general partner and manager of Jayhawk Institutional and Jayhawk Investments and, as such, has sole voting and dispositive power over these shares. Mr. McCarthy disclaims beneficial ownership of all such shares other than his personal holdings. Mr. McCarthy’s address is 8201 Mission Road, Suite 110, Prairie Village, Kansas 66208. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”
 
(8) Paul J. Denby advised the Company that he has voting and dispositive power over 1,143,752 shares of Common Stock (which includes 180,952 shares of Common Stock receivable upon conversion of 41,800 shares of Series 2 Preferred). This number of shares includes 49,329 shares beneficially owned by Mr. Denby’s spouse over which Mr. Denby shares voting and dispositive power. Mr. Denby’s address is 4613 Redwood Court, Irving, Texas 75038.
 
(9) James W. Sight has sole voting and dispositive power over 875,521 shares of Common Stock (which includes 153,368 shares of Common Stock receivable upon conversion of 35,428 shares of Series 2 Preferred). Mr. Sight’s address is 8500 College Boulevard, Overland Park, Kansas 66210.
 
84

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Security Ownership of Management The following table sets forth certain information obtained from the directors of the Company and the directors and executive officers of the Company as a group as to their beneficial ownership of our voting Common Stock and voting Preferred Stock as of March 20, 2006.
 
Name of Beneficial Owner
   Title of Class   
Amount of
Shares
Beneficially Owned (1)
    Percent of Class+  
Raymond B. Ackerman
   Common    21,000 (2)   *  
Robert C. Brown, M.D.
   Common    208,329 (3)   1.5 %
Charles A. Burtch
   Common    15,000 (4)   *  
Grant J. Donovan
   Common    42,951 (5)   *  
Dr. N. Allen Ford
   Common    1,432 (6)   *  
Barry H. Golsen
   Common
Voting Preferred
   3,170,062
1,016,000
(7)
(7)
  21.4
99.5
%
%
Jack E. Golsen
   Common
Voting Preferred
   3,910,543
1,020,000
(8)
(8)
  25.9
99.9
%
%
David R. Goss
   Common    311,872 (9)   2.2 %
Bernard G. Ille
   Common    45,000 (10)   *  
Donald W. Munson
   Common    16,432 (11)   *  
Horace G. Rhodes
   Common    20,000 (12)   *  
David M. Shear
   Common    173,000 (13)   1.2 %
Tony M. Shelby
   Common    359,629 (14)   2.6 %
Directors and Executive Officers as a group number (14 persons)
   Common
Voting Preferred
   5,908,153
1,020,000
 
(15)
  36.9
99.9
%
%
 
* Less than 1%.
 
+ See footnote + to the table under “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners.”
 
(1) The Company based the information, with respect to beneficial ownership, on information furnished by each director or officer, contained in filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or contained in the Company’s records. As of March 20, 2006, John A. Shelley did not beneficially own any of our voting Common Stock or voting Preferred Stock.
 
(2)
This amount includes the following shares over which Mr. Ackerman shares voting and dispositive power: (a) 2,000 shares held by Mr. Ackerman’s trust, and (b) 4,000 shares held by
 
85

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
 
the trust of Mr. Ackerman’s wife. The remaining 15,000 shares of Common Stock included herein are shares that Mr. Ackerman may acquire pursuant to currently exercisable non-qualified stock options granted to him by the Company.
 
(3) The amount shown includes 15,000 shares of Common Stock that Dr. Brown may acquire pursuant to currently exercisable non-qualified stock options granted to him by the Company. The shares, with respect to which Dr. Brown shares the voting and dispositive power, consists of 122,516 shares owned by Dr. Brown’s wife, 50,727 shares owned by Robert C. Brown, M.D., Inc., a corporation wholly-owned by Dr. Brown, and 20,086 shares held by the Robert C. Brown M.D., Inc. Employee Profit Sharing Plan, of which Dr. Brown serves as the trustee. The amount shown does not include 19,914 shares owned directly, or through trusts, by the children of Dr. Brown and the son-in-law of Dr. Brown, David M. Shear, all of which Dr. Brown disclaims beneficial ownership.
 
(4) Mr. Burtch has sole voting and dispositive power over these shares, which may be acquired by Mr. Burtch pursuant to currently exercisable non-qualified stock options granted to him by the Company.
 
(5) The amount includes (a) 42,451 shares of common stock, including 30,251 shares that Mr. Donovan has the right to acquire upon conversion of 6,988 shares of Series 2 Preferred, over which Mr. Donovan has the sole voting and dispositive power, and (b) 500 shares owned of record by Mr. Donovan’s wife, voting and dispositive power of which are shared by Mr. Donovan and his wife.
 
(6) The amount includes (a) 1,000 shares of common stock which Dr. Ford has sole voting and dispositive power, and (b) 432 shares that Dr. Ford’s wife has the right to acquire upon conversion of 100 shares of Series 2 Preferred.
 
(7) See footnotes (3), (4), and (6) of the table under “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” for a description of the amount and nature of the shares beneficially owned by B. Golsen.
 
(8) See footnotes (3), (4), and (6) of the table under “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” for a description of the amount and nature of the shares beneficially owned by J. Golsen.
 
(9) Mr. Goss has the sole voting and dispositive power over these shares, which include 200,000 shares that Mr. Goss has the right to acquire within 60 days pursuant to options granted under the Company’s stock option plans.
 
(10) The amount includes (a) 25,000 shares of common stock, including 15,000 shares that Mr. Ille may purchase pursuant to currently exercisable non-qualified stock options, over which Mr. Ille has the sole voting and dispositive power, and (b) 20,000 shares owned of record by Mr. Ille’s wife, voting and dispositive power of which are shared by Mr. Ille and his wife.
 
(11)
Mr. Munson has the sole voting and dispositive power over these shares, which include (a) 432 shares of Common Stock that Mr. Munson has the right to acquire upon conversion of 100
 
86

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
 
shares of Series 2 Preferred and (b) 15,000 shares that Mr. Munson may purchase pursuant to currently exercisable non-qualified stock options.
 
(12) Mr. Rhodes has sole voting and dispositive power over these shares, which include 15,000 shares that may be acquired by Mr. Rhodes pursuant to currently exercisable non-qualified stock options granted to him by the Company.
 
(13) Mr. Shear has the sole voting and dispositive power over these shares, which include 164,544 shares that Mr. Shear has the right to acquire within 60 days pursuant to options granted under the Company’s stock option plans. This amount does not include, and Mr. Shear disclaims beneficial ownership of, the shares beneficially owned by Mr. Shear’s wife, which consist of 12,240 shares over which she has the sole voting and dispositive power, 24,760 shares that she has the right to acquire within 60 days pursuant to options granted under the Company’s stock option plans, and 281,708 shares, the beneficial ownership of which is disclaimed by her, that are held by trusts of which she is the trustee.
 
(14) Mr. Shelby has the sole voting and dispositive power over these shares, which include 200,000 shares that Mr. Shelby has the right to acquire within 60 days pursuant to options granted under the Company’s stock option plans and 15,151 shares that Mr. Shelby has the right to acquire upon conversion of 3,500 shares of Series 2 Preferred.
 
(15) The amount shown includes 1,085,044 shares of Common Stock that executive officers, directors, or entities controlled by executive officers and directors of the Company have the right to acquire within 60 days.
 
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Northwest Northwest Internal Medicine Associates (“Northwest”), a division of Plaza Medical Group, P.C., has an agreement with the Company to perform medical examinations of the management and supervisory personnel of the Company and its subsidiaries. Under such agreement, Northwest is paid $2,000 a month to perform all such examinations. Dr. Robert C. Brown (a director of the Company) is Vice President and Treasurer of Plaza Medical Group, P.C.
Prime and John A. Shelley In August 1996, Prime made a loan to John A. Shelley (elected a director of the Company during 2005 Annual Meeting) in the principal sum of $50,000, bearing an annual rate of interest of 9%, payable on demand. The loan was evidenced by a demand promissory note and was made as part of his severance package as President when the Company sold Equity Bank. The note was fully reserved by the Company. The Company has never demanded repayment of the principal or any accrued interest under the note. The Company wrote off the note in 2005 prior to the 2005 Annual Meeting.
Jayhawk During March 2006, Jayhawk Institutional, who together with its affiliate, Kent C. McCarthy and Jayhawk, owned beneficially approximately 17.4% of our common stock (which includes shares that may be issued upon conversion of outstanding preferred stock and exercise of an outstanding warrant), purchased $1 million principal amount of our 2006 Debentures from us in connection with our private placement of $18 million of the 2006 Debentures. See “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management Related Stockholders
 
87

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Matters – Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” and “Sale of Unregistered Securities” under Item 5.
Effective March 25, 2003, the Company completed a private placement to Jayhawk Institutional of 450,000 shares of its common stock and a five-year warrant to purchase up to 112,500 share of its common stock at an exercise price of $3.49 per share, subject to anti-dilution adjustments under certain conditions. The total price paid by Jayhawk Institutional to the Company for the shares of common stock and the warrant was $1,570,500. Jayhawk has certain registration rights.
 
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees billed by Ernst & Young LLP for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, for the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for those fiscal years, and for review of documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for those fiscal years were approximately $679,500 and $613,500, respectively.
Audit-Related Fees
Ernst & Young LLP billed the Company $231,300 and $139,800 during 2005 and 2004, respectively, for audit-related services, which included benefit plan audit and accounting consultations which included assistance with the SEC comment letters and related restatements during 2005.
Tax Fees
Ernst & Young LLP billed $112,943 and $101,209 during 2005 and 2004, respectively, for tax services to the Company, which included tax return review and preparation and tax consultations and planning.
All Other Fees
The Company did not engage its accountants to provide any other services for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.
Engagement of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee is responsible for approving all engagements with Ernst & Young LLP to perform audit or non-audit services for us prior to us engaging Ernst & Young LLP to provide those services. All of the services under the headings Audit Related, Tax Services, and All Other Fees were approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X of the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of
 
88

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Directors has considered whether Ernst & Young LLP’s provision of the services described above for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 is compatible with maintaining its independence.
Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Policies and ProceduresAll audit and non-audit services that may be provided by our principal accountant, Ernst & Young LLP to the Company require pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Further, Ernst & Young LLP shall not provide those services to the Company specifically prohibited by the Securities and Exchange Commission, including bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the audit client; financial information systems design and implementation; appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinion, or contribution-in-kind reports; actuarial services; internal audit outsourcing services; management functions; human resources; broker-dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services; legal services and expert services unrelated to the audit; and any other service that the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board determines, by regulation, is impermissible.
 
89

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
PART IV
 
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) (1) Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statements of the Company appear immediately following this Part IV:
 
     Pages
   F-2
   F-3 to F-4
   F-5
   F-6
   F-7 to F-8
   F-9 to F-63
   F-64 to F-66
(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules
  
The Company has included the following schedules in this report:
  
   F-67 to F-70
   F-71 to F-72
We have omitted all other schedules because the conditions requiring their filing do not exist or because the required information appears in our Consolidated Financial Statements, including the notes to those statements.
 
90

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
(a)(3) Exhibits
 
3.1    Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Certificate of Designation dated February 17, 1989 and certificate of Elimination dated April 30, 1993 which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement, No. 33-61640; Certificate of Designation for the Company’s $3.25 Convertible Exchangeable Class C Preferred Stock, Series 2, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement, No. 33-61640.
3.2    Certificate of Designations of LSB Industries, Inc., relating to the issuance of a new series of Class C Preferred Stock, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference form Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2001.
3.3    Bylaws, as amended, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 3(ii) to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998. See SEC file number 001-07677
4.1    Specimen Certificate for the Company’s Non-cumulative Preferred Stock, having a par value of $100 per share.
4.2    Specimen Certificate for the Company’s Series B Preferred Stock, having a par value of $100 per share, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.27 to the Company’s Registration Statement No. 33-9848.
4.3    Specimen Certificate for the Company’s Series 2 Preferred, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement No. 33-61640.
4.4    Specimen of Certificate of Series D 6% Cumulative, Convertible Class C Preferred Stock which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2001.
4.5    Specimen Certificate for the Company’s Common Stock, which the Company incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.4 to the Company’s Registration Statement No. 33-61640.
4.6    Renewed Rights Agreement, dated January 6, 1999 between the Company and Bank One, N.A., which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit No. 1 to the Company’s Form 8-A Registration Statement, dated January 27, 1999.
4.7    Indenture, dated as of November 26, 1997 by and among ThermaClime, Inc., the Subsidiary Guarantors and Bank One, NA, as trustee, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, dated November 26, 1997. See SEC file number 001-07677
 
91

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
4.8    First Supplemental Indenture, dated February 8, 1999 by and among ThermaClime, Inc., the Guarantors, and Bank One N.A., which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.19 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. See SEC file number 001-07677
4.9    Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 24, 2002 among the Company, the Guarantors, and Bank One, N.A, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K, dated May 24, 2002.
4.10    Form of 10 3/4% Series B Senior Notes due 2007 which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to the ThermaClime Registration Statement, No. 333-44905.
4.11    Loan and Security Agreement, dated April 13, 2001 by and among LSB Industries, Inc., ThermaClime and each of its Subsidiaries that are Signatories, the Lenders that are Signatories and Foothill Capital Corporation, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.51 to ThermaClime, Inc.’s amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000. See SEC file number 001-07677
4.12    Second Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated May 24, 2002 by and among the Company, LSB, certain subsidiaries of the Company, Foothill Capital Corporation and Congress Financial Corporation (Southwest), which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, dated May 24, 2002. Omitted are exhibits and schedules attached thereto. The Agreement contains a list of such exhibits and schedules, which the Company agrees to file with the Commission supplementally upon the Commission’s request.
4.13    Third Amendment, dated as of November 18, 2002 to the Loan and Security Agreement dated as of April 13, 2001 as amended by the First Amendment dated as of August 3, 2001 and the second Amendment dated as of May 24, 2002 by and among LSB Industries, Inc., ThermaClime, Inc., and certain subsidiaries of ThermaClime, Congress Financial Corporation (Southwest) and Foothill Capital Corporation which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2002.
4.14    Fourth Amendment, dated as of March 3, 2003 to the Loan and Security Agreement dated as of April 13, 2001 as amended by the First, Second, and Third Amendments, by and among LSB Industries, Inc., ThermaClime, Inc., and certain subsidiaries of ThermaClime, Inc., Congress Financial Corporation (Southwest) and Foothill Capital Corporation, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.18 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.
4.15    Fifth Amendment, dated as of December 31, 2003 to the Loan and Security Agreement dated as of April 13, 2001 as amended by the First, Second, Third and Fourth
 
92

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
   Amendments, by and among LSB Industries, Inc., ThermaClime, Inc., and certain subsidiaries of ThermaClime, Inc., Congress Financial Corporation (Southwest) and Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.15 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
4.16    Waiver and Consent, dated March 25, 2004 to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of April 13, 2001 (as amended to date), by and among LSB Industries, Inc., ThermaClime, Inc., and certain subsidiaries of ThermaClime, Inc. and Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc. which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.16 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
4.17    Sixth Amendment, dated as of June 29, 2004 to the Loan and Security Agreement dated as of April 13, 2001 as amended, by and among LSB Industries, Inc., ThermaClime, Inc. and certain subsidiaries of ThermaClime, Inc., Congress Financial Corporation (Southwest) and Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004.
4.18    Seventh Amendment, dated as of September 15, 2004 to the Loan and Security Agreement dated as of April 13, 2001 as amended, by and among LSB Industries, Inc., ThermaClime, Inc. and certain subsidiaries of ThermaClime, Inc., Congress Financial Corporation (Southwest) and Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004.
4.19    Eighth Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated February 28, 2005, between LSB Industries, Inc., ThermaClime, Inc., the subsidiaries of ThermaClime, Inc. that are signatories thereto, and Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., as arranger and administrative agent for various lenders, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, dated February 28, 2005.
4.20    Ninth amendment to Loan and Security Agreement, dated February 22, 2006, between LSB Industries, Inc., ThermaClime, Inc., the subsidiaries of ThermaClime, Inc. that are signatories thereto, and Wells Fargo Foothill, Inc., as arranger and administrative agent for various lenders.
4.21    Loan Agreement, dated September 15, 2004 between ThermaClime, Inc. and certain subsidiaries of ThermaClime, Inc., Cherokee Nitrogen Holdings, Inc., Orix Capital Markets, L.L.C. and LSB Industries, Inc. (“Loan Agreement”) which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, dated September 16, 2004. The Loan Agreement lists numerous Exhibits and Schedules that are attached thereto, which will be provided to the Commission upon the commission’s request.
4.22    First Amendment, dated February 18, 2005 to Loan Agreement, dated as of September 15, 2004, among ThermaClime, Inc., and certain subsidiaries of ThermaClime, Cherokee Nitrogen Holdings, Inc., and Orix Capital Markets, L.L.C. which the
 
93

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
   Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 4.21 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
4.23    Waiver and Consent, dated as of January 1, 2006 to the Loan Agreement dated as of September 15, 2004 among ThermaClime, Inc., and certain subsidiaries of ThermaClime, Inc., Cherokee Nitrogen Holdings, Inc., Orix Capital Markets, L.L.C. and LSB Industries, Inc.
10.1    Limited Partnership Agreement dated as of May 4, 1995 between the general partner, and LSB Holdings, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation, as limited partner which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995. See SEC file number 001-07677.
10.2    Form of Death Benefit Plan Agreement between the Company and the employees covered under the plan.
10.3    The Company’s 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.
10.4    First Amendment to Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, dated March 2, 1994 and Second Amendment to Stock Option Agreement, dated April 3, 1995 each between the Company and Jack E. Golsen, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 1995. See SEC file number 001-07677.
10.5    Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, dated April 22, 1998 between the Company and Robert C. Brown, M.D., which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.43 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998. The Company entered into substantially identical agreements with Bernard G. Ille, Raymond B. Ackerman, Horace G. Rhodes, and Donald W. Munson. The Company will provide copies of these agreements to the Commission upon request. See SEC file number 001-07677.
10.6    The Company’s 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.44 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. See SEC file number 001-07677.
10.7    LSB Industries, Inc. 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit “B” to the LSB Proxy Statement, dated May 24, 1999 for Annual Meeting of Stockholders. See SEC file number 001-07677.
10.8    LSB Industries, Inc. Outside Directors Stock Option Plan, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit “C” to the LSB Proxy Statement, dated May 24, 1999 for Annual Meeting of Stockholders. See SEC file number 001-07677.
 
94

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
10.9    Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated November 7, 2002 between the Company and John J. Bailey Jr, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 55 to the Company’s Form 10-K/A Amendment No.1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.
10.10    Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated November 29, 2001 between the Company and Dan Ellis, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.56 to the Company’s Form 10-K/A Amendment No.1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.
10.11    Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated July 20, 2000 between the Company and Claude Rappaport for the purchase of 80,000 shares of common stock, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.57 to the Company’s Form 10-K/A Amendment No.1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. Substantially similar nonqualified stock option agreements were entered into with Mr. Rappaport (40,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.25 per share, expiring on July 20, 2009), (5,000 shares at an exercise price of $5.362 per share, expiring on July 20, 2007), and (60,000 shares at an exercise price of $1.375 per share, expiring on July 20, 2009), copies of which will be provided to the Commission upon request.
10.12    Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, dated July 8, 1999 between the Company and Jack E. Golsen, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.58 to the Company’s Form 10-K/A Amendment No.1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. Substantially similar nonqualified stock options were granted to Barry H. Golsen (55,000 shares), Stephen J. Golsen (35,000 shares), David R. Goss (35,000 shares), Tony M. Shelby (35,000 shares), David M. Shear (35,000 shares) and five other employees (165,000 shares), copies of which will be provided to the Commission upon request.
10.13    Severance Agreement, dated January 17, 1989 between the Company and Jack E. Golsen. The Company also entered into identical agreements with Tony M. Shelby, David R. Goss, Barry H. Golsen, David M. Shear, and Jim D. Jones and the Company will provide copies thereof to the Commission upon request.
10.14    Employment Agreement and Amendment to Severance Agreement dated January 12, 1989 between the Company and Jack E. Golsen, dated March 21, 1996 which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 1995. See SEC file number 001-07677.
10.15    First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated April 29, 2003 between the Company and Jack E. Golsen, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.52 to the Company’s Form 10-K/A Amendment No.1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.
 
95

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
10.16    Baytown Nitric Acid Project and Supply Agreement dated June 27, 1997 by and among El Dorado Nitrogen Company, El Dorado Chemical Company and Bayer Corporation which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1997. CERTAIN INFORMATION WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AS IT IS THE SUBJECT OF COMMISSION ORDER CF #5551, DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 1997 GRANTING A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AND THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. See SEC file number 001-07677.
10.17    First Amendment to Baytown Nitric Acid Project and Supply Agreement, dated February 1, 1999 between El Dorado Nitrogen Company and Bayer Corporation, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.30 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. CERTAIN INFORMATION WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AS IT IS THE SUBJECT OF COMMISSION ORDER CF #7927, DATED JUNE 9, 1999 GRANTING A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AND THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. See SEC file number 001-07677.
10.18    Service Agreement, dated June 27, 1997 between Bayer Corporation and El Dorado Nitrogen Company which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1997. CERTAIN INFORMATION WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AS IT IS THE SUBJECT OF COMMISSION ORDER CF #5551, DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 1997, GRANTING A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AND THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. See SEC file number 001-07677.
10.19    Ground Lease dated June 27, 1997 between Bayer Corporation and El Dorado Nitrogen Company which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1997. CERTAIN INFORMATION WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AS IT IS THE SUBJECT OF COMMISSION ORDER CF #5551, DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 1997 GRANTING A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AND THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. See SEC file number 001-07677.
10.20    Participation Agreement, dated as of June 27, 1997 among El Dorado Nitrogen Company, Boatmen’s Trust Company of Texas as Owner Trustee, Security Pacific Leasing Corporation, as Owner Participant and a Construction Lender, Wilmington Trust Company, Bayerische Landes Bank, New York Branch, as a Construction Lender and the Note Purchaser, and Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, as Construction Loan Agent which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1997. CERTAIN INFORMATION WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AS IT IS THE SUBJECT OF COMMISSION ORDER CF #5551, DATED SEPTEMBER 25, 1997
 
96

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
   GRANTING A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AND THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. See SEC file number 001-07677.
10.21    Lease Agreement, dated as of June 27, 1997 between Boatmen’s Trust Company of Texas as Owner Trustee and El Dorado Nitrogen Company which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1997. See SEC file number 001-07677.
10.22    Security Agreement and Collateral Assignment of Construction Documents, dated as of June 27, 1997 made by El Dorado Nitrogen Company which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1997. See SEC file number 001-07677.
10.23    Security Agreement and Collateral Assignment of Facility Documents, dated as of June 27, 1997 made by El Dorado Nitrogen Company and consented to by Bayer Corporation which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 1997. See SEC file number 001-07677.
10.24    Loan Agreement dated December 23, 1999 between Climate Craft, Inc. and the City of Oklahoma City, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.49 to the Company’s Amendment No. 2 to its 1999 Form 10-K. See SEC file number 001-07677.
10.25    Assignment, dated May 8, 2001 between Climate Master, Inc. and Prime Financial Corporation, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2001.
10.26    Agreement for Purchase and Sale, dated April 10, 2001 by and between Prime Financial Corporation and Raptor Master, L.L.C. which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2001.
10.27    Amended and Restated Lease Agreement, dated May 8, 2001 between Raptor Master, L.L.C. and Climate Master, Inc. which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2001.
10.28    Option Agreement, dated May 8, 2001 between Raptor Master, L.L.C. and Climate Master, Inc., which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2001.
10.29    Stock Purchase Agreement, dated September 30, 2001 by and between Summit Machinery Company and SBL Corporation, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’ Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2001.
 
97

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
10.30    Asset Purchase Agreement, dated October 22, 2001 between Orica USA, Inc. and El Dorado Chemical Company and Northwest Financial Corporation, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 28, 2001. CERTAIN INFORMATION WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AS IT IS THE SUBJECT OF A REQUEST BY THE COMPANY FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. THE OMITTED INFORMATION HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FOR PURPOSES OF SUCH REQUEST.
10.31    AN Supply Agreement, dated November 1, 2001 between Orica USA, Inc. and El Dorado Company, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 28, 2001. CERTAIN INFORMATION WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AS IT IS THE SUBJECT OF A REQUEST BY THE COMPANY FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. THE OMITTED INFORMATION HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FOR PURPOSES OF SUCH REQUEST.
10.32    Ammonium Nitrate Sales Agreement between Nelson Brothers, L.L.C. and Cherokee Nitrogen Company, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 99.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K dated December 28, 2001. CERTAIN INFORMATION WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AS IT IS THE SUBJECT OF A REQUEST BY THE COMPANY FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. THE OMITTED INFORMATION HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FOR PURPOSES OF SUCH REQUEST.
10.33    Agreement, dated August 1, 2004, between El Dorado Chemical Company and Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical and Energy Workers International Union AFL-CIO and its Local 5-434, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
10.34    Agreement, dated October 17, 2004, between El Dorado Chemical Company and International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO Local No. 224, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
10.35    Agreement, dated November 12, 2004, between The United Steelworkers of America International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC, Cherokee Local No. 417-G and Cherokee Nitrogen Division of El Dorado Chemical Company, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.38 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
 
98

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
10.36    Warrant, dated May 24, 2002 granted by the Company to a Lender for the right to purchase up to 132,508 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, dated May 24, 2002. Four substantially similar Warrants, dated May 24, 2002 for the purchase of an aggregate additional 463,077 shares at an exercise price of $0.10 were issued. Copies of these Warrants will be provided to the Commission upon request.
10.37    Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 6, 2002 by and among Energetic Systems Inc. LLC, UTeC Corporation, LLC, SEC Investment Corp. LLC, DetaCorp Inc. LLC, Energetic Properties, LLC, Slurry Explosive Corporation, Universal Tech Corporation, El Dorado Chemical Company, LSB Chemical Corp., LSB Industries, Inc. and Slurry Explosive Manufacturing Corporation, LLC, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, dated December 12, 2002. The asset purchase agreement contains a brief list identifying all schedules and exhibits to the asset purchase agreement. Such schedules and exhibits are not filed herewith, and the Registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of the omitted schedules and exhibits to the commission upon request.
10.38    Anhydrous Ammonia Sales Agreement, dated effective January 3, 2005 between Koch Nitrogen Company and El Dorado Chemical Company which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.41 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. CERTAIN INFORMATION WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AS IT IS THE SUBJECT OF A REQUEST BY THE COMPANY FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. THE OMITTED INFORMATION HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FOR PURPOSES OF SUCH REQUEST.
10.39    Warrant Agreement, dated March 25, 2003 between LSB Industries, Inc. and Jayhawk Institutional Partners, L.P., which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.51 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.
10.40    Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 25, 2003 among LSB Industries, Inc., Kent C. McCarthy, Jayhawk Capital management, L.L.C., Jayhawk Investments, L.P. and Jayhawk Institutional Partners, L.P., which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.49 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.
10.41    Subscription Agreement, dated March 25, 2003 by and between LSB Industries, Inc. and Jayhawk Institutional Partners, L.P., which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.50 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.
10.42    First Amendment to Anhydrous Ammonia Sales Agreement, dated effective August 29, 2005 between Koch Nitrogen Company and El Dorado Chemical Company. CERTAIN
 
99

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
   INFORMATION WITHIN THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN OMITTED AS IT IS THE SUBJECT OF A REQUEST BY THE COMPANY FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT. THE OMITTED INFORMATION HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FOR PURPOSES OF SUCH REQUEST.
10.43    Second Amendment and Extension of Stock Purchase Option, effective July 1, 2004, between LSB Holdings, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation and Dr. Hauri AG, a Swiss corporation, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004.
10.44    Debt Forgiveness Agreement, effective July 1, 2004, by and between Companie Financiere du Taraois, a French corporation and LSB Holding, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004.
14.1    Code of Ethics for CEO and Senior Financial Officers of Subsidiaries of LSB Industries, Inc., which the Company hereby incorporates by reference from Exhibit 14.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.
21.1    Subsidiaries of the Company.
23.1    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
31.1    Certification of Jack E. Golsen, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302.
31.2    Certification of Tony M. Shelby, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 302.
32.1    Certification of Jack E. Golsen, Chief Executive Officer, furnished pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 906.
32.2    Certification of Tony M. Shelby, Chief Financial Officer, furnished pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Section 906.
 
100

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
   
LSB INDUSTRIES, INC.
Dated:
   
By:
 
/s/ Jack E. Golsen
March 31, 2006
     
Jack E. Golsen
       
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
       
(Principal Executive Officer)
Dated:
   
By:
 
/s/ Tony M. Shelby
March 31, 2006
     
Tony M. Shelby
        Executive Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
       
(Principal Financial Officer)
Dated:
   
By:
 
/s/ Jim D. Jones
March 31, 2006
     
Jim D. Jones
       
Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller and Treasurer
       
(Principal Accounting Officer)
 
101

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
Dated:
   
By:
 
/s/ Jack E. Golsen
March 31, 2006
     
Jack E. Golsen, Director
Dated:
   
By:
 
/s/ Tony M. Shelby
March 31, 2006
     
Tony M. Shelby, Director
Dated:
   
By:
 
/s/ David R. Goss
March 31, 2006
     
David R. Goss, Director
Dated:
   
By:
 
/s/ Barry H. Golsen
March 31, 2006
     
Barry H. Golsen, Director
Dated:
   
By:
 
/s/ Robert C. Brown MD
March 31, 2006
     
Robert C. Brown MD, Director
Dated:
   
By:
 
/s/ Bernard G. Ille
March 31, 2006
     
Bernard G. Ille, Director
Dated:
   
By:
 
/s/ Raymond B. Ackerman
March 31, 2006
     
Raymond B. Ackerman, Director
Dated:
   
By:
 
/s/ Horace G. Rhodes
March 31, 2006
     
Horace G. Rhodes, Director
Dated:
   
By:
 
/s/ Donald W. Munson
March 31, 2006
     
Donald W. Munson , Director
Dated:
   
By:
 
/s/ Charles A. Burtch
March 31, 2006
     
Charles A. Burtch, Director
Dated:
   
By:
 
/s/ John A. Shelley
March 31, 2006
     
John A. Shelley, Director
Dated:
   
By:
 
/s/ Grant J. Donovan
March 31, 2006
     
Grant J. Donovan, Director
Dated:
   
By:
 
/s/ Dr. N. Allen Ford
March 31, 2006
     
Dr. N. Allen Ford, Director
 
102

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Consolidated Financial Statements
for Inclusion in Form 10-K
Years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
CONTENTS
 
   F-2
Consolidated Financial Statements
  
   F-3
   F-5
   F-6
   F-7
   F-9
 
F-1

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of LSB Industries, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of LSB Industries, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of LSB Industries, Inc. at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective March 31, 2004 the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
By: /s/ Ernst & Young LLP  
  
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
March 30, 2006
 
F-2

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
     December 31,
     2005    2004
     (In Thousands)
Assets
     
Current assets:
     
Cash
   $ 4,653    $ 1,020
Restricted cash
     177      158
Accounts receivable, net
     49,437      42,541
Inventories
     37,271      28,657
Supplies, prepaid items and other:
     
Deferred rent expense
     —        938
Prepaid insurance
     3,453      4,498
Precious metals
     4,987      5,616
Other
     4,432      3,736
             
Total supplies, prepaid items and other
     12,872      14,788
             
Total current assets
     104,410      87,164
Property, plant and equipment, net
     74,082      70,219
Other assets:
     
Debt issuance and other debt-related costs, net
     2,573      2,517
Investment in affiliate
     3,368      3,111
Goodwill
     1,724      1,724
Other, net
     2,806      2,833
             
Total other assets
     10,471      10,185
             
   $ 188,963    $ 167,568
             
(Continued on following page)
 
F-3

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued)
 
     December 31,  
     2005     2004  
     (In Thousands)  
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
    
Current liabilities:
    
Accounts payable
   $ 31,687     $ 27,698  
Short-term financing and drafts payable
     2,790       3,707  
Accrued liabilities
     23,219       17,080  
Current portion of long-term debt
     3,348       4,833  
                
Total current liabilities
     61,044       53,318  
Long-term debt
     108,776       101,674  
Other noncurrent liabilities
     5,687       4,178  
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
    
Stockholders’ equity:
    
Series B 12% cumulative, convertible preferred stock, $100 par value; 20,000 shares issued and outstanding; aggregate liquidation preference of $3,440,000 in 2005 ($3,200,000 in 2004)
     2,000       2,000  
Series 2 $3.25 convertible, exchangeable Class C preferred stock, $50 stated value; 623,550 shares issued; aggregate liquidation preference of $43,963,000 in 2005 ($42,234,000 in 2004)
     31,177       31,177  
Series D 6% cumulative, convertible Class C preferred stock, no par value; 1,000,000 shares issued; aggregate liquidation preference of $1,240,000 in 2005 ($1,180,000 in 2004)
     1,000       1,000  
Common stock, $.10 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized, 17,082,265 shares issued (16,400,985 in 2004)
     1,708       1,640  
Capital in excess of par value
     57,547       57,352  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
     (990 )     (1,280 )
Accumulated deficit
     (61,738 )     (66,840 )
                
     30,704       25,049  
Less treasury stock, at cost:
    
Series 2 preferred, 18,300 shares (5,000 in 2004)
     797       200  
Common stock, 3,321,607 shares
     16,451       16,451  
                
Total stockholders’ equity
     13,456       8,398  
                
   $ 188,963     $ 167,568  
                
See accompanying notes.
 
F-4

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
 
     Year ended December 31,  
     2005     2004     2003  
     (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)  
Net sales
   $ 396,722     $ 363,608     $ 316,661  
Cost of sales
     330,651       310,497       266,750  
                        
Gross profit
     66,071       53,111       49,911  
Selling, general and administrative expense
     53,456       49,430       41,884  
Other expense (Note 19)
     332       1,111       755  
Other income (Note 19)
     (2,682 )     (674 )     (730 )
                        
Operating income
     14,965       3,244       8,002  
Interest expense (Note 9)
     11,407       7,393       6,097  
Provision for loss on notes receivable (Note 2)
     —         1,447       —    
Gains on extinguishment of debt (Note 9)
     —         (4,400 )     (258 )
Non-operating other income, net (Note 19)
     (1,561 )     (2,434 )     (731 )
                        
Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes, equity in earnings of affiliate and cumulative effect of accounting change
     5,119       1,238       2,894  
Provision for income taxes
     (118 )     —         —    
Equity in earnings of affiliate (Note 7)
     745       668       19  
                        
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change
     5,746       1,906       2,913  
Net loss from discontinued operations (Note 11)
     (644 )     —         —    
Cumulative effect of accounting change (Note 2)
     —         (536 )     —    
                        
Net income
     5,102       1,370       2,913  
Preferred stock dividend requirements
     (2,283 )     (2,322 )     (2,327 )
                        
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock
   $ 2,819     $ (952 )   $ 586  
                        
Income (loss) per common share:
      
Basic:
      
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change
   $ .26     $ (.03 )   $ .05  
Loss from discontinued operations, net
     (.05 )     —         —    
Cumulative effect of accounting change
     —         (.04 )     —    
                        
Net income (loss)
   $ .21     $ (.07 )   $ .05  
                        
Diluted:
      
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change
   $ .23     $ (.03 )   $ .04  
Loss from discontinued operations, net
     (.04 )     —         —    
Cumulative effect of accounting change
     —         (.04 )     —    
                        
Net income (loss)
   $ .19     $ (.07 )   $ .04  
                        
See accompanying notes.
 
F-5

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
 
     Common
Stock
Shares
   Non-
Redeemable
Preferred
Stock
    Common
Stock
Par Value
   Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
    Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
    Accumulated
Deficit
    Treasury
Stock -
Preferred
    Treasury
Stock -
Common
    Total  
     (In Thousands)  
Balance at December 31, 2002
   15,236    $ 34,427     $ 1,524    $ 54,503     $ (1,859 )   $ (71,123 )   $ (200 )   $ (16,068 )   $ 1,204  
Net income
                 2,913           2,913  
Amortization of cash flow hedge (Note 2)
               289             289  
                          
Total comprehensive income
                       3,202  
Issuance of 450,000 shares of common stock (Note 13)
   450        45      1,526               1,571  
Exercise of stock options
   131        13      186               199  
Conversion of 83 shares of redeemable preferred stock to common stock
   3           8               8  
                                                                    
Balance at December 31, 2003
   15,820      34,427       1,582      56,223       (1,570 )     (68,210 )     (200 )     (16,068 )     6,184  
Net income
                 1,370           1,370  
Amortization of cash flow hedge (Note 2)
               290             290  
                          
Total comprehensive income
                       1,660  
Exercise of stock options
   579        58      1,145             (383 )     820  
Acquisition of 5,000 shares of non-redeemable preferred stock (Note 13)
        (250 )        (21 )             (271 )
Conversion of 57 shares of redeemable preferred stock to common stock
   2           5               5  
                                                                    
Balance at December 31, 2004
   16,401      34,177       1,640      57,352       (1,280 )     (66,840 )     (200 )     (16,451 )     8,398  
Net income
                 5,102           5,102  
Amortization of cash flow hedge (Note 2)
               290             290  
                          
Total comprehensive income
                       5392  
Exercise of warrants (Notes 9 and 13)
   586        59      (59 )             —    
Exercise of stock options
   89        8      240               248  
Acquisition of 13,300 shares of non-redeemable preferred stock (Note 13)
                   (597 )       (597 )
Conversion of 156 shares of redeemable preferred stock to common stock
   6        1      14               15  
                                                                    
Balance at December 31, 2005
   17,082    $ 34,177     $ 1,708    $ 57,547     $ (990 )   $ (61,738 )   $ (797 )   $ (16,451 )   $ 13,456  
                                                                    
See accompanying notes.
 
F-6

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 
     Year ended December 31,  
     2005     2004     2003  
     (In Thousands)  
Cash flows from operating activities
      
Net income
   $ 5,102     $ 1,370     $ 2,913  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by continuing operating activities:
      
Loss from discontinued operations, net
     644       —         —    
Cumulative effect of accounting change
     —         536       —    
Gains on extinguishment of debt
     —         (4,400 )     (258 )
Losses (gains) on sales of property and equipment
     (714 )     (340 )     4  
Gains on property insurance recoveries
     (1,618 )     —         —    
Realization and reversal of provision for losses on firm sales commitments
     —         (106 )     (589 )
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
     10,875       10,194       10,312  
Amortization
     1,151       1,101       904  
Provision for losses on accounts receivable
     810       211       1,031  
Provision for (realization and reversal of) losses on inventory
     239       548       (436 )
Provision for loss on notes receivable
     —         1,447       —    
Provision for impairment on long-lived assets
     237       737       500  
Net loss of variable interest entity
     —         575       —    
Other
     (36 )     121       (14 )
Cash provided (used) by changes in assets and liabilities (net of effects of discontinued operations):
      
Accounts receivable
     (8,664 )     (6,554 )     (1,871 )
Inventories
     (8,888 )     (1,763 )     671  
Other supplies and prepaid items
     798       (1,447 )     (1,226 )
Accounts payable
     3,990       5,688       (1,968 )
Customer deposits
     (1,494 )     (1,155 )     1,107  
Deferred rent expense
     6,047       (4,704 )     631  
Other accrued and noncurrent liabilities
     2,496       (959 )     1,265  
                        
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities
     10,975       1,100       12,976  
Cash flows from investing activities
      
Capital expenditures
     (15,315 )     (9,600 )     (7,177 )
Proceeds from property insurance recoveries
     2,888       —         —    
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
     2,355       262       84  
Proceeds from (payment of) restricted cash
     (19 )     (158 )     1,838  
Other assets
     (483 )     (530 )     598  
                        
Net cash used by investing activities
     (10,574 )     (10,026 )     (4,657 )
(Continued on following page)
 
F-7

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
 
     Year ended December 31,  
     2005     2004     2003  
     (In Thousands)  
Cash flows from financing activities
      
Proceeds from revolving debt facilities
   $ 363,671     $ 330,680     $ 281,461  
Payments on revolving debt facilities, including fees
     (359,451 )     (327,103 )     (284,885 )
Proceeds from Senior Secured Loan, net of fees
     —         47,708       —    
Payments on Financing Agreement
     —         (38,531 )     (3,375 )
Acquisition of 10 3/4% Senior Unsecured Notes
     —         (5,000 )     —    
Proceeds from other long-term and other debt, net of fees
     3,584       2,666       1,890  
Payments on other long-term and other debt
     (3,267 )     (4,886 )     (4,282 )
Proceeds from short-term financing and drafts payable
     5,061       5,774       5,276  
Payments on short-term financing and drafts payable
     (5,978 )     (5,100 )     (5,076 )
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants
     248       820       1,770  
Acquisition of non-redeemable preferred stock
     (597 )     (271 )     —    
                        
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
     3,271       6,757       (7,221 )
Cash flows of discontinued operations:
      
Operating cash flows
     (39 )     —         —    
                        
Net increase (decrease) in cash
     3,633       (2,169 )     1,098  
Cash at beginning of year
     1,020       3,189       2,091  
                        
Cash at end of year
   $ 4,653     $ 1,020     $ 3,189  
                        
Supplemental cash flow information:
      
Cash payment (receipts) for:
      
Interest on long-term debt and other
   $ 10,291     $ 6,294     $ 5,691  
Income taxes, net of refunds
   $ —       $ —       $ (43 )
Noncash investing and financing activities:
      
Receivable from sale of property and equipment
   $ —       $ 202     $ —    
Debt issuance costs
   $ —       $ 2,315     $ —    
Mark-to-market provision on interest rate caps
   $ (162 )   $ —       $ —    
Long-term and other debt issued for property, plant and equipment
   $ 1,036     $ —       $ 639  
Long-term debt extinguished in exchange for the extinguishment of a note receivable
   $ —       $ —       $ (1,276 )
See accompanying notes.
 
F-8

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Basis of Presentation
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of LSB Industries, Inc. (the “Company”, “We”, “Us”, or “Our”) and its subsidiaries. We are a diversified holding company which is engaged, through our subsidiaries, in the manufacture and sale of a broad range of air handling and heat pump products (the “Climate Control Business”) and the manufacture and sale of chemical products (the “Chemical Business”). See Note 20 - Segment Information. Entities that are 20% to 50% owned and for which we have significant influence are accounted for on the equity method. See Note 7 - Investment in Affiliate. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Based on internal reviews of our accounting policies and financial presentation, we have made a classification change relating to receivables for insurance recoveries involving group health and workers’ compensation. At December 31, 2004, we had receivables for insurance recoveries of $653,000 which were included in accrued insurance liabilities. In 2005, we have reclassified this 2004 balance to accounts receivable which resulted in an increase to accounts receivable and accrued liabilities of $653,000 in our 2004 consolidated balance sheet. The effect of this classification change on our consolidated statement of cash flows for 2004 was an increase in cash used by the change in accounts receivable and an increase in cash provided by the change in accrued liabilities of $653,000, the net result of which did not affect net cash provided by operating activities. In addition, this classification change did not affect our consolidated statements of income for 2004.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. (See Note 3 - Changes in Accounting Estimates).
Accounts Receivable and Credit Risk
Sales to contractors and independent sales representatives are generally subject to a mechanics lien in the Climate Control Business. Other sales are generally unsecured. Credit is extended to customers based on an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition and other factors. Credit losses are provided for in the consolidated financial statements based on historical experience and periodic assessment of outstanding accounts receivable, particularly those accounts which are past due (determined based upon how recently payments have been received). Our periodic assessment of accounts and credit loss provisions are based on our best estimate of amounts that are not
 
F-9

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
recoverable. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited due to the large number of customers comprising our customer bases and their dispersion across many different industries and geographic areas, however, four customers account for approximately 25% of our total net receivables at December 31, 2005. We do not believe this concentration in these four customers represents a significant credit risk due to the financial stability of these customers. (See Note 4 - Accounts Receivable).
Inventories
Inventories are priced at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined using the first-in, first-out basis (See Note 5 - Inventories). Finished goods and work-in-process inventories include material, labor, and manufacturing overhead costs. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the carrying value of certain nitrogen-based inventories produced by our Chemical Business was reduced to market because cost exceeded the net realizable value by $1,395,000 and $1,277,000, respectively. In addition, the carrying value of certain slow-moving inventory items (primarily Climate Control products) was reduced to market because cost exceeded the net realizable value by $1,028,000 and $908,000 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Precious Metals
Precious metals are used as a catalyst in the Chemical Business manufacturing process. Precious metals are carried at cost, with cost being determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) basis. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, precious metals were $4,987,000 and $5,616,000, respectively, and are included in supplies, prepaid items and other in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Because some of the catalyst consumed in the production process cannot be readily recovered and the amount and timing of recoveries are not predictable, we follow the practice of expensing precious metals as they are consumed. For 2005, 2004 and 2003, the amounts expensed for precious metals were approximately $3,535,000, $3,332,000 and $3,265,000, respectively, and are included in cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. Periodically, during major maintenance or capital projects, we may be able to perform procedures to recover precious metals (previously expensed) which have accumulated within the manufacturing equipment. For 2005, 2004 and 2003, we recognized recoveries of precious metals at historical FIFO costs of approximately $2,050,000, $189,000 and $1,885,000, respectively, which are reductions to cost of sales.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost. For financial reporting purposes, depreciation is primarily computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leases meeting capital lease criteria have been capitalized and included in property, plant and equipment. Amortization of assets under capital leases is included in depreciation expense. No provision for depreciation is made on construction in progress or capital spare parts until such time as the relevant assets are put into service (See Note 6 - Property, Plant and Equipment). Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are charged to operations while major renewals and improvements are capitalized in property, plant and equipment.
 
F-10

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
Goodwill
As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, goodwill was $1,724,000 of which $103,000 and $1,621,000 relates to business acquisitions in prior periods in the Climate Control and Chemical Businesses, respectively. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment at least annually in accordance with SFAS 142.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If assets to be held and used are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is the amount by which the carrying amounts of the assets exceed the fair values of the assets as measured by the present value of future net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets or their appraised value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amounts of the assets or fair values less costs to sell. At December 31, 2005 we had no long-lived assets that met the criteria presented in SFAS 144 to be classified as assets held for sale.
We have obtained estimates from external sources and made internal estimates based on inquiry and other techniques of the fair values of certain capital spare parts and idle assets in our Chemical Business and certain non-core equipment included in our Corporate assets in order to determine recoverability of the carrying amounts of such assets.
Based on these estimates, we recognized the following impairments which are included in other expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of income (in thousands):
 
     Year ended December 31,
     2005    2004    2003
Chemical Business assets
   $ 117    $ 362    $ 200
Corporate assets
     120      375      300
                    
   $ 237    $ 737    $ 500
                    
Debt Issuance and Other Debt-Related Costs, net
Debt issuance and other debt-related costs are amortized over the term of the associated debt instrument using the straight-line method except for the cost of interest caps (discussed below). Such costs, which are included in supplies, prepaid items and other and other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, were $2,583,000 and $2,690,000, net of accumulated amortization of $2,991,000 and $2,231,000 as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
In 2004, our wholly-owned subsidiary ThermaClime, Inc. (“ThermaClime”) incurred debt issuance costs of $2,464,000 including the cost of an interest rate cap relating to the Senior Secured Loan (See Note 9 (A)). This interest rate cap is being amortized over the term of the Senior Secured Loan using the effective interest rate method. In 2005, we purchased two interest rate cap contracts
 
F-11

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
for a cost of $590,000. These contracts are free-standing derivatives and are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis in accordance with SFAS No.133. See discussion below under “Derivatives, Hedges and Financial Instruments.”
Accrued Insurance Liabilities
We are self-insured up to certain limits for group health, workers’ compensation and general liability claims. Above these limits, we have insurance coverage, which management considers to be adequate. Our accrued insurance liabilities are based on estimates of the self-insured portions of the claims, which include the incurred claims amounts plus estimates of future claims development calculated by applying our historical claims development factors to our incurred claims amounts. We also consider the reserves established by our insurance adjustors and/or estimates provided by attorneys handling the claims, if any. In addition, our accrued insurance liabilities include estimates of incurred, but not reported, claims and other insurance-related costs. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, our claims liabilities are $1,426,000 and $1,351,000, respectively, which are included in accrued liabilities as shown in Note 8-Accrued Liabilities.
Product Warranty
Our Climate Control Business sells equipment that has an expected life, under normal circumstances and use that extends over several years. As such, we provide warranties after equipment shipment/start-up covering defects in materials and workmanship.
Generally, the warranty coverage for the manufactured equipment in the Climate Control Business is limited to eighteen months from the date of shipment or twelve months from the date of start-up, whichever is shorter, and to ninety days for spare parts. In most cases, equipment is required to be returned to the factory or its’ authorized representative and the warranty is limited to the repair and replacement of the defective product, with a maximum warranty of the refund of the purchase price. Furthermore, companies within the Climate Control Business do not make any warranties related to merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose and disclaim and exclude any liability for consequential or incidental damages. In some cases, the customer may purchase an extended warranty. The above discussion is generally applicable, but variations do occur depending upon specific contractual obligations, to certain system components and local laws.
Our accounting policy and methodology for warranty arrangements is to periodically measure and recognize the expense and liability for such warranty obligations using a percentage of net sales, based upon our historical warranty costs. It is possible that future warranty costs could exceed our estimates.
 
F-12

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
The carrying amounts of the product warranty obligation, which are included in accrued liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, are as follows:
 
Description
   Balance at
Beginning
of Year
   Additions-
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
   Deductions-
Costs
Incurred
   Balance
at End
of Year
     (In Thousands)
Product warranty:
           
2005
   $ 1,999    $ 1,830    $ 1,527    $ 2,302
                           
2004
   $ 1,693    $ 1,736    $ 1,430    $ 1,999
                           
Accrued Plant Turnaround Costs
We accrue in advance the costs expected to be incurred in the next planned major maintenance activities (“Turnarounds”) of our Chemical Business. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, accrued Turnarounds were $1,405,000 and $1,517,000, respectively, which are included in accrued liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) is currently working on a project to clarify guidance on the accounting for Turnarounds. In March 2006, FASB decided to issue guidance in the form of a FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) to eliminate the accrue-in-advance method of accounting for Turnarounds and to address transition guidance at a future FASB meeting and directed their staff (“Staff”) to research the practicability of retrospective application. The Staff’s immediate plans are to provide FASB with a recommendation on transition guidance after researching the practicability of accounting for the adoption of the provisions in the FSP as a change in accounting principle with retrospective application as described in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 154-Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. As discussed above, we are using the accrue-in-advance method for Turnarounds that FASB may eliminate in the near future. If the FSP was effective as of December 31, 2005, the pro forma effect on our consolidated balance sheet would be a decrease in accrued and other noncurrent liabilities and an increase in stockholders’ equity of $1,405,000. Depending on the transition guidance provided, our preliminary analysis of the pro forma effect on our consolidated statements of income would be (a) an increase in net income of $1,405,000 as a cumulative effect of accounting change for 2005 or (b) an increase (decrease) in net income of $(112,000), $(1,161,000) and $792,000 for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and an increase in stockholders’ equity of $1,886,000 at December 31, 2002.
Executive Benefit Agreements
We have entered into benefit agreements with certain key executives. Costs associated with these individual benefit agreements are accrued when they become probable over the estimated remaining service period. Total costs accrued equal the present value of specified payments to be made after benefits become payable. (See Note 3 - Changes in Accounting Estimates and Note 15 - Executive Benefit Agreements and Employee Savings Plans).
 
F-13

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
Deferred Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes, and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Valuation allowances are provided against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We are able to realize deferred tax assets up to an amount equal to the future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences. The taxable temporary differences will turn around in the loss carry forward period as the differences reverse. Other differences will turn around as the assets are realized or liabilities are paid in the normal course of business. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, our deferred tax assets were net of a valuation allowance of $26.1 million and $27.9 million, respectively. (See Note 10 – Income Taxes).
Contingencies
We accrue for contingent losses when such losses are probable and reasonably estimable. In addition, we recognize contingent gains when such gains are realized. Our Chemical Business is subject to specific federal and state regulatory and environmental compliance laws and guidelines. We have developed policies and procedures related to environmental and regulatory compliance. We must continually monitor whether we have maintained compliance with such laws and regulations and the operating implications, if any, and amount of penalties, fines and assessments that may result from noncompliance. At December 31, 2005 a liability of $33,000 has been accrued relating to a new Consent Administrative Order (“CAO”) covering the El Dorado Facility and $1,458,000 relating to the CAO covering our former Hallowell Facility. These liabilities are based on current estimates that may be revised in the near term based on results of our investigation, risk assessment and remediation pursuant to these CAOs. See Note 11 - Commitments and Contingencies.
Stock Options
At December 31, 2005, we have several Qualified and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plans, which are described more fully in Note 13 - Stockholders’ Equity. We account for those plans under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. See discussion below under “Recently Issued and Other Significant Accounting Pronouncements.” Stock-based compensation cost is not usually reflected in results of operations, as the majority of all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. As discussed in Note 13 - Stockholders’ Equity, effective December 31, 2005, our Board of Directors approved the acceleration of the vesting schedule of both qualified and non-qualified stock options that were unvested at December 31, 2005. Based on FASB Interpretation No. 44 (“FIN 44”), since this modification to the vesting schedule did not renew or increase the life of these stock options, a remeasurement of the stock options was not required and no stock-based compensation was recognized.
 
F-14

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) applicable to common stock and net income (loss) per share if we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based compensation. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for 2005 (there were no stock options granted in 2004 or 2003): risk-free interest rates of 4.64%; a dividend yield of 0; volatility factors of the expected market price of our common stock of .75; and a weighted average expected life of the options of 7.36 years.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the qualified and non-qualified stock options were amortized to expense over the options’ vesting period. As discussed above, since our Board of Directors approved the acceleration of the vesting schedule of both qualified and non-qualified stock options that were unvested at December 31, 2005, the remaining portion (unvested) of the pro forma stock-based compensation expense prior to the acceleration is included in the 2005 deduction amount below.
 
     Year ended December 31,  
     2005     2004     2003  
     (In Thousands)  
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock, as reported
   $ 2,819     $ (952 )   $ 586  
Less total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects
     (530 )     (235 )     (380 )
                        
Pro forma net income (loss) applicable to common stock
   $ 2,289     $ (1,187 )   $ 206  
                        
Net income (loss) per share:
      
Basic-as reported
   $ .21     $ (.07 )   $ .05  
                        
Basic-pro forma
   $ .17     $ (.09 )   $ .02  
                        
Diluted-as reported
   $ .19     $ (.07 )   $ .04  
                        
Diluted-pro forma
   $ .15     $ (.09 )   $ .01  
                        
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue for substantially all of our operations at the time title to the goods transfers to the buyer and there remains no significant future performance obligations by us. If revenue relates to construction contracts, we recognize revenue using the percentage-of-completion method based primarily on contract costs incurred to date compared with total estimated contract costs. Changes to total estimated contract costs or losses, if any, are recognized in the period in which they are determined.
 
F-15

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
Recognition of Insurance Recoveries
If our insurance claim relates to a recovery of losses, we recognize the recovery when it is probable and reasonably estimable. If our insurance claim relates to a contingent gain, we recognize the recovery when it is realized (See Note 4 – Accounts Receivable and Note 18 – Property and Business Interruption Insurance Recoveries).
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales includes materials, labor and overhead costs to manufacture the products sold plus inbound freight, purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, internal transfer costs and warehousing costs excluding certain handling costs directly related to loading product being shipped to customers in our Chemical Business.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses include costs associated with the sales, marketing and administrative functions. Such costs include personnel costs, including benefits, advertising costs, commissions expenses, office and occupancy costs associated with the sales, marketing and administrative functions. Selling, general and administrative expenses also include outbound freight in our Climate Control Business and certain handling costs directly related to product being shipped to customers in our Chemical Business. These handling costs primarily consist of personnel costs for loading product into transportation equipment, rent and maintenance costs related to the transportation equipment, and certain indirect costs.
Shipping and Handling Costs
For 2005, 2004 and 2003, shipping costs of $10,564,000, $8,567,000 and $8,740,000, respectively, are included in net sales as these costs relate to amounts billed to our customers and handling costs of $4,177,000, $3,208,000 and $2,994,000, respectively, are included in selling, general and administrative expense for the Chemical Business. For the Climate Control Business, shipping and handling costs of $6,396,000, $5,416,000 and $4,043,000 are included in selling, general and administrative expense for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Advertising Costs
Costs in connection with advertising and promotion of our products are expensed as incurred. Such costs amounted to $1,402,000 in 2005, $1,023,000 in 2004 and $692,000 in 2003.
Derivatives, Hedges and Financial Instruments
We account for derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS No.133 requires the recognition of derivatives in the balance sheet and the measurement of these instruments at fair value. Changes in fair value of
 
F-16

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
derivatives are recorded in results of operations unless the normal purchase or sale exceptions apply or hedge accounting is elected.
In 1997, we entered into an interest rate forward agreement to effectively fix the interest rate of a long-term lease commitment (not for trading purposes). In 1999, we executed a long-term lease agreement (initial lease term of ten years) and terminated the forward agreement at a net cost of $2.8 million. We historically accounted for this cash flow hedge under the deferral method (as an adjustment of the initial term lease rentals). Upon adoption of SFAS No. 133 in 2001, the remaining deferred cost amount was reclassified from other assets to accumulated other comprehensive loss and is being amortized to operations over the term of the lease arrangement. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, accumulated other comprehensive loss consisted of the remaining deferred cost of $990,000 and $1,280,000, respectively. The amounts amortized were $290,000, $290,000 and $289,000 for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. There were no income tax benefits related to these expenses. For 2006, we currently expect approximately $290,000 to be amortized to operations.
In March 2005, we purchased two interest rate cap contracts for a cost of $590,000. These contracts are free-standing derivatives and are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis in accordance with SFAS No.133. At December 31, 2005, the market value of these contracts was $429,000 and is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The change in the value of these contracts is included in interest expense.
Raw materials for use in our manufacturing processes include copper used by our Climate Control Business and natural gas used by our Chemical Business. As part of our raw material price risk management, we periodically enter into exchange-traded futures contracts for these materials, which contracts are generally accounted for on a mark-to-market basis in accordance with SFAS No. 133. At December 31, 2005 the unrealized gains on these contracts were $367,000 (minimal at December 31, 2004) and are included in supplies, prepaid items and other in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as the term of these contracts are for periods of twelve months or less. For 2005, 2004 and 2003, gains on such contracts of $931,000, $189,000 and $367,000, respectively, are included in cost of sales. See Note 11 - Commitments and Contingencies.
Income (Loss) per Share
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock is computed by adjusting net income (loss) by the amount of preferred stock dividends. Basic income (loss) per common share is based upon net income (loss) applicable to common stock and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted income (loss) per share, if applicable, is based on the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common equivalent shares outstanding, if any, and the assumed conversion of dilutive convertible securities outstanding, if any. See Note 12 - Redeemable Preferred Stock, Note 13 - Stockholders’ Equity, and Note 14 - Non-Redeemable Preferred Stock for a full description of securities which may have a dilutive effect in future years.
 
F-17

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
     2005     2004     2003  
Numerator:
      
Net income
   $ 5,102     $ 1,370     $ 2,913  
Preferred stock dividend requirements
     (2,283 )     (2,322 )     (2,327 )
                        
Numerator for basic and diluted net income (loss) per share - net income (loss) applicable to common stock
   $ 2,819     $ (952 )   $ 586  
                        
Denominator:
      
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per share - weighted average shares
     13,617,418       12,888,136       12,352,613  
Effect of dilutive securities:
      
Employee stock options
     1,195,320       —         1,293,262  
Warrants
     51,583       —         604,286  
Convertible preferred stock
     38,390       —         44,375  
Convertible note payable
     4,000       —         4,000  
                        
Dilutive potential common shares
     1,289,293       —         1,945,923  
                        
Denominator for dilutive net income (loss) per share - adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions
     14,906,711       12,888,136       14,298,536  
                        
Basic net income (loss) per share
   $ .21     $ (.07 )   $ .05  
                        
Diluted net income (loss) per share
   $ .19     $ (.07 )   $ .04  
                        
The following shares of securities were not included in the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share as their effect would have been antidilutive:   
     2005     2004     2003  
Employee stock options
     —         2,063,829       249,625  
Warrants
     —         708,085       —    
Convertible preferred stock
     3,546,402       3,634,599       3,597,931  
Convertible note payable
     —         4,000       —    
                        
     3,546,402       6,410,513       3,847,556  
                        
 
F-18

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
Recently Issued and Other Significant Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus and issued EITF Issue No. 04-13, “Accounting for Purchases and Sales of Inventory with the Same Counterparty” in which inventory purchase and sale transactions with the same counterparty that are entered into in contemplation of one another should be combined for purposes of applying APB Opinion No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions.” The EITF also concluded that exchanges of inventory should be recognized at carryover basis except for changes of finished goods for either raw materials or work in progress, which would be recognized at fair value. This consensus should be applied in the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after March 15, 2006 to new arrangements and previous arrangements that were modified or renegotiated after the effective date. We do not expect the impact of this new standard to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2005, the FASB issued SFAS 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections,” which replaces APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes” and SFAS 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements.” SFAS 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle and requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. Adoption of SFAS 154 is required for accounting changes and error corrections made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. We will adopt SFAS 154 effective January 1, 2006. We do not expect the impact of this new standard to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47 (“FIN 47”), “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations,” in which an entity is required to recognize a liability for the fair value of an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) that is conditional on a future event if the liability’s fair value can be reasonably estimated. The fair value of a liability for the conditional ARO should be recognized when incurred. Uncertainty surrounding the timing and method of settlement of a conditional ARO should be factored into the measurement of the liability when sufficient information exists. However, in some cases, there is insufficient information to estimate the fair value of an ARO. In these cases, the liability should be initially recognized in the period in which sufficient information is available for an entity to make a reasonable estimate of the liability’s fair value. FIN 47 requires both recognition of a cumulative change in accounting principle and disclosure of the liability on a pro forma basis for transition purposes. FIN 47 is effective no later than the end of fiscal years ending after December 15, 2005. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 47 on December 31, 2005 and the adoption has not had a material affect on the Company’s financial statements. We have identified other ARO’s related to our Chemical Business that have not been recorded because we determined that these assets have indefinite lives.
In November 2004, FASB issued SFAS 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of APB No. 43, Chapter 4. The standard requires that abnormal amounts of idle capacity and spoilage costs be excluded from the cost of inventory and expensed when incurred. The standard is effective for fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We will adopt SFAS 151 effective January 1, 2006.
 
F-19

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
The adoption of this new standard has the potential to create material impacts on our financial statements should we incur reductions in production similar to those discussed in Note 18 - Property and Business Interruption Insurance Recoveries.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions. SFAS 153 requires exchanges of productive assets to be accounted for at fair value, rather than at carryover basis, unless (1) neither the asset received nor the asset surrendered has a fair value that is determinable within reasonable limits or (2) the transactions lack commercial substance. SFAS 153 is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. We will adopt SFAS 153 effective January 1, 2006 and we do not expect the adoption of this new standard to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends SFAS 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in SFAS 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS 123. However, SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative.
As allowed by the Securities and Exchange Commission, SFAS 123(R) must be adopted at the beginning of the next fiscal year that begins after June 15, 2005. We will adopt SFAS 123(R) effective January 1, 2006. As discussed in Note 13 - Stockholders’ Equity, effective December 31, 2005, our Board of Directors approved the acceleration of the vesting schedule of both qualified and non-qualified stock options that were unvested at December 31, 2005. As a result, all outstanding stock options were fully vested at December 31, 2005 to avoid the recognition of compensation expense in our future financial statements relating to these stock options. In addition, no cumulative effect of accounting change adjustment will be required on our consolidated financial statements in January 2006 when we adopt SFAS 123(R). Based on FIN 44, since this modification to the vesting schedule did not renew or increase the life of these stock options, a remeasurement of the stock options was not required and no stock-based compensation was recognized in 2005.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”) “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” FIN 46 addresses the consolidation of variable interest entities which meet certain characteristics. In December 2003, the FASB revised FIN 46 that included changes to the effective dates depending on the characteristics of the variable interest entities and the date of involvement.
Prior to 2003, we, through our subsidiaries, entered into loan agreements where we loaned funds to the parent company of MultiClima, S.A. (“MultiClima”) a French manufacturer of HVAC equipment, whose product line was compatible with our Climate Control Business. Under the
 
F-20

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)
 
loan agreements, one of our subsidiaries obtained the option (“Option”) to exchange its rights under the loan agreements for 100% of the borrower’s outstanding common stock. This subsidiary also obtained a security interest in the stock of MultiClima to secure its loans. Based on our assessment of the parent company and MultiClima in relation to FIN 46, as revised, we were required to consolidate this entity effective March 31, 2004. Prior to consolidating this entity, the outstanding notes receivable balance, net of reserve, was $2,558,000.
As a result of consolidating the consolidated assets and liabilities of the parent company of MultiClima, at March 31, 2004 we recorded a cumulative effect of accounting change of $536,000 which is included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income. The cumulative effect of the accounting change primarily relates to the elimination of embedded profit included in the cost of inventory which was purchased from MultiClima by certain of our subsidiaries.
For the three months ended June 30, 2004, the parent company of MultiClima had a consolidated net loss of $575,000 (after all material intercompany transactions were eliminated). Based on our assessment of the parent company and MultiClima’s historical and forecasted liquidity and results of operations during 2004, we concluded that the outstanding notes receivable were not collectable. As a result, effective July 1, 2004, we forgave and canceled the loan agreements in exchange for extending the Option’s expiration date from June 15, 2005 to June 15, 2008. We recognized a provision for loss of $1,447,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2004. As a result of the cancellation and the estimation of the value of this Option at zero, we no longer had a variable interest in this entity and were no longer required to consolidate this entity.
3. Changes in Accounting Estimates
As discussed in Note 11 - Commitments and Contingencies and Note 15 - Executive Benefit Agreements and Employee Savings Plans, during 2005, we had the following changes in accounting estimates:
 
    the recognition of $644,000 of soil remediation costs classified as discontinued operations and
 
    the recognition of $351,000 relating to a death benefit obligation classified as a selling, general and administrative expense.
The effect of these changes in accounting estimates decreased net income by $995,000 (basis and diluted net income per share by $.07) for 2005.
 
F-21

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
 
4. Accounts Receivable
 
     December 31,  
     2005     2004  
     (In Thousands)  
Trade receivables
   $ 51,096     $ 41,578  
Insurance claims
     236       2,440  
Other
     785       855  
                
     52,117       44,873  
Allowance for doubtful accounts
     (2,680 )     (2,332 )
                
   $ 49,437     $ 42,541  
                
5. Inventories
 
     Finished
Goods
   Work-in-
Process
   Raw
Materials
   Total
     (In Thousands)
December 31, 2005:
           
Climate Control products
   $ 5,367    $ 2,601    $ 8,637    $ 16,605
Chemical products
     16,326      —        2,691      19,017
Industrial machinery and components
     1,829      —        —        1,829
                           
     23,522      2,601      11,328      37,451
Less amount not expected to be realized within one year
     180      —        —        180
                           
   $ 23,342    $ 2,601    $ 11,328    $ 37,271
                           
December 31, 2004 total
   $ 17,323    $ 2,364    $ 9,113    $ 28,800
Less amount not expected to be realized within one year
     143      —        —        143
                           
   $ 17,180    $ 2,364    $ 9,113    $ 28,657
                           
6. Property, Plant and Equipment
 
    
Useful lives
in years
   December 31,
        2005    2004
          (In Thousands)
Machinery, equipment and automotive
   3-25    $ 133,192    $ 125,949
Buildings and improvements
   3-30      22,806      21,505
Furniture, fixtures and store equipment
   3-10      6,818      6,085
Assets under capital leases
   3-12      1,688      674
Construction in progress
   N/A      5,034      5,018
Capital spare parts
   N/A      2,156      1,742
Land
   N/A      2,152      2,252
                
        173,846      163,225
Less accumulated depreciation
        99,764      93,006
                
      $ 74,082    $ 70,219
                
 
F-22

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
 
6. Property, Plant and Equipment (continued)
Machinery, equipment and automotive primarily includes the categories of property and equipment and estimated useful lives as follows: chemical processing plants and plant infrastructure (15-25 years); production, fabrication, and assembly equipment (7-15 years); certain processing plant components (3-10 years); and trucks, automobiles, trailers, and other rolling stock (3-7) years. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, assets under capital lease consist of $1,593,000 and $674,000 of machinery, equipment and automotive, respectively, and $95,000 of furniture, fixtures and store equipment at December 31, 2005. Accumulated depreciation for assets under capital leases were $326,000 and $238,000 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
7. Investment in Affiliate (Unaudited)
One of our subsidiaries has a 50% equity interest in Cepolk Limited Partnership, an energy conservation joint venture, which is accounted for on the equity method. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, our investment was $3,368,000 and $3,111,000, respectively. For 2005, 2004 and 2003, distributions received from this affiliate were $488,000, $250,000 and $60,000, respectively.
Summarized financial information of the joint venture is as follows (in thousands):
 
     December 31,
     2005    2004
Current assets
   $ 2,610    $ 2,577
             
Noncurrent assets
   $ 8,327    $ 9,333
             
Current liabilities
   $ 1,699    $ 1,815
             
Noncurrent liabilities
   $ 5,872    $ 7,019
             
Partners’ capital
   $ 3,366    $ 3,076
             
 
     Year ended December 31,
     2005    2004    2003
Total revenues
   $ 4,360    $ 4,311    $ 3,311
                    
Operating income
   $ 2,189    $ 2,166    $ 959
                    
Net income
   $ 1,491    $ 1,336    $ 37
                    
 
F-23

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
 
8. Accrued Liabilities
 
     December 31,
     2005    2004
     (In Thousands)
Deferred rent expense
   $ 5,109    $ —  
Accrued payroll and benefits
     3,519      3,117
Customer deposits
     1,927      3,421
Accrued property taxes
     1,902      1,848
Accrued insurance
     1,426      1,351
Accrued commissions
     1,406      1,117
Current portion of accrued warranty
     1,282      1,147
Current portion of plant turnaround costs
     1,249      1,182
Other
     5,399      3,897
             
   $ 23,219    $ 17,080
             
9. Long-Term Debt
 
     December 31,
     2005    2004
     (In Thousands)
Senior Secured Loan due 2009 (A)
   $ 50,000    $ 50,000
Secured revolving credit facility - ThermaClime (B)
     31,975      27,489
10-3/4% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2007 (C)
     13,300      13,300
Other, with interest at rates of 2% to 14.13%, most of which is secured by machinery, equipment and real estate (D)
     16,849      15,718
             
     112,124      106,507
Less current portion of long-term debt
     3,348      4,833
             
Long-term debt due after one year
   $ 108,776    $ 101,674
             
 
(A) In September 2004, ThermaClime and certain of its subsidiaries (the “Borrowers”) completed a $50 million term loan (“Senior Secured Loan”) with a certain lender (the “Lender”). The Senior Secured Loan is to be repaid as follows:
 
    quarterly interest payments which began September 30, 2004;
 
    quarterly principal payments of $312,500 beginning September 30, 2007;
 
    a final payment of the remaining outstanding principal of $47.5 million and accrued interest on September 16, 2009.
The Senior Secured Loan accrues interest at the applicable LIBOR rate, as defined, plus an applicable LIBOR margin, as defined or, at the election of the Borrowers, the alternative base rate, as defined, plus an applicable base rate margin, as defined, with the annual interest rate not to exceed 11% or 11.5% depending on the leverage ratio. At December 31, 2005 the effective interest rate was 11.5%.
 
F-24

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
9. Long-Term Debt (continued)
 
The Borrowers are subject to numerous covenants under the Senior Secured Loan agreement including, but not limited to, limitation on the incurrence of certain additional indebtedness and liens, limitations on mergers, acquisitions, dissolution and sale of assets, and limitations on declaration of dividends and distributions to us, all with certain exceptions. The Borrowers are also subject to a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio, measured quarterly on a trailing twelve-month basis. The Borrowers’ fixed charge coverage ratio exceeded the required ratio for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2005. The maturity date of the Senior Secured Loan can be accelerated by the Lender upon the occurrence of a continuing event of default, as defined.
The Senior Secured Loan agreement includes a prepayment fee equal to 2% of the principal amount should the Borrowers elect to prepay any principal amount prior to September 15, 2006. This fee is reduced to 1% during the subsequent twelve-month period and 0% thereafter.
The Senior Secured Loan is secured by (a) a first lien on (i) certain real property and equipment located at the El Dorado, Arkansas plant (“El Dorado Facility”), (ii) certain real property and equipment located at the Cherokee, Alabama plant (“Cherokee Facility”), (iii) certain equipment of the Climate Control Business, and (iv) the equity stock of certain of ThermaClime’s subsidiaries, and (b) a second lien on the assets upon which ThermaClime’s Working Capital Revolver lender has a first lien. The carrying value of the pledged assets is approximately $151.3 million at December 31, 2005. The Senior Secured Loan is guaranteed by the Company and is also secured with the stock of ThermaClime.
The proceeds of the Senior Secured Loan were used as follows:
 
    repaid the outstanding principal balance due 2005 under the Financing Agreement discussed below, plus accrued interest, of $36.8 million;
 
    repurchased a portion of ThermaClime’s 10 3/4% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2007 (discussed in (C) below), held by the Lender, plus accrued interest, of $5.2 million;
 
    paid certain fees and expenses of $2.4 million including the cost of an interest cap which sets a maximum annual interest rate of 11% or 11.5% depending on the leverage ratio;
 
    repaid the outstanding principal balance of a term loan of $.4 million;
 
    paid down the Working Capital Revolver Loan with the remaining balance.
Due to the repayment of the Loans (discussed below) prior to the maturity date of June 30, 2005 with the proceeds of the Senior Secured Loan and since the Lender is not an affiliate of the lenders of the Loans, we recognized a gain on extinguishment of debt of $4.4 million in 2004.
In May 2002, ThermaClime entered into a financing agreement (“Financing Agreement”) with certain lenders in order to fund the repurchase of a portion of the Senior Unsecured Notes at a substantial discount to the face value. Based upon certain criteria, including but
 
F-25

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
9. Long-Term Debt (continued)
 
not limited to, unfavorable changes in ThermaClime’s financial condition since the Senior Unsecured Notes were originally sold and the high interest rates on the loans (the “Loans”) under the Financing Agreement, the Financing Agreement transaction was accounted for as a debt restructuring. As a result, we were required to recognize all of the interest payments associated with the Loans in long-term debt. Subsequent interest payments on the Loans were charged against the debt balance. Therefore no interest expense on the Financing Agreement indebtedness was recognized from May 2002 through September 2004 in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
As required by the lenders of the Loans, as a condition precedent to the completion of the lenders and the transactions contemplated by the Financing Agreement, we granted to the lenders warrants to purchase 595,585 shares of our common stock subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments. The estimated fair value of the warrants at the grant date ($1,983,000) was accounted for as debt issuance costs. The exercise price of the warrants was $0.10 per share and contained a provision for cashless exercise. The warrants provided for certain demand registration rights and piggyback registration rights. In March 2005, the lenders of the Loans exercised the warrants, under the cashless exercise provision, to purchase 586,140 shares of our common stock.
 
(B) In April 2001, ThermaClime and its subsidiaries (“the Borrowers”) entered into a $50 million revolving credit facility (the “Working Capital Revolver Loan”) that provides for advances based on specified percentages of eligible accounts receivable and inventories for ThermaClime, and its subsidiaries. Effective February 28, 2005, the Working Capital Revolver Loan was amended which, among other things, extended the maturity date to April 2009 and removed a subjective acceleration clause. The Working Capital Revolver Loan, as amended, accrues interest at a base rate (generally equivalent to the prime rate) plus .75% or LIBOR plus 2% (formerly base rate plus 2% or LIBOR plus 4.50%). The effective rate at December 31, 2005 was 6.92%. Interest is paid monthly. The facility provides for up to $8.5 million of letters of credit. All letters of credit outstanding reduce availability under the facility. Amounts available for additional borrowing under the Working Capital Revolver Loan at December 31, 2005 were $15.9 million. Under the Working Capital Revolver Loan, as amended, the lender also requires the borrowers to pay a letter of credit fee equal to 1% (formerly 2.75%) per annum of the undrawn amount of all outstanding letters of credit, an unused line fee equal to .5% per annum for the excess amount available under the facility not drawn and various other audit, appraisal and valuation charges.
In March 2005, we purchased two interest rate cap contracts which set a maximum three-month LIBOR base rate of 4.59% on $30 million and mature on March 29, 2009. See “Derivatives, Hedges and Financial Instruments” under Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
The lender may, upon an event of default, as defined, terminate the Working Capital Revolver Loan and make the balance outstanding due and payable in full. The Working
 
F-26

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
9. Long-Term Debt (continued)
 
Capital Revolver Loan is secured by receivables, inventories and intangibles of all the ThermaClime entities other than DSN Corporation and El Dorado Nitric Company and its subsidiaries (“EDNC”) and a second lien on certain real property and equipment. EDNC is neither a borrower nor guarantor of the Working Capital Revolver Loan. The carrying value of the pledged assets is approximately $133.6 million at December 31, 2005.
A prepayment premium equal to 3% of the facility is due to the lender should the borrowers elect to prepay the facility prior to April 13, 2006. This premium is reduced to 2% during the second twelve-month period and to 1% during the third twelve-month period and 0% thereafter.
The Working Capital Revolver Loan, as amended, requires ThermaClime to maintain quarterly earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), as defined, for ThermaClime and its Climate Control Business on a trailing twelve-month basis. ThermaClime and its Climate Control Business’s EBITDA for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2005 was in excess of the required amounts. The trailing twelve-months EBITDA requirements for 2006 range from $16.4 million to $20.6 million for ThermaClime and is fixed at $10 million for the Climate Control Business. The Working Capital Revolver Loan also requires ThermaClime to achieve an annual fixed charge coverage ratio and limits capital expenditures, as defined, measured quarterly on a trailing twelve-month basis. The Working Capital Revolver Loan also contains covenants that, among other things, limit the Borrowers’ ability to: (a) incur additional indebtedness, (b) incur liens, (c) make restricted payments or loans to affiliates who are not Borrowers, (d) engage in mergers, consolidations or other forms of recapitalization, (e) dispose of assets, or (f) repurchase ThermaClime’s 10-3/4% Senior Unsecured Notes. The Working Capital Revolver Loan also requires all collections on accounts receivable be made through a bank account in the name of the lender or their agent.
 
(C) In 1997, ThermaClime completed the sale of its 10-3/4% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2007 (the “Notes”). The Notes bear interest at an annual rate of 10-3/4% payable semiannually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year. The Notes are senior unsecured obligations of ThermaClime and rank equal in right of payment to all existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness of ThermaClime and its subsidiaries. The Notes are effectively subordinated to all existing and future secured indebtedness of ThermaClime.
In May 2002, ThermaClime and the trustee under the Indenture (as defined below), with the consent of the holders of at least 66-2/3% of the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Notes (the “Holders”), entered into a Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 24, 2002 (the “Supplement”), to the Indenture dated November 27, 1997 as amended (the “Indenture”), which governs ThermaClime’s Notes. The Supplement amends the Indenture by, among other things, (a) deleting most of the restrictive covenants, (b) deleting the requirements upon a change of control of ThermaClime or sale of all or substantially all of the assets of ThermaClime, (c) specifying ThermaClime’s subsidiaries which are
 
F-27

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
9. Long-Term Debt (continued)
 
guarantors of the Notes and deleting the requirement that certain future subsidiaries of ThermaClime be guarantors, (d) deleting certain events from the definition of “Event of Default,” and (e) providing for conforming changes to the Indenture and the promissory note executed by ThermaClime pursuant to the terms of the Indenture.
The Notes are subject to redemption at the option of ThermaClime, in whole or in part, at the redemption prices set forth in the Indenture, plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, plus liquidated damages, if any, to the applicable redemption date.
ThermaClime owns substantially all of the companies comprising our Climate Control and Chemical Businesses. ThermaClime is a holding company with no significant assets or operations other than its investments in its subsidiaries, and each of its subsidiaries is wholly-owned, directly or indirectly, by ThermaClime. ThermaClime’s payment obligations under the Notes are fully, unconditionally and joint and severally guaranteed by all of the existing subsidiaries of ThermaClime, except for EDNC (“Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”).
Set forth below is consolidating financial information of ThermaClime’s Guarantor Subsidiaries, the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries, and ThermaClime.
 
F-28

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
9. Long-Term Debt (continued)
 
ThermaClime, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
As of December 31, 2005
(In Thousands)
 
     Combined
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   
Consolidated
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
    ThermaClime,
Inc. (Parent)
    Eliminations     Consolidated  
Assets
          
Current assets:
          
Cash
   $ 201     $ —       $ 1,833       $ 2,034  
Accounts receivable, net
     44,467       3,617       209         48,293  
Inventories
     35,419       203       —           35,622  
Supplies, prepaid items and other
     6,027       32       3,795         9,854  
Deferred income taxes
     —         —         5,478         5,478  
                                  
Total current assets
     86,114       3,852       11,315         101,281  
Property, plant and equipment, net
     63,084       2,951       59         66,094  
Investment in and advances to affiliates
     —         —         104,097     $ (104,097 )     —    
Receivable from Parent
     23,321       17,698       —         (41,019 )     —    
Other assets, net
     5,909       20       2,673         8,602  
                                        
   $ 178,428     $ 24,521     $ 118,144     $ (145,116 )   $ 175,977  
                                        
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
          
Current liabilities:
          
Accounts payable
   $ 26,410     $ 2,017     $ 588       $ 29,015  
Short-term financing
     6       —         2,645         2,651  
Accrued liabilities
     11,661       7,708       1,873         21,242  
Due to LSB and affiliates, net
     —         —         1,872         1,872  
Current portion of long-term debt
     376       353       —           729  
                                  
Total current liabilities
     38,453       10,078       6,978         55,509  
Long-term debt
     6,194       500       91,808         98,502  
Deferred income taxes
     —         —         4,234         4,234  
Other non-current liabilities
     3,275       323       —           3,598  
Stockholders’ equity:
          
Common stock
     66       1       1     $ (67 )     1  
Capital in excess of par value
     166,212       —         13,067       (166,212 )     13,067  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
     —         (990 )     —           (990 )
Due from LSB and affiliates
     —         —         (2,558 )       (2,558 )
Retained earnings (deficit)
     (35,772 )     14,609       4,614       21,163       4,614  
                                        
Total stockholders’ equity
     130,506       13,620       15,124       (145,116 )     14,134  
                                        
   $ 178,428     $ 24,521     $ 118,144     $ (145,116 )   $ 175,977  
                                        
 
F-29

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
9. Long-Term Debt (continued)
 
ThermaClime, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
As of December 31, 2004
(In Thousands)
 
     Combined
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   
Consolidated
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
    ThermaClime,
Inc. (Parent)
    Eliminations     Consolidated  
Assets
          
Current assets:
          
Cash
   $ 174     $ —       $ 676       $ 850  
Restricted cash
     —         —         158         158  
Accounts receivable, net
     36,075       4,716       17         40,808  
Inventories
     27,345       195       —           27,540  
Supplies, prepaid items and other
     4,349       887       4,467         9,703  
Deferred rent expense
     —         938       —           938  
Deferred income taxes
     —         —         4,675         4,675  
                                  
Total current assets
     67,943       6,736       9,993         84,672  
Property, plant and equipment, net
     62,482       2,393       32         64,907  
Investment in and advances to affiliates
     —         —         96,127     $ (96,127 )     —    
Receivable from Parent
     39,163       8,364       —         (47,527 )     —    
Other assets, net
     5,271       25       2,783         8,079  
                                        
   $ 174,859     $ 17,518     $ 108,935     $ (143,654 )   $ 157,658  
                                        
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
          
Current liabilities:
          
Accounts payable
   $ 22,560     $ 2,663     $ 390       $ 25,613  
Short-term financing
     —         —         3,513         3,513  
Accrued liabilities
     11,592       2,279       1,178         15,049  
Due to LSB and affiliates, net
     —         —         1,480         1,480  
Current portion of long-term debt
     444       353       —           797  
                                  
Total current liabilities
     34,596       5,295       6,561         46,452  
Long-term debt
     6,353       853       87,538         94,744  
Deferred income taxes
     —         —         1,735         1,735  
Other non-current liabilities
     2,449       457       —           2,906  
Stockholders’ equity:
          
Common stock
     66       1       1     $ (67 )     1  
Capital in excess of par value
     166,212       —         13,052       (166,212 )     13,052  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
     —         (1,280 )     —           (1,280 )
Due from LSB and affiliates
     —         —         (2,558 )       (2,558 )
Retained earnings (deficit)
     (34,817 )     12,192       2,606       22,625       2,606  
                                        
Total stockholders’ equity
     131,461       10,913       13,101       (143,654 )     11,821  
                                        
   $ 174,859     $ 17,518     $ 108,935     $ (143,654 )   $ 157,658  
                                        
 
F-30

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
9. Long-Term Debt (continued)
 
ThermaClime, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004
(In Thousands)
 
     Combined
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   
Consolidated
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
    ThermaClime,
Inc. (Parent)
    Eliminations     Consolidated  
2005
          
Net sales
   $ 347,076     $ 42,837         $ 389,913  
Cost of sales
     292,561       38,599     $ 374         331,534  
                                  
Gross profit (loss)
     54,515       4,238       (374 )       58,379  
Selling, general and administrative
     44,039       405       2,177     $ (7 )     46,614  
Other expense (income), net
     (1,720 )     68       (12 )     7       (1,657 )
                                        
Operating income (loss)
     12,196       3,765       (2,539 )     —         13,422  
Interest expense
     10,482       44       10,019       (10,182 )     10,363  
Non-operating other expense (income), net
     3,338       (241 )     (13,913 )     10,182       (634 )
                                        
Income (loss) from continuing operations before equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries and affiliate and income taxes
     (1,624 )     3,962       1,355       —         3,693  
Equity in losses of subsidiaries
     —         —         1462       (1,462 )     —    
Equity in earnings of affiliate
     745       —         —           745  
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
     343       (1,545 )     (809 )       (2,011 )
                                        
Income (loss) from continuing operations
     (536 )     2,417       2,008       (1,462 )     2,427  
Net loss from discontinued operations
     (419 )     —         —           (419 )
                                        
Net income (loss)
   $ (955 )   $ 2,417     $ 2,008     $ (1,462 )   $ 2,008  
                                        
2004
          
Net sales
   $ 307,501     $ 45,609         $ 353,110  
Cost of sales
     265,237       41,508     $ 669         307,414  
                                  
Gross profit (loss)
     42,264       4,101       (669 )       45,696  
Selling, general and administrative
     38,711       412       2,475     $ (7 )     41,591  
Other expense (income), net
     476       108       (272 )     7       319  
                                        
Operating income (loss)
     3,077       3,581       (2,872 )     —         3,786  
Interest expense
     10,742       34       5,970       (10,373 )     6,373  
Gain extinguishment of debt
     —         —         (4,400 )       (4,400 )
Non-operating other income, net
     (239 )     (18 )     (10,379 )     10,373       (263 )
                                        
Income (loss) from operations before equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries and affiliate and income taxes
     (7,426 )     3,565       5,937       —         2,076  
Equity in losses of subsidiaries
     —         —         (1,947 )     1,947       —    
Equity in earnings of affiliate
     668       —         —           668  
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
     2,636       (1,390 )     (2,571 )       (1,325 )
                                        
Net income (loss)
   $ (4,122 )   $ 2,175     $ 1,419     $ 1,947     $ 1,419  
                                        
 
F-31

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
9. Long-Term Debt (continued)
 
ThermaClime, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Year ended December 31, 2003
(In Thousands)
 
     Combined
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   
Consolidated
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
    ThermaClime,
Inc. (Parent)
    Eliminations     Consolidated  
Net sales
   $ 269,253     $ 42,947         $ 312,200  
Cost of sales
     228,927       38,829     $ 717     $ (5 )     268,468  
                                        
Gross profit (loss)
     40,326       4,118       (717 )     5       43,732  
Selling, general and administrative
     34,280       437       2,171       (7 )     36,881  
Other expense (income), net
     18       87       (101 )     12       16  
                                        
Operating income (loss)
     6,028       3,594       (2,787 )     —         6,835  
Interest expense
     10,993       39       5,226       (10,454 )     5,804  
Non-operating other income, net
     —         (9 )     (11,805 )     10,454       (1,360 )
                                        
Income (loss) from operations before equity in earnings (losses) of subsidiaries and affiliate and income taxes
     (4,965 )     3,564       3,792       —         2,391  
Equity in losses of subsidiaries
     —         —         (843 )     843       —    
Equity in earnings of affiliate
     19       —         —           19  
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
     1,929       (1,390 )     (1,489 )       (950 )
                                        
Net income (loss)
   $ (3,017 )   $ 2,174     $ 1,460     $ 843     $ 1,460  
                                        
 
F-32

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
9. Long-Term Debt (continued)
 
ThermaClime, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year ended December 31, 2005
(In Thousands)
 
     Combined
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   
Consolidated
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
    ThermaClime,
Inc. (Parent)
    Eliminations    Consolidated  
Cash flows provided (used) by continuing operating activities
   $ (8,182 )   $ 10,614     $ 4,684        $ 7,116  
Cash flows from investing activities:
           
Capital expenditures
     (10,603 )     (926 )     (47 )        (11,576 )
Proceeds from property insurance recoveries
     2,888       —         —            2,888  
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
     124       —         —            124  
Proceeds from of restricted cash
     —         —         158          158  
Other assets
     (61 )     (1 )     (473 )        (535 )
                                   
Net cash used by investing activities
     (7,652 )     (927 )     (362 )        (8,941 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
           
Proceeds from revolving debt
     245       —         363,424          363,669  
Payments on revolving debt
     (28 )     —         (359,380 )        (359,408 )
Payments on long-term debt
     (278 )     (353 )     —            (631 )
Proceeds from short-term financing
     129       —         4,537          4,666  
Payments on short-term financing
     (122 )     —         (5,406 )        (5,528 )
Net change in due to/from LSB and affiliates
     —         —         280          280  
Advances to/from affiliates
     15,954       (9,334 )     (6,620 )        —    
                                   
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
     15,900       (9,687 )     (3,165 )        3,048  
Cash flows of discontinued operations:
           
Operating cash flows
     (39 )     —         —            (39 )
                                   
Net increase in cash from all activities
     27       —         1,157          1,184  
Cash at the beginning of year
     174       —         676          850  
                                   
Cash at the end of year
   $ 201     $ —       $ 1,833        $ 2,034  
                                   
 
F-33

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
9. Long-Term Debt (continued)
 
ThermaClime, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year ended December 31, 2004
(In Thousands)
 
     Combined
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Consolidated
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
    ThermaClime,
Inc. (Parent)
    Eliminations    Consolidated  
Cash flows provided (used) by operating activities
   $ (587 )   $ (3,739 )   $ 3,549        $ (777 )
Cash flows from investing activities:
           
Capital expenditures
     (8,183 )     (742 )     (3 )        (8,928 )
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
     862       —              862  
Payment of restricted cash
     —         —         (158 )        (158 )
Other assets
     (418 )     4       (156 )        (570 )
                                   
Net cash used by investing activities
     (7,739 )     (738 )     (317 )        (8,794 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
           
Proceeds from revolving debt
     1,791       —         328,890          330,681  
Payments on revolving debt
     —         —         (327,219 )        (327,219 )
Payments on Financing Agreement
     —         —         (38,531 )        (38,531 )
Payments on long-term debt
     (909 )     (353 )     (601 )        (1,863 )
Acquisition of 10  3/4% Senior Unsecured Notes
     —         —         (5,000 )        (5,000 )
Proceeds from Senior Secured Loan, net of fees
     —         —         47,708          47,708  
Proceeds from short-term financing
     —         —         5,302          5,302  
Payments on short-term financing
     —         —         (4,805 )        (4,805 )
Net change in due to/from LSB and affiliates
     —         —         1,228          1,228  
Advances to/from affiliates
     7,410       4,830       (12,240 )        —    
                                   
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
     8,292       4,477       (5,268 )        7,501  
                                   
Net decrease in cash from all activities
     (34 )     —         (2,036 )        (2,070 )
Cash at the beginning of year
     208       —         2,712          2,920  
                                   
Cash at the end of year
   $ 174     $ —       $ 676        $ 850  
                                   
 
F-34

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
9. Long-Term Debt (continued)
 
ThermaClime, Inc.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Year ended December 31, 2003
(In Thousands)
 
     Combined
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Consolidated
Non-
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
    ThermaClime,
Inc. (Parent)
    Eliminations    Consolidated  
Cash flows provided by operating activities
   $ 3,435     $ 3,524     $ 5,228        $ 12,187  
Cash flows from investing activities:
           
Capital expenditures
     (6,988 )     (162 )     (91 )        (7,241 )
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
     81       —         —            81  
Proceeds from restricted cash held in escrow
     —         —         1,838          1,838  
Other assets
     48       —         50          98  
                                   
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities
     (6,859 )     (162 )     1,797          (5,224 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
           
Proceeds from revolving debt
     353       —         277,760          278,113  
Payments on revolving debt
     —         —         (281,295 )        (281,295 )
Payments on Financing Agreement
     —         —         (3,375 )        (3,375 )
Payments on long-term debt
     (694 )     (353 )     (198 )        (1,245 )
Long-term and other borrowings, net of fees
     —         —         800          800  
Proceeds from short-term financing
     —         —         5,071          5,071  
Payments on short-term financing
     —         —         (4,848 )        (4,848 )
Net change in due to/from LSB and affiliates
     —         —         1,376          1,376  
Advances to/from affiliates
     3,563       (3,009 )     (554 )        —    
                                   
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities
     3,222       (3,362 )     (5,263 )        (5,403 )
                                   
Net increase (decrease) in cash from all activities
     (202 )     —         1,762          1,560  
Cash at the beginning of year
     410       —         950          1,360  
                                   
Cash at the end of year
   $ 208     $ —       $ 2,712        $ 2,920  
                                   
 
F-35

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
9. Long-Term Debt (continued)
 
(D) Amounts include capital lease obligations of $1,200,000 and $341,000 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. See Note 11 - Commitments and Contingencies.
Maturities of long-term debt for each of the five years after December 31, 2005 are as follows (in thousands):
 
2006
   $ 3,348
2007
     19,485
2008
     4,255
2009
     81,053
2010
     999
Thereafter
     2,984
      
   $ 112,124
      
On March 14, 2006 we sold $18 million aggregate principal amount of our 7% Convertible Senior Subordinated Debentures due 2011. See Note 21 – Subsequent Events.
10. Income Taxes
Temporary differences and carryforwards which gave rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2005 and 2004 include:
 
     2005    2004
     (In Thousands)
Deferred tax assets
     
Amounts not deductible for tax purposes:
     
Allowance for doubtful accounts
   $ 1,461    $ 1,367
Asset impairment
     781      837
Inventory reserves
     945      749
Deferred compensation
     1,510      780
Other accrued liabilities
     1,600      1,484
Other
     —        397
Capitalization of certain costs as inventory for tax purposes
     1,434      1,151
Net operating loss carryforwards
     26,129      27,983
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards
     793      793
             
Total deferred tax assets
     34,653      35,541
Less valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
     26,146      27,928
             
Net deferred tax assets
   $ 8,507    $ 7,613
             
Deferred tax liabilities
     
Accelerated depreciation used for tax purposes
   $ 8,042    $ 7,031
Excess of book gain over tax gain resulting from sale of land
     391      434
Other
     74      148
             
Total deferred tax liabilities
   $ 8,507    $ 7,613
             
 
F-36

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
10. Income Taxes (continued)
 
We are able to realize deferred tax assets up to an amount equal to the future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences. The taxable temporary differences will turn around in the loss carryforward period as the differences reverse. Other differences will turn around as the assets are disposed in the normal course of business.
The differences between the amount of the provision for income taxes (consisting solely of federal alternative minimum tax) and the amount which would result from the application of the federal statutory rate to “Income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change” for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 are detailed below:
 
     2005     2004     2003  
     (In Thousands)  
Provision for income taxes at federal statutory rate
   $ 2,097     $ 434     $ 1,311  
Changes in the valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets, net of rate differential
     (1,782 )     (123 )     (581 )
Effect of discontinued operations and other on valuation allowance
     (249 )     (350 )     (792 )
Federal alternative minimum tax
     118       —         —    
Permanent differences
     (66 )     39       62  
                        
Provision for income taxes
   $ 118     $ —       $ —    
                        
At December 31, 2005 we have regular-tax net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $67 million ($47.8 million alternative minimum tax NOLs) that begin expiring in 2009.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Capital and Operating Leases
We and our subsidiaries lease certain property, plant and equipment under capital leases and non-cancelable operating leases in accordance with SFAS 13, Accounting for Leases. Leased assets meeting capital lease criteria have been capitalized and the present value of the related lease payments are included in long-term debt (See Notes 6 and 9). Future minimum payments on leases, including the Nitric Acid Plant lease (“Baytown Lease”) discussed below, with initial or remaining terms of one year or more at December 31, 2005, are as follows (in thousands):
 
F-37

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
11. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
 
    
Capital
Leases
   Operating Leases    Total
       
Baytown
Lease
   Others   
2006
   $ 566    $ 8,175    $ 2,702    $ 11,443
2007
     383      9,227      1,883      11,493
2008
     382      11,173      1,237      12,792
2009
     11      4,882      876      5,769
2010
     —        —        687      687
Thereafter
     —        —        3,504      3,504
                           
Total minimum lease payments
     1,342    $ 33,457    $ 10,889    $ 45,688
                       
Less amounts representing interest
     142         
               
Present value of minimum lease payments included in long-term debt
   $ 1,200         
               
Rent expense under all operating lease agreements, including month-to-month leases, was $12,205,000 in 2005, $12,313,000 in 2004 and $12,022,000 in 2003. Renewal options are available under certain of the lease agreements for various periods at approximately the existing annual rental amounts.
Nitric Acid Plant
Our wholly owned subsidiary, EDNC operates a nitric acid plant (the “Baytown Plant”) at a Baytown, Texas chemical facility in accordance with a series of agreements with Bayer Corporation (“Bayer”) (collectively, the “Bayer Agreement”). Under the terms of the Bayer Agreement, EDNC is leasing the Baytown Plant pursuant to a leveraged lease (the “Baytown Lease”) from an unrelated third party with an initial lease term of ten years. Upon expiration of the initial ten-year term, the Bayer Agreement may be renewed for up to six renewal terms of five years each; however, prior to each renewal period, either party to the Bayer Agreement may opt against renewal. The total amount of future minimum payments due under the Baytown Lease is being charged to rent expense on the straight-line method over the initial ten-year term of the lease. The difference between rent expense recorded and the amount paid is credited or charged to deferred rent expense which is included in supplies, prepaid items and other and accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company and its subsidiaries have not provided a residual value guarantee on the value of the equipment related to the Baytown Lease and Bayer has the unilateral right to determine if the fixed-price purchase option is exercised in 2009. If Bayer decides to exercise the purchase option, they must also fund it. EDNC’s ability to perform on its lease commitments is contingent upon Bayer’s performance under the Bayer Agreement. One of our subsidiaries has guaranteed the performance of EDNC’s obligations under the Bayer Agreement.
 
F-38

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
11. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
 
Purchase and Sales Commitments
Under an agreement, as amended, with its principal supplier of anhydrous ammonia, the El Dorado Chemical Company (“EDC”) will purchase substantially all of its anhydrous ammonia requirements using a market price-based formula plus transportation to the El Dorado Facility through December 31, 2006.
In 1995, one of our subsidiaries entered into a product supply agreement with a third party whereby the subsidiary is required to make monthly facility fee and other payments which aggregate $81,300. In return for this payment, the subsidiary is entitled to certain quantities of compressed oxygen produced by the third party. Except in circumstances as defined by the agreement, the monthly payment is payable regardless of the quantity of compressed oxygen used by the subsidiary. The term of this agreement is for fifteen years; however, the subsidiary can currently terminate the agreement without cause at a cost of approximately $4.5 million. Based on the subsidiary’s estimate of compressed oxygen demands of the plant, the cost of the oxygen under this agreement is expected to be favorable compared to floating market prices. Purchases under this agreement aggregated $1,035,000, $988,000, and $960,000 in 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively.
At December 31, 2005 our Climate Control Business had purchase commitments under exchange-traded futures for 600,000 pounds of copper through December 2006 at a weighted average cost of $1.37 per pound and a weighted average market value of $1.98 per pound.
At December 31, 2005, we also had standby letters of credit outstanding of $2.1 million of which $1.3 million related to our Climate Control Business.
At December 31, 2005, we had deposits from customers of $1.9 million for forward sales commitments including $1.1 million with firm sales prices of large custom air handlers for deliveries in 2007 relating to our Climate Control Business.
Effective October 1, 2001, our subsidiary, Cherokee Nitrogen Holding, Inc. (“CNH”) entered into a long term 83% ammonium nitrate solution supply agreement with a third party (“Solution Agreement”). Under the Solution Agreement, CNH will supply to the third party its requirements of 83% ammonium nitrate solution from CNH’s Cherokee Facility for a term through at least September 2006 on a cost-plus basis. This customer has orally advised us that they may be reducing the amount of product that they take from our subsidiary.
On November 1, 2001, EDC entered into a long-term cost-plus industrial grade ammonium nitrate supply agreement (“Supply Agreement”) with a third party. Under the Supply Agreement, EDC will supply from the El Dorado Facility approximately 190,000 tons of industrial grade ammonium nitrate per year, which is approximately 90% of the plant’s manufacturing capacity for that product, for a term through at least March 2008. EDC and this customer have agreed in principal to a new five year agreement beginning January 1, 2006, with the new agreement to
 
F-39

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
11. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
 
provide for certain price increases and an increase in the amount of product that this customer will take from EDC each year and renewal provision thereafter. This new agreement is subject to finalization of a definitive agreement.
Employment and Severance Agreements
We have employment and severance agreements with several of our officers. The agreements provide for annual base salaries, bonuses and other benefits commonly found in such agreements. In the event of termination of employment due to a change in control (as defined in the agreements), the agreements provide for payments aggregating $7.8 million at December 31, 2005.
Legal Matters
Following is a summary of certain legal matters involving the Company.
A. Environmental Matters
Our operations are subject to numerous environmental laws (“Environmental Laws”) and to other federal, state and local laws regarding health and safety matters (“Health Laws”). In particular, the manufacture and distribution of chemical products are activities which entail environmental risks and impose obligations under the Environmental Laws and the Health Laws, many of which provide for certain performance obligations, substantial fines and criminal sanctions for violations. There can be no assurance that material costs or liabilities will not be incurred by us in complying with such laws or in paying fines or penalties for violation of such laws. The Environmental Laws and Health Laws and enforcement policies thereunder relating to our Chemical Business have in the past resulted, and could in the future result, in compliance expenses, cleanup costs, penalties or other liabilities relating to the handling, manufacture, use, emission, discharge or disposal of pollutants or other substances at or from our facilities or the use or disposal of certain of its chemical products. Historically, significant expenditures have been incurred by subsidiaries within our Chemical Business in order to comply with the Environmental Laws and Health Laws. Our Chemical Business could be required to make significant additional site or operational modifications involving substantial expenditures. We have a legal obligation to monitor certain discharge water outlets at our Chemical Business facilities should we discontinue the operations of a facility. We do not believe that the annual costs of the required monitoring activities would be significant and as we currently have no plans to discontinue the use of the facilities and the remaining life of either facility is indeterminable, an asset retirement liability has not been recognized. However, we will continue to review this obligation and record a liability when a reasonable estimate of the fair value can be made. Currently, there is insufficient information to estimate the fair value of the asset retirement obligation.
 
F-40

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
11. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
 
FASB Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations requires recognition of a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated. The Company has certain facilities that contain asbestos insulation around certain piping and heated surfaces. The asbestos insulation is in adequate condition to prevent leakage and can remain in place as long as the facility is operated or remains assembled. The Company plans to maintain the facilities in an adequate condition to prevent leakage through its standard repair and maintenance activities. The Company has not recorded a liability relating to the asbestos insulation, as management believes that it is not possible to reasonably estimate a settlement date for asbestos insulation removal because the facilities have an indeterminate life.
1. Discharge Water Matters
The El Dorado Facility generates process wastewater. The process water discharge and storm-water run off are governed by a state National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) water discharge permit issued by the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (“ADEQ”), which permit is to be renewed every five years. The ADEQ issued to EDC a new revised NPDES water discharge permit in 2004, and EDC has until June 2007 to meet the compliance deadline for the more restrictive limits under the recently issued NPDES permit. In order to meet EDC’s effluent limits under the permit, EDC had planned to utilize a pipeline to be built by the City of El Dorado, Arkansas (the “City”).
The City council approved the joint pipeline, but construction of the pipeline by the City is subject to the City receiving a permit from the ADEQ. The ADEQ has not issued the necessary permit to discharge wastewater into the pipeline and, as a result, this has caused a delay of unknown duration in construction of the pipeline. This delay may impact our ability to meet our compliance schedule under the NPDES permit. As a result, EDC has proposed to the ADEQ an extension of its compliance deadlines under its NPDES permit but there are no assurances that the ADEQ will grant such extension. If the City is not able to build its pipeline or can build it in a timely manner, EDC intends to discharge its wastewater through the City’s sewer system subject to obtaining a sewer discharge permit from the City and EDC building a pipeline to the City’s sewer system in a timely manner. The estimated remaining capital expenditures to meet the requirements of the NPDES permit ranges from $.5 million to $3.3 million plus approximately $2 million for our pro-rata portion of pipeline engineering and construction costs should the City build a pipeline.
In addition, EDC has entered into a CAO that recognizes the presence of nitrate contamination in the shallow groundwater at the El Dorado Facility. A new CAO is being completed to address the shallow groundwater contamination, which will include an evaluation of the current conditions and remediation based upon a risk assessment. The final remedy for shallow groundwater contamination, should any remediation be required, will be selected pursuant to the new CAO and based upon the risk assessment. There are no known users of this shallow
 
F-41

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
11. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
 
groundwater in the area, and preliminary risk assessments have not identified any public health risk that would require remediation. During 2005, we spent $325,000 relating to the dredging of our neutralization pond to increase its efficiency. At December 31, 2005 the estimated cost to complete the requested investigation and risk assessment is approximately $33,000 which liability has been recorded. This amount is not discounted to its present value. The cost of any additional remediation that may be required will be determined based on the results of the investigation and risk assessment and cannot currently be reasonably estimated. Therefore, it is reasonably possible that a change in estimate will occur in the near term.
2. Air Matters
Under the terms of a consent administrative order (“AirCAO”), which became effective in February 2004 resolving certain air regulatory alleged violations associated with EDC’s sulfuric acid plant and certain other alleged air emission violations, EDC is required to implement additional air emission controls at the El Dorado Facility no later than six years from the effective date of the AirCAO. The ultimate cost of any technology changes required cannot presently be determined but is believed to cost between $1.5 million to $3 million of capital expenditures, depending on the technology changes as may be required.
3. Other Environmental Matters
In April 2002, Slurry Explosive Corporation (“Slurry”), later renamed Chemex I Corp., a subsidiary within our Chemical Business, entered into a Consent Administrative Order (“Slurry Consent Order”) with the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (“KDHE”), regarding Slurry’s Hallowell, Kansas manufacturing facility (“Hallowell Facility”). The Slurry Consent Order addressed the release of contaminants from the facility into the soils and groundwater and surface water at the Hallowell Facility. There are no known users of the groundwater in the area. The adjacent strip pit is used for fishing. Under the terms of the Slurry Consent Order, Slurry is required to, among other things, submit an environmental assessment work plan to the KDHE for review and approval, and agree with the KDHE as to any required corrective actions to be performed at the Hallowell Facility.
In connection with the sale of substantially all of the operating assets of Slurry and Universal Tech Corporation (“UTeC”) in December 2002, which was accounted for as discontinued operations, both subsidiaries within our Chemical Business, UTeC leased the Hallowell Facility to the buyer under a triple net long-term lease agreement. However, Slurry retained the obligation to be responsible for, and perform the activities under, the Slurry Consent Order. In addition, certain of our subsidiaries agreed to indemnify the buyer of such assets for these environmental matters. Slurry placed prior owners (“Chevron”) of the Hallowell Facility on notice of their responsibility for contribution towards the costs to investigate and remediate this site. Representatives of Chevron have agreed to pay one-half of the costs of certain interim remediation of the site.
 
F-42

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
11. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
 
During 2005, representatives of Slurry and Chevron met with the KDHE and proposed to remove the bulk of contaminated soil at the Hallowell site, which was orally agreed to by the KDHE subject to approval of a written work plan submitted to the KDHE. As a result of these meetings, we recorded provisions totaling $644,000 for our share of these estimated costs. At December 31, 2005, our liability (which is included in other current and noncurrent accrued liabilities) in connection with this remediation matter is $1,458,000 and our receivable (which is included in accounts receivable and other assets) from Chevron for one-half of these costs is $730,000. These amounts are not discounted to their present value. It is reasonably possible that a change in estimate of our liability and receivable will occur in the near term. For 2005, our share of these expenses are classified as discontinued operations (in accordance with SFAS 144) in the accompanying consolidated statement of income (there are no income tax benefits related to these expenses).
It is expected that this soil remediation will occur over the next two years.
Grand Jury Investigation - Slurry - Hallowell Facility
The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (“ATF”) previously conducted an investigation at Slurry. In August 2003, we learned that a federal grand jury for the District of Kansas was investigating Slurry and certain of its former employees relating to the alleged violations of explosive storage and related regulations at Slurry’s Hallowell Facility. Active operations at the Hallowell Facility were discontinued in February 2002 after its license to possess explosives was revoked by the ATF. In response to the Assistant U.S. Attorney’s suggestion, our counsel sent a letter to the U.S. Attorney offering to plead guilty to one count of a misdemeanor violation of explosive storage regulations with no monetary fine or forfeiture. The U.S. Attorney has not yet responded to our counsel’s offer. As of December 31, 2005, no liability has been recorded for any possible monetary fine or forfeiture because the decision from the U.S. Attorney is currently unknown. In the meantime, the U.S. government has continued to subpoena records for the grand jury and to examine witnesses in connection with this matter.
B. Other Pending, Threatened or Settled Litigation
1. Climate Control Business
Trison Construction, Inc. (“Trison”), a subsidiary within our Climate Control Business, is involved in a lawsuit brought against it by Trade Mechanical Construction, Inc. (“Trade”). The lawsuit is styled Trade Mechanical Contractors, Inc., et al. v. Trison Construction, Inc., and is pending in the District Court, State of Oklahoma, Pontotoc County. Trison entered into a contract with Johnson Controls, Inc. (“JCI”) to design, remove and install selected components on existing air conditioning systems at a project in Oklahoma (“Project”). In connection with the Project, Trison entered into a subcontract with Trade to provide certain services for Trison relating to the Project and disputes arose over the performance of the subcontract. During the
 
F-43

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
11. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
 
first quarter of 2006, this lawsuit was settled by Trison agreeing to pay $125,000 to Trade which was accrued at December 31, 2005.
In connection with the Project, JCI alleged that Trison’s work on the Project contained certain defects and purported inadequacies and claimed that Trison defaulted on its contract with JCI. JCI made demand under Trison’s performance bond seeking recovery of costs alleged to have been required to correct and complete Trison’s work under its contract with JCI. In June 2004, JCI filed for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association claiming damages in the amount of approximately $1,700,000. Trison denies that its work was defective or otherwise incomplete and filed a counterclaim against JCI in the arbitration. On January 16, 2006, the arbitrator issued an interim award in this matter, as follows:
 
    Denying JCI’s claims for breach of contract in their entirety;
 
    Denying JCI’s claims for breach of the performance bond and bad faith against Trison’s bonding company;
 
    Holding that JCI’s claims for termination for default by Trison was not sustainable and, therefore, Trison’s termination was a termination for convenience as required under the subcontract between Trison and JCI;
 
    Holding that JCI is not entitled to any damages from Trison or its bonding company; and
 
    Holding that Trison and its bonding company are the prevailing parties and under the subcontract are entitled to recover from JCI all reasonable costs and expenses including attorney fees incurred in this proceeding, the amount of which is to be determined at a further hearing.
JCI has reasserted a motion to disqualify the arbitrator based on alleged bias in the arbitration proceedings and to set aside the interim award. JCI’s original motion alleging arbitrator bias was denied by the American Arbitration Association.
We have spent approximately $1.3 million in attorneys’ fees and expenses in connection with this arbitration as of December 31, 2005. There are no assurances that we will recover the total amount of fees and expenses that we have incurred in connection with this matter.
There was no accounting recognition for this interim award issued on January 16, 2006, as of December 31, 2005. When the final award is realized, it will be recorded in the financial statements at that time.
The Company and one of our subsidiaries within the Climate Control Business, ClimaCool Corp., have been sued, together with two unrelated companies, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, in a case styled Multistack LLC v. ClimaCool Corp., et al., alleging that we, ClimaCool and others infringed on a patent in connection with certain modular air chillers that ClimaCool purchased from a French air
 
F-44

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
11. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
 
conditioning company for resale in the United States. During the first quarter of 2006, the plaintiff dismissed this lawsuit without prejudice.
2. Chemical Business
Cherokee Nitrogen, Inc. (“Cherokee”), a subsidiary within our Chemical Business, has been sued for an undisclosed amount of monies based on a claim that Cherokee breached an agreement by overcharging the plaintiff, Nelson Brothers, LLC, (“Nelson”) for ammonium nitrate as a result of inflated prices for natural gas used to manufacture the ammonium nitrate. The suit is Nelson Brothers, LLC v. Cherokee Nitrogen v. Dynegy Marketing, and is pending in Alabama state court in Colbert County. Cherokee has filed a third-party complaint against Dynegy and a subsidiary (“Dynegy”) asserting that Dynegy was the party responsible for fraudulently causing artificial natural gas prices to exist and seeking an undisclosed amount from Dynegy, including any amounts which may be recovered by Nelson. Dynegy has filed a counterclaim against Cherokee for $600,000 allegedly owed on account, which has been recorded by Cherokee. Although there is no assurance, counsel for Cherokee has advised us that, at this time, they believe that Cherokee will recover monies from Dynegy and the likelihood of Dynegy recovering from Cherokee is remote. Our counsel also has advised us that they believe that the likelihood of Nelson recovering monies from Cherokee over and above any monies which may be recovered from Dynegy by Cherokee is remote.
Cherokee has filed suit against Meecorp Capital Markets, LLC (“Meecorp”) and Lending Solutions, Inc. in Alabama State Court, in Etowah County, Alabama, for recovery of actual damages plus punitive damages, relating to a loan transaction. Meecorp counterclaimed for the balance of an alleged commitment fee of $100,000, an alleged equity kicker of $200,000 and $3,420,000 for loss of opportunity. Cherokee is vigorously pursuing this matter, and counsel for Cherokee has advised that they believe there is a substantial likelihood Cherokee will recover from the defendants and that the likelihood of Meecorp recovering from Cherokee is remote.
3. Other
Zeller Pension Plan
In February 2000, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized management to proceed with the sale of the automotive products business, since the automotive products business was no longer a “core business” of the Company. In May 2000, the Company sold substantially all of its assets in its automotive products business. After the authorization by the board, but prior to the sale, the automotive products business purchased the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Zeller Corporation (“Zeller”). The liabilities of Zeller assumed by the automotive products business included Zeller’s pension plan, which is not a multi-employer pension plan. In June 2003, the principal owner (“Owner”) of the buyer of the automotive products business was contacted by a representative of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) regarding the plan. The Owner has been informed by the PBGC of a possible under-funding of the plan and
 
F-45

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
11. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
 
a possible takeover of the plan by the PBGC. The Owner has notified the Company of these events. The Company has also been contacted by the PBGC and has been advised that the PBGC considers the Company to be potentially liable for the under-funding of the Zeller Plan in the event that the plan is taken over by the PBGC and has alleged that the under-funding is approximately $.6 million. The Company has been advised by ERISA counsel that, based upon numerous representations made by the Company and the assumption that the trier of fact determining the Company’s obligations with respect to the plan would find that: we disposed, in May 4, 2000 of interest in the automotive products business including the Zeller assets and business pursuant to a bona fide purchase agreement under the terms of which the purchaser assumed all obligations with respect to the operation, including funding of the Zeller plan, the purpose of the sale of the automotive products business did not include an attempt to evade liability for funding the Zeller plan, at the time we disposed of our interest in the automotive products business, the Zeller plan was adequately funded, on an ongoing basis and all required contributions had been made, and the Zeller plan did not terminate at anytime that any member of the Company’s controlled group of entities was a contribution sponsor to the Zeller plan, that the possibility of an unfavorable outcome to us in a lawsuit if the PBGC attempts to hold us liable for the under-funding of the Zeller plan is remote.
Asserting Financing Fee
On December 4, 2003, the Company and Southwest Securities, Inc. (“Southwest”) entered into a letter agreement whereby the Company agreed to retain Southwest to assist the Company in obtaining financing for the Company. Southwest’s right to a fee under the Agreement is limited to a refinancing occurring during “a period of sixty days, to be extended if a transaction is ongoing.” A financing did not occur within sixty days of the date of the Agreement, nor was a funding transaction “ongoing” at the end of that period. In September 2004, more than ten months after the date of the Agreement between the Company and Southwest, ThermaClime borrowed $50 million from Orix Capital Markets, LLC (“Orix”). It is the Company’s position that the Orix financing transaction was not the result of any efforts by Southwest, nor was it the culmination of any negotiations or transaction commenced during the sixty-day term of the Agreement. Nonetheless, Southwest has asserted that it is entitled to a fee of $1.7 million pursuant to the Agreement. The Company brought an action against Southwest in Oklahoma state court in a lawsuit styled LSB Industries, Inc. v. Southwest Securities, Inc. pending in the Oklahoma District Court, Oklahoma County, for a declaratory judgment that the Company is not liable to Southwest under the Agreement as a result of the Orix financing transaction. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against the claim by Southwest, and counsel handling this matter for the Company has advised that the Company’s prospects for a favorable outcome in this matter appears likely. Our counsel has advised us that prospects for an adverse result against us is remote, but that discovery is continuing and counsel’s judgment may change depending upon the nature of additional evidence. Recently, the parties attempted to mediate this matter but were unable to agree on a settlement. No liability has been established relating to the fee asserted by Southwest as of December 31, 2005.
 
F-46

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
11. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
 
We are also involved in various other claims and legal actions which in the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, if determined adversely to us, would not have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
12. Redeemable Preferred Stock
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, we had 871 shares and 1,027 shares, respectively, outstanding of noncumulative redeemable preferred stock. Each share of redeemable preferred stock, $100 par value, is convertible into 40 shares of our common stock at the option of the holder at any time and entitles the holder to one vote. The redeemable preferred stock is redeemable at par at the option of the holder or the Company. The redeemable preferred stock provides for a noncumulative annual dividend of 10%, payable when and as declared. The redeemable preferred stock is classified as accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
13. Stockholders’ Equity
Qualified Stock Option Plans
At December 31, 2005 we have a 1993 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (“1993 Plan”) and a 1998 Stock Option Plan (“1998 Plan”). The 1993 Plan has expired, and accordingly, no additional options may be granted from this plan. Options granted prior to the expiration of this plan continue to remain valid thereafter in accordance with their terms. Under the 1998 Plan, we are authorized to grant options to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock to our key employees; however, no options are available to be granted as of December 31, 2005. At December 31, 2005, there were 376,500 options outstanding related to the 1993 Plan and 509,204 options outstanding relating to the 1998 Plan. Under the plans, these options become exercisable 20% after one year from date of grant, 40% after two years, 70% after three years, 100% after four years and lapse at the end of ten years. However effective December 31, 2005 our Board of Directors approved the acceleration of the vesting schedule of 61,500 shares of qualified stock options which would have been fully vested on November 17, 2009 to avoid the recognition of compensation expense in our future financial statements relating to these stock options. As a result, all outstanding qualified stock options were exercisable at December 31, 2005. Based on FIN 44, since this modification to the vesting schedule did not renew or increase the life of these stock options, a remeasurement of the stock options was not required and no stock-based compensation was recognized in 2005. The exercise price of options granted under these plans was equal to the market value of our common stock at the date of grant. For participants who own 10% or more of our common stock at the date of grant, the exercise price is 110% of the market value at the date of grant and the options lapse after five years from the date of grant.
 
F-47

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
13. Stockholders’ Equity (continued)
 
Activity in our qualified stock option plans during each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 is as follows:
 
     2005    2004    2003
     Shares    
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Shares    
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Shares    
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Outstanding at beginning of year
   921,204     $ 2.65    1,283,800     $ 2.37    1,424,600     $ 2.34
Granted
   61,500     $ 5.10    —       $ —      —       $ —  
Exercised
   (80,500 )   $ 2.83    (346,596 )   $ 1.59    (127,800 )   $ 1.53
Canceled, forfeited or expired
   (16,500 )   $ 3.79    (16,000 )   $ 2.72    (13,000 )   $ 7.21
                          
Outstanding at end of year
   885,704     $ 2.78    921,204     $ 2.65    1,283,800     $ 2.37
                          
Exercisable at end of year
   885,704     $ 2.78    863,454     $ 2.65    1,168,300     $ 2.33
                          
Weighted average fair value of options granted during year
     $ 3.78        N/A        N/A
The following table summarizes information about qualified stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2005:
 
     Stock Options Outstanding and Exercisable
Exercise Prices
  
Shares
Outstanding and
Exercisable
  
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$ 1.25
   366,204    3.58    $ 1.25
$ 2.73 - $ 3.00
   155,000    5.35    $ 2.76
$ 4.13
   280,000    .92    $ 4.13
$ 4.88 - $ 5.10
   84,500    7.35    $ 5.04
          
$ 1.25 - $ 5.10
   885,704    3.41    $ 2.78
          
Non-Qualified Stock Option Plans
Our Board of Directors approved the grants of non-qualified stock options to our outside directors, our President and certain key employees, as shown below. The option prices are generally based on the market value of our common stock at the dates of grants. These options have vesting terms and lives specific to each grant but generally vest over 48 months and expire ten years from the grant date. However, effective December 31, 2005, our Board of Directors
 
F-48

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
13. Stockholders’ Equity (continued)
 
approved the acceleration of the vesting schedule of 30,000 shares of non-qualified stock options which would have been fully vested on April 22, 2008 and 15,000 shares of non-qualified stock options which would have been fully vested on November 7, 2006 to avoid the recognition of compensation expense in our future financial statements relating to these stock options. As a result, all outstanding non-qualified stock options were exercisable at December 31, 2005. Based on FIN 44, since this modification to the vesting schedule did not renew or increase the life of these stock options, a remeasurement of the stock options was not required and no stock-based compensation was recognized in 2005.
We have an Outside Directors Stock Option Plan (the “Outside Director Plan”). The Outside Director Plan authorizes the grant of non-qualified stock options to each member of our Board of Directors who is not an officer or employee of the Company or its subsidiaries. The maximum number of options that may be issued under the Outside Director Plan is 400,000 of which 295,000 are available to be granted at December 31, 2005. At December 31, 2005, there are 90,000 options outstanding related to the Outside Director Plan.
Activity in our non-qualified stock option plans during each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 is as follows:
 
     2005    2004    2003
     Shares    
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Shares    
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
   Shares    
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Outstanding at beginning of year
   1,014,000     $ 2.01    1,254,000     $ 2.17    1,351,000     $ 2.32
Granted
   —       $ —      —       $ —      —       $ —  
Exercised
   (8,400 )   $ 2.44    (235,000 )   $ 2.81    (3,000 )   $ 1.25
Surrendered, forfeited, or expired
   —       $ —      (5,000 )   $ 4.19    (94,000 )   $ 4.39
                          
Outstanding at end of year
   1,005,600     $ 2.00    1,014,000     $ 2.01    1,254,000     $ 2.17
                          
Exercisable at end of year
   1,005,600     $ 2.00    913,250     $ 1.87    1,102,500     $ 2.03
                          
 
F-49

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
13. Stockholders’ Equity (continued)
 
The following table summarizes information about non-qualified stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2005:
 
     Stock Options Outstanding and Exercisable
Exercise Prices
  
Shares
Outstanding
  
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life in Years
  
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$ 1.25 - $ 1.38
   706,500    3.58    $ 1.26
$ 2.62 - $ 2.73
   108,500    6.19    $ 2.70
$ 4.19
   105,600    2.27    $ 4.19
$ 4.54 - $ 5.36
   85,000    1.58    $ 4.59
          
$ 1.25 - $ 5.36
   1,005,600    3.56    $ 2.00
          
Preferred Share Purchase Rights
We have adopted a preferred share rights plan (the “Rights Plan”), which became effective as of February 27, 1999. The Rights Plan replaced and renewed a rights plan that was terminating as of that date. Under the Rights Plan, we declared a dividend distribution of one Renewed Preferred Share Purchase Right (the “Renewed Preferred Right”) for each outstanding share of our common stock outstanding as of February 27, 1999 and all further issuances of our common stock would carry the rights. The Rights Plan has a term of ten years from its effective date. The Renewed Preferred Rights are designed to ensure that all of our stockholders receive fair and equal treatment in the event of a proposed takeover or abusive tender offer.
The Renewed Preferred Rights are generally exercisable when a person or group (other than Jack E. Golsen, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), and his affiliates, our company or any of our subsidiaries, our employee savings plans and certain other limited excluded persons or entities, as set forth in the Rights Plan) acquire beneficial ownership of 20% or more of our common stock (such a person or group will be referred to as the “Acquirer”). Each Renewed Preferred Right (excluding Renewed Preferred Rights owned by the Acquirer) entitles stockholders to buy one one-hundredth (1/100) of a share of a new series of participating preferred stock at an exercise price of $20. Following the acquisition by the Acquirer of beneficial ownership of 20% or more of our common stock, and prior to the acquisition of 50% or more of our common stock by the Acquirer, our Board of Directors may exchange all or a portion of the Renewed Preferred Rights (other than Renewed Preferred Rights owned by the Acquirer) for our common stock at the rate of one share of common stock per Renewed Preferred Right. Following acquisition by the Acquirer of 20% or more of our common stock, each Renewed Preferred Right (other than the Renewed Preferred Rights owned by the Acquirer) will entitle its holder to purchase a number of our common shares having a market value of two times the Renewed Preferred Right’s exercise price in lieu of the new preferred stock. Thus, only as an example, if our common shares at such time were trading at $10 per share and the exercise price
 
F-50

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
13. Stockholders’ Equity (continued)
 
of the Renewed Preferred Right is $20, each Renewed Preferred Right would thereafter be exercisable at $20 for four of our common shares.
If after the Renewed Preferred Share Rights are triggered, we are acquired, or we sell 50% or more of our assets or earning power, each Renewed Preferred Right (other than the Renewed Preferred Rights owned by the Acquirer) will entitle its holder to purchase a number of the acquiring company’s common shares having a market value at the time of two times the Renewed Preferred Right’s exercise price, except if the transaction is consummated with a person or group who acquired our common shares pursuant to a Permitted Offer, the price for all of our common shares paid to all of our common shareholders is not less than the price per share of our common stock pursuant to the Permitted Offer and the form of consideration offered in the transaction is the same as the form of consideration paid pursuant to the Permitted Offer. As defined in the Rights Plan, a “Permitted Offer” is an offer for all of our common shares at a price and on terms that a majority of our Board, who are not officers, or the person or group who could trigger the exerciseability of the Renewed Preferred Rights, deems adequate and in our best interest and that of our shareholders. Thus, only as an example, if our common shares were trading at $10 per share and the exercise price of a Renewed Preferred Right is $20, each Renewed Preferred Right would thereafter be exercisable at $20 for four shares of the Acquirer.
Prior to the acquisition by the Acquirer of beneficial ownership of 20% or more of our stock, our Board of Directors may redeem the Renewed Preferred Rights for $.01 per Renewed Preferred Right.
In March 2003, we sold for $1,570,500 in cash 450,000 shares of common stock and a warrant (exercisable at $3.49 per share until March 2008) to purchase 112,500 shares of common stock. The proceeds were used to reduce debt.
In May 2002, we issued warrants to purchase 595,585 shares of our common stock exercisable at $.10 per share until May 2012. In March 2005, the holders exercised the warrants, under a cashless exercise provision, to purchase 586,140 shares of our common stock (See Note 9 (A)).
As of December 31, 2005, we have reserved 5.9 million shares of common stock issuable upon potential conversion of preferred stocks, stock options and warrants.
14. Non-Redeemable Preferred Stock
The 20,000 shares of Series B cumulative, convertible preferred stock, $100 par value, are convertible, in whole or in part, into 666,666 shares of our common stock (33.3333 shares of common stock for each share of preferred stock) at any time at the option of the holder and entitles the holder to one vote per share. The Series B preferred stock provides for annual cumulative dividends of 12% from date of issue, payable when and as declared. At December 31, 2005, $1.4 million of dividends ($72 per share) on the Series B preferred stock were in arrears.
 
F-51

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
14. Non-Redeemable Preferred Stock (continued)
 
The Class C preferred stock, designated as a $3.25 convertible exchangeable Class C preferred stock, Series 2, has no par value (“Series 2 Preferred”). The Series 2 Preferred has a liquidation preference of $50.00 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends and is convertible at the option of the holder at any time, unless previously redeemed, into our common stock at an initial conversion price of $11.55 per share (equivalent to a conversion rate of approximately 4.3 shares of common stock for each share of Series 2 Preferred), subject to adjustment under certain conditions. Upon the mailing of notice of certain corporate actions, holders will have special conversion rights for a 45-day period. The Series 2 Preferred is redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, at $50.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends to the redemption date. Dividends on the Series 2 Preferred are cumulative and payable quarterly in arrears. At December 31, 2005, $12.8 million of dividends ($21.125 per share) on the Series 2 Preferred were in arrears.
The Series 2 Preferred also is exchangeable in whole, but not in part, at our option on any dividend payment date for 6.50% Convertible Subordinated Debentures due 2018 (the “Debentures”) at the rate of $50.00 principal amount of Debentures for each share of Series 2 Preferred. Interest on the Debentures, if issued, will be payable semiannually in arrears. The Debentures will, if issued, contain conversion and optional redemption provisions similar to those of the Series 2 Preferred and will be subject to a mandatory annual sinking fund redemption of 5% of the amount of Debentures initially issued, commencing on the June 15 following their issuance.
During 2005, we purchased 13,300 shares of Series 2 Preferred in the open market for $597,000 (average cost of $44.90 per share). These shares are being held as treasury stock. During 2004, we purchased 5,000 shares of Series 2 Preferred in the open market for $271,000 ($54.12 per share). These shares were canceled by the Company.
The 1,000,000 shares of Class C preferred stock, designated as Series D 6% cumulative, convertible Class C preferred stock (“Series D Preferred”), have no par value and are convertible, in whole or in part, into 250,000 shares of our common stock (1 share of common stock for 4 shares of preferred stock) at any time at the option of the holder. Dividends on the Series D Preferred are cumulative and payable annually in arrears at the rate of 6% per annum of the liquidation preference of $1.00 per share but will be paid only after accrued and unpaid dividends are paid on the Series 2 Preferred. At December 31, 2005, $240,000 of dividends ($.24 per share) on the Series D Preferred were in arrears. Each holder of the Series D Preferred shall be entitled to .875 votes per share.
At December 31, 2005, we are authorized to issue an additional 3,791 shares of $100 par value preferred stock and an additional 3,394,750 shares of no par value preferred stock. Upon issuance, our Board of Directors will determine the specific terms and conditions of such preferred stock.
 
F-52

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
15. Executive Benefit Agreements and Employee Savings Plans
 
In 1981, we entered into individual death benefit agreements with certain key executives (“1981 Agreements”). Under the 1981 Agreements, should the executive die while employed, we are required to pay the beneficiary named in the agreement in 120 equal monthly installments aggregating to an amount specified in the agreement. At December 31, 2005, the monthly installments specified in the 1981 Agreements total $34,000 and the aggregate undiscounted death benefits are $4.1 million. The benefits under the 1981 Agreements are forfeited if the respective executive’s employment is terminated for any reason prior to death. The 1981 Agreements may be terminated by the Company at any time and for any reason prior to the death of the employee.
In 1992, we entered into individual benefit agreements with certain key executives (“1992 Agreements”) that provide for annual benefit payments for life (in addition to salary) ranging from $16,000 to $18,000 payable in monthly installments when the employee reaches age 65. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the liability for benefits under the 1992 Agreements is $938,000 and $960,000, respectively, which is included in accrued liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The liability reflects the present value of the remaining estimated payments at discount rates of 5.57% and 5.68% as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Future estimated undiscounted payments aggregate to $2.1 million as of December 31, 2005. For 2005, 2004 and 2003, charges to selling, general and administrative expenses for these benefits were $110,000, $171,000 and $230,000, respectively. As part of the 1992 Agreements, should the executive die prior the age of 65, we will pay the beneficiary named in the agreement in 120 equal monthly installments aggregating to an amount specified in the agreement. This is in addition to any amount payable under the 1981 agreement should that executive have both a 1981 and 1992 agreement. At December 31, 2005, the aggregate undiscounted death benefit payments specified in the 1992 Agreements are $780,000. The benefits under the 1992 Agreements are forfeited if the respective executive’s employment is terminated prior to age 65 for any reason other than death. The 1992 Agreements may be terminated by the Company at any time and for any reason prior to the death of the employee.
On May 12, 2005 we entered into a death benefit agreement (“2005 Agreement”) with our CEO. The Death Benefit Agreement provides that, upon our CEO’s death, we will pay to our CEO’s designated beneficiary, a lump-sum payment of $2.5 million to be funded from the net proceeds received by us under certain life insurance policies on our CEO’s life that are owned by us. We are obligated to keep in existence life insurance policies with a total face amount of no less than $2.5 million of the stated death benefit. As of December 31, 2005, the life insurance policies owned by us on the life of our CEO have a total face amount of $7 million. The benefit under the 2005 Agreement is not contingent upon continued employment and may be amended at any time by written agreement executed by the CEO and the Company.
As of December 31, 2005, the liability for death benefits under the 1981, 1992 and 2005 Agreements is $869,000 (none at December 31, 2004) which is included in accrued and other noncurrent liabilities. We accrue for such liabilities when they become probable and discount the liabilities to their present value. The increase in the liability relates to the untimely death of one
 
F-53

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
15. Executive Benefit Agreements and Employee Savings Plans (continued)
 
of our executives in January 2005 (the net proceeds from the related life insurance policies are included in non-operating other income as shown in Note 19 – Other Expense, Other Income and Non-Operating Other Income, net) and the change in accounting estimate for our CEO’s remaining service period (See Note 3 - Changes in Accounting Estimates).
To assist us in funding the benefit agreements discussed above, we purchased life insurance contracts on various individuals in which we are the beneficiary. As of December 31, 2005, the total face amount of these policies is $22 million of which $2.5 million of the proceeds is required to be paid as discussed above.
Some of these life insurance policies have cash surrender values that we have borrowed against. The cash surrender values are included in other assets in the amounts of $632,000 and 635,000, net of borrowings of $1,939,000 and $2,444,000 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Increases in cash surrender values of $574,000, $465,000 and $300,000 are netted against the premiums paid for life insurance policies of $1,037,000, $678,000 and $717,000 in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
We sponsor a savings plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code under which participation is available to substantially all full-time employees. We do not presently contribute to this plan except for EDC and Cherokee Nitrogen Company’s union employees and EDNC employees which amounts were not material for each of the three years ended December 31, 2005.
16. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following discussion of fair values is not indicative of the overall fair value of our assets and liabilities since the provisions of SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” do not apply to all assets, including intangibles.
As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, due to their short-term nature, the carrying values of cash, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, short-term financing and drafts payable, and accrued liabilities approximated their estimated fair values. Carrying values for variable rate borrowings are believed to approximate their fair value. Fair values for fixed rate borrowings, other than the Notes, are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis that applies interest rates currently being offered on borrowings of similar amounts and terms to those currently outstanding while also taking into consideration our current credit worthiness. The fair value for the Notes was based on market quotations; however, there has been a low volume of trading activity. In addition, in March 2006, we purchased approximately $6 million of the Notes at carrying value.
 
F-54

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
16. Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)
 
     December 31, 2005    December 31, 2004
    
Estimated
Fair Value
  
Carrying
Value
  
Estimated
Fair Value
  
Carrying
Value
     (In thousands)
Variable Rate:
           
Senior Secured Loan (1)
   $ 48,695    $ 50,000    $ 50,000    $ 50,000
Bank debt and equipment financing
     35,197      35,197      31,740      31,740
Fixed Rate:
           
Bank debt and equipment financing
     13,574      13,627      12,574      11,467
Senior Unsecured Notes due 2007
     6,118      13,300      6,071      13,300
                           
   $ 103,584    $ 112,124    $ 100,385    $ 106,507
                           
 
(1) The Senior Secured Loan has a variable interest rate not to exceed 11% or 11.5% depending on ThermaClime’s leverage ratio.
17. Inventory Write-Down
During 2005, 2004 and 2003, our Climate Control Business wrote down the carrying value of certain slow-moving inventory items by $121,000, $363,000 and $222,000, respectively. During 2005 and 2004, our Chemical Business wrote down the carrying value of certain nitrogen-based inventories by $118,000 and $714,000, respectively. These costs are included in cost of sales in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
18. Property and Business Interruption Insurance Recoveries
Beginning in October 2004 and continuing into June 2005, the Chemical Business’ results were adversely affected as a result of the loss of production due to a mechanical failure of one of the four nitric acid plants at the El Dorado Facility. The plant was restored to normal production in June 2005. We filed a property damage insurance claim for $3.8 million, net of a $1 million deductible. In 2005, we recognized insurance recoveries of $2.7 million under our replacement cost insurance policy relating to this property damage claim. The effect of this property insurance recovery to the accompanying consolidated statement of income was $1.5 million for 2005 which is included in other income. The insurers are contesting the remaining claim and we have instituted litigation against the insurers in connection with this claim . Additional recoveries upon final resolution will be recognized when realized.
In addition, we filed a claim for recovery of the business interruption losses related to this incident. Our business interruption insurance policy contains a forty-five day waiting period before covering losses resulting from business interruptions. The claim is for $4.7 million, net of the forty-five day waiting period. In 2005, we realized insurance recoveries of $1.9 million relating to this claim which is recorded as a reduction to cost of sales. As of March 20, 2006, additional business interruption insurance payments totaling $554,000 were agreed to and paid by our insurers in 2006 which will be recognized in the first quarter of 2006. We have instituted litigation for the remaining balance. Additional recoveries, if any, related to this business interruption will be recognized when realized.
 
F-55

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
18. Property and Business Interruption Insurance Recoveries (continued)
 
Beginning in 2001 through 2003, we incurred business interruptions as the result of a sulfuric acid plant at the El Dorado Facility experiencing several mechanical problems with a boiler that had been repaired by one of our vendors. As a result, other equipment was also damaged at the plant. During 2004, net settlements of $1.5 million were reached with the vendor’s insurance carrier and our insurance carriers. These settlements are classified as a reduction of cost of sales in 2004.
19. Other Expense, Other Income and Non-Operating Other Income, net
 
     Year ended December 31  
     2005     2004     2003  
     (In thousands)  
Other expense:
      
Impairments of long-lived assets
   $ 237     $ 737     $ 500  
Other (1)
     95       374       255  
                        
Total other expense
   $ 332     $ 1,111     $ 755  
                        
Other income:
      
Property insurance recoveries in excess of losses incurred
   $ 1,618     $ —       $ —    
Gains on the sale of property and equipment, net
     714       340       —    
Rental income
     142       128       228  
Other (1)
     208       206       502  
                        
Total other income
   $ 2,682     $ 674     $ 730  
                        
Non-operating other income, net:
      
Net proceeds from certain key individual life insurance policies (Note 15)
   $ 1,162     $ —       $ —    
Gains on sale of certain current assets, primarily precious metals
     237       2,335       502  
Miscellaneous income (1)
     311       258       564  
Miscellaneous expense (1)
     (149 )     (159 )     (335 )
                        
Total non-operating other income, net
   $ 1,561     $ 2,434     $ 731  
                        
 
(1) Amounts represent numerous unrelated transactions, none of which are individually significant requiring separate disclosure.
20. Segment Information
Factors Used by Management to Identify the Enterprise’s Reportable Segments and Measurement of Segment Income or Loss and Segment Assets
We have two continuing reportable segments: the Climate Control Business and the Chemical Business. Our reportable segments are based on business units that offer similar products and services. The reportable segments are each managed separately because they manufacture and distribute distinct products with different production processes.
 
F-56

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
20. Segment Information (continued)
 
We evaluate performance and allocate resources based on operating income or loss. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.
Description of Each Reportable Segment
Climate Control
This business segment manufactures and sells, primarily from its various facilities in Oklahoma City, a variety of water source heat pumps, hydronic fan coils and other heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (“HVAC”) products for use in commercial and residential air conditioning and heating systems including large custom air handlers and modular chillers systems. Our various facilities in Oklahoma City comprise substantially all of the Climate Control segment’s operations. Sales to customers of this segment primarily include original equipment manufacturers, contractors and independent sales representatives located throughout the world.
Chemical
This segment manufactures and sells fertilizer grade ammonium nitrate, urea ammonium nitrate, urea and anhydrous ammonia for agricultural applications, concentrated, blended and regular nitric acid, metallurgical grade anhydrous ammonia and sulfuric acid for industrial applications and industrial grade ammonium nitrate and solutions for the mining industry. Our primary manufacturing facilities are located in El Dorado, Arkansas, Baytown, Texas and Cherokee, Alabama. Sales to customers of this segment primarily include farmers, ranchers, fertilizer dealers and distributors located in the Central and Southeastern United States, explosive manufacturers in the United States and industrial users of acids throughout the United States and parts of Canada.
The Chemical Business is subject to various federal, state and local environmental regulations. Although we have designed policies and procedures to help reduce or minimize the likelihood of significant chemical accidents and/or environmental contamination, there can be no assurances that we will not sustain a significant future operating loss related thereto.
As of December 31, 2005, our Chemical Business employed 373 persons, with 123 represented by unions under agreements expiring in July through November of 2007.
 
F-57

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
20. Segment Information (continued)
 
Information about our continuing operations in different industry segments for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, is detailed below.
 
     2005     2004     2003  
     (In Thousands)  
Net sales:
      
Climate Control:
      
Water source heat pumps
   $ 84,895     $ 73,557     $ 60,473  
Hydronic fan coils
     53,564       48,760       47,423  
Other HVAC products
     18,007       18,321       11,136  
                        
Total Climate Control
     156,466       140,638       119,032  
Chemical:
      
Agricultural products
     80,638       72,154       70,729  
Industrial acids and other chemical products
     80,228       82,040       70,219  
Mining products
     72,581       62,070       52,220  
                        
Total Chemical
     233,447       216,264       193,168  
Other
     6,809       6,706       4,461  
                        
   $ 396,722     $ 363,608     $ 316,661  
                        
Gross profit:
      
Climate Control
   $ 47,315     $ 42,049     $ 36,139  
Chemical
     16,426       8,917       12,281  
Other
     2,330       2,145       1,491  
                        
   $ 66,071     $ 53,111     $ 49,911  
                        
Operating income (loss):
      
Climate Control
   $ 14,097     $ 11,707     $ 11,519  
Chemical
     7,703       (877 )     3,043  
General corporate expenses and other business operations, net (1)
     (6,835 )     (7,586 )     (6,560 )
                        
     14,965       3,244       8,002  
Interest expense
     (11,407 )     (7,393 )     (6,097 )
Gains on extinguishment of debt
     —         4,400       258  
Provision for loss on notes receivable-Climate Control
     —         (1,447 )     —    
Non-operating income (expense), net:
      
Chemical
     362       2,463       511  
Corporate and other business operations
     1,199       (29 )     220  
Provision for income taxes
     (118 )     —         —    
Equity in earnings of affiliate - Climate Control
     745       668       19  
                        
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change
   $ 5,746     $ 1,906     $ 2,913  
                        
 
F-58

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
20. Segment Information (continued)
 
(1) General corporate expenses and other business operations, net consist of the following:
 
     2005     2004     2003  
     (In Thousands)  
Gross profit-Other
   $ 2,330     $ 2,145     $ 1,491  
Selling, general and administrative:
      
Personnel costs
     (5,258 )     (4,194 )     (3,838 )
Professional fees
     (2,398 )     (2,672 )     (1,653 )
Office overhead
     (598 )     (637 )     (628 )
Property, franchise and other taxes
     (250 )     (283 )     (256 )
All other
     (1,424 )     (1,703 )     (1,466 )
                        
Total selling, general and administrative
     (9,928 )     (9,489 )     (7,841 )
Other income
     883       144       165  
Other expense
     (120 )     (386 )     (375 )
                        
Total general corporate expenses and other business operations, net
   $ (6,835 )   $ (7,586 )   $ (6,560 )
                        
Information about our property, plant and equipment and total assets by industry segment is detailed below:  
     2005     2004     2003  
     (In Thousands)  
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment:
      
Climate Control
   $ 2,223     $ 1,720     $ 2,188  
Chemical
     8,503       8,288       7,938  
Corporate assets and other
     149       186       186  
                        
Total depreciation of property, plant and equipment
   $ 10,875     $ 10,194     $ 10,312  
                        
Additions to property, plant and equipment:
      
Climate Control
   $ 4,322     $ 730     $ 1,543  
Chemical
     11,617       8,606       6,043  
Corporate assets and other
     232       96       230  
                        
Total additions to property, plant and equipment
   $ 16,171     $ 9,432     $ 7,816  
                        
Total assets:
      
Climate Control
   $ 60,970     $ 54,423     $ 51,683  
Chemical
     111,212       94,981       92,093  
Corporate assets and other
     16,781       18,164       18,037  
                        
Total assets
   $ 188,963     $ 167,568     $ 161,813  
                        
 
F-59

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
20. Segment Information (continued)
 
Net sales by industry segment include net sales to unaffiliated customers as reported in the consolidated financial statements. Net sales classified as “Other” consist of sales of industrial machinery and related components. Intersegment net sales are not significant.
Gross profit by industry segment represents net sales less cost of sales. Gross profit classified as “Other” relates to industrial machinery and components.
Our chief operating decision makers use operating income (loss) by industry segment for purposes of making decisions which include resource allocations and performance evaluations. Operating income (loss) by industry segment represents gross profit by industry segment less selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) incurred by each industry segment plus other income and other expense earned/incurred by each industry segment before general corporate expenses and other business operations, net. General corporate expenses and other business operations, net consist of unallocated portions of gross profit, SG&A, other income and other expense.
Identifiable assets by industry segment are those assets used in the operations of each industry. Corporate assets and other are those principally owned by the parent company or by subsidiaries not involved in the two identified industries.
Information about our domestic and foreign operations from continuing operations for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, is detailed below:
 
Geographic Region
   2005     2004     2003
     (In Thousands)
Net sales:
      
Domestic operations
   $ 396,722     $ 359,800     $ 316,584
Foreign operations (1)
     —         3,808       77
                      
   $ 396,722     $ 363,608     $ 316,661
                      
Income (loss) from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change:
      
Domestic operations
   $ 5,768     $ 2,501     $ 2,817
Foreign operations (1)
     (22 )     (595 )     96
                      
   $ 5,746     $ 1,906     $ 2,913
                      
Long-lived assets:
      
Domestic operations
   $ 74,082     $ 70,219     $ 71,931
Foreign operations
     —         —         3
                      
   $ 74,082     $ 70,219     $ 71,934
                      
 
(1) Net sales by foreign operations are to unaffiliated customers. The 2004 amounts relate primarily to MultiClima’s operations as discussed in Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
 
F-60

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
20. Segment Information (continued)
 
Net sales to unaffiliated customers include foreign export sales as follows:
 
Geographic Area
   2005    2004    2003
     (In Thousands)
Canada
   $ 12,077    $ 11,464    $ 6,162
Middle East
     2,647      2,193      996
South and East Asia
     1,502      1,173      816
Europe
     1,148      1,752      1,650
Mexico, Central and South America
     831      1,075      1,376
Other
     397      320      279
                    
   $ 18,602    $ 17,977    $ 11,279
                    
Major Customers
Net sales to one customer, Orica USA, Inc., of our Chemical Business segment represented approximately 11%, 10% and 11% of our total net sales for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. As discussed in Note 11 - Commitments and Contingencies, under the terms of the Supply Agreement, EDC will supply from the El Dorado Facility industrial grade ammonium nitrate through at least March 2008, with provisions for renewal thereafter.
Net sales to another customer, Bayer, of our Chemical Business segment represented approximately 9%, 11% and 12% of our total net sales for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. As discussed in Note 11 - Commitments and Contingencies, under the terms of the Bayer Agreement, Bayer will purchase, from one of our subsidiaries, all of its requirements for nitric acid to be used at the Baytown, Texas facility for a term through at least May 2009, with provisions for renewal thereafter.
21. Subsequent Events (Unaudited)
On March 14, 2006, the Company completed a private placement to six qualified institutional buyers (“OIBs”), pursuant to which the Company sold $18 million aggregate principal amount of its 7% Convertible Senior Subordinated Debentures due 2011 (the “Debentures”) pursuant to the exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), afforded by Section 4(2) of the Act and/or Regulation D promulgated under the Act. The Debentures are eligible for resale by the investors under Rule144A under the Act prior to registration of the Debentures. J. Giordano Securities Group acted as the Company’s exclusive placement agent for this transaction and was paid an aggregate of 6% of the aggregate gross proceeds in the financing. Aggregate estimated offering expenses in connection with the
 
F-61

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
21. Subsequent Events (Unaudited) (continued)
 
transaction, including discounts and commissions, were approximately $.4 million. In connection with the closing, the Company entered into an indenture (the “Indenture”) with UMB Bank, n.a., as trustee (the “Trustee”), governing the Debentures. The Trustee is also the Company’s transfer agent. The Trustee receives customary compensation from the Company for such services.
Jayhawk Institutional Partners, L.P., who together with its affiliates, Kent C. McCarthy and Jayhawk Capital Management, L.L.C., owned beneficially approximately 17.4% our common stock (including shares issuable upon conversion of our preferred stock and exercise of an outstanding warrant) prior to the closing of the private placement, purchased $1 million principal amount of the Debentures.
The Debentures are convertible by holders in whole or in part into shares of the Company’s common stock prior to their maturity on March 1, 2011. The conversion rate of the Debentures for holders electing to convert all or any portion of a debenture prior to September 1, 2006 will be 125 shares per $1,000 principal amount of debentures (representing a conversion price of $8.00 per share). Holders of debentures electing to convert all or any portion of a debenture on or after September 1, 2006 and before March 1, 2009 will obtain the following conversion rate per $1,000 principal amount of debentures during the dates indicated: September 1, 2006 to February 28, 2007, 141.25 shares (representing a conversion price of approximately $7.08 per share); March 1, 2007 to August 31, 2007, 141.04 shares (representing a conversion price of approximately $7.09 per share); September 1, 2007 to February 29, 2008, 137.27 shares (representing a conversion price of approximately $7.28 per share); March 1, 2008 to August 31, 2008, 133.32 shares (representing a conversion price of approximately $7.50 per share); and September 1, 2008 to February 28, 2009, 129.23 shares (representing a conversion price of approximately $7.74 per share). On March 1, 2009, the conversion rate returns to 125 shares per $1,000 principal amount of debentures (representing a conversion price of $8.00 per share), until their maturity on March 1, 2011. The conversion price will be adjusted to reflect dividends, stock splits, issuances of rights to purchase shares of common stock and other events, as set forth in the Indenture.
The Debentures may be redeemable beginning March 1, 2009, under certain conditions. The redemption price is payable at our option in cash or, subject to certain conditions, in shares of our common stock. At maturity, we may elect to pay up to one-half of the principal amount of the Debentures, plus accrued and unpaid interest due thereon at maturity, in shares of our common stock under certain conditions. If we pay the redemption price on any portion of the Debentures at maturity on our common stock, our common stock is to be valued for those purposes at 95% of the weighted average of the closing sales price of our common stock for the 20 consecutive trading days ending on the 5th trading day prior to the applicable redemption date or maturity date.
We will use all, or substantially all, of the net proceeds for the repayment or purchase of our higher interest rate debt or debt of our subsidiaries, including ThermaClime’s 10-3/4% Senior Unsecured Notes due 2007 (“Notes”), and the remaining balance, if any, for general corporate
 
F-62

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
21. Subsequent Events (Unaudited) (continued)
 
purposes. Pending such uses, the net proceeds of this offering will be invested in investments with highly rated money market funds, U.S. government securities, treasury bills and/or short-term commercial paper.
On March 28, 2006, we purchased approximately $6 million of the Notes at ThermaClime’s carrying value.
We are obligated to register the Debentures and the common stock issuable upon conversion of the Debentures pursuant to the terms and conditions of a Registration Rights Agreement entered into between us and each of the OIBs.
 
F-63

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Supplementary Financial Data
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
 
     Three months ended  
     March 31     June 30    September 30     December 31  
2005
         
Net sales (1)
   $ 86,681     $ 109,508    $ 105,181     $ 95,352  
                               
Gross profit (1) (2) (3)
   $ 14,549     $ 17,720    $ 17,733     $ 16,069  
                               
Income from continuing operations before cumulative effect of accounting change (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
   $ 1,414     $ 2,077    $ 2,168     $ 87  
Net loss from discontinued operations (11)
     —         —        (512 )     (132 )
                               
Net income (loss)
   $ 1,414     $ 2,077    $ 1,656     $ (45 )
                               
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock
   $ 852     $ 1,522    $ 1,102     $ (657 )
                               
Income (loss) per common share:
         
Basic:
         
Income (loss) from continuing operations
   $ .06     $ .11    $ .12     $ (.04 )
Loss from discontinued operations, net
     —         —        (.04 )     (.01 )
                               
Net income (loss)
   $ .06     $ .11    $ .08     $ (.05 )
                               
Diluted:
         
Income (loss) from continuing operations
   $ .06     $ .10    $ .10     $ (.04 )
Loss from discontinued operations, net
     —         —        (.03 )     (.01 )
                               
Net income (loss)
   $ .06     $ .10    $ .07     $ (.05 )
                               
2004
         
Net sales (1) (12)
   $ 83,669     $ 103,910    $ 92,243     $ 83,786  
                               
Gross profit (1) (3) (12) (13) (14) (15)
   $ 11,031     $ 16,484    $ 14,615     $ 10,981  
                               
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change (4) (5) (8) (12) (16)
   $ 293     $ 1,601    $ 3,398     $ (3,386 )
Cumulative effect of accounting change (12)
     (536 )     —        —         —    
                               
Net income (loss)
   $ (243 )   $ 1,601    $ 3,398     $ (3,386 )
                               
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock
   $ (810 )   $ 1,034    $ 2,832     $ (4,008 )
                               
Income (loss) per common share:
         
Basic:
         
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
   $ (.02 )   $ .08    $ .22     $ (.31 )
Cumulative effect of accounting change
     (.04 )     —        —         —    
                               
Net income (loss)
   $ (.06 )   $ .08    $ .22     $ (.31 )
                               
Diluted:
         
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
   $ (.02 )   $ .07    $ .18     $ (.31 )
Cumulative effect of accounting change
     (.04 )     —        —         —    
                               
Net income (loss)
   $ (.06 )   $ .07    $ .18     $ (.31 )
                               
 
(1) Beginning in October 2004 and continuing into June 2005, the Chemical Business’ results were adversely affected as a result of the loss of production due to a mechanical failure of one of the four nitric acid plants at the El Dorado Facility. The plant was restored to normal production in June 2005. During the fourth quarter of 2005, we recognized insurance recoveries of $1.9 million under our business interruption insurance policy relating to this claim which is recorded as a reduction to cost of sales.
 
F-64

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Supplementary Financial Data
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) (continued)
 
(2) During the first and fourth quarters of 2005, we had cost recoveries of $1 million and $1 million, respectively, of production catalyst (precious metals) used in the Chemical Business’s manufacturing process.
 
(3) We recorded provisions for (realization and reversal of) losses on certain nitrate-based inventories of $(.3 million), $(.7 million), $(.1 million) and $1.2 million during the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2005, respectively, and of $.8 million, $(.6 million) and $.5 million during the first, second and fourth quarters of 2004, respectively.
 
(4) During the first and fourth quarters of 2005, we recognized impairments on long-lived assets of $.1 million and $.1 million, respectively, compared to of $.3 million and $.4 million, respectively, during the third and fourth quarters of 2004.
 
(5) During the first and second quarters of 2005, we recognized gains of $.4 million and $.3 million, respectively, from the sales of corporate assets. During the first and second quarters of 2004, we recognized gains of $1.8 million and $.5 million, respectively, from the sales of certain current assets (primarily precious metals).
 
(6) During the second, third and fourth quarter of 2005, we recognized gains of $.4 million, $.6 million and $.4 million, respectively, from replacement cost property insurance recoveries.
 
(7) During the first quarter of 2005, we recognized $1.1 million in net proceeds from certain key individual life insurance policies as the result of the untimely death of one of our executives in January 2005.
 
(8) During the first, second and third quarters of 2005, Trison incurred professional fees of $.1 million, $.3 million and $.6 million, respectively. During the second quarter of 2004, we incurred professional fees and other costs of $1 million relating to a proposed unregistered offering of Senior Secured Notes which was terminated in June 2004.
 
(9) During the third quarter of 2005, we recognized personnel costs of $.4 million relating to the change in estimate of the obligations under a death benefit agreement with our CEO.
 
(10) During the first, second and third quarters of 2005, we recognized interest expense of $1.4 million, $1.5 million and $1.6 million, respectively, relating to the Senior Secured Loan which was completed in September 2004.
 
(11)
As discussed in Note 11, during 2005, representatives of Slurry and a prior owner met with the KDHE and proposed to remove the bulk of contaminated soil at the Hallowell site, which
 
F-65

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Supplementary Financial Data
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) (continued)
 
 
was orally agreed to by the KDHE subject to approval of a written work plan submitted to the KDHE. As a result of meetings with the KDHE, provisions of $.5 million and $.1 million were recorded for our share of these costs during the third and fourth quarters of 2005.
 
(12) As a result of FIN 46, as revised, we were required to consolidate MultiClima and its parent company at the end of the first quarter of 2004. Therefore, we recorded a cumulative effect of accounting change of $.5 million. For the second quarter of 2004, the parent company of MultiClima had consolidated net sales of $3.8 million, gross profit of $.8 million and a loss before cumulative effect of accounting change of $.6 million. Based on our assessment of MultiClima and its parent’s historical and forecasted liquidity and results of operations during 2004, we concluded the outstanding notes receivable with the parent company of MultiClima were not collectible and recognized a provision for loss of $1.4 million at the beginning of the third quarter of 2004.
 
(13) We recorded a provision for loss on firm sales commitments of $.3 million in the third quarter of 2004.
 
(14) During the fourth quarter of 2004, we recorded an inventory adjustment of $1.1 million in the Climate Control Business as a result of increased raw material costs not passed through to customers.
 
(15) During the second, third and fourth quarters of 2004, net settlements of $.6 million, $.3 million and $.6 million were reached with a vendor’s insurance carrier and our insurance carrier relating to several mechanical problems with a boiler that had been repaired by one of our vendors at the El Dorado Facility. These amounts are classified as reductions of cost of sales.
 
(16) During the third quarter of 2004, we recognized a gain on extinguishment of debt of $4.4 million as a result of the repayment of loans under the Financing Agreement.
 
F-66

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Condensed Balance Sheets
The following condensed financial statements in this Schedule I are of the parent company only, LSB Industries, Inc.
 
     December 31,  
     2005     2004  
     (In Thousands)  
Assets
    
Current assets:
    
Cash
   $ 1,783     $ 114  
Accounts receivable, net
     52       46  
Supplies, prepaid items and other
     2,689       2,806  
Due from subsidiaries
     1,872       1,480  
                
Total current assets
     6,396       4,446  
Property, plant and equipment, net
     234       142  
Investments in and due from subsidiaries
     25,639       21,934  
Other assets, net
     315       356  
                
   $ 32,584     $ 26,878  
                
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
    
Current liabilities:
    
Accounts payable
   $ 129     $ 94  
Accrued liabilities
     1,014       829  
Redeemable, noncumulative, convertible preferred stock
     83       97  
Current portion of long-term debt
     41       1,662  
                
Total current liabilities
     1,267       2,682  
Long-term debt
     1,727       16  
Due to subsidiaries
     2,558       2,558  
Other noncurrent liabilities
     1,745       1,103  
Stockholders’ equity:
    
Preferred stock
     34,177       34,177  
Common stock
     1,708       1,640  
Capital in excess of par value
     57,547       57,352  
Accumulated deficit
     (61,738 )     (66,840 )
                
     31,694       26,329  
Treasury stock
     (6,407 )     (5,810 )
                
Total stockholders’ equity
     25,287       20,519  
                
   $ 32,584     $ 26,878  
                
See accompanying notes.
 
F-67

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Condensed Statements of Income
 
     Year ended December 31,  
     2005     2004     2003  
     (In Thousands)  
Fees under service, tax sharing and management agreements with subsidiaries
   $ 1,001     $ 1,001     $ 1,150  
Selling, general and administrative
     4,161       3,352       2,633  
Other income, net
     (708 )     (594 )     (630 )
                        
Operating loss
     (2,452 )     (1,757 )     (853 )
Interest expense
     2,553       1,427       2,529  
Net proceeds from certain key individual life insurance policies in excess of benefit obligations
     (1,162 )     —         —    
Interest and other non-operating income, net
     (373 )     (229 )     (618 )
                        
Loss from continuing operations
     (3,470 )     (2,955 )     (2,764 )
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
     9,216       4,325       5,677  
Loss from discontinued operations, net
     (644 )     —         —    
                        
Net income
   $ 5,102     $ 1,370     $ 2,913  
                        
See accompanying notes.
 
F-68

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
 
     Year ended December 31,  
     2005     2004     2003  
     (In Thousands)  
Cash flows used by continuing operating activities
   $ (2,484 )   $ (2,950 )   $ (2,728 )
Cash flows from investing activities:
      
Capital expenditures
     (9 )     (27 )     (11 )
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
     —         4       —    
Other assets
     40       —         76  
                        
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities
     31       (23 )     65  
Cash flows from financing activities:
      
Payments on long-term and other debt
     (4 )     (277 )     (445 )
Long-term borrowings
     —         22       —    
Net change in due to/from subsidiaries
     4,475       2,658       847  
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants
     248       820       1,770  
Acquisition of non-redeemable preferred stock
     (597 )     (271 )     —    
                        
Net cash provided by financing activities
     4,122       2,952       2,172  
                        
Net increase (decrease) in cash
     1,669       (21 )     (491 )
Cash at the beginning of year
     114       135       626  
                        
Cash at the end of year
   $ 1,783     $ 114     $ 135  
                        
See accompanying notes.
 
F-69

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed financial statements of the parent company include the accounts of LSB Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) only. The Company’s investments in subsidiaries are stated at cost plus equity in undistributed earnings (losses) of subsidiaries since date of acquisition. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
2. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company has guaranteed the payment of principal and interest under the terms of various debt. Subsidiaries long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 2005, which is guaranteed by the Company is as follows (in thousands):
 
Senior Secured Loan due 2009
   $ 50,000
Secured revolving credit facility - ThermaClime
     31,975
Other, most of which is collateralized by machinery, equipment and real estate
     8,601
      
   $ 90,576
      
In addition, the Company has guaranteed approximately $8 million of our subsidiaries performance bonds.
See Notes 9 and 11 of the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for discussion of the long-term debt and commitments and contingencies.
3. Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, a subsidiary of the Company owns 2,451,527 shares of the Company’s common stock which shares have been considered as issued and outstanding in the accompanying Condensed Balance Sheets included in this Schedule I - Condensed Financial Information of Registrant. See Notes 12, 13 and 14 of notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for discussion of matters relating to the Company’s preferred stock and other stockholders’ equity matters.
 
F-70

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In Thousands)
 
Description
  
Balance at
Beginning
of Year
  
Additions-
Charges to
(Recoveries)
Costs and
Expenses
  
Deductions-
Write-offs/
Costs
Incurred
  
Balance at
End
of Year
Accounts receivable - allowance for doubtful accounts (1):
           
2005
   $ 2,332    $ 810    $ 462    $ 2,680
                           
2004
   $ 3,225    $ 211    $ 1,104    $ 2,332
                           
2003
   $ 2,405    $ 1,031    $ 211    $ 3,225
                           
Inventory-reserve for slow-moving items (1):
           
2005
   $ 908    $ 121    $ 1    $ 1,028
                           
2004
   $ 1,441    $ 303    $ 836    $ 908
                           
2003
   $ 1,261    $ 222    $ 42    $ 1,441
                           
Notes receivable-allowance for doubtful accounts (1):
           
2005
   $ 1,020    $ —      $ 50    $ 970
                           
2004
   $ 13,655    $ 1,447    $ 14,082    $ 1,020
                           
2003
   $ 13,655    $ —      $ —      $ 13,655
                           
Deferred tax assets - valuation (1):
           
2005
   $ 27,928    $ —      $ 1,782    $ 26,146
                           
2004
   $ 28,051    $ —      $ 123    $ 27,928
                           
2003
   $ 28,632    $ —      $ 581    $ 28,051
                           
 
F-71

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
LSB Industries, Inc.
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (continued)
Years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
(In Thousands)
 
Description
  
Balance at
Beginning
of Year
  
Additions-
Charged to
Costs and
Expenses
  
Deductions-
Write-offs/
Costs
Incurred
  
Balance
at End
of Year
Accrual for plant turnaround:
           
2005
   $ 1,517    $ 2,601    $ 2,713    $ 1,405
                           
2004
   $ 2,678    $ 1,742    $ 2,903    $ 1,517
                           
2003
   $ 1,886    $ 2,745    $ 1,953    $ 2,678
                           
 
(1) Deducted in the consolidated balance sheet from the related assets to which the reserve applies.
Other valuation and qualifying accounts are detailed in our notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
F-72